Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2016-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e011951-e011951
Hauptverfasser: Rosenthal, Meagen M, Molzahn, Anita E, Chan, Christopher T, Cockfield, Sandra L, Kim, S Joseph, Pauly, Robert P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e011951
container_issue 5
container_start_page e011951
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 6
creator Rosenthal, Meagen M
Molzahn, Anita E
Chan, Christopher T
Cockfield, Sandra L
Kim, S Joseph
Pauly, Robert P
description ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.ParticipantsThe study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.AnalysisA constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.ResultsIn this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of ‘why take a chance when things are going well?’ was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including ‘negative past experience’, ‘feeling well on NHD’, ‘gaining autonomy’ and ‘responsibility’.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4874163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4065394991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c27cf42c2ea7bf89eb6a198618aad76693619d522ffd1c6eb09ecad809e237d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1TAQRSMEolXpFyAhS2zYpNiO48QbUFVBi1SJDYil5diTxq-JndpOqyz5c_zIoyqs8GYs-dw7M75F8ZrgM0Iq_r6bdn4GV1JMeIkJETV5VhxTzFjJcV0_f3I_Kk5j3OF8WC3qmr4sjmhDBKsoPS5-_hhWlNQtoDQA0oNyGj6ic3S3qNEmlew9oJvgF2fA7BEfVhTTYlbke-S8TktwakSDgskbq8Y12ogCaDtbcCmih8EjA3q0DtCtNQ5yt6BcnEfl9vbevSpe9GqMcHqoJ8X3z5--XVyV118vv1ycX5cda2gqNW10z6imoJqubwV0XBHRctIqZRrORcWJMDWlfW-I5tBhAVqZNhdaNaauTooPm--8dBMYnccLapRzsJMKq_TKyr9fnB3kjb-XrG0Y4VU2eHcwCP5ugZjkZKOGMW8CfomSNAIzTkmLM_r2H3Tnf3_URrWCC0wyVW2UDj7GAP3jMATLfcrykLLcpyy3lLPqzdM9HjV_Ms3A2QZk9X85_gIYnrd-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790896901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rosenthal, Meagen M ; Molzahn, Anita E ; Chan, Christopher T ; Cockfield, Sandra L ; Kim, S Joseph ; Pauly, Robert P</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Meagen M ; Molzahn, Anita E ; Chan, Christopher T ; Cockfield, Sandra L ; Kim, S Joseph ; Pauly, Robert P</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.ParticipantsThe study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.AnalysisA constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.ResultsIn this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of ‘why take a chance when things are going well?’ was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including ‘negative past experience’, ‘feeling well on NHD’, ‘gaining autonomy’ and ‘responsibility’.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27194322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Adult ; Data collection ; Decision Making ; Diet ; Female ; Grounded Theory ; Health Status ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immunosuppression - adverse effects ; Interviews ; Interviews as Topic ; Kidney diseases ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; Kidney Transplantation - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; Peritoneal dialysis ; Personal Autonomy ; Qualitative Research ; Renal Dialysis - methods ; Renal Dialysis - psychology ; Self Care ; Studies ; Substance abuse treatment ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Refusal - psychology ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2016-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e011951-e011951</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c27cf42c2ea7bf89eb6a198618aad76693619d522ffd1c6eb09ecad809e237d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c27cf42c2ea7bf89eb6a198618aad76693619d522ffd1c6eb09ecad809e237d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/5/e011951.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/5/e011951.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27549,27550,27924,27925,53791,53793,77601,77632</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Meagen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molzahn, Anita E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cockfield, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauly, Robert P</creatorcontrib><title>Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.ParticipantsThe study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.AnalysisA constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.ResultsIn this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of ‘why take a chance when things are going well?’ was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including ‘negative past experience’, ‘feeling well on NHD’, ‘gaining autonomy’ and ‘responsibility’.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grounded Theory</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppression - adverse effects</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Peritoneal dialysis</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - psychology</subject><subject>Self Care</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Refusal - psychology</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1TAQRSMEolXpFyAhS2zYpNiO48QbUFVBi1SJDYil5diTxq-JndpOqyz5c_zIoyqs8GYs-dw7M75F8ZrgM0Iq_r6bdn4GV1JMeIkJETV5VhxTzFjJcV0_f3I_Kk5j3OF8WC3qmr4sjmhDBKsoPS5-_hhWlNQtoDQA0oNyGj6ic3S3qNEmlew9oJvgF2fA7BEfVhTTYlbke-S8TktwakSDgskbq8Y12ogCaDtbcCmih8EjA3q0DtCtNQ5yt6BcnEfl9vbevSpe9GqMcHqoJ8X3z5--XVyV118vv1ycX5cda2gqNW10z6imoJqubwV0XBHRctIqZRrORcWJMDWlfW-I5tBhAVqZNhdaNaauTooPm--8dBMYnccLapRzsJMKq_TKyr9fnB3kjb-XrG0Y4VU2eHcwCP5ugZjkZKOGMW8CfomSNAIzTkmLM_r2H3Tnf3_URrWCC0wyVW2UDj7GAP3jMATLfcrykLLcpyy3lLPqzdM9HjV_Ms3A2QZk9X85_gIYnrd-</recordid><startdate>20160518</startdate><enddate>20160518</enddate><creator>Rosenthal, Meagen M</creator><creator>Molzahn, Anita E</creator><creator>Chan, Christopher T</creator><creator>Cockfield, Sandra L</creator><creator>Kim, S Joseph</creator><creator>Pauly, Robert P</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160518</creationdate><title>Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation</title><author>Rosenthal, Meagen M ; Molzahn, Anita E ; Chan, Christopher T ; Cockfield, Sandra L ; Kim, S Joseph ; Pauly, Robert P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c27cf42c2ea7bf89eb6a198618aad76693619d522ffd1c6eb09ecad809e237d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grounded Theory</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppression - adverse effects</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Peritoneal dialysis</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - psychology</topic><topic>Self Care</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Refusal - psychology</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Meagen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molzahn, Anita E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cockfield, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauly, Robert P</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosenthal, Meagen M</au><au>Molzahn, Anita E</au><au>Chan, Christopher T</au><au>Cockfield, Sandra L</au><au>Kim, S Joseph</au><au>Pauly, Robert P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2016-05-18</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e011951</spage><epage>e011951</epage><pages>e011951-e011951</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.ParticipantsThe study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.AnalysisA constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.ResultsIn this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of ‘why take a chance when things are going well?’ was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including ‘negative past experience’, ‘feeling well on NHD’, ‘gaining autonomy’ and ‘responsibility’.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>27194322</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2016-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e011951-e011951
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4874163
source BMJ Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Data collection
Decision Making
Diet
Female
Grounded Theory
Health Status
Hospitals
Humans
Immunosuppression - adverse effects
Interviews
Interviews as Topic
Kidney diseases
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects
Kidney Transplantation - psychology
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrology
Peritoneal dialysis
Personal Autonomy
Qualitative Research
Renal Dialysis - methods
Renal Dialysis - psychology
Self Care
Studies
Substance abuse treatment
Transplants & implants
Treatment Refusal - psychology
Uncertainty
title Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20take%20the%20chance?%20A%20qualitative%20grounded%20theory%20study%20of%20nocturnal%20haemodialysis%20recipients%20who%20decline%20kidney%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Rosenthal,%20Meagen%20M&rft.date=2016-05-18&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e011951&rft.epage=e011951&rft.pages=e011951-e011951&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4065394991%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790896901&rft_id=info:pmid/27194322&rfr_iscdi=true