Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development
•Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Drug discovery today 2016-03, Vol.21 (3), p.445-453 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 453 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 445 |
container_title | Drug discovery today |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Roiser, Jonathan P. Nathan, Pradeep J. Mander, Adrian P. Adusei, Gabriel Zavitz, Kenton H. Blackwell, Andrew D. |
description | •Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive measurements.•Benchmarking is a useful method for quantifying and communicating cognitive risk.
Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognised as an important potential adverse effect of medication. However, many drug development programmes do not incorporate sensitive cognitive measurements. Here, we review the rationale for cognitive safety assessment, and explain several basic methodological principles for measuring cognition during clinical drug development, including study design and statistical analysis, from Phase I through to postmarketing. The crucial issue of how cognition should be assessed is emphasized, especially the sensitivity of measurement. We also consider how best to interpret the magnitude of any identified effects, including comparison with benchmarks. We conclude by discussing strategies for the effective communication of cognitive risks.
This keynote review outlines the rationale, study design, and methods for cognitive safety assessment during clinical drug development, as well as strategies for interpreting and communicating cognitive risk. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4863933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359644615004225</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1359644615004225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-7798e0cbd45526e61a51391351c81300711065651bf7a7bdb3230b7bf8e814143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUheIHEne8gGQSjFExS80esl2Z3ULWlSdtNC394t1ao3Xs3A8B_mI-QaaAYU5O0ys35jXchyCiIDyChlJ2QMqlCpUCw_jTsTZSo5lyNyEcKSUshLIc_JKJcSKAc5JnfTEDCEFXZD0jeJ6RedG9wWk1A1OOwS1yWmdZ0zVZvEvEVicYttv94LLslZU7UBr77mhLw_PrzNntP569PLbDpPDZdsSIuiVEhNbbkQuUQJlQBWxm5gFDBKCwAqhRRQN0VV1LZmOaN1UTcKFXDgbELuD77rTb1Ca2K0r1q99m5V-Z3uK6f_Xjr3oRf9VnMlWclYNOAHA-P7EDw2Ry1QvYepl_oAU-9hagAdYUbZze_co-ib3k8xjN9vHXodjMPOoHUezaBt7_5P-AQFoIgK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Roiser, Jonathan P. ; Nathan, Pradeep J. ; Mander, Adrian P. ; Adusei, Gabriel ; Zavitz, Kenton H. ; Blackwell, Andrew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roiser, Jonathan P. ; Nathan, Pradeep J. ; Mander, Adrian P. ; Adusei, Gabriel ; Zavitz, Kenton H. ; Blackwell, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><description>•Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive measurements.•Benchmarking is a useful method for quantifying and communicating cognitive risk.
Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognised as an important potential adverse effect of medication. However, many drug development programmes do not incorporate sensitive cognitive measurements. Here, we review the rationale for cognitive safety assessment, and explain several basic methodological principles for measuring cognition during clinical drug development, including study design and statistical analysis, from Phase I through to postmarketing. The crucial issue of how cognition should be assessed is emphasized, especially the sensitivity of measurement. We also consider how best to interpret the magnitude of any identified effects, including comparison with benchmarks. We conclude by discussing strategies for the effective communication of cognitive risks.
This keynote review outlines the rationale, study design, and methods for cognitive safety assessment during clinical drug development, as well as strategies for interpreting and communicating cognitive risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-6446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26610416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognition - drug effects ; Cognition Disorders - chemically induced ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology ; Humans ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Research Design</subject><ispartof>Drug discovery today, 2016-03, Vol.21 (3), p.445-453</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-7798e0cbd45526e61a51391351c81300711065651bf7a7bdb3230b7bf8e814143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-7798e0cbd45526e61a51391351c81300711065651bf7a7bdb3230b7bf8e814143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26610416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roiser, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathan, Pradeep J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mander, Adrian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adusei, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavitz, Kenton H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development</title><title>Drug discovery today</title><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><description>•Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive measurements.•Benchmarking is a useful method for quantifying and communicating cognitive risk.
Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognised as an important potential adverse effect of medication. However, many drug development programmes do not incorporate sensitive cognitive measurements. Here, we review the rationale for cognitive safety assessment, and explain several basic methodological principles for measuring cognition during clinical drug development, including study design and statistical analysis, from Phase I through to postmarketing. The crucial issue of how cognition should be assessed is emphasized, especially the sensitivity of measurement. We also consider how best to interpret the magnitude of any identified effects, including comparison with benchmarks. We conclude by discussing strategies for the effective communication of cognitive risks.
This keynote review outlines the rationale, study design, and methods for cognitive safety assessment during clinical drug development, as well as strategies for interpreting and communicating cognitive risk.</description><subject>Cognition - drug effects</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - chemically induced</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><issn>1359-6446</issn><issn>1878-5832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUheIHEne8gGQSjFExS80esl2Z3ULWlSdtNC394t1ao3Xs3A8B_mI-QaaAYU5O0ys35jXchyCiIDyChlJ2QMqlCpUCw_jTsTZSo5lyNyEcKSUshLIc_JKJcSKