Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates
Whole body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the standard of care in oncologic diagnosis and staging, and patient radiation dose must be well understood to balance exam benefits with the risk from radiation exposure. Although reference PET/CT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC medical imaging 2016-06, Vol.16 (1), p.41-41, Article 41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 41 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | BMC medical imaging |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Quinn, Brian Dauer, Zak Pandit-Taskar, Neeta Schoder, Heiko Dauer, Lawrence T |
description | Whole body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the standard of care in oncologic diagnosis and staging, and patient radiation dose must be well understood to balance exam benefits with the risk from radiation exposure. Although reference PET/CT patient doses are available, the potential for widely varying total dose prompts evaluation of clinic-specific patient dose. The aims of this study were to use exam-specific information to characterize the radiation dosimetry of PET/CT exams that used two different CT techniques for adult oncology patients and evaluate the practicality of employing an exam-specific approach to dose estimation.
Whole body PET/CT scans from two sets of consecutive adult patients were retrospectively reviewed. One set received a PET scan with a standard registration CT and the other a PET scan with a diagnostic quality CT. PET dose was calculated by modifying the standard reference phantoms in OLINDA/EXM 1.1 with patient-specific organ mass. CT dose was calculated using patient-specific data in ImPACT. International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 tissue weighting coefficients were used for effective dose.
One hundred eighty three adult scans were evaluated (95 men, 88 women). The mean patient-specific effective dose from a mean injected 18F-FDG activity of 450 ± 32 MBq was 9.0 ± 1.6 mSv. For all standard PET/CT patients, mean effective mAs was 39 ± 11 mAs, mean CT effective dose was 5.0 ± 1.0 mSv and mean total effective dose was 14 ± 1.3 mSv. For all diagnostic PET/CT patients, mean effective mAs was 120 ± 51 mAs, mean CT effective dose was 15.4 ± 5.0 mSv and mean total effective dose was 24.4 ± 4.3 mSv. The five organs receiving the highest organ equivalent doses in all exams were bladder, heart, brain, liver and lungs.
Patient-specific parameters optimize the patient dosimetry utilized in the medical justification of whole body PET/CT referrals and optimization of PET and CT acquisition parameters. Incorporating patient-specific data into dose estimates is a worthwhile effort for characterizing patient dose, and the specific dosimetric information assists in the justification of risk and optimization of PET/CT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12880-016-0143-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4912712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A468880516</galeid><sourcerecordid>A468880516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-ae6d0dd8a9174454ffd7ba3f0d5d5b5f34f84b235d023a48adf55f4cf67401e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkltrFDEYhoMo9qA_wBsZ8MabafNNjuOFUNZuFQqKrNchm8OaMpOMyWxx_71Ztq2tSAgJyfO--ZK8CL0BfAYg-XmBTkrcYuC1U9LunqFjoALajtDu-aP5ETop5QZjEJLQl-ioEwQEFfIYqe_aBj2HFBubShjdnHdN8g3IZbv8dNV8u1ydL1YfmhBNylPKFY2bxv3WY1smZ4IPppl01lXocqnY3sY1rsxh1LMrr9ALr4fiXt-Np-jH8nK1-Nxef736sri4bg3jeG614xZbK3Vf66KMem_FWhOPLbNszTyhXtJ1R5jFHdFUausZ89R4LigG15NT9PHgO23Xo7PGxTnrQU25lpF3Kumgnu7E8FNt0q2iPXQCumrw_s4gp1_bWr8aQzFuGHR0aVsUiF72vcAMKvruH_QmbXOs11MgMeaE8b7_S2304FSIPtVzzd5UXVAu68cx4JU6-w9Vm3VjMCk6H-r6EwEcBCanUrLzD3cErPapUIdUqJoKtU-F2lXN28eP86C4jwH5A2V1sgU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1800635699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Quinn, Brian ; Dauer, Zak ; Pandit-Taskar, Neeta ; Schoder, Heiko ; Dauer, Lawrence T</creator><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Brian ; Dauer, Zak ; Pandit-Taskar, Neeta ; Schoder, Heiko ; Dauer, Lawrence T</creatorcontrib><description>Whole body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the standard of care in oncologic diagnosis and staging, and patient radiation dose must be well understood to balance exam benefits with the risk from radiation exposure. Although reference PET/CT patient doses are available, the potential for widely varying total dose prompts evaluation of clinic-specific patient dose. The aims of this study were to use exam-specific information to characterize the radiation dosimetry of PET/CT exams that used two different CT techniques for adult oncology patients and evaluate the practicality of employing an exam-specific approach to dose estimation.
