Modelling Neglected Tropical Diseases diagnostics: the sensitivity of skin snips for Onchocerca volvulus in near elimination and surveillance settings

The African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control has proposed provisional thresholds for the prevalence of microfilariae in humans and of L3 larvae in blackflies, below which mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin can be stopped and surveillance started. Skin snips are currently the gold sta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Parasites & vectors 2016-06, Vol.9 (1), p.343-343, Article 343
Hauptverfasser: Bottomley, Christian, Isham, Valerie, Vivas-Martínez, Sarai, Kuesel, Annette C, Attah, Simon K, Opoku, Nicholas O, Lustigman, Sara, Walker, Martin, Basáñez, Maria-Gloria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 343
container_issue 1
container_start_page 343
container_title Parasites & vectors
container_volume 9
creator Bottomley, Christian
Isham, Valerie
Vivas-Martínez, Sarai
Kuesel, Annette C
Attah, Simon K
Opoku, Nicholas O
Lustigman, Sara
Walker, Martin
Basáñez, Maria-Gloria
description The African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control has proposed provisional thresholds for the prevalence of microfilariae in humans and of L3 larvae in blackflies, below which mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin can be stopped and surveillance started. Skin snips are currently the gold standard test for detecting patent Onchocerca volvulus infection, and the World Health Organization recommends their use to monitor progress of treatment programmes (but not to verify elimination). However, if they are used (in transition and in parallel to Ov-16 serology), sampling protocols should be designed to demonstrate that programmatic goals have been reached. The sensitivity of skin snips is key to the design of such protocols. We develop a mathematical model for the number of microfilariae in a skin snip and parameterise it using data from Guatemala, Venezuela, Ghana and Cameroon collected before the start of ivermectin treatment programmes. We use the model to estimate sensitivity as a function of time since last treatment, number of snips taken, microfilarial aggregation and female worm fertility after exposure to 10 annual rounds of ivermectin treatment. The sensitivity of the skin snip method increases with time after treatment, with most of the increase occurring between 0 and 5 years. One year after the last treatment, the sensitivity of two skin snips taken from an individual infected with a single fertile female worm is 31 % if there is no permanent effect of multiple ivermectin treatments on fertility; 18 % if there is a 7 % reduction per treatment, and 0.6 % if there is a 35 % reduction. At 5 years, the corresponding sensitivities are 76 %, 62 % and 4.7 %. The sensitivity improves significantly if 4 skin snips are taken: in the absence of a permanent effect of ivermectin, the sensitivity of 4 skin snips is 53 % 1 year and 94 % 5 years after the last treatment. Our model supports the timelines proposed by APOC for post-MDA follow-up and surveillance surveys every 3-5 years. Two skin snips from the iliac region have reasonable sensitivity to detect residual infection, but the sensitivity can be significantly improved by taking 4 snips. The costs and benefits of using four versus two snips should be evaluated.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13071-016-1605-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4908809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A469297593</galeid><sourcerecordid>A469297593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-ceefec3b712db0966de80bf8d55b18da721a7851d8171a837686652148352dbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAGyQJTawSLGT8U9YIFXlr1KhEpS15XFuMi4ee_B1RvRFeF4cTSkdhLywZX_n-N6rU1VPGT1mTIlXyFoqWU2ZqJmgvG7vVYdMclG3LeX375wPqkeIV5QK2nHxsDpoZEsZF_Kw-vUp9uC9CyP5DKMHm6EnlylunDWevHUIBgFJ78wYImZn8TXJKyAIAV12W5evSRwIfneBYHAbJENM5CLYVbSQrCHb6LeTn5AUIIBJBLxbu2Cyi4GY0BOc0hac9ybY2TbnUgs-rh4MxiM8udmPqm_v312efqzPLz6cnZ6c15Y3KtcWYADbLiVr-iXthOhB0eWges6XTPVGNsxIxVmvmGRGtVIoIXjDFqrlRWHbo-rNznczLdfQWwg5Ga83ya1NutbROL3_EtxKj3GrFx1VinbF4MWNQYo_JsCs1w4tzO1AnFAz2Um-aBaSFfT5P-hVnFIo7WmmKFWi1Nj-pUbjQbswxPKvnU31yUJ0TbHrZur4P1RZPaydjQEGV-73BC_3BIXJ8DOPZkLUZ1-_7LNsx9oUERMMt_NgVM_B07vg6RI8PQdPz5pndwd5q_iTtPY3_uLVdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1800861713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling Neglected Tropical Diseases diagnostics: the sensitivity of skin snips for Onchocerca volvulus in near elimination and surveillance settings</title><source>SpringerOpen</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Bottomley, Christian ; Isham, Valerie ; Vivas-Martínez, Sarai ; Kuesel, Annette C ; Attah, Simon K ; Opoku, Nicholas O ; Lustigman, Sara ; Walker, Martin ; Basáñez, Maria-Gloria</creator><creatorcontrib>Bottomley, Christian ; Isham, Valerie ; Vivas-Martínez, Sarai ; Kuesel, Annette C ; Attah, Simon K ; Opoku, Nicholas O ; Lustigman, Sara ; Walker, Martin ; Basáñez, Maria-Gloria</creatorcontrib><description>The African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control has proposed provisional thresholds for the prevalence of microfilariae