Rates and predictors of progression to esophageal carcinoma in a large population-based Barrett's esophagus cohort
Background and Aims Rates of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma in subjects with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are lower than previously estimated. Identification of predictors of progression will enable risk stratification of BE subjects, potentially making current surveillance programs more effic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2016-07, Vol.84 (1), p.40-46.e7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46.e7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 40 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh, MD Borah, Bijan, PhD Heien, Herbert, MS Das, Ananya, MD Chak, Amitabh, MD Iyer, Prasad G., MD, MSc, FASGE |
description | Background and Aims Rates of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma in subjects with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are lower than previously estimated. Identification of predictors of progression will enable risk stratification of BE subjects, potentially making current surveillance programs more efficient. We aimed to assess the potential of demographic and lifestyle factors, obesity, and medications in predicting progression in BE. Methods BE subjects were identified from the General Practice Research Database using validated diagnostic codes. BE subjects developing esophageal cancer (EC) 12 months after their index BE diagnosis were defined as progressors. Time-to-event analysis was used to assess the overall risk of progression to EC. Cox proportional hazards models and time-varying marginal structural models were used to assess predictors of progression. Results Included in the analysis were 9660 BE patients. The mean age (SD) of the study subjects was 63 (13.5) years; 62.6% were men. One hundred three subjects (1.1%) progressed to EC. The mean (SD) follow-up since initial diagnosis was 4.8 (3.3) years. The incidence of EC was 2.23 per 1000 person-years of follow-up. Increasing age, male gender, and being overweight (body mass index, 25-29.9) were found to be independent predictors of progression. When time-varying models were used, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and statin use were protective against progression. Conclusions In this large population-based cohort of patients with BE, increasing age, male gender, and being overweight predicted progression to EC, whereas PPI and statin use were protective against EC development. These factors may aid in developing a risk score to predict the risk of progression and chemopreventive strategies in patients with BE. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.036 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4912845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510716000055</els_id><sourcerecordid>1797869930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-f7e0206e9976be9c400163a667272620e766f69ea3f9707bb832afa5ad8bcce83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl2L1DAYhYMo7rj6A7yR3OlNa5JOkwZhQRe_YEHw4zq8Td_OZOwkNUkX9t-bMruLeuFVCHnOSXLOS8hzzmrOuHx9qHcOa8F4W3NRs0Y-IBvOtKqkUvoh2bACVS1n6ow8SenAGOtEwx-TM1EA0Wm-IfErZEwU_EDniIOzOcREw1h2YRcxJRc8zYFiCvMedggTtRCt8-EI1HkKdIK4QzqHeZkgF7rqIeFA30GMmPPLdCddErVhH2J-Sh6NMCV8druekx8f3n-__FRdffn4-fLtVWVbJXI1KmSCSdRayR613a6_aUBKJZSQgqGScpQaoRm1Yqrvu0bACC0MXW8tds05uTj5zkt_xMGizxEmM0d3hHhjAjjz94l3e7ML12aruei2bTF4dWsQw68FUzZHlyxOE3gMSzJcadVJrRtWUH5CbQwpRRzvr-HMrF2ZgyldmbUrw4UpXRXNiz_fd6-4K6cAb04AlpSuHUaTrENvS00RbTZDcP-1v_hHbSfnnYXpJ95gOoQl-hK_4SYVgfm2xrvOCpdlTljbNr8BrYK8VQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797869930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rates and predictors of progression to esophageal carcinoma in a large population-based Barrett's esophagus cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh, MD ; Borah, Bijan, PhD ; Heien, Herbert, MS ; Das, Ananya, MD ; Chak, Amitabh, MD ; Iyer, Prasad G., MD, MSc, FASGE</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh, MD ; Borah, Bijan, PhD ; Heien, Herbert, MS ; Das, Ananya, MD ; Chak, Amitabh, MD ; Iyer, Prasad G., MD, MSc, FASGE</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims Rates of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma in subjects with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are lower than previously estimated. Identification of predictors of progression will enable risk stratification of BE subjects, potentially making current surveillance programs more efficient. We aimed to assess the potential of demographic and lifestyle factors, obesity, and medications in predicting progression in BE. Methods BE subjects were identified from the General Practice Research Database using validated diagnostic codes. BE subjects developing esophageal cancer (EC) 12 months after their index BE diagnosis were defined as progressors. Time-to-event analysis was used to assess the overall risk of progression to EC. Cox proportional hazards models and time-varying marginal structural models were used to assess predictors of progression. Results Included in the analysis were 9660 BE patients. The mean age (SD) of the study subjects was 63 (13.5) years; 62.6% were men. One hundred three subjects (1.1%) progressed to EC. The mean (SD) follow-up since initial diagnosis was 4.8 (3.3) years. The incidence of EC was 2.23 per 1000 person-years of follow-up. Increasing age, male gender, and being overweight (body mass index, 25-29.9) were found to be independent predictors of progression. When time-varying models were used, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and statin use were protective against progression. Conclusions In this large population-based cohort of patients with BE, increasing age, male gender, and being overweight predicted progression to EC, whereas PPI and statin use were protective against EC development. These factors may aid in developing a risk score to predict the risk of progression and chemopreventive strategies in patients with BE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26772891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use ; Barrett Esophagus - epidemiology ; Body Mass Index ; Databases, Factual ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology ; Disease Progression ; Esophageal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use ; Incidence ; Male ; Metformin - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Overweight - epidemiology ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Protective Factors ; Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; Time Factors ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016-07, Vol.84 (1), p.40-46.e7</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-f7e0206e9976be9c400163a667272620e766f69ea3f9707bb832afa5ad8bcce83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-f7e0206e9976be9c400163a667272620e766f69ea3f9707bb832afa5ad8bcce83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26772891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borah, Bijan, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heien, Herbert, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Ananya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chak, Amitabh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyer, Prasad G., MD, MSc, FASGE</creatorcontrib><title>Rates and predictors of progression to esophageal carcinoma in a large population-based Barrett's esophagus cohort</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background and Aims Rates of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma in subjects with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are lower than previously estimated. Identification of predictors of progression will enable risk stratification of BE subjects, potentially making current surveillance programs more efficient. We aimed to assess the potential of demographic and lifestyle factors, obesity, and medications in predicting progression in BE. Methods BE subjects were identified from the General Practice Research Database using validated diagnostic codes. BE subjects developing esophageal cancer (EC) 12 months after their index BE diagnosis were defined as progressors. Time-to-event analysis was used to assess the overall risk of progression to EC. Cox proportional hazards models and time-varying marginal structural models were used to assess predictors of progression. Results Included in the analysis were 9660 BE patients. The mean age (SD) of the study subjects was 63 (13.5) years; 62.6% were men. One hundred three subjects (1.1%) progressed to EC. The mean (SD) follow-up since initial diagnosis was 4.8 (3.3) years. The incidence of EC was 2.23 per 1000 person-years of follow-up. Increasing age, male gender, and being overweight (body mass index, 25-29.9) were found to be independent predictors of progression. When time-varying models were used, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and statin use were protective against progression. Conclusions In this large population-based cohort of patients with BE, increasing age, male gender, and being overweight predicted progression to EC, whereas PPI and statin use were protective against EC development. These factors may aid in developing a risk score to predict the risk of progression and chemopreventive strategies in patients with BE.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Barrett Esophagus - epidemiology</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metformin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Overweight - epidemiology</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Protective Factors</subject><subject>Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl2L1DAYhYMo7rj6A7yR3OlNa5JOkwZhQRe_YEHw4zq8Td_OZOwkNUkX9t-bMruLeuFVCHnOSXLOS8hzzmrOuHx9qHcOa8F4W3NRs0Y-IBvOtKqkUvoh2bACVS1n6ow8SenAGOtEwx-TM1EA0Wm-IfErZEwU_EDniIOzOcREw1h2YRcxJRc8zYFiCvMedggTtRCt8-EI1HkKdIK4QzqHeZkgF7rqIeFA30GMmPPLdCddErVhH2J-Sh6NMCV8druekx8f3n-__FRdffn4-fLtVWVbJXI1KmSCSdRayR613a6_aUBKJZSQgqGScpQaoRm1Yqrvu0bACC0MXW8tds05uTj5zkt_xMGizxEmM0d3hHhjAjjz94l3e7ML12aruei2bTF4dWsQw68FUzZHlyxOE3gMSzJcadVJrRtWUH5CbQwpRRzvr-HMrF2ZgyldmbUrw4UpXRXNiz_fd6-4K6cAb04AlpSuHUaTrENvS00RbTZDcP-1v_hHbSfnnYXpJ95gOoQl-hK_4SYVgfm2xrvOCpdlTljbNr8BrYK8VQ</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh, MD</creator><creator>Borah, Bijan, PhD</creator><creator>Heien, Herbert, MS</creator><creator>Das, Ananya, MD</creator><creator>Chak, Amitabh, MD</creator><creator>Iyer, Prasad