Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning
•State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Mod...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation and program planning 2016-06, Vol.56, p.50-55 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 55 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 50 |
container_title | Evaluation and program planning |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Schmitt, Carol L. Glasgow, LaShawn Lavinghouze, S. Rene Rieker, Patricia P. Fulmer, Erika McAleer, Kelly Rogers, Todd |
description | •State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Model of Infrastructure, developed to provide a clear, practical evaluable description of tobacco control program infrastructure.•Program managers in nine states found this tool to be user-friendly and the measures relevant to their understanding and experience of their program infrastructure.•The tool was slightly modified as a result of this pilot test and is currently being administered to state tobacco control program managers in all 50 states.
State tobacco prevention and control programs (TCPs) require a fully functioning infrastructure to respond effectively to the Surgeon General’s call for accelerating the national reduction in tobacco use. The literature describes common elements of infrastructure; however, a lack of valid and reliable measures has made it difficult for program planners to monitor relevant infrastructure indicators and address observed deficiencies, or for evaluators to determine the association among infrastructure, program efforts, and program outcomes. The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI) is a comprehensive, evidence-based framework that facilitates TCP program planning efforts to develop and maintain their infrastructure. Measures of CMI components were needed to evaluate the model’s utility and predictive capability for assessing infrastructure. This paper describes the development of CMI measures and results of a pilot test with nine state TCP managers. Pilot test findings indicate that the tool has good face validity and is clear and easy to follow. The CMI tool yields data that can enhance public health efforts in a funding-constrained environment and provides insight into program sustainability. Ultimately, the CMI measurement tool could facilitate better evaluation and program planning across public health programs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4915728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149718915301026</els_id><sourcerecordid>4079066921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-f9dcc82aa74bd149fee34ad64f2f00956bee396d49a8ed350dbd97da49f9af0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUUtP3DAQtqpWZXn8BRS156TjxIljDkiIFqgE4tKerVl7sni76wQ7WYl_j6MFRG-cRpr5XpqPsW8cCg68-bEuaIebIfSrYYO-KNOugKoAkJ_YgreyymUr4TNbABcql7xVB-wwxjUACCXFV3ZQSqhkU9cLdn1HGKfg_CpzvgsYxzCZcQp0ll1k_-gpiyMN6ZTNdgG32Ww94eh6n6G32ZzAJ_Yx-9LhJtLJyzxif69-_bm8yW_vr39fXtzmpub1mHfKGtOWiFIsbUrXEVUCbSO6sgNQdbNMC9VYobAlW9Vgl1ZJiwmpsAOqjtj5XneYlluyhvwYcKOH4LYYnnSPTv9_8e5Br_qdForXsmyTwPcXgdA_ThRHve6n4FNmzaWqVNnUYkad7VEm9DEG6t4cOOi5BL3W70vQcwkaKp1KSOTT9xnfqK9fT4CfewClT-0cBR2NI2_IukBm1LZ3H_F5Bh1DopU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793926548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Schmitt, Carol L. ; Glasgow, LaShawn ; Lavinghouze, S. Rene ; Rieker, Patricia P. ; Fulmer, Erika ; McAleer, Kelly ; Rogers, Todd</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Carol L. ; Glasgow, LaShawn ; Lavinghouze, S. Rene ; Rieker, Patricia P. ; Fulmer, Erika ; McAleer, Kelly ; Rogers, Todd</creatorcontrib><description>•State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Model of Infrastructure, developed to provide a clear, practical evaluable description of tobacco control program infrastructure.•Program managers in nine states found this tool to be user-friendly and the measures relevant to their understanding and experience of their program infrastructure.•The tool was slightly modified as a result of this pilot test and is currently being administered to state tobacco control program managers in all 50 states.
