Gender Differences in Scholarly Productivity Within Academic Gynecologic Oncology Departments

OBJECTIVE:To estimate whether there is a gender difference in scholarly productivity among academic gynecologic oncologists. METHODS:In this cross-sectional study, the academic rank and gender of gynecologic oncology faculty in the United States were determined from online residency and fellowship d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2015-12, Vol.126 (6), p.1279-1284
Hauptverfasser: Hill, Emily K., Blake, Rachel A., Emerson, Jenna B., Svider, Peter, Eloy, Jean Anderson, Raker, Christina, Robison, Katina, Stuckey, Ashley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:To estimate whether there is a gender difference in scholarly productivity among academic gynecologic oncologists. METHODS:In this cross-sectional study, the academic rank and gender of gynecologic oncology faculty in the United States were determined from online residency and fellowship directories and departmental web sites. Each individualʼs h-index and years of publication were determined from Scopus (a citation database of peer-reviewed literature). The h-index is a quantification of an authorʼs scholarly productivity that combines the number of publications with the number of times the publications have been cited. We generated descriptive statistics and compared rank, gender, and productivity scores. RESULTS:Five hundred seven academic faculty within 137 U.S. teaching programs were identified. Of these, 215 (42%) were female and 292 (58%) were male. Men had significantly higher median h-indices than women, 16 compared with 8, respectively (P
ISSN:0029-7844
1873-233X
DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001133