Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ open 2016-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e011951-e011951 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e011951 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e011951 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Rosenthal, Meagen M Molzahn, Anita E Chan, Christopher T Cockfield, Sandra L Kim, S Joseph Pauly, Robert P |
description | ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.ParticipantsThe study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.AnalysisA constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.ResultsIn this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of ‘why take a chance when things are going well?’ was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including ‘negative past experience’, ‘feeling well on NHD’, ‘gaining autonomy’ and ‘responsibility’.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4874163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4065394991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c27cf42c2ea7bf89eb6a198618aad76693619d522ffd1c6eb09ecad809e237d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1TAQRSMEolXpFyAhS2zYpNiO48QbUFVBi1SJDYil5diTxq-JndpOqyz5c_zIoyqs8GYs-dw7M75F8ZrgM0Iq_r6bdn4GV1JMeIkJETV5VhxTzFjJcV0_f3I_Kk5j3OF8WC3qmr4sjmhDBKsoPS5-_hhWlNQtoDQA0oNyGj6ic3S3qNEmlew9oJvgF2fA7BEfVhTTYlbke-S8TktwakSDgskbq8Y12ogCaDtbcCmih8EjA3q0DtCtNQ5yt6BcnEfl9vbevSpe9GqMcHqoJ8X3z5--XVyV118vv1ycX5cda2gqNW10z6imoJqubwV0XBHRctIqZRrORcWJMDWlfW-I5tBhAVqZNhdaNaauTooPm--8dBMYnccLapRzsJMKq_TKyr9fnB3kjb-XrG0Y4VU2eHcwCP5ugZjkZKOGMW8CfomSNAIzTkmLM_r2H3Tnf3_URrWCC0wyVW2UDj7GAP3jMATLfcrykLLcpyy3lLPqzdM9HjV_Ms3A2QZk9X85_gIYnrd-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790896901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rosenthal, Meagen M ; Molzahn, Anita E ; Chan, Christopher T ; Cockfield, Sandra L ; Kim, S Joseph ; Pauly, Robert P</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Meagen M ; Molzahn, Anita E ; Chan, Christopher T ; Cockfield, Sandra L ; Kim, S Joseph ; Pauly, Robert P</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.ParticipantsThe study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.AnalysisA constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.ResultsIn this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of ‘why take a chance when things are going well?’ was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including ‘negative past experience’, ‘feeling well on NHD’, ‘gaining autonomy’ and ‘responsibility’.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27194322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Adult ; Data collection ; Decision Making ; Diet ; Female ; Grounded Theory ; Health Status ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immunosuppression - adverse effects ; Interviews ; Interviews as Topic ; Kidney diseases ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; Kidney Transplantation - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; Peritoneal dialysis ; Personal Autonomy ; Qualitative Research ; Renal Dialysis - methods ; Renal Dialysis - psychology ; Self Care ; Studies ; Substance abuse treatment ; Transplants & implants ; Treatment Refusal - psychology ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2016-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e011951-e011951</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c27cf42c2ea7bf89eb6a198618aad76693619d522ffd1c6eb09ecad809e237d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c27cf42c2ea7bf89eb6a198618aad76693619d522ffd1c6eb09ecad809e237d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/5/e011951.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/5/e011951.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27549,27550,27924,27925,53791,53793,77601,77632</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Meagen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molzahn, Anita E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cockfield, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauly, Robert P</creatorcontrib><title>Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.ParticipantsThe study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.AnalysisA constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.ResultsIn this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of ‘why take a chance when things are going well?’ was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including ‘negative past experience’, ‘feeling well on NHD’, ‘gaining autonomy’ and ‘responsibility’.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grounded Theory</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppression - adverse effects</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Peritoneal dialysis</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - psychology</subject><subject>Self Care</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Treatment Refusal - psychology</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1TAQRSMEolXpFyAhS2zYpNiO48QbUFVBi1SJDYil5diTxq-JndpOqyz5c_zIoyqs8GYs-dw7M75F8ZrgM0Iq_r6bdn4GV1JMeIkJETV5VhxTzFjJcV0_f3I_Kk5j3OF8WC3qmr4sjmhDBKsoPS5-_hhWlNQtoDQA0oNyGj6ic3S3qNEmlew9oJvgF2fA7BEfVhTTYlbke-S8TktwakSDgskbq8Y12ogCaDtbcCmih8EjA3q0DtCtNQ5yt6BcnEfl9vbevSpe9GqMcHqoJ8X3z5--XVyV118vv1ycX5cda2gqNW10z6imoJqubwV0XBHRctIqZRrORcWJMDWlfW-I5tBhAVqZNhdaNaauTooPm--8dBMYnccLapRzsJMKq_TKyr9fnB3kjb-XrG0Y4VU2eHcwCP5ugZjkZKOGMW8CfomSNAIzTkmLM_r2H3Tnf3_URrWCC0wyVW2UDj7GAP3jMATLfcrykLLcpyy3lLPqzdM9HjV_Ms3A2QZk9X85_gIYnrd-</recordid><startdate>20160518</startdate><enddate>20160518</enddate><creator>Rosenthal, Meagen M</creator><creator>Molzahn, Anita E</creator><creator>Chan, Christopher T</creator><creator>Cockfield, Sandra L</creator><creator>Kim, S Joseph</creator><creator>Pauly, Robert P</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160518</creationdate><title>Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation</title><author>Rosenthal, Meagen M ; Molzahn, Anita E ; Chan, Christopher T ; Cockfield, Sandra L ; Kim, S Joseph ; Pauly, Robert P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c27cf42c2ea7bf89eb6a198618aad76693619d522ffd1c6eb09ecad809e237d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grounded Theory</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppression - adverse effects</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Peritoneal dialysis</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - psychology</topic><topic>Self Care</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Treatment Refusal - psychology</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Meagen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molzahn, Anita E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cockfield, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauly, Robert P</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosenthal, Meagen M</au><au>Molzahn, Anita E</au><au>Chan, Christopher T</au><au>Cockfield, Sandra L</au><au>Kim, S Joseph</au><au>Pauly, Robert P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2016-05-18</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e011951</spage><epage>e011951</epage><pages>e011951-e011951</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).DesignA grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.SettingParticipants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.ParticipantsThe study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.AnalysisA constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.ResultsIn this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of ‘why take a chance when things are going well?’ was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including ‘negative past experience’, ‘feeling well on NHD’, ‘gaining autonomy’ and ‘responsibility’.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>27194322</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2016-05, Vol.6 (5), p.e011951-e011951 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4874163 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Data collection Decision Making Diet Female Grounded Theory Health Status Hospitals Humans Immunosuppression - adverse effects Interviews Interviews as Topic Kidney diseases Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects Kidney Transplantation - psychology Male Middle Aged Nephrology Peritoneal dialysis Personal Autonomy Qualitative Research Renal Dialysis - methods Renal Dialysis - psychology Self Care Studies Substance abuse treatment Transplants & implants Treatment Refusal - psychology Uncertainty |
title | Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20take%20the%20chance?%20A%20qualitative%20grounded%20theory%20study%20of%20nocturnal%20haemodialysis%20recipients%20who%20decline%20kidney%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Rosenthal,%20Meagen%20M&rft.date=2016-05-18&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e011951&rft.epage=e011951&rft.pages=e011951-e011951&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4065394991%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790896901&rft_id=info:pmid/27194322&rfr_iscdi=true |