Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults

Hepatitis B was still a worldwide health problem. This study aimed to conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess a more precise estimation of factors that influence the response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults. Our included studies examined seroprotection rates close to the end of va...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.27251-27251, Article 27251
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Shigui, Tian, Guo, Cui, Yuanxia, Ding, Cheng, Deng, Min, Yu, Chengbo, Xu, Kaijin, Ren, Jingjing, Yao, Jun, Li, Yiping, Cao, Qing, Chen, Ping, Xie, Tiansheng, Wang, Chencheng, Wang, Bing, Mao, Chen, Ruan, Bing, Jiang, Tian’an, Li, Lanjuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27251
container_issue 1
container_start_page 27251
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 6
creator Yang, Shigui
Tian, Guo
Cui, Yuanxia
Ding, Cheng
Deng, Min
Yu, Chengbo
Xu, Kaijin
Ren, Jingjing
Yao, Jun
Li, Yiping
Cao, Qing
Chen, Ping
Xie, Tiansheng
Wang, Chencheng
Wang, Bing
Mao, Chen
Ruan, Bing
Jiang, Tian’an
Li, Lanjuan
description Hepatitis B was still a worldwide health problem. This study aimed to conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess a more precise estimation of factors that influence the response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults. Our included studies examined seroprotection rates close to the end of vaccination schedules in healthy adult populations. This meta-analysis including 21053 adults in 37 articles showed that a significantly decreased response to hepatitis B vaccine appeared in adults (age ≥ 40) (RR:1.86, 95% CI:1.55–2.23), male adults (RR:1.40, 95% CI:1.22–1.61), BMI ≥ 25 adults (RR:1.56, 95% CI:1.12–2.17), smoker (RR:1.53, 95% CI:1.21–1.93), and adults with concomitant disease (RR:1.39, 95% CI:1.04–1.86). Meanwhile, we further found a decreased response to hepatitis B vaccine appeared in adults (age ≥ 30) (RR:1.77, 95% CI:1.48–2.10), and adults (age ≥ 60) (RR:1.30, 95% CI:1.01–1.68). However, there were no difference in response to hepatitis B vaccine both in alcoholic (RR:0.90, 95% CI:0.64–1.26) and 0-1-12 vs. 0-1-6 vaccination schedule (RR:1.39, 95% CI:0.41–4.67). Pooling of these studies recommended the sooner the better for adult hepatitis B vaccine strategy. More vaccine doses, supplemental/additional strengthening immunity should be emphasized on the susceptible population of increasing aged, male, BMI ≥ 25, smoking and concomitant disease. The conventional 0-1-6 vaccination schedule could be still worth to be recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/srep27251
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4914839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1798993223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-50b8ba65d441a715e2cf8d87528cf2ab19cd63f9b339002096db69ecabce02de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkUtLxDAUhYMojugs_ANScKPCaF5tk42g4gsEN7oOaXo7E2mTmrSC_97IjMOod5ML58u5NzkIHRJ8TjATFzFAT0uaky20RzHPZ5RRur3RT9A0xjecKqeSE7mLJrRklAvB99DjnTaDDzGzrmlHcMa6eWa7bnS-9XNrsgCx9y5CNvhsAb0e7GBjdp19aJNYSPcyXY_tEA_QTqPbCNPVuY9e725fbh5mT8_3jzdXTzPDmRhmOa5EpYu85pzokuRATSNqUeZUmIbqikhTF6yRFWMSY4plUVeFBKMrA5jWwPbR5dK3H6sOagNuCLpVfbCdDp_Ka6t-K84u1Nx_KC4JF0wmg5OVQfDvI8RBdTYaaFvtwI9RkVIKKdPHsYQe_0Hf_Bhcep4iAmPCGRdFok6XlAk-pjia9TIEq--M1DqjxB5tbr8mfxJJwNkSiElycwgbI_-5fQGf6JwC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1800143486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Yang, Shigui ; Tian, Guo ; Cui, Yuanxia ; Ding, Cheng ; Deng, Min ; Yu, Chengbo ; Xu, Kaijin ; Ren, Jingjing ; Yao, Jun ; Li, Yiping ; Cao, Qing ; Chen, Ping ; Xie, Tiansheng ; Wang, Chencheng ; Wang, Bing ; Mao, Chen ; Ruan, Bing ; Jiang, Tian’an ; Li, Lanjuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shigui ; Tian, Guo ; Cui, Yuanxia ; Ding, Cheng ; Deng, Min ; Yu, Chengbo ; Xu, Kaijin ; Ren, Jingjing ; Yao, Jun ; Li, Yiping ; Cao, Qing ; Chen, Ping ; Xie, Tiansheng ; Wang, Chencheng ; Wang, Bing ; Mao, Chen ; Ruan, Bing ; Jiang, Tian’an ; Li, Lanjuan</creatorcontrib><description>Hepatitis B was still a worldwide health problem. This study aimed to conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess a more precise estimation of factors that influence the response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults. Our included studies examined seroprotection rates close to the end of vaccination schedules in healthy adult populations. This meta-analysis including 21053 adults in 37 articles showed that a significantly decreased response to hepatitis B vaccine appeared in adults (age ≥ 40) (RR:1.86, 95% CI:1.55–2.23), male adults (RR:1.40, 95% CI:1.22–1.61), BMI ≥ 25 adults (RR:1.56, 95% CI:1.12–2.17), smoker (RR:1.53, 95% CI:1.21–1.93), and adults with concomitant disease (RR:1.39, 95% CI:1.04–1.86). Meanwhile, we further found a decreased response to hepatitis B vaccine appeared in adults (age ≥ 30) (RR:1.77, 95% CI:1.48–2.10), and adults (age ≥ 60) (RR:1.30, 95% CI:1.01–1.68). However, there were no difference in response to hepatitis B vaccine both in alcoholic (RR:0.90, 95% CI:0.64–1.26) and 0-1-12 vs. 0-1-6 vaccination schedule (RR:1.39, 95% CI:0.41–4.67). Pooling of these studies recommended the sooner the better for adult hepatitis B vaccine strategy. More vaccine doses, supplemental/additional strengthening immunity should be emphasized on the susceptible population of increasing aged, male, BMI ≥ 25, smoking and concomitant disease. The conventional 0-1-6 vaccination schedule could be still worth to be recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep27251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27324884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/250/254 ; 631/250/255/234/2513/1549 ; Adult ; Adults ; Age ; Aged ; Alcohol Drinking - immunology ; Antibodies ; Body mass index ; Female ; Hepatitis ; Hepatitis B ; Hepatitis B - epidemiology ; Hepatitis B - immunology ; Hepatitis B - prevention &amp; control ; Hepatitis B - virology ; Hepatitis B Vaccines - immunology ; Hepatitis B Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Hepatitis B virus - immunology ; Hepatitis B virus - pathogenicity ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Immunity, Innate ; Immunization ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Liver cirrhosis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; multidisciplinary ; Regression Analysis ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Vaccination ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.27251-27251, Article 27251</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jun 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-50b8ba65d441a715e2cf8d87528cf2ab19cd63f9b339002096db69ecabce02de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-50b8ba65d441a715e2cf8d87528cf2ab19cd63f9b339002096db69ecabce02de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4914839/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4914839/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shigui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Yuanxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chengbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kaijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Tiansheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chencheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tian’an</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lanjuan</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Hepatitis B was still a worldwide health problem. This study aimed to conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess a more precise estimation of factors that influence the response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults. Our included studies examined seroprotection rates close to the end of vaccination schedules in healthy adult populations. This meta-analysis including 21053 adults in 37 articles showed that a significantly decreased response to hepatitis B vaccine appeared in adults (age ≥ 40) (RR:1.86, 95% CI:1.55–2.23), male adults (RR:1.40, 95% CI:1.22–1.61), BMI ≥ 25 adults (RR:1.56, 95% CI:1.12–2.17), smoker (RR:1.53, 95% CI:1.21–1.93), and adults with concomitant disease (RR:1.39, 95% CI:1.04–1.86). Meanwhile, we further found a decreased response to hepatitis B vaccine appeared in adults (age ≥ 30) (RR:1.77, 95% CI:1.48–2.10), and adults (age ≥ 60) (RR:1.30, 95% CI:1.01–1.68). However, there were no difference in response to hepatitis B vaccine both in alcoholic (RR:0.90, 95% CI:0.64–1.26) and 0-1-12 vs. 0-1-6 vaccination schedule (RR:1.39, 95% CI:0.41–4.67). Pooling of these studies recommended the sooner the better for adult hepatitis B vaccine strategy. More vaccine doses, supplemental/additional strengthening immunity should be emphasized on the susceptible population of increasing aged, male, BMI ≥ 25, smoking and concomitant disease. The conventional 0-1-6 vaccination schedule could be still worth to be recommended.</description><subject>631/250/254</subject><subject>631/250/255/234/2513/1549</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking - immunology</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Hepatitis B</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - immunology</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - virology</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hepatitis B virus - immunology</subject><subject>Hepatitis B virus - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunity, Innate</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkUtLxDAUhYMojugs_ANScKPCaF5tk42g4gsEN7oOaXo7E2mTmrSC_97IjMOod5ML58u5NzkIHRJ8TjATFzFAT0uaky20RzHPZ5RRur3RT9A0xjecKqeSE7mLJrRklAvB99DjnTaDDzGzrmlHcMa6eWa7bnS-9XNrsgCx9y5CNvhsAb0e7GBjdp19aJNYSPcyXY_tEA_QTqPbCNPVuY9e725fbh5mT8_3jzdXTzPDmRhmOa5EpYu85pzokuRATSNqUeZUmIbqikhTF6yRFWMSY4plUVeFBKMrA5jWwPbR5dK3H6sOagNuCLpVfbCdDp_Ka6t-K84u1Nx_KC4JF0wmg5OVQfDvI8RBdTYaaFvtwI9RkVIKKdPHsYQe_0Hf_Bhcep4iAmPCGRdFok6XlAk-pjia9TIEq--M1DqjxB5tbr8mfxJJwNkSiElycwgbI_-5fQGf6JwC</recordid><startdate>20160621</startdate><enddate>20160621</enddate><creator>Yang, Shigui</creator><creator>Tian, Guo</creator><creator>Cui, Yuanxia</creator><creator>Ding, Cheng</creator><creator>Deng, Min</creator><creator>Yu, Chengbo</creator><creator>Xu, Kaijin</creator><creator>Ren, Jingjing</creator><creator>Yao, Jun</creator><creator>Li, Yiping</creator><creator>Cao, Qing</creator><creator>Chen, Ping</creator><creator>Xie, Tiansheng</creator><creator>Wang, Chencheng</creator><creator>Wang, Bing</creator><creator>Mao, Chen</creator><creator>Ruan, Bing</creator><creator>Jiang, Tian’an</creator><creator>Li, Lanjuan</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160621</creationdate><title>Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults</title><author>Yang, Shigui ; Tian, Guo ; Cui, Yuanxia ; Ding, Cheng ; Deng, Min ; Yu, Chengbo ; Xu, Kaijin ; Ren, Jingjing ; Yao, Jun ; Li, Yiping ; Cao, Qing ; Chen, Ping ; Xie, Tiansheng ; Wang, Chencheng ; Wang, Bing ; Mao, Chen ; Ruan, Bing ; Jiang, Tian’an ; Li, Lanjuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-50b8ba65d441a715e2cf8d87528cf2ab19cd63f9b339002096db69ecabce02de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>631/250/254</topic><topic>631/250/255/234/2513/1549</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking - immunology</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Hepatitis B</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - immunology</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - virology</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hepatitis B virus - immunology</topic><topic>Hepatitis B virus - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunity, Innate</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shigui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Yuanxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chengbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kaijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Tiansheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chencheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tian’an</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lanjuan</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Shigui</au><au>Tian, Guo</au><au>Cui, Yuanxia</au><au>Ding, Cheng</au><au>Deng, Min</au><au>Yu, Chengbo</au><au>Xu, Kaijin</au><au>Ren, Jingjing</au><au>Yao, Jun</au><au>Li, Yiping</au><au>Cao, Qing</au><au>Chen, Ping</au><au>Xie, Tiansheng</au><au>Wang, Chencheng</au><au>Wang, Bing</au><au>Mao, Chen</au><au>Ruan, Bing</au><au>Jiang, Tian’an</au><au>Li, Lanjuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2016-06-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27251</spage><epage>27251</epage><pages>27251-27251</pages><artnum>27251</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Hepatitis B was still a worldwide health problem. This study aimed to conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess a more precise estimation of factors that influence the response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults. Our included studies examined seroprotection rates close to the end of vaccination schedules in healthy adult populations. This meta-analysis including 21053 adults in 37 articles showed that a significantly decreased response to hepatitis B vaccine appeared in adults (age ≥ 40) (RR:1.86, 95% CI:1.55–2.23), male adults (RR:1.40, 95% CI:1.22–1.61), BMI ≥ 25 adults (RR:1.56, 95% CI:1.12–2.17), smoker (RR:1.53, 95% CI:1.21–1.93), and adults with concomitant disease (RR:1.39, 95% CI:1.04–1.86). Meanwhile, we further found a decreased response to hepatitis B vaccine appeared in adults (age ≥ 30) (RR:1.77, 95% CI:1.48–2.10), and adults (age ≥ 60) (RR:1.30, 95% CI:1.01–1.68). However, there were no difference in response to hepatitis B vaccine both in alcoholic (RR:0.90, 95% CI:0.64–1.26) and 0-1-12 vs. 0-1-6 vaccination schedule (RR:1.39, 95% CI:0.41–4.67). Pooling of these studies recommended the sooner the better for adult hepatitis B vaccine strategy. More vaccine doses, supplemental/additional strengthening immunity should be emphasized on the susceptible population of increasing aged, male, BMI ≥ 25, smoking and concomitant disease. The conventional 0-1-6 vaccination schedule could be still worth to be recommended.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>27324884</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep27251</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.27251-27251, Article 27251
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4914839
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects 631/250/254
631/250/255/234/2513/1549
Adult
Adults
Age
Aged
Alcohol Drinking - immunology
Antibodies
Body mass index
Female
Hepatitis
Hepatitis B
Hepatitis B - epidemiology
Hepatitis B - immunology
Hepatitis B - prevention & control
Hepatitis B - virology
Hepatitis B Vaccines - immunology
Hepatitis B Vaccines - therapeutic use
Hepatitis B virus - immunology
Hepatitis B virus - pathogenicity
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Immunity, Innate
Immunization
Infections
Infectious diseases
Liver cirrhosis
Male
Middle Aged
multidisciplinary
Regression Analysis
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Vaccination
Vaccines
title Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A32%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20immunologic%20response%20to%20hepatitis%20B%20vaccine%20in%20adults&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Yang,%20Shigui&rft.date=2016-06-21&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27251&rft.epage=27251&rft.pages=27251-27251&rft.artnum=27251&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep27251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1798993223%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1800143486&rft_id=info:pmid/27324884&rfr_iscdi=true