Validation of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index: characterizing disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change

Summary Background The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was developed for use in clinical trials and longitudinal patient assessment. Objectives To characterize disease severity using the CDASI and assess the responsiveness of this instrument to clinically meaningful...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2015-10, Vol.173 (4), p.969-974
Hauptverfasser: Anyanwu, C.O., Fiorentino, D.F., Chung, L., Dzuong, C., Wang, Y., Okawa, J., Carr, K., Propert, K.J., Werth, V.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 974
container_issue 4
container_start_page 969
container_title British journal of dermatology (1951)
container_volume 173
creator Anyanwu, C.O.
Fiorentino, D.F.
Chung, L.
Dzuong, C.
Wang, Y.
Okawa, J.
Carr, K.
Propert, K.J.
Werth, V.P.
description Summary Background The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was developed for use in clinical trials and longitudinal patient assessment. Objectives To characterize disease severity using the CDASI and assess the responsiveness of this instrument to clinically meaningful changes in disease activity. Methods Patients with cutaneous dermatomyositis at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn, n = 93) and Stanford University (Stanford, n = 106) were prospectively evaluated using the CDASI, physician global assessment (PGA) Likert scales and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data was analysed using logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves to select cut‐offs. Results Baseline CDASI activity scores for the patients evaluated at UPenn ranged from 0 to 47 (median 17), and baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·6 (median 1·1). At UPenn a CDASI activity score of 19 differentiated mild from moderate and severe disease. At Stanford baseline CDASI scores ranged from 0 to 48 (median 21), baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·7 (median 4·2) and CDASI activity scores of 14 or less characterized mild disease. When a 2‐cm change in the PGA VAS was regarded as a clinically significant improvement, a 4‐point (UPenn) or 5‐point (Stanford) change in CDASI reflected a minimal clinically significant response. Conclusions The CDASI is a valid and responsive measure that can be used to characterize cutaneous dermatomyositis severity and detect improvement in disease activity. Variations in cut‐offs may be due to differences in disease severity between the two populations or inter‐rater variations in the use of the external gold measures. What's already known about this topic? Validated outcome measures are essential for comparative trials. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was created for the assessment of cutaneous dermatomyositis in clinical trials, translational research and clinical practice. Previous studies have demonstrated the validity and reliability of this instrument. What does this study add? Cutaneous dermatomyositis disease severity can be characterized with the CDASI. Clinical change can be assessed by changes in CDASI activity scores. Practical and standardized use of the CDASI is now possible. Linked Comment: Volc‐Platzer, Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 890–891.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjd.13915
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4878996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1728671064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5515-4e63ea0194ae797fff2babe70a61cacfb651a888933f6985f33debe0577abbbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2P0zAQhiMEYruFA38AWeLCHrJrx3GccEBaWvZLCxyA5WhNkknrktrFdsuW38KPxaUfAiTmYnnmmVcz8ybJM0ZPWYyzetaeMl4x8SAZMF6INGOcP0wGlFKZ0qrgR8mx9zNKGaeCPk6OMlFVOedykPy8g163ELQ1xHYkTJGMlgEM2qUnY3RzCHa-tl4HHf_aI3gk5w6BgGnJR1yh02FNrk2L969IMwUHTYi5H9pMSLvj_R7b9ID36P2m7NAvrPF6hSZmSLCk6bXRDfQbITPBJ8mjDnqPT3fvMPl88fbT6Cq9_XB5PTq_TRshmEhzLDgCZVUOKCvZdV1WQ42SQsEaaLq6EAzKsqw474qqFB3nLdZIhZRQx-DD5PVWd7Gs59g2aIKDXi2cnoNbKwta_V0xeqomdqXyUpZVvO8webkTcPbbEn1Qc-0b7PvtIRWTWVlIRos8oi_-QWd26UxcT2U0z_JKioJG6mRLNc5677A7DMOo2niuoufqt-eRff7n9Adyb3IEzrbAd93j-v9K6s3NeC-Zbju0D3h_6AD3VRWSS6G-vL9U765YeXFzN1YV_wVThMo_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2042497560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index: characterizing disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Anyanwu, C.O. ; Fiorentino, D.F. ; Chung, L. ; Dzuong, C. ; Wang, Y. ; Okawa, J. ; Carr, K. ; Propert, K.J. ; Werth, V.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anyanwu, C.O. ; Fiorentino, D.F. ; Chung, L. ; Dzuong, C. ; Wang, Y. ; Okawa, J. ; Carr, K. ; Propert, K.J. ; Werth, V.P.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was developed for use in clinical trials and longitudinal patient assessment. Objectives To characterize disease severity using the CDASI and assess the responsiveness of this instrument to clinically meaningful changes in disease activity. Methods Patients with cutaneous dermatomyositis at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn, n = 93) and Stanford University (Stanford, n = 106) were prospectively evaluated using the CDASI, physician global assessment (PGA) Likert scales and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data was analysed using logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves to select cut‐offs. Results Baseline CDASI activity scores for the patients evaluated at UPenn ranged from 0 to 47 (median 17), and baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·6 (median 1·1). At UPenn a CDASI activity score of 19 differentiated mild from moderate and severe disease. At Stanford baseline CDASI scores ranged from 0 to 48 (median 21), baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·7 (median 4·2) and CDASI activity scores of 14 or less characterized mild disease. When a 2‐cm change in the PGA VAS was regarded as a clinically significant improvement, a 4‐point (UPenn) or 5‐point (Stanford) change in CDASI reflected a minimal clinically significant response. Conclusions The CDASI is a valid and responsive measure that can be used to characterize cutaneous dermatomyositis severity and detect improvement in disease activity. Variations in cut‐offs may be due to differences in disease severity between the two populations or inter‐rater variations in the use of the external gold measures. What's already known about this topic? Validated outcome measures are essential for comparative trials. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was created for the assessment of cutaneous dermatomyositis in clinical trials, translational research and clinical practice. Previous studies have demonstrated the validity and reliability of this instrument. What does this study add? Cutaneous dermatomyositis disease severity can be characterized with the CDASI. Clinical change can be assessed by changes in CDASI activity scores. Practical and standardized use of the CDASI is now possible. Linked Comment: Volc‐Platzer, Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 890–891.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13915</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25994337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Clinical trials ; Data processing ; Dermatomyositis ; Dermatomyositis - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Regression analysis ; ROC Curve ; Severity of Illness Index ; Visual Analog Scale ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of dermatology (1951), 2015-10, Vol.173 (4), p.969-974</ispartof><rights>Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 British Association of Dermatologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5515-4e63ea0194ae797fff2babe70a61cacfb651a888933f6985f33debe0577abbbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5515-4e63ea0194ae797fff2babe70a61cacfb651a888933f6985f33debe0577abbbb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjd.13915$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjd.13915$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25994337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anyanwu, C.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorentino, D.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzuong, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Propert, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werth, V.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index: characterizing disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change</title><title>British journal of dermatology (1951)</title><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary Background The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was developed for use in clinical trials and longitudinal patient assessment. Objectives To characterize disease severity using the CDASI and assess the responsiveness of this instrument to clinically meaningful changes in disease activity. Methods Patients with cutaneous dermatomyositis at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn, n = 93) and Stanford University (Stanford, n = 106) were prospectively evaluated using the CDASI, physician global assessment (PGA) Likert scales and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data was analysed using logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves to select cut‐offs. Results Baseline CDASI activity scores for the patients evaluated at UPenn ranged from 0 to 47 (median 17), and baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·6 (median 1·1). At UPenn a CDASI activity score of 19 differentiated mild from moderate and severe disease. At Stanford baseline CDASI scores ranged from 0 to 48 (median 21), baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·7 (median 4·2) and CDASI activity scores of 14 or less characterized mild disease. When a 2‐cm change in the PGA VAS was regarded as a clinically significant improvement, a 4‐point (UPenn) or 5‐point (Stanford) change in CDASI reflected a minimal clinically significant response. Conclusions The CDASI is a valid and responsive measure that can be used to characterize cutaneous dermatomyositis severity and detect improvement in disease activity. Variations in cut‐offs may be due to differences in disease severity between the two populations or inter‐rater variations in the use of the external gold measures. What's already known about this topic? Validated outcome measures are essential for comparative trials. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was created for the assessment of cutaneous dermatomyositis in clinical trials, translational research and clinical practice. Previous studies have demonstrated the validity and reliability of this instrument. What does this study add? Cutaneous dermatomyositis disease severity can be characterized with the CDASI. Clinical change can be assessed by changes in CDASI activity scores. Practical and standardized use of the CDASI is now possible. Linked Comment: Volc‐Platzer, Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 890–891.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Dermatomyositis</subject><subject>Dermatomyositis - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Visual Analog Scale</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-0963</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2P0zAQhiMEYruFA38AWeLCHrJrx3GccEBaWvZLCxyA5WhNkknrktrFdsuW38KPxaUfAiTmYnnmmVcz8ybJM0ZPWYyzetaeMl4x8SAZMF6INGOcP0wGlFKZ0qrgR8mx9zNKGaeCPk6OMlFVOedykPy8g163ELQ1xHYkTJGMlgEM2qUnY3RzCHa-tl4HHf_aI3gk5w6BgGnJR1yh02FNrk2L969IMwUHTYi5H9pMSLvj_R7b9ID36P2m7NAvrPF6hSZmSLCk6bXRDfQbITPBJ8mjDnqPT3fvMPl88fbT6Cq9_XB5PTq_TRshmEhzLDgCZVUOKCvZdV1WQ42SQsEaaLq6EAzKsqw474qqFB3nLdZIhZRQx-DD5PVWd7Gs59g2aIKDXi2cnoNbKwta_V0xeqomdqXyUpZVvO8webkTcPbbEn1Qc-0b7PvtIRWTWVlIRos8oi_-QWd26UxcT2U0z_JKioJG6mRLNc5677A7DMOo2niuoufqt-eRff7n9Adyb3IEzrbAd93j-v9K6s3NeC-Zbju0D3h_6AD3VRWSS6G-vL9U765YeXFzN1YV_wVThMo_</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Anyanwu, C.O.