Whole body PET/CT scans from two sets of consecutive adult patients were retrospectively reviewed. One set received a PET scan with a standard registration CT and the other a PET scan with a diagnostic quality CT. PET dose was calculated by modifying the standard reference phantoms in OLINDA/EXM 1.1 with patient-specific organ mass. CT dose was calculated using patient-specific data in ImPACT. International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 tissue weighting coefficients were used for effective dose.
One hundred eighty three adult scans were evaluated (95 men, 88 women). The mean patient-specific effective dose from a mean injected 18F-FDG activity of 450 ± 32 MBq was 9.0 ± 1.6 mSv. For all standard PET/CT patients, mean effective mAs was 39 ± 11 mAs, mean CT effective dose was 5.0 ± 1.0 mSv and mean total effective dose was 14 ± 1.3 mSv. For all diagnostic PET/CT patients, mean effective mAs was 120 ± 51 mAs, mean CT effective dose was 15.4 ± 5.0 mSv and mean total effective dose was 24.4 ± 4.3 mSv. The five organs receiving the highest organ equivalent doses in all exams were bladder, heart, brain, liver and lungs.
Patient-specific parameters optimize the patient dosimetry utilized in the medical justification of whole body PET/CT referrals and optimization of PET and CT acquisition parameters. Incorporating patient-specific data into dose estimates is a worthwhile effort for characterizing patient dose, and the specific dosimetric information assists in the justification of risk and optimization of PET/CT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2342</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2342</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0143-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27317478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; CT imaging ; Female ; Fluorides ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - administration & dosage ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; PET imaging ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiometry ; Retrospective Studies ; Whole Body Imaging - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC medical imaging, 2016-06, Vol.16 (1), p.41-41, Article 41</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-ae6d0dd8a9174454ffd7ba3f0d5d5b5f34f84b235d023a48adf55f4cf67401e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-ae6d0dd8a9174454ffd7ba3f0d5d5b5f34f84b235d023a48adf55f4cf67401e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912712/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912712/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27317478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauer, Zak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit-Taskar, Neeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoder, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauer, Lawrence T</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates</title><title>BMC medical imaging</title><addtitle>BMC Med Imaging</addtitle><description>Whole body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the standard of care in oncologic diagnosis and staging, and patient radiation dose must be well understood to balance exam benefits with the risk from radiation exposure. Although reference PET/CT patient doses are available, the potential for widely varying total dose prompts evaluation of clinic-specific patient dose. The aims of this study were to use exam-specific information to characterize the radiation dosimetry of PET/CT exams that used two different CT techniques for adult oncology patients and evaluate the practicality of employing an exam-specific approach to dose estimation.
Whole body PET/CT scans from two sets of consecutive adult patients were retrospectively reviewed. One set received a PET scan with a standard registration CT and the other a PET scan with a diagnostic quality CT. PET dose was calculated by modifying the standard reference phantoms in OLINDA/EXM 1.1 with patient-specific organ mass. CT dose was calculated using patient-specific data in ImPACT. International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 tissue weighting coefficients were used for effective dose.
One hundred eighty three adult scans were evaluated (95 men, 88 women). The mean patient-specific effective dose from a mean injected 18F-FDG activity of 450 ± 32 MBq was 9.0 ± 1.6 mSv. For all standard PET/CT patients, mean effective mAs was 39 ± 11 mAs, mean CT effective dose was 5.0 ± 1.0 mSv and mean total effective dose was 14 ± 1.3 mSv. For all diagnostic PET/CT patients, mean effective mAs was 120 ± 51 mAs, mean CT effective dose was 15.4 ± 5.0 mSv and mean total effective dose was 24.4 ± 4.3 mSv. The five organs receiving the highest organ equivalent doses in all exams were bladder, heart, brain, liver and lungs.