State tobacco prevention and control programs (TCPs) require a fully functioning infrastructure to respond effectively to the Surgeon General’s call for accelerating the national reduction in tobacco use. The literature describes common elements of infrastructure; however, a lack of valid and reliable measures has made it difficult for program planners to monitor relevant infrastructure indicators and address observed deficiencies, or for evaluators to determine the association among infrastructure, program efforts, and program outcomes. The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI) is a comprehensive, evidence-based framework that facilitates TCP program planning efforts to develop and maintain their infrastructure. Measures of CMI components were needed to evaluate the model’s utility and predictive capability for assessing infrastructure. This paper describes the development of CMI measures and results of a pilot test with nine state TCP managers. Pilot test findings indicate that the tool has good face validity and is clear and easy to follow. The CMI tool yields data that can enhance public health efforts in a funding-constrained environment and provides insight into program sustainability. Ultimately, the CMI measurement tool could facilitate better evaluation and program planning across public health programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7870</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27037655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Capabilities ; Computer Managed Instruction ; Evaluators ; Evidence based ; Financing ; Health care policy ; Health Planning - methods ; Health Programs ; Health Promotion - methods ; Health Promotion - organization & administration ; Humans ; Infrastructure ; Infrastructure measurement ; Measurement ; Models, Organizational ; Planners ; Planning ; Prevention programs ; Program Development ; Program Evaluation ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Program sustainability ; Public health ; Public Health Administration - methods ; Smoking ; Smoking Prevention - methods ; Smoking Prevention - organization & administration ; State Government ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Tobacco ; Tobacco smoke ; United States</subject><ispartof>Evaluation and program planning, 2016-06, Vol.56, p.50-55</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-f9dcc82aa74bd149fee34ad64f2f00956bee396d49a8ed350dbd97da49f9af0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-f9dcc82aa74bd149fee34ad64f2f00956bee396d49a8ed350dbd97da49f9af0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27037655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, LaShawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavinghouze, S. Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieker, Patricia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulmer, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAleer, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Todd</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning</title><title>Evaluation and program planning</title><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><description>•State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Model of Infrastructure, developed to provide a clear, practical evaluable description of tobacco control program infrastructure.•Program managers in nine states found this tool to be user-friendly and the measures relevant to their understanding and experience of their program infrastructure.•The tool was slightly modified as a result of this pilot test and is currently being administered to state tobacco control program managers in all 50 states.
State tobacco prevention and control programs (TCPs) require a fully functioning infrastructure to respond effectively to the Surgeon General’s call for accelerating the national reduction in tobacco use. The literature describes common elements of infrastructure; however, a lack of valid and reliable measures has made it difficult for program planners to monitor relevant infrastructure indicators and address observed deficiencies, or for evaluators to determine the association among infrastructure, program efforts, and program outcomes. The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI) is a comprehensive, evidence-based framework that facilitates TCP program planning efforts to develop and maintain their infrastructure. Measures of CMI components were needed to evaluate the model’s utility and predictive capability for assessing infrastructure. This paper describes the development of CMI measures and results of a pilot test with nine state TCP managers. Pilot test findings indicate that the tool has good face validity and is clear and easy to follow. The CMI tool yields data that can enhance public health efforts in a funding-constrained environment and provides insight into program sustainability. Ultimately, the CMI measurement tool could facilitate better evaluation and program planning across public health programs.</description><subject>Capabilities</subject><subject>Computer Managed Instruction</subject><subject>Evaluators</subject><subject>Evidence based</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Planning - methods</subject><subject>Health Programs</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Health Promotion - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Infrastructure measurement</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Models, Organizational</subject><subject>Planners</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Program sustainability</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health Administration - methods</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention - organization & administration</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco smoke</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0149-7189</issn><issn>1873-7870</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUUtP3DAQtqpWZXn8BRS156TjxIljDkiIFqgE4tKerVl7sni76wQ7WYl_j6MFRG-cRpr5XpqPsW8cCg68-bEuaIebIfSrYYO-KNOugKoAkJ_YgreyymUr4TNbABcql7xVB-wwxjUACCXFV3ZQSqhkU9cLdn1HGKfg_CpzvgsYxzCZcQp0ll1k_-gpiyMN6ZTNdgG32Ww94eh6n6G32ZzAJ_Yx-9LhJtLJyzxif69-_bm8yW_vr39fXtzmpub1mHfKGtOWiFIsbUrXEVUCbSO6sgNQdbNMC9VYobAlW9Vgl1ZJiwmpsAOqjtj5XneYlluyhvwYcKOH4LYYnnSPTv9_8e5Br_qdForXsmyTwPcXgdA_ThRHve6n4FNmzaWqVNnUYkad7VEm9DEG6t4cOOi5BL3W70vQcwkaKp1KSOTT9xnfqK9fT4CfewClT-0cBR2NI2_IukBm1LZ3H_F5Bh1DopU</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Schmitt, Carol L.