G., MD, MSc, FASGE</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Rates and predictors of progression to esophageal carcinoma in a large population-based Barrett's esophagus cohort</title><author>Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh, MD ; Borah, Bijan, PhD ; Heien, Herbert, MS ; Das, Ananya, MD ; Chak, Amitabh, MD ; Iyer, Prasad G., MD, MSc, FASGE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-f7e0206e9976be9c400163a667272620e766f69ea3f9707bb832afa5ad8bcce83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Barrett Esophagus - epidemiology</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metformin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Overweight - epidemiology</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Protective Factors</topic><topic>Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borah, Bijan, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heien, Herbert, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Ananya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chak, Amitabh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyer, Prasad G., MD, MSc, FASGE</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh, MD</au><au>Borah, Bijan, PhD</au><au>Heien, Herbert, MS</au><au>Das, Ananya, MD</au><au>Chak, Amitabh, MD</au><au>Iyer, Prasad G., MD, MSc, FASGE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rates and predictors of progression to esophageal carcinoma in a large population-based Barrett's esophagus cohort</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>46.e7</epage><pages>40-46.e7</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims Rates of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma in subjects with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are lower than previously estimated. Identification of predictors of progression will enable risk stratification of BE subjects, potentially making current surveillance programs more efficient. We aimed to assess the potential of demographic and lifestyle factors, obesity, and medications in predicting progression in BE. Methods BE subjects were identified from the General Practice Research Database using validated diagnostic codes. BE subjects developing esophageal cancer (EC) 12 months after their index BE diagnosis were defined as progressors. Time-to-event analysis was used to assess the overall risk of progression to EC. Cox proportional hazards models and time-varying marginal structural models were used to assess predictors of progression. Results Included in the analysis were 9660 BE patients. The mean age (SD) of the study subjects was 63 (13.5) years; 62.6% were men. One hundred three subjects (1.1%) progressed to EC. The mean (SD) follow-up since initial diagnosis was 4.8 (3.3) years. The incidence of EC was 2.23 per 1000 person-years of follow-up. Increasing age, male gender, and being overweight (body mass index, 25-29.9) were found to be independent predictors of progression. When time-varying models were used, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and statin use were protective against progression. Conclusions In this large population-based cohort of patients with BE, increasing age, male gender, and being overweight predicted progression to EC, whereas PPI and statin use were protective against EC development. These factors may aid in developing a risk score to predict the risk of progression and chemopreventive strategies in patients with BE.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26772891</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.036</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016-07, Vol.84 (1), p.40-46.e7 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4912845 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology Age Factors Aged Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use Barrett Esophagus - epidemiology Body Mass Index Databases, Factual Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology Disease Progression Esophageal Neoplasms - epidemiology Female Gastroenterology and Hepatology Humans Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors - therapeutic use Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use Incidence Male Metformin - therapeutic use Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Obesity - epidemiology Overweight - epidemiology Proportional Hazards Models Protective Factors Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use Risk Factors Sex Factors Time Factors United Kingdom - epidemiology |
title | Rates and predictors of progression to esophageal carcinoma in a large population-based Barrett's esophagus cohort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T04%3A44%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rates%20and%20predictors%20of%20progression%20to%20esophageal%20carcinoma%20in%20a%20large%20population-based%20Barrett's%20esophagus%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Krishnamoorthi,%20Rajesh,%20MD&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=46.e7&rft.pages=40-46.e7&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1797869930%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797869930&rft_id=info:pmid/26772891&rft_els_id=S0016510716000055&rfr_iscdi=true |