Patient-specific parameters optimize the patient dosimetry utilized in the medical justification of whole body PET/CT referrals and optimization of PET and CT acquisition parameters. Incorporating patient-specific data into dose estimates is a worthwhile effort for characterizing patient dose, and the specific dosimetric information assists in the justification of risk and optimization of PET/CT.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorides</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PET imaging</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Whole Body Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2342</issn><issn>1471-2342</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkltrFDEYhoMo9qA_wBsZ8MabafNNjuOFUNZuFQqKrNchm8OaMpOMyWxx_71Ztq2tSAgJyfO--ZK8CL0BfAYg-XmBTkrcYuC1U9LunqFjoALajtDu-aP5ETop5QZjEJLQl-ioEwQEFfIYqe_aBj2HFBubShjdnHdN8g3IZbv8dNV8u1ydL1YfmhBNylPKFY2bxv3WY1smZ4IPppl01lXocqnY3sY1rsxh1LMrr9ALr4fiXt-Np-jH8nK1-Nxef736sri4bg3jeG614xZbK3Vf66KMem_FWhOPLbNszTyhXtJ1R5jFHdFUausZ89R4LigG15NT9PHgO23Xo7PGxTnrQU25lpF3Kumgnu7E8FNt0q2iPXQCumrw_s4gp1_bWr8aQzFuGHR0aVsUiF72vcAMKvruH_QmbXOs11MgMeaE8b7_S2304FSIPtVzzd5UXVAu68cx4JU6-w9Vm3VjMCk6H-r6EwEcBCanUrLzD3cErPapUIdUqJoKtU-F2lXN28eP86C4jwH5A2V1sgU</recordid><startdate>20160618</startdate><enddate>20160618</enddate><creator>Quinn, Brian</creator><creator>Dauer, Zak</creator><creator>Pandit-Taskar, Neeta</creator><creator>Schoder, Heiko</creator><creator>Dauer, Lawrence T</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160618</creationdate><title>Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates</title><author>Quinn, Brian ; Dauer, Zak ; Pandit-Taskar, Neeta ; Schoder, Heiko ; Dauer, Lawrence T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-ae6d0dd8a9174454ffd7ba3f0d5d5b5f34f84b235d023a48adf55f4cf67401e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorides</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PET imaging</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Whole Body Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauer, Zak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit-Taskar, Neeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoder, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauer, Lawrence T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC medical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quinn, Brian</au><au>Dauer, Zak</au><au>Pandit-Taskar, Neeta</au><au>Schoder, Heiko</au><au>Dauer, Lawrence T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates</atitle><jtitle>BMC medical imaging</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Med Imaging</addtitle><date>2016-06-18</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>41-41</pages><artnum>41</artnum><issn>1471-2342</issn><eissn>1471-2342</eissn><abstract>Whole body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the standard of care in oncologic diagnosis and staging, and patient radiation dose must be well understood to balance exam benefits with the risk from radiation exposure. Although reference PET/CT patient doses are available, the potential for widely varying total dose prompts evaluation of clinic-specific patient dose. The aims of this study were to use exam-specific information to characterize the radiation dosimetry of PET/CT exams that used two different CT techniques for adult oncology patients and evaluate the practicality of employing an exam-specific approach to dose estimation.
Whole body PET/CT scans from two sets of consecutive adult patients were retrospectively reviewed. One set received a PET scan with a standard registration CT and the other a PET scan with a diagnostic quality CT. PET dose was calculated by modifying the standard reference phantoms in OLINDA/EXM 1.1 with patient-specific organ mass. CT dose was calculated using patient-specific data in ImPACT. International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 tissue weighting coefficients were used for effective dose.
One hundred eighty three adult scans were evaluated (95 men, 88 women). The mean patient-specific effective dose from a mean injected 18F-FDG activity of 450 ± 32 MBq was 9.0 ± 1.6 mSv. For all standard PET/CT patients, mean effective mAs was 39 ± 11 mAs, mean CT effective dose was 5.0 ± 1.0 mSv and mean total effective dose was 14 ± 1.3 mSv. For all diagnostic PET/CT patients, mean effective mAs was 120 ± 51 mAs, mean CT effective dose was 15.4 ± 5.0 mSv and mean total effective dose was 24.4 ± 4.3 mSv. The five organs receiving the highest organ equivalent doses in all exams were bladder, heart, brain, liver and lungs.
Patient-specific parameters optimize the patient dosimetry utilized in the medical justification of whole body PET/CT referrals and optimization of PET and CT acquisition parameters. Incorporating patient-specific data into dose estimates is a worthwhile effort for characterizing patient dose, and the specific dosimetric information assists in the justification of risk and optimization of PET/CT.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27317478</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12880-016-0143-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2342 |
ispartof | BMC medical imaging, 2016-06, Vol.16 (1), p.41-41, Article 41 |
issn | 1471-2342 1471-2342 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4912712 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over CT imaging Female Fluorides Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - administration & dosage Health aspects Humans Male Middle Aged PET imaging Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods Radiation Dosage Radiometry Retrospective Studies Whole Body Imaging - methods Young Adult |
title | Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T18%3A58%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20dosimetry%20of%2018F-FDG%20PET/CT:%20incorporating%20exam-specific%20parameters%20in%20dose%20estimates&rft.jtitle=BMC%20medical%20imaging&rft.au=Quinn,%20Brian&rft.date=2016-06-18&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=41-41&rft.artnum=41&rft.issn=1471-2342&rft.eissn=1471-2342&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12880-016-0143-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA468880516%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1800635699&rft_id=info:pmid/27317478&rft_galeid=A468880516&rfr_iscdi=true |