Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning

•State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Mod...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evaluation and program planning 2016-06, Vol.56, p.50-55
Hauptverfasser: Schmitt, Carol L., Glasgow, LaShawn, Lavinghouze, S. Rene, Rieker, Patricia P., Fulmer, Erika, McAleer, Kelly, Rogers, Todd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 55
container_issue
container_start_page 50
container_title Evaluation and program planning
container_volume 56
creator Schmitt, Carol L.
Glasgow, LaShawn
Lavinghouze, S. Rene
Rieker, Patricia P.
Fulmer, Erika
McAleer, Kelly
Rogers, Todd
description •State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Model of Infrastructure, developed to provide a clear, practical evaluable description of tobacco control program infrastructure.•Program managers in nine states found this tool to be user-friendly and the measures relevant to their understanding and experience of their program infrastructure.•The tool was slightly modified as a result of this pilot test and is currently being administered to state tobacco control program managers in all 50 states. State tobacco prevention and control programs (TCPs) require a fully functioning infrastructure to respond effectively to the Surgeon General’s call for accelerating the national reduction in tobacco use. The literature describes common elements of infrastructure; however, a lack of valid and reliable measures has made it difficult for program planners to monitor relevant infrastructure indicators and address observed deficiencies, or for evaluators to determine the association among infrastructure, program efforts, and program outcomes. The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI) is a comprehensive, evidence-based framework that facilitates TCP program planning efforts to develop and maintain their infrastructure. Measures of CMI components were needed to evaluate the model’s utility and predictive capability for assessing infrastructure. This paper describes the development of CMI measures and results of a pilot test with nine state TCP managers. Pilot test findings indicate that the tool has good face validity and is clear and easy to follow. The CMI tool yields data that can enhance public health efforts in a funding-constrained environment and provides insight into program sustainability. Ultimately, the CMI measurement tool could facilitate better evaluation and program planning across public health programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4915728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149718915301026</els_id><sourcerecordid>4079066921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-f9dcc82aa74bd149fee34ad64f2f00956bee396d49a8ed350dbd97da49f9af0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUUtP3DAQtqpWZXn8BRS156TjxIljDkiIFqgE4tKerVl7sni76wQ7WYl_j6MFRG-cRpr5XpqPsW8cCg68-bEuaIebIfSrYYO-KNOugKoAkJ_YgreyymUr4TNbABcql7xVB-wwxjUACCXFV3ZQSqhkU9cLdn1HGKfg_CpzvgsYxzCZcQp0ll1k_-gpiyMN6ZTNdgG32Ww94eh6n6G32ZzAJ_Yx-9LhJtLJyzxif69-_bm8yW_vr39fXtzmpub1mHfKGtOWiFIsbUrXEVUCbSO6sgNQdbNMC9VYobAlW9Vgl1ZJiwmpsAOqjtj5XneYlluyhvwYcKOH4LYYnnSPTv9_8e5Br_qdForXsmyTwPcXgdA_ThRHve6n4FNmzaWqVNnUYkad7VEm9DEG6t4cOOi5BL3W70vQcwkaKp1KSOTT9xnfqK9fT4CfewClT-0cBR2NI2_IukBm1LZ3H_F5Bh1DopU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793926548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Schmitt, Carol L. ; Glasgow, LaShawn ; Lavinghouze, S. Rene ; Rieker, Patricia P. ; Fulmer, Erika ; McAleer, Kelly ; Rogers, Todd</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Carol L. ; Glasgow, LaShawn ; Lavinghouze, S. Rene ; Rieker, Patricia P. ; Fulmer, Erika ; McAleer, Kelly ; Rogers, Todd</creatorcontrib><description>•State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Model of Infrastructure, developed to provide a clear, practical evaluable description of tobacco control program infrastructure.•Program managers in nine states found this tool to be user-friendly and the measures relevant to their understanding and experience of their program infrastructure.•The tool was slightly modified as a result of this pilot test and is currently being administered to state tobacco control program managers in all 50 states. State tobacco prevention and control programs (TCPs) require a fully functioning infrastructure to respond effectively to the Surgeon General’s call for accelerating the national reduction in tobacco use. The literature describes common elements of infrastructure; however, a lack of valid and reliable measures has made it difficult for program planners to monitor relevant infrastructure indicators and address observed deficiencies, or for evaluators to determine the association among infrastructure, program efforts, and program outcomes. The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI) is a comprehensive, evidence-based framework that facilitates TCP program planning efforts to develop and maintain their infrastructure. Measures of CMI components were needed to evaluate the model’s utility and predictive capability for assessing infrastructure. This paper describes the development of CMI measures and results of a pilot test with nine state TCP managers. Pilot test findings indicate that the tool has good face validity and is clear and easy to follow. The CMI tool yields data that can enhance public health efforts in a