Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice
Patients often have lower (white coat effect) or higher (masked effect) ambulatory/home blood pressure readings compared with clinic measurements, resulting in misdiagnosis of hypertension. The present study assessed whether blood pressure and patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) Tex. 1979), 2016-05, Vol.67 (5), p.941-950 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 950 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 941 |
container_title | Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Sheppard, James P Stevens, Richard Gill, Paramjit Martin, Una Godwin, Marshall Hanley, Janet Heneghan, Carl Hobbs, F.D Richard Mant, Jonathan McKinstry, Brian Myers, Martin Nunan, David Ward, Alison Williams, Bryan McManus, Richard J |
description | Patients often have lower (white coat effect) or higher (masked effect) ambulatory/home blood pressure readings compared with clinic measurements, resulting in misdiagnosis of hypertension. The present study assessed whether blood pressure and patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict the difference between ambulatory/home and clinic blood pressure readings (the home–clinic difference). A linear regression model predicting the home–clinic blood pressure difference was derived in 2 data sets measuring automated clinic and ambulatory/home blood pressure (n=991) using candidate predictors identified from a literature review. The model was validated in 4 further data sets (n=1172) using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. A masked effect was associated with male sex, a positive clinic blood pressure change (difference between consecutive measurements during a single visit), and a diagnosis of hypertension. Increasing age, clinic blood pressure level, and pulse pressure were associated with a white coat effect. The model showed good calibration across data sets (Pearson correlation, 0.48–0.80) and performed well-predicting ambulatory hypertension (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.79 [systolic]; 0.87; 0.85–0.89 [diastolic]). Used as a triaging tool for ambulatory monitoring, the model improved classification of a patient’s blood pressure status compared with other guideline recommended approaches (93% [92% to 95%] classified correctly; United States, 73% [70% to 75%]; Canada, 74% [71% to 77%]; United Kingdom, 78% [76% to 81%]). This study demonstrates that patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict a patient’s ambulatory blood pressure. Usage of this prediction tool for triaging of ambulatory monitoring could result in more accurate diagnosis of hypertension and hence more appropriate treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.07108 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4905620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1781537908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3708-ba54a20f94b7eb95ad184148d8c6c6470465ac19f29cb51bc445c599a3f409273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdFu0zAUhi0EYmXwCsjcjYsMO7GTGAmkrnS00liqURBcWY5jrx5OXOyk096KR8RdxgS74urY53zn_4_0A_AKo2OMc_xm8X01v1jPzz8vq_PpYhqb9BgVGJWPwATTlCSE5tljMEGYkYRh_O0APAvhCiFMCCmegoO0iO-UsQn4tfKqMbI33SWshj5xOqm0NlLBE-tcA-M4hMEraDrYbxScWdMZCY9WF1V1mpysXr-FH5Q3O9Eb10HRNfCrsKYZv05DAdfOWdg7uGy33u3UrcpUysELebMnHvh8UmJfW9X1e8_RT9gIiHilVM_BEy1sUC_u6iH4cjpfzxbJWfVxOZueJTIrUJnUghKRIs1IXaiaUdHgkmBSNqXMZU4KRHIqJGY6ZbKmuJaEUEkZE5kmiKVFdgjej7rboW5VI-M9Xli-9aYV_oY7Yfi_k85s-KXbccIQzVMUBY7uBLz7OajQ89YEqawVnXJD4LgoMc0KhsqIshGV3oXglb63wYjvE-cPEo9Nym8Tj7sv_77zfvNPxBF4NwLXzvbKhx92uFaeb5Sw_eY_DH4Do3G-5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781537908</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sheppard, James P ; Stevens, Richard ; Gill, Paramjit ; Martin, Una ; Godwin, Marshall ; Hanley, Janet ; Heneghan, Carl ; Hobbs, F.D Richard ; Mant, Jonathan ; McKinstry, Brian ; Myers, Martin ; Nunan, David ; Ward, Alison ; Williams, Bryan ; McManus, Richard J</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, James P ; Stevens, Richard ; Gill, Paramjit ; Martin, Una ; Godwin, Marshall ; Hanley, Janet ; Heneghan, Carl ; Hobbs, F.D Richard ; Mant, Jonathan ; McKinstry, Brian ; Myers, Martin ; Nunan, David ; Ward, Alison ; Williams, Bryan ; McManus, Richard J</creatorcontrib><description>Patients often have lower (white coat effect) or higher (masked effect) ambulatory/home blood pressure readings compared with clinic measurements, resulting in misdiagnosis of hypertension. The present study assessed whether blood pressure and patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict the difference between ambulatory/home and clinic blood pressure readings (the home–clinic difference). A linear regression model predicting the home–clinic blood pressure difference was derived in 2 data sets measuring automated clinic and ambulatory/home blood pressure (n=991) using candidate predictors identified from a literature review. The model was validated in 4 further data sets (n=1172) using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. A masked effect was associated with male sex, a positive clinic blood pressure change (difference between consecutive measurements during a single visit), and a diagnosis of hypertension. Increasing age, clinic blood pressure level, and pulse pressure were associated with a white coat effect. The model showed good calibration across data sets (Pearson correlation, 0.48–0.80) and performed well-predicting ambulatory hypertension (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.79 [systolic]; 0.87; 0.85–0.89 [diastolic]). Used as a triaging tool for