in humans and of L3 larvae in blackflies, below which mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin can be stopped and surveillance started. Skin snips are currently the gold standard test for detecting patent Onchocerca volvulus infection, and the World Health Organization recommends their use to monitor progress of treatment programmes (but not to verify elimination). However, if they are used (in transition and in parallel to Ov-16 serology), sampling protocols should be designed to demonstrate that programmatic goals have been reached. The sensitivity of skin snips is key to the design of such protocols. We develop a mathematical model for the number of microfilariae in a skin snip and parameterise it using data from Guatemala, Venezuela, Ghana and Cameroon collected before the start of ivermectin treatment programmes. We use the model to estimate sensitivity as a function of time since last treatment, number of snips taken, microfilarial aggregation and female worm fertility after exposure to 10 annual rounds of ivermectin treatment. The sensitivity of the skin snip method increases with time after treatment, with most of the increase occurring between 0 and 5 years. One year after the last treatment, the sensitivity of two skin snips taken from an individual infected with a single fertile female worm is 31 % if there is no permanent effect of multiple ivermectin treatments on fertility; 18 % if there is a 7 % reduction per treatment, and 0.6 % if there is a 35 % reduction. At 5 years, the corresponding sensitivities are 76 %, 62 % and 4.7 %. The sensitivity improves significantly if 4 skin snips are taken: in the absence of a permanent effect of ivermectin, the sensitivity of 4 skin snips is 53 % 1 year and 94 % 5 years after the last treatment. Our model supports the timelines proposed by APOC for post-MDA follow-up and surveillance surveys every 3-5 years. Two skin snips from the iliac region have reasonable sensitivity to detect residual infection, but the sensitivity can be significantly improved by taking 4 snips. The costs and benefits of using four versus two snips should be evaluated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1605-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27301567</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cameroon - epidemiology ; Computational biology ; Female ; Ghana - epidemiology ; Guatemala - epidemiology ; Humans ; Ivermectin - therapeutic use ; Methods ; Neglected Diseases - diagnosis ; Neglected Diseases - drug therapy ; Neglected Diseases - epidemiology ; Neglected Diseases - parasitology ; Onchocerca volvulus - isolation &amp; purification ; Onchocerciasis - diagnosis ; Onchocerciasis - drug therapy ; Onchocerciasis - epidemiology ; Onchocerciasis - parasitology ; Population Surveillance ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sentinel health events ; Skin - parasitology ; Venezuela - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Parasites &amp; vectors, 2016-06, Vol.9 (1), p.343-343, Article 343</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-ceefec3b712db0966de80bf8d55b18da721a7851d8171a837686652148352dbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-ceefec3b712db0966de80bf8d55b18da721a7851d8171a837686652148352dbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908809/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4908809/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27301567$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bottomley, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isham, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivas-Martínez, Sarai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuesel, Annette C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attah, Simon K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opoku, Nicholas O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustigman, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basáñez, Maria-Gloria</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling Neglected Tropical Diseases diagnostics: the sensitivity of skin snips for Onchocerca volvulus in near elimination and surveillance settings</title><title>Parasites &amp; vectors</title><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><description>The African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control has proposed provisional thresholds for the prevalence of microfilariae in humans and of L3 larvae in blackflies, below which mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin can be stopped and surveillance started. Skin snips are currently the gold standard test for detecting patent Onchocerca volvulus infection, and the World Health Organization recommends their use to monitor progress of treatment programmes (but not to verify elimination). However, if they are used (in transition and in parallel to Ov-16 serology), sampling protocols should be designed to demonstrate that programmatic goals have been reached. The sensitivity of skin snips is key to the design of such protocols. We develop a mathematical model for the number of microfilariae in a skin snip and parameterise it using data from Guatemala, Venezuela, Ghana and Cameroon collected before the start of ivermectin