funding-constrained environment and provides insight into program sustainability. Ultimately, the CMI measurement tool could facilitate better evaluation and program planning across public health programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7870</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27037655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Capabilities ; Computer Managed Instruction ; Evaluators ; Evidence based ; Financing ; Health care policy ; Health Planning - methods ; Health Programs ; Health Promotion - methods ; Health Promotion - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Infrastructure ; Infrastructure measurement ; Measurement ; Models, Organizational ; Planners ; Planning ; Prevention programs ; Program Development ; Program Evaluation ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Program sustainability ; Public health ; Public Health Administration - methods ; Smoking ; Smoking Prevention - methods ; Smoking Prevention - organization &amp; administration ; State Government ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Tobacco ; Tobacco smoke ; United States</subject><ispartof>Evaluation and program planning, 2016-06, Vol.56, p.50-55</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-f9dcc82aa74bd149fee34ad64f2f00956bee396d49a8ed350dbd97da49f9af0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-f9dcc82aa74bd149fee34ad64f2f00956bee396d49a8ed350dbd97da49f9af0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27037655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, LaShawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavinghouze, S. Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieker, Patricia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulmer, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAleer, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Todd</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning</title><title>Evaluation and program planning</title><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><description>•State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Model of Infrastructure, developed to provide a clear, practical evaluable description of tobacco control program infrastructure.•Program managers in nine states found this tool to be user-friendly and the measures relevant to their understanding and experience of their program infrastructure.•The tool was slightly modified as a result of this pilot test and is currently being administered to state tobacco control program managers in all 50 states. State tobacco prevention and control programs (TCPs) require a fully functioning infrastructure to respond effectively to the Surgeon General’s call for accelerating the national reduction in tobacco use. The literature describes common elements of infrastructure; however, a lack of valid and reliable measures has made it difficult for program planners to monitor relevant infrastructure indicators and address observed deficiencies, or for evaluators to determine the association among infrastructure, program efforts, and program outcomes. The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI) is a comprehensive, evidence-based framework that facilitates TCP program planning efforts to develop and maintain their infrastructure. Measures of CMI components were needed to evaluate the model’s utility and predictive capability for assessing infrastructure. This paper describes the development of CMI measures and results of a pilot test with nine state TCP managers. Pilot test findings indicate that the tool has good face validity and is clear and easy to follow. The CMI tool yields data that can enhance public health efforts in a funding-constrained environment and provides insight into program sustainability. Ultimately, the CMI measurement tool could facilitate better evaluation and program planning across public health programs.</description><subject>Capabilities</subject><subject>Computer Managed Instruction</subject><subject>Evaluators</subject><subject>Evidence based</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Planning - methods</subject><subject>Health Programs</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Health Promotion - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Infrastructure measurement</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Models, Organizational</subject><subject>Planners</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Program sustainability</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health Administration - methods</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco smoke</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0149-7189</issn><issn>1873-7870</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUUtP3DAQtqpWZXn8BRS156TjxIljDkiIFqgE4tKerVl7sni76wQ7WYl_j6MFRG-cRpr5XpqPsW8cCg68-bEuaIebIfSrYYO-KNOugKoAkJ_YgreyymUr4TNbABcql7xVB-wwxjUACCXFV3ZQSqhkU9cLdn1HGKfg_CpzvgsYxzCZcQp0ll1k_-gpiyMN6ZTNdgG32Ww94eh6n6G32ZzAJ_Yx-9LhJtLJyzxif69-_bm8yW_vr39fXtzmpub1mHfKGtOWiFIsbUrXEVUCbSO6sgNQdbNMC9VYobAlW9Vgl1ZJiwmpsAOqjtj5XneYlluyhvwYcKOH4LYYnnSPTv9_8e5Br_qdForXsmyTwPcXgdA_ThRHve6n4FNmzaWqVNnUYkad7VEm9DEG6t4cOOi5BL3W70vQcwkaKp1KSOTT9xnfqK9fT4CfewClT-0cBR2NI2_IukBm1LZ3H_F5Bh1DopU</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Schmitt, Carol L.</creator><creator>Glasgow, LaShawn</creator><creator>Lavinghouze, S. Rene</creator><creator>Rieker, Patricia P.