Impact of various media and organic carbon sources on biofuel production potential from Chlorella spp
In this study, five Chlorella species ( Chlorella vulgaris , Chlorella minutissima , Chlorella pyrenoidosa , Chlorella sp.1 and Chlorella sp.2) were grown in various nutrient medium including BG-11, BBM, Fog’s medium and M 4 N medium for the evolution of biomass and lipid production potential. Among...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | 3 Biotech 2016-12, Vol.6 (2), p.116-12, Article 116 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 12 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 116 |
| container_title | 3 Biotech |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Sharma, Amit Kumar Sahoo, Pradeepta Kumar Singhal, Shailey Patel, Alok |
| description | In this study, five
Chlorella species
(
Chlorella vulgaris
,
Chlorella minutissima
,
Chlorella pyrenoidosa
,
Chlorella
sp.1 and
Chlorella
sp.2) were grown in various nutrient medium including BG-11, BBM, Fog’s medium and M
4
N medium for the evolution of biomass and lipid production potential. Among the tested medium, BG-11 was found most economical and efficient medium for all
Chlorella
species. To see the impact of organic carbon sources on lipid production potential, all microalgae species were also cultured in selected medium (BG-11) with different organic carbon sources like glucose, glycerol, sodium acetate, and sucrose under mixotrophic condition. The results showed that all
Chlorella
species performs better under mixotrophic condition, but
Chlorella vulgaris
achieved maximum lipid productivity (3.5 folds higher) in glycerol supplemented culture medium than control medium among all species. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13205-016-0434-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4909020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4084937861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-9848199c8c7454845693da0aac1745b6c13121c9a09ee0de3eca62f1720455fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1r3DAQFaWhCUl-QC9F0Esvbmf0YVuXQln6EQj00kBuQivLGwXbciU7kH_fWTZd0kKhumiYefNm5j3GXiO8R4DmQ0EpQFeAdQVKqqp-wc4EGqh0I9uXx1jcnrLLUu6BnkZtEF6xU9FKCQLEGQtX4-z8wlPPH1yOaS18DF103E0dT3nnpui5d3mbJl7Smn0onMJtTP0aBj7n1K1-iZSa0xKmJbqB9zmNfHM3pByGwfEyzxfspHdDCZdP_zm7-fL5x-Zbdf3969Xm03XldW2WyrSqRWN86xulVasoKTsHznmkxLb2KFGgNw5MCNAFGbyrRY-NAKV138lz9vHAO69bOsPTQtkNds5xdPnRJhftn5Up3tlderDKgCFBiODdE0FOP9dQFjvG4vdnTIG0sdi2oOqmUfI_oEgOSC0bgr79C3pPUk6khMXG6FpACzWh8IDyOZWSQ3_cG8HuLbcHyy1ZbveW233Pm-cHHzt-G0wAcQAUKk27kJ-N_ifrL8Jltrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795620806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of various media and organic carbon sources on biofuel production potential from Chlorella spp</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sharma, Amit Kumar ; Sahoo, Pradeepta Kumar ; Singhal, Shailey ; Patel, Alok</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Amit Kumar ; Sahoo, Pradeepta Kumar ; Singhal, Shailey ; Patel, Alok</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, five
Chlorella species
(
Chlorella vulgaris
,
Chlorella minutissima
,
Chlorella pyrenoidosa
,
Chlorella
sp.1 and
Chlorella
sp.2) were grown in various nutrient medium including BG-11, BBM, Fog’s medium and M
4
N medium for the evolution of biomass and lipid production potential. Among the tested medium, BG-11 was found most economical and efficient medium for all
Chlorella
species. To see the impact of organic carbon sources on lipid production potential, all microalgae species were also cultured in selected medium (BG-11) with different organic carbon sources like glucose, glycerol, sodium acetate, and sucrose under mixotrophic condition. The results showed that all
Chlorella
species performs better under mixotrophic condition, but
Chlorella vulgaris
achieved maximum lipid productivity (3.5 folds higher) in glycerol supplemented culture medium than control medium among all species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-572X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-5738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0434-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28330202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Algae ; Alternative energy sources ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Bioinformatics ; Biomass ; Biomaterials ; Biotechnology ; Cancer Research ; Carbon ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chlorella minutissima ; Chlorella pyrenoidosa ; Chlorella vulgaris ; Glycerol ; Laboratories ; Lipids ; Original ; Original Article ; Productivity ; Stem Cells</subject><ispartof>3 Biotech, 2016-12, Vol.6 (2), p.116-12, Article 116</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>3 Biotech is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-9848199c8c7454845693da0aac1745b6c13121c9a09ee0de3eca62f1720455fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-9848199c8c7454845693da0aac1745b6c13121c9a09ee0de3eca62f1720455fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909020/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4909020/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28330202$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Amit Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Pradeepta Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singhal, Shailey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Alok</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of various media and organic carbon sources on biofuel production potential from Chlorella spp</title><title>3 Biotech</title><addtitle>3 Biotech</addtitle><addtitle>3 Biotech</addtitle><description>In this study, five