treatment programmes. We use the model to estimate sensitivity as a function of time since last treatment, number of snips taken, microfilarial aggregation and female worm fertility after exposure to 10 annual rounds of ivermectin treatment. The sensitivity of the skin snip method increases with time after treatment, with most of the increase occurring between 0 and 5 years. One year after the last treatment, the sensitivity of two skin snips taken from an individual infected with a single fertile female worm is 31 % if there is no permanent effect of multiple ivermectin treatments on fertility; 18 % if there is a 7 % reduction per treatment, and 0.6 % if there is a 35 % reduction. At 5 years, the corresponding sensitivities are 76 %, 62 % and 4.7 %. The sensitivity improves significantly if 4 skin snips are taken: in the absence of a permanent effect of ivermectin, the sensitivity of 4 skin snips is 53 % 1 year and 94 % 5 years after the last treatment. Our model supports the timelines proposed by APOC for post-MDA follow-up and surveillance surveys every 3-5 years. Two skin snips from the iliac region have reasonable sensitivity to detect residual infection, but the sensitivity can be significantly improved by taking 4 snips. The costs and benefits of using four versus two snips should be evaluated.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cameroon - epidemiology</subject><subject>Computational biology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ghana - epidemiology</subject><subject>Guatemala - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ivermectin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neglected Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neglected Diseases - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neglected Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neglected Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Onchocerca volvulus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Onchocerciasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Onchocerciasis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Onchocerciasis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Onchocerciasis - parasitology</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sentinel health events</subject><subject>Skin - parasitology</subject><subject>Venezuela - epidemiology</subject><issn>1756-3305</issn><issn>1756-3305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAGyQJTawSLGT8U9YIFXlr1KhEpS15XFuMi4ee_B1RvRFeF4cTSkdhLywZX_n-N6rU1VPGT1mTIlXyFoqWU2ZqJmgvG7vVYdMclG3LeX375wPqkeIV5QK2nHxsDpoZEsZF_Kw-vUp9uC9CyP5DKMHm6EnlylunDWevHUIBgFJ78wYImZn8TXJKyAIAV12W5evSRwIfneBYHAbJENM5CLYVbSQrCHb6LeTn5AUIIBJBLxbu2Cyi4GY0BOc0hac9ybY2TbnUgs-rh4MxiM8udmPqm_v312efqzPLz6cnZ6c15Y3KtcWYADbLiVr-iXthOhB0eWges6XTPVGNsxIxVmvmGRGtVIoIXjDFqrlRWHbo-rNznczLdfQWwg5Ga83ya1NutbROL3_EtxKj3GrFx1VinbF4MWNQYo_JsCs1w4tzO1AnFAz2Um-aBaSFfT5P-hVnFIo7WmmKFWi1Nj-pUbjQbswxPKvnU31yUJ0TbHrZur4P1RZPaydjQEGV-73BC_3BIXJ8DOPZkLUZ1-_7LNsx9oUERMMt_NgVM_B07vg6RI8PQdPz5pndwd5q_iTtPY3_uLVdg</recordid><startdate>20160614</startdate><enddate>20160614</enddate><creator>Bottomley, Christian</creator><creator>Isham, Valerie</creator><creator>Vivas-Martínez, Sarai</creator><creator>Kuesel, Annette C</creator><creator>Attah, Simon K</creator><creator>Opoku, Nicholas O</creator><creator>Lustigman, Sara</creator><creator>Walker, Martin</creator><creator>Basáñez, Maria-Gloria</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160614</creationdate><title>Modelling Neglected Tropical Diseases diagnostics: the sensitivity of skin snips for Onchocerca volvulus in near elimination and surveillance settings</title><author>Bottomley, Christian ; Isham, Valerie ; Vivas-Martínez, Sarai ; Kuesel, Annette C ; Attah, Simon K ; Opoku, Nicholas O ; Lustigman, Sara ; Walker, Martin ; Basáñez, Maria-Gloria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-ceefec3b712db0966de80bf8d55b18da721a7851d8171a837686652148352dbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cameroon - epidemiology</topic><topic>Computational biology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ghana - epidemiology</topic><topic>Guatemala - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ivermectin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neglected Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neglected Diseases - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neglected Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neglected Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Onchocerca volvulus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Onchocerciasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Onchocerciasis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Onchocerciasis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Onchocerciasis - parasitology</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sentinel health events</topic><topic>Skin - parasitology</topic><topic>Venezuela - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bottomley, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isham, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivas-Martínez, Sarai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuesel, Annette