</creator><creator>Fiorentino, D.F.</creator><creator>Chung, L.</creator><creator>Dzuong, C.</creator><creator>Wang, Y.</creator><creator>Okawa, J.</creator><creator>Carr, K.</creator><creator>Propert, K.J.</creator><creator>Werth, V.P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Validation of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index: characterizing disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change</title><author>Anyanwu, C.O. ; Fiorentino, D.F. ; Chung, L. ; Dzuong, C. ; Wang, Y. ; Okawa, J. ; Carr, K. ; Propert, K.J. ; Werth, V.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5515-4e63ea0194ae797fff2babe70a61cacfb651a888933f6985f33debe0577abbbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Dermatomyositis</topic><topic>Dermatomyositis - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Visual Analog Scale</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anyanwu, C.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorentino, D.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzuong, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Propert, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werth, V.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anyanwu, C.O.</au><au>Fiorentino, D.F.</au><au>Chung, L.</au><au>Dzuong, C.</au><au>Wang, Y.</au><au>Okawa, J.</au><au>Carr, K.</au><au>Propert, K.J.</au><au>Werth, V.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index: characterizing disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change</atitle><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>969</spage><epage>974</epage><pages>969-974</pages><issn>0007-0963</issn><eissn>1365-2133</eissn><abstract>Summary Background The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was developed for use in clinical trials and longitudinal patient assessment. Objectives To characterize disease severity using the CDASI and assess the responsiveness of this instrument to clinically meaningful changes in disease activity. Methods Patients with cutaneous dermatomyositis at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn, n = 93) and Stanford University (Stanford, n = 106) were prospectively evaluated using the CDASI, physician global assessment (PGA) Likert scales and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data was analysed using logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves to select cut‐offs. Results Baseline CDASI activity scores for the patients evaluated at UPenn ranged from 0 to 47 (median 17), and baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·6 (median 1·1). At UPenn a CDASI activity score of 19 differentiated mild from moderate and severe disease. At Stanford baseline CDASI scores ranged from 0 to 48 (median 21), baseline PGA VAS scores ranged from 0 to 9·7 (median 4·2) and CDASI activity scores of 14 or less characterized mild disease. When a 2‐cm change in the PGA VAS was regarded as a clinically significant improvement, a 4‐point (UPenn) or 5‐point (Stanford) change in CDASI reflected a minimal clinically significant response. Conclusions The CDASI is a valid and responsive measure that can be used to characterize cutaneous dermatomyositis severity and detect improvement in disease activity. Variations in cut‐offs may be due to differences in disease severity between the two populations or inter‐rater variations in the use of the external gold measures. What's already known about this topic? Validated outcome measures are essential for comparative trials. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was created for the assessment of cutaneous dermatomyositis in clinical trials, translational research and clinical practice. Previous studies have demonstrated the validity and reliability of this instrument. What does this study add? Cutaneous dermatomyositis disease severity can be characterized with the CDASI. Clinical change can be assessed by changes in CDASI activity scores. Practical and standardized use of the CDASI is now possible. Linked Comment: Volc‐Platzer, Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 890–891.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25994337</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjd.13915</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0963
ispartof British journal of dermatology (1951), 2015-10, Vol.173 (4), p.969-974
issn 0007-0963
1365-2133
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4878996
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clinical trials
Data processing
Dermatomyositis
Dermatomyositis - pathology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Regression analysis
ROC Curve
Severity of Illness Index
Visual Analog Scale
Young Adult
title Validation of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index: characterizing disease severity and assessing responsiveness to clinical change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T19%3A03%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Cutaneous%20Dermatomyositis%20Disease%20Area%20and%20Severity%20Index:%20characterizing%20disease%20severity%20and%20assessing%20responsiveness%20to%20clinical%20change&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20dermatology%20(1951)&rft.au=Anyanwu,%20C.O.&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=969&rft.epage=974&rft.pages=969-974&rft.issn=0007-0963&rft.eissn=1365-2133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjd.13915&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1728671064%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2042497560&rft_id=info:pmid/25994337&rfr_iscdi=true