</creator><creator>Fulmer, Erika</creator><creator>McAleer, Kelly</creator><creator>Rogers, Todd</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning</title><author>Schmitt, Carol L. ; Glasgow, LaShawn ; Lavinghouze, S. Rene ; Rieker, Patricia P. ; Fulmer, Erika ; McAleer, Kelly ; Rogers, Todd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-f9dcc82aa74bd149fee34ad64f2f00956bee396d49a8ed350dbd97da49f9af0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Capabilities</topic><topic>Computer Managed Instruction</topic><topic>Evaluators</topic><topic>Evidence based</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Planning - methods</topic><topic>Health Programs</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Health Promotion - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Infrastructure measurement</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Models, Organizational</topic><topic>Planners</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Program sustainability</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health Administration - methods</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco smoke</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, LaShawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavinghouze, S. Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieker, Patricia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulmer, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAleer, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Todd</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmitt, Carol L.</au><au>Glasgow, LaShawn</au><au>Lavinghouze, S. Rene</au><au>Rieker, Patricia P.</au><au>Fulmer, Erika</au><au>McAleer, Kelly</au><au>Rogers, Todd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>56</volume><spage>50</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>50-55</pages><issn>0149-7189</issn><eissn>1873-7870</eissn><abstract>•State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Model of Infrastructure, developed to provide a clear, practical evaluable description of tobacco control program infrastructure.•Program managers in nine states found this tool to be user-friendly and the measures relevant to their understanding and experience of their program infrastructure.•The tool was slightly modified as a result of this pilot test and is currently being administered to state tobacco control program managers in all 50 states. State tobacco prevention and control programs (TCPs) require a fully functioning infrastructure to respond effectively to the Surgeon General’s call for accelerating the national reduction in tobacco use. The literature describes common elements of infrastructure; however, a lack of valid and reliable measures has made it difficult for program planners to monitor relevant infrastructure indicators and address observed deficiencies, or for evaluators to determine the association among infrastructure, program efforts, and program outcomes. The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI) is a comprehensive, evidence-based framework that facilitates TCP program planning efforts to develop and maintain their infrastructure. Measures of CMI components were needed to evaluate the model’s utility and predictive capability for assessing infrastructure. This paper describes the development of CMI measures and results of a pilot test with nine state TCP managers. Pilot test findings indicate that the tool has good face validity and is clear and easy to follow. The CMI tool yields data that can enhance public health efforts in a funding-constrained environment and provides insight into program sustainability. Ultimately, the CMI measurement tool could facilitate better evaluation and program planning across public health programs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27037655</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-7189
ispartof Evaluation and program planning, 2016-06, Vol.56, p.50-55
issn 0149-7189
1873-7870
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4915728
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Capabilities
Computer Managed Instruction
Evaluators
Evidence based
Financing
Health care policy
Health Planning - methods
Health Programs
Health Promotion - methods
Health Promotion - organization & administration
Humans
Infrastructure
Infrastructure measurement
Measurement
Models, Organizational
Planners
Planning
Prevention programs
Program Development
Program Evaluation
Program Evaluation - methods
Program sustainability
Public health
Public Health Administration - methods
Smoking
Smoking Prevention - methods
Smoking Prevention - organization & administration
State Government
Studies
Sustainability
Tobacco
Tobacco smoke
United States
title Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A46%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20infrastructure:%20A%20key%20step%20in%20program%20evaluation%20and%20planning&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20and%20program%20planning&rft.au=Schmitt,%20Carol%20L.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=56&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=50-55&rft.issn=0149-7189&rft.eissn=1873-7870&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4079066921%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793926548&rft_id=info:pmid/27037655&rft_els_id=S0149718915301026&rfr_iscdi=true