Chlorella species
(
Chlorella vulgaris
,
Chlorella minutissima
,
Chlorella pyrenoidosa
,
Chlorella
sp.1 and
Chlorella
sp.2) were grown in various nutrient medium including BG-11, BBM, Fog’s medium and M
4
N medium for the evolution of biomass and lipid production potential. Among the tested medium, BG-11 was found most economical and efficient medium for all
Chlorella
species. To see the impact of organic carbon sources on lipid production potential, all microalgae species were also cultured in selected medium (BG-11) with different organic carbon sources like glucose, glycerol, sodium acetate, and sucrose under mixotrophic condition. The results showed that all
Chlorella
species performs better under mixotrophic condition, but
Chlorella vulgaris
achieved maximum lipid productivity (3.5 folds higher) in glycerol supplemented culture medium than control medium among all species.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chlorella minutissima</subject><subject>Chlorella pyrenoidosa</subject><subject>Chlorella vulgaris</subject><subject>Glycerol</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><issn>2190-572X</issn><issn>2190-5738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUU1r3DAQFaWhCUl-QC9F0Esvbmf0YVuXQln6EQj00kBuQivLGwXbciU7kH_fWTZd0kKhumiYefNm5j3GXiO8R4DmQ0EpQFeAdQVKqqp-wc4EGqh0I9uXx1jcnrLLUu6BnkZtEF6xU9FKCQLEGQtX4-z8wlPPH1yOaS18DF103E0dT3nnpui5d3mbJl7Smn0onMJtTP0aBj7n1K1-iZSa0xKmJbqB9zmNfHM3pByGwfEyzxfspHdDCZdP_zm7-fL5x-Zbdf3969Xm03XldW2WyrSqRWN86xulVasoKTsHznmkxLb2KFGgNw5MCNAFGbyrRY-NAKV138lz9vHAO69bOsPTQtkNds5xdPnRJhftn5Up3tlderDKgCFBiODdE0FOP9dQFjvG4vdnTIG0sdi2oOqmUfI_oEgOSC0bgr79C3pPUk6khMXG6FpACzWh8IDyOZWSQ3_cG8HuLbcHyy1ZbveW233Pm-cHHzt-G0wAcQAUKk27kJ-N_ifrL8Jltrg</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Sharma, Amit Kumar</creator><creator>Sahoo, Pradeepta Kumar</creator><creator>Singhal, Shailey</creator><creator>Patel, Alok</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Impact of various media and organic carbon sources on biofuel production potential from Chlorella spp</title><author>Sharma, Amit Kumar ; Sahoo, Pradeepta Kumar ; Singhal, Shailey ; Patel, Alok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-9848199c8c7454845693da0aac1745b6c13121c9a09ee0de3eca62f1720455fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chlorella minutissima</topic><topic>Chlorella pyrenoidosa</topic><topic>Chlorella vulgaris</topic><topic>Glycerol</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Amit Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Pradeepta Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singhal, Shailey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Alok</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>3 Biotech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Amit Kumar</au><au>Sahoo, Pradeepta Kumar</au><au>Singhal, Shailey</au><au>Patel, Alok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of various media and organic carbon sources on biofuel production potential from Chlorella spp</atitle><jtitle>3 Biotech</jtitle><stitle>3 Biotech</stitle><addtitle>3 Biotech</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>116-12</pages><artnum>116</artnum><issn>2190-572X</issn><eissn>2190-5738</eissn><abstract>In this study, five
Chlorella species
(
Chlorella vulgaris
,
Chlorella minutissima
,
Chlorella pyrenoidosa
,
Chlorella
sp.1 and
Chlorella
sp.2) were grown in various nutrient medium including BG-11, BBM, Fog’s medium and M
4
N medium for the evolution of biomass and lipid production potential. Among the tested medium, BG-11 was found most economical and efficient medium for all
Chlorella
species. To see the impact of organic carbon sources on lipid production potential, all microalgae species were also cultured in selected medium (BG-11) with different organic carbon sources like glucose, glycerol, sodium acetate, and sucrose under mixotrophic condition. The results showed that all
Chlorella
species performs better under mixotrophic condition, but
Chlorella vulgaris
achieved maximum lipid productivity (3.5 folds higher) in glycerol supplemented culture medium than control medium among all species.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28330202</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13205-016-0434-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2190-572X |
| ispartof | 3 Biotech, 2016-12, Vol.6 (2), p.116-12, Article 116 |
| issn | 2190-572X 2190-5738 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4909020 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Agriculture Algae Alternative energy sources Biodiesel fuels Biofuels Bioinformatics Biomass Biomaterials Biotechnology Cancer Research Carbon Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Chlorella minutissima Chlorella pyrenoidosa Chlorella vulgaris Glycerol Laboratories Lipids Original Original Article Productivity Stem Cells |
| title | Impact of various media and organic carbon sources on biofuel production potential from Chlorella spp |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A22%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20various%20media%20and%20organic%20carbon%20sources%20on%20biofuel%20production%20potential%20from%20Chlorella%20spp&rft.jtitle=3%20Biotech&rft.au=Sharma,%20Amit%20Kumar&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=116-12&rft.artnum=116&rft.issn=2190-572X&rft.eissn=2190-5738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13205-016-0434-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4084937861%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795620806&rft_id=info:pmid/28330202&rfr_iscdi=true |