C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attah, Simon K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opoku, Nicholas O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustigman, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basáñez, Maria-Gloria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Parasites &amp; vectors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bottomley, Christian</au><au>Isham, Valerie</au><au>Vivas-Martínez, Sarai</au><au>Kuesel, Annette C</au><au>Attah, Simon K</au><au>Opoku, Nicholas O</au><au>Lustigman, Sara</au><au>Walker, Martin</au><au>Basáñez, Maria-Gloria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling Neglected Tropical Diseases diagnostics: the sensitivity of skin snips for Onchocerca volvulus in near elimination and surveillance settings</atitle><jtitle>Parasites &amp; vectors</jtitle><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><date>2016-06-14</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>343-343</pages><artnum>343</artnum><issn>1756-3305</issn><eissn>1756-3305</eissn><abstract>The African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control has proposed provisional thresholds for the prevalence of microfilariae in humans and of L3 larvae in blackflies, below which mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin can be stopped and surveillance started. Skin snips are currently the gold standard test for detecting patent Onchocerca volvulus infection, and the World Health Organization recommends their use to monitor progress of treatment programmes (but not to verify elimination). However, if they are used (in transition and in parallel to Ov-16 serology), sampling protocols should be designed to demonstrate that programmatic goals have been reached. The sensitivity of skin snips is key to the design of such protocols. We develop a mathematical model for the number of microfilariae in a skin snip and parameterise it using data from Guatemala, Venezuela, Ghana and Cameroon collected before the start of ivermectin treatment programmes. We use the model to estimate sensitivity as a function of time since last treatment, number of snips taken, microfilarial aggregation and female worm fertility after exposure to 10 annual rounds of ivermectin treatment. The sensitivity of the skin snip method increases with time after treatment, with most of the increase occurring between 0 and 5 years. One year after the last treatment, the sensitivity of two skin snips taken from an individual infected with a single fertile female worm is 31 % if there is no permanent effect of multiple ivermectin treatments on fertility; 18 % if there is a 7 % reduction per treatment, and 0.6 % if there is a 35 % reduction. At 5 years, the corresponding sensitivities are 76 %, 62 % and 4.7 %. The sensitivity improves significantly if 4 skin snips are taken: in the absence of a permanent effect of ivermectin, the sensitivity of 4 skin snips is 53 % 1 year and 94 % 5 years after the last treatment. Our model supports the timelines proposed by APOC for post-MDA follow-up and surveillance surveys every 3-5 years. Two skin snips from the iliac region have reasonable sensitivity to detect residual infection, but the sensitivity can be significantly improved by taking 4 snips. The costs and benefits of using four versus two snips should be evaluated.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27301567</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13071-016-1605-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1756-3305
ispartof Parasites & vectors, 2016-06, Vol.9 (1), p.343-343, Article 343
issn 1756-3305
1756-3305
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4908809
source SpringerOpen; MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Animals
Cameroon - epidemiology
Computational biology
Female
Ghana - epidemiology
Guatemala - epidemiology
Humans
Ivermectin - therapeutic use
Methods
Neglected Diseases - diagnosis
Neglected Diseases - drug therapy
Neglected Diseases - epidemiology
Neglected Diseases - parasitology
Onchocerca volvulus - isolation & purification
Onchocerciasis - diagnosis
Onchocerciasis - drug therapy
Onchocerciasis - epidemiology
Onchocerciasis - parasitology
Population Surveillance
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sentinel health events
Skin - parasitology
Venezuela - epidemiology
title Modelling Neglected Tropical Diseases diagnostics: the sensitivity of skin snips for Onchocerca volvulus in near elimination and surveillance settings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A18%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20Neglected%20Tropical%20Diseases%20diagnostics:%20the%20sensitivity%20of%20skin%20snips%20for%20Onchocerca%20volvulus%20in%20near%20elimination%20and%20surveillance%20settings&rft.jtitle=Parasites%20&%20vectors&rft.au=Bottomley,%20Christian&rft.date=2016-06-14&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=343-343&rft.artnum=343&rft.issn=1756-3305&rft.eissn=1756-3305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13071-016-1605-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA469297593%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1800861713&rft_id=info:pmid/27301567&rft_galeid=A469297593&rfr_iscdi=true