A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research

Biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are significant contributors to the educational mission of universities, particularly in introductory courses, yet there is a lack of empirical data on how to best prepare them for their teaching roles. This essay proposes a conceptual framework for biolog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CBE life sciences education 2016-06, Vol.15 (2), p.es2
Hauptverfasser: Reeves, Todd D, Marbach-Ad, Gili, Miller, Kristen R, Ridgway, Judith, Gardner, Grant E, Schussler, Elisabeth E, Wischusen, E. William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page es2
container_title CBE life sciences education
container_volume 15
creator Reeves, Todd D
Marbach-Ad, Gili
Miller, Kristen R
Ridgway, Judith
Gardner, Grant E
Schussler, Elisabeth E
Wischusen, E. William
description Biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are significant contributors to the educational mission of universities, particularly in introductory courses, yet there is a lack of empirical data on how to best prepare them for their teaching roles. This essay proposes a conceptual framework for biology GTA teaching professional development (TPD) program evaluation and research with three overarching variable categories for consideration: outcome variables, contextual variables, and moderating variables. The framework's outcome variables go beyond GTA satisfaction and instead position GTA cognition, GTA teaching practice, and undergraduate learning outcomes as the foci of GTA TPD evaluation and research. For each GTA TPD outcome variable, key evaluation questions and example assessment instruments are introduced to demonstrate how the framework can be used to guide GTA TPD evaluation and research plans. A common conceptual framework is also essential to coordinating the collection and synthesis of empirical data on GTA TPD nationally. Thus, the proposed conceptual framework serves as both a guide for conducting GTA TPD evaluation at single institutions and as a means to coordinate research across institutions at a national level.
doi_str_mv 10.1187/cbe.15-10-0225
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4909349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1108210</ericid><sourcerecordid>1790466066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-77386be5b163fc76300d3d4fafdb5a0f3cbaffedd9dd3f828215588f686479d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1P2zAYthDTYGxXbpt85JJix7EdXyZVpbAhpCHEzpZjv24DSVzspGj_fq7KKnayXz0f78eD0DklM0preWkbmFFeUFKQsuRH6JQqRgupKDt-9z9Bn1J6IqQShPKP6KSUGSoVPUWrOV6EwcJmnEyHr6Pp4TXEZ-xDxDfRuMmMgB_B2HU7rPA8pTaNZhjxfQwechWGLLuCLXRh00MGllvTZVEGsBkcfoAEJtr1Z_TBmy7Bl7f3DP2-Xj4ufhR3v25-LuZ3hWWl5IWUrBYN8IYK5q0UjBDHXOWNdw03xDPbGO_BOeUc83VZl5TzuvaiFpVUjrEz9H3vu5maHpzNI0XT6U1sexP_6GBa_T8ytGu9CltdKaJYpbLBxZtBDC8TpFH3bbLQdWaAMCVNpcpnFESITJ3tqTaGlCL4QxtK9C4dndPRlO_KXTpZ8O39cAf6vzgy4eueALG1B3h5SynJmxL2F_2Nl1k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790466066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Reeves, Todd D ; Marbach-Ad, Gili ; Miller, Kristen R ; Ridgway, Judith ; Gardner, Grant E ; Schussler, Elisabeth E ; Wischusen, E. William</creator><contributor>Stains, Marilyne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Todd D ; Marbach-Ad, Gili ; Miller, Kristen R ; Ridgway, Judith ; Gardner, Grant E ; Schussler, Elisabeth E ; Wischusen, E. William ; Stains, Marilyne</creatorcontrib><description>Biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are significant contributors to the educational mission of universities, particularly in introductory courses, yet there is a lack of empirical data on how to best prepare them for their teaching roles. This essay proposes a conceptual framework for biology GTA teaching professional development (TPD) program evaluation and research with three overarching variable categories for consideration: outcome variables, contextual variables, and moderating variables. The framework's outcome variables go beyond GTA satisfaction and instead position GTA cognition, GTA teaching practice, and undergraduate learning outcomes as the foci of GTA TPD evaluation and research. For each GTA TPD outcome variable, key evaluation questions and example assessment instruments are introduced to demonstrate how the framework can be used to guide GTA TPD evaluation and research plans. A common conceptual framework is also essential to coordinating the collection and synthesis of empirical data on GTA TPD nationally. Thus, the proposed conceptual framework serves as both a guide for conducting GTA TPD evaluation at single institutions and as a means to coordinate research across institutions at a national level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1187/cbe.15-10-0225</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27193291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Cell Biology</publisher><subject>Biology ; Context Effect ; Education, Graduate ; Faculty Development ; Graduate Students ; Guidelines ; Outcomes of Education ; Professional Competence ; Program Evaluation ; Research - education ; Science Instruction ; Student Characteristics ; Teaching Assistants ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>CBE life sciences education, 2016-06, Vol.15 (2), p.es2</ispartof><rights>2016 T. D. Reeves et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).</rights><rights>2016 T. D. Reeves © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( ). 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-77386be5b163fc76300d3d4fafdb5a0f3cbaffedd9dd3f828215588f686479d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-77386be5b163fc76300d3d4fafdb5a0f3cbaffedd9dd3f828215588f686479d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909349/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909349/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1108210$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Stains, Marilyne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Todd D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marbach-Ad, Gili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kristen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridgway, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Grant E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schussler, Elisabeth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wischusen, E. William</creatorcontrib><title>A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research</title><title>CBE life sciences education</title><addtitle>CBE Life Sci Educ</addtitle><description>Biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are