ambulatory monitoring, the model improved classification of a patient’s blood pressure status compared with other guideline recommended approaches (93% [92% to 95%] classified correctly; United States, 73% [70% to 75%]; Canada, 74% [71% to 77%]; United Kingdom, 78% [76% to 81%]). This study demonstrates that patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict a patient’s ambulatory blood pressure. Usage of this prediction tool for triaging of ambulatory monitoring could result in more accurate diagnosis of hypertension and hence more appropriate treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-911X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.07108</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27001299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Blood Pressure Determination - methods ; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods ; Canada ; Circadian Rhythm ; Cohort Studies ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Male ; Masked Hypertension - diagnosis ; Middle Aged ; Office Visits ; Original ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Assessment ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; United Kingdom ; United States ; White Coat Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 2016-05, Vol.67 (5), p.941-950</ispartof><rights>2016 American Heart Association, Inc</rights><rights>2016 The Authors.</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3708-ba54a20f94b7eb95ad184148d8c6c6470465ac19f29cb51bc445c599a3f409273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3687,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27001299$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, James P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Paramjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Una</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godwin, Marshall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heneghan, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, F.D Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mant, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinstry, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Richard J</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice</title><title>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</title><addtitle>Hypertension</addtitle><description>Patients often have lower (white coat effect) or higher (masked effect) ambulatory/home blood pressure readings compared with clinic measurements, resulting in misdiagnosis of hypertension. The present study assessed whether blood pressure and patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict the difference between ambulatory/home and clinic blood pressure readings (the home–clinic difference). A linear regression model predicting the home–clinic blood pressure difference was derived in 2 data sets measuring automated clinic and ambulatory/home blood pressure (n=991) using candidate predictors identified from a literature review. The model was validated in 4 further data sets (n=1172) using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. A masked effect was associated with male sex, a positive clinic blood pressure change (difference between consecutive measurements during a single visit), and a diagnosis of hypertension. Increasing age, clinic blood pressure level, and pulse pressure were associated with a white coat effect. The model showed good calibration across data sets (Pearson correlation, 0.48–0.80) and performed well-predicting ambulatory hypertension (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.79 [systolic]; 0.87; 0.85–0.89 [diastolic]). Used as a triaging tool for ambulatory monitoring, the model improved classification of a patient’s blood pressure status compared with other guideline recommended approaches (93% [92% to 95%] classified correctly; United States, 73% [70% to 75%]; Canada, 74% [71% to 77%]; United Kingdom, 78% [76% to 81%]). This study demonstrates that patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict a patient’s ambulatory blood pressure. Usage of this prediction tool for triaging of ambulatory monitoring could result in more accurate diagnosis of hypertension and hence more appropriate treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Circadian Rhythm</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Masked Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Office Visits</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>White Coat Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><issn>0194-911X</issn><issn>1524-4563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkdFu0zAUhi0EYmXwCsjcjYsMO7GTGAmkrnS00liqURBcWY5jrx5OXOyk096KR8RdxgS74urY53zn_4_0A_AKo2OMc_xm8X01v1jPzz8vq_PpYhqb9BgVGJWPwATTlCSE5tljMEGYkYRh_O0APAvhCiFMCCmegoO0iO-UsQn4tfKqMbI33SWshj5xOqm0NlLBE-tcA-M4hMEraDrYbxScWdMZCY9WF1V1mpysXr-FH5Q3O9Eb10HRNfCrsKYZv05DAdfOWdg7uGy33u3UrcpUysELebMnHvh8UmJfW9X1e8_RT9gIiHilVM_BEy1sUC_u6iH4cjpfzxbJWfVxOZueJTIrUJnUghKRIs1IXaiaUdHgkmBSNqXMZU4KRHIqJGY6ZbKmuJaEUEkZE5kmiKVFdgjej7rboW5VI-M9Xli-9aYV_oY7Yfi_k85s-KXbccIQzVMUBY7uBLz7OajQ89YEqawVnXJD4LgoMc0KhsqIshGV3oXglb63wYjvE-cPEo9Nym8Tj7sv_77zfvNPxBF4NwLXzvbKhx92uFaeb5Sw_eY_DH4Do3G-5A</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Sheppard, James P</creator><creator>Stevens, Richard</creator><creator>Gill, Paramjit</creator><creator>Martin, Una</creator><creator>Godwin, Marshall</creator><creator>Hanley, Janet</creator><creator>Heneghan, Carl</creator><creator>Hobbs, F.D Richard</creator><creator>Mant, Jonathan</creator><creator>McKinstry, Brian</creator><creator>Myers, Martin</creator><creator>Nunan, David</creator><creator>Ward, Alison</creator><creator>Williams, Bryan</creator><creator>McManus, Richard