</creator><creator>Glasgow, LaShawn</creator><creator>Lavinghouze, S. Rene</creator><creator>Rieker, Patricia P.</creator><creator>Fulmer, Erika</creator><creator>McAleer, Kelly</creator><creator>Rogers, Todd</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning</title><author>Schmitt, Carol L. ; Glasgow, LaShawn ; Lavinghouze, S. Rene ; Rieker, Patricia P. ; Fulmer, Erika ; McAleer, Kelly ; Rogers, Todd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-f9dcc82aa74bd149fee34ad64f2f00956bee396d49a8ed350dbd97da49f9af0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Capabilities</topic><topic>Computer Managed Instruction</topic><topic>Evaluators</topic><topic>Evidence based</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Planning - methods</topic><topic>Health Programs</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Health Promotion - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Infrastructure measurement</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Models, Organizational</topic><topic>Planners</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Program sustainability</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health Administration - methods</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention - organization & administration</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco smoke</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, LaShawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavinghouze, S. Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieker, Patricia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulmer, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAleer, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Todd</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmitt, Carol L.</au><au>Glasgow, LaShawn</au><au>Lavinghouze, S. Rene</au><au>Rieker, Patricia P.</au><au>Fulmer, Erika</au><au>McAleer, Kelly</au><au>Rogers, Todd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>56</volume><spage>50</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>50-55</pages><issn>0149-7189</issn><eissn>1873-7870</eissn><abstract>•State tobacco prevention and control programs need a functioning infrastructure to implement the interventions that have successfully decreased tobacco use over the past five decades.•This paper describes development and pilot testing of an infrastructure measurement tool based on the Component Model of Infrastructure, developed to provide a clear, practical evaluable description of tobacco control program infrastructure.•Program managers in nine states found this tool to be user-friendly and the measures relevant to their understanding and experience of their program infrastructure.•The tool was slightly modified as a result of this pilot test and is currently being administered to state tobacco control program managers in all 50 states.
State tobacco prevention and control programs (TCPs) require a fully functioning infrastructure to respond effectively to the Surgeon General’s call for accelerating the national reduction in tobacco use. The literature describes common elements of infrastructure; however, a lack of valid and reliable measures has made it difficult for program planners to monitor relevant infrastructure indicators and address observed deficiencies, or for evaluators to determine the association among infrastructure, program efforts, and program outcomes. The Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI) is a comprehensive, evidence-based framework that facilitates TCP program planning efforts to develop and maintain their infrastructure. Measures of CMI components were needed to evaluate the model’s utility and predictive capability for assessing infrastructure. This paper describes the development of CMI measures and results of a pilot test with nine state TCP managers. Pilot test findings indicate that the tool has good face validity and is clear and easy to follow. The CMI tool yields data that can enhance public health efforts in a funding-constrained environment and provides insight into program sustainability. Ultimately, the CMI measurement tool could facilitate better evaluation and program planning across public health programs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27037655</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-7189 |
ispartof | Evaluation and program planning, 2016-06, Vol.56, p.50-55 |
issn | 0149-7189 1873-7870 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4915728 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Capabilities Computer Managed Instruction Evaluators Evidence based Financing Health care policy Health Planning - methods Health Programs Health Promotion - methods Health Promotion - organization & administration Humans Infrastructure Infrastructure measurement Measurement Models, Organizational Planners Planning Prevention programs Program Development Program Evaluation Program Evaluation - methods Program sustainability Public health Public Health Administration - methods Smoking Smoking Prevention - methods Smoking Prevention - organization & administration State Government Studies Sustainability Tobacco Tobacco smoke United States |
title | Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A46%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20infrastructure:%20A%20key%20step%20in%20program%20evaluation%20and%20planning&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20and%20program%20planning&rft.au=Schmitt,%20Carol%20L.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=56&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=50-55&rft.issn=0149-7189&rft.eissn=1873-7870&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4079066921%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793926548&rft_id=info:pmid/27037655&rft_els_id=S0149718915301026&rfr_iscdi=true |