significant contributors to the educational mission of universities, particularly in introductory courses, yet there is a lack of empirical data on how to best prepare them for their teaching roles. This essay proposes a conceptual framework for biology GTA teaching professional development (TPD) program evaluation and research with three overarching variable categories for consideration: outcome variables, contextual variables, and moderating variables. The framework's outcome variables go beyond GTA satisfaction and instead position GTA cognition, GTA teaching practice, and undergraduate learning outcomes as the foci of GTA TPD evaluation and research. For each GTA TPD outcome variable, key evaluation questions and example assessment instruments are introduced to demonstrate how the framework can be used to guide GTA TPD evaluation and research plans. A common conceptual framework is also essential to coordinating the collection and synthesis of empirical data on GTA TPD nationally. Thus, the proposed conceptual framework serves as both a guide for conducting GTA TPD evaluation at single institutions and as a means to coordinate research across institutions at a national level.</description><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Context Effect</subject><subject>Education, Graduate</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Research - education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Teaching Assistants</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1931-7913</issn><issn>1931-7913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1P2zAYthDTYGxXbpt85JJix7EdXyZVpbAhpCHEzpZjv24DSVzspGj_fq7KKnayXz0f78eD0DklM0preWkbmFFeUFKQsuRH6JQqRgupKDt-9z9Bn1J6IqQShPKP6KSUGSoVPUWrOV6EwcJmnEyHr6Pp4TXEZ-xDxDfRuMmMgB_B2HU7rPA8pTaNZhjxfQwechWGLLuCLXRh00MGllvTZVEGsBkcfoAEJtr1Z_TBmy7Bl7f3DP2-Xj4ufhR3v25-LuZ3hWWl5IWUrBYN8IYK5q0UjBDHXOWNdw03xDPbGO_BOeUc83VZl5TzuvaiFpVUjrEz9H3vu5maHpzNI0XT6U1sexP_6GBa_T8ytGu9CltdKaJYpbLBxZtBDC8TpFH3bbLQdWaAMCVNpcpnFESITJ3tqTaGlCL4QxtK9C4dndPRlO_KXTpZ8O39cAf6vzgy4eueALG1B3h5SynJmxL2F_2Nl1k</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Reeves, Todd D</creator><creator>Marbach-Ad, Gili</creator><creator>Miller, Kristen R</creator><creator>Ridgway, Judith</creator><creator>Gardner, Grant E</creator><creator>Schussler, Elisabeth E</creator><creator>Wischusen, E. William</creator><general>American Society for Cell Biology</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research</title><author>Reeves, Todd D ; Marbach-Ad, Gili ; Miller, Kristen R ; Ridgway, Judith ; Gardner, Grant E ; Schussler, Elisabeth E ; Wischusen, E. William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-77386be5b163fc76300d3d4fafdb5a0f3cbaffedd9dd3f828215588f686479d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Context Effect</topic><topic>Education, Graduate</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Research - education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Teaching Assistants</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Todd D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marbach-Ad, Gili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kristen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridgway, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Grant E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schussler, Elisabeth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wischusen, E. William</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reeves, Todd D</au><au>Marbach-Ad, Gili</au><au>Miller, Kristen R</au><au>Ridgway, Judith</au><au>Gardner, Grant E</au><au>Schussler, Elisabeth E</au><au>Wischusen, E. William</au><au>Stains, Marilyne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1108210</ericid><atitle>A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research</atitle><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle><addtitle>CBE Life Sci Educ</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>es2</spage><pages>es2-</pages><issn>1931-7913</issn><eissn>1931-7913</eissn><abstract>Biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are significant contributors to the educational mission of universities, particularly in introductory courses, yet there is a lack of empirical data on how to best prepare them for their teaching roles. This essay proposes a conceptual framework for biology GTA teaching professional development (TPD) program evaluation and research with three overarching variable categories for consideration: outcome variables, contextual variables, and moderating variables. The framework's outcome variables go beyond GTA satisfaction and instead position GTA cognition, GTA teaching practice, and undergraduate learning outcomes as the foci of GTA TPD evaluation and research. For each GTA TPD outcome variable, key evaluation questions and example assessment instruments are introduced to demonstrate how the framework can be used to guide GTA TPD evaluation and research plans. A common conceptual framework is also essential to coordinating the collection and synthesis of empirical data on GTA TPD nationally. Thus, the proposed conceptual framework serves as both a guide for conducting GTA TPD evaluation at single institutions and as a means to coordinate research across institutions at a national level.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Cell Biology</pub><pmid>27193291</pmid><doi>10.1187/cbe.15-10-0225</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7913
ispartof CBE life sciences education, 2016-06, Vol.15 (2), p.es2
issn 1931-7913
1931-7913
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4909349
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biology
Context Effect
Education, Graduate
Faculty Development
Graduate Students
Guidelines
Outcomes of Education
Professional Competence
Program Evaluation
Research - education
Science Instruction
Student Characteristics
Teaching Assistants
Teaching Methods
Undergraduate Students
title A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A33%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Conceptual%20Framework%20for%20Graduate%20Teaching%20Assistant%20Professional%20Development%20Evaluation%20and%20Research&rft.jtitle=CBE%20life%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Reeves,%20Todd%20D&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=es2&rft.pages=es2-&rft.issn=1931-7913&rft.eissn=1931-7913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1187/cbe.15-10-0225&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1790466066%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790466066&rft_id=info:pmid/27193291&rft_ericid=EJ1108210&rfr_iscdi=true