J</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><general>Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice</title><author>Sheppard, James P ; Stevens, Richard ; Gill, Paramjit ; Martin, Una ; Godwin, Marshall ; Hanley, Janet ; Heneghan, Carl ; Hobbs, F.D Richard ; Mant, Jonathan ; McKinstry, Brian ; Myers, Martin ; Nunan, David ; Ward, Alison ; Williams, Bryan ; McManus, Richard J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3708-ba54a20f94b7eb95ad184148d8c6c6470465ac19f29cb51bc445c599a3f409273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Circadian Rhythm</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Masked Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Office Visits</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>White Coat Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, James P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Paramjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Una</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godwin, Marshall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heneghan, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, F.D Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mant, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinstry, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Richard J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheppard, James P</au><au>Stevens, Richard</au><au>Gill, Paramjit</au><au>Martin, Una</au><au>Godwin, Marshall</au><au>Hanley, Janet</au><au>Heneghan, Carl</au><au>Hobbs, F.D Richard</au><au>Mant, Jonathan</au><au>McKinstry, Brian</au><au>Myers, Martin</au><au>Nunan, David</au><au>Ward, Alison</au><au>Williams, Bryan</au><au>McManus, Richard J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice</atitle><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle><addtitle>Hypertension</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>941</spage><epage>950</epage><pages>941-950</pages><issn>0194-911X</issn><eissn>1524-4563</eissn><abstract>Patients often have lower (white coat effect) or higher (masked effect) ambulatory/home blood pressure readings compared with clinic measurements, resulting in misdiagnosis of hypertension. The present study assessed whether blood pressure and patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict the difference between ambulatory/home and clinic blood pressure readings (the home–clinic difference). A linear regression model predicting the home–clinic blood pressure difference was derived in 2 data sets measuring automated clinic and ambulatory/home blood pressure (n=991) using candidate predictors identified from a literature review. The model was validated in 4 further data sets (n=1172) using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. A masked effect was associated with male sex, a positive clinic blood pressure change (difference between consecutive measurements during a single visit), and a diagnosis of hypertension. Increasing age, clinic blood pressure level, and pulse pressure were associated with a white coat effect. The model showed good calibration across data sets (Pearson correlation, 0.48–0.80) and performed well-predicting ambulatory hypertension (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.79 [systolic]; 0.87; 0.85–0.89 [diastolic]). Used as a triaging tool for ambulatory monitoring, the model improved classification of a patient’s blood pressure status compared with other guideline recommended approaches (93% [92% to 95%] classified correctly; United States, 73% [70% to 75%]; Canada, 74% [71% to 77%]; United Kingdom, 78% [76% to 81%]). This study demonstrates that patient characteristics from a single clinic visit can accurately predict a patient’s ambulatory blood pressure. Usage of this prediction tool for triaging of ambulatory monitoring could result in more accurate diagnosis of hypertension and hence more appropriate treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>27001299</pmid><doi>10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.07108</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0194-911X |
ispartof | Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 2016-05, Vol.67 (5), p.941-950 |
issn | 0194-911X 1524-4563 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4905620 |
source | MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Algorithms Blood Pressure Determination - methods Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods Canada Circadian Rhythm Cohort Studies Databases, Factual Female Humans Linear Models Male Masked Hypertension - diagnosis Middle Aged Office Visits Original Predictive Value of Tests Risk Assessment ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity United Kingdom United States White Coat Hypertension - diagnosis |
title | Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T10%3A20%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Out-of-Office%20Blood%20Pressure%20in%20the%20Clinic%20(PROOF-BP):%20Derivation%20and%20Validation%20of%20a%20Tool%20to%20Improve%20the%20Accuracy%20of%20Blood%20Pressure%20Measurement%20in%20Clinical%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Hypertension%20(Dallas,%20Tex.%201979)&rft.au=Sheppard,%20James%20P&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=941&rft.epage=950&rft.pages=941-950&rft.issn=0194-911X&rft.eissn=1524-4563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.07108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1781537908%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781537908&rft_id=info:pmid/27001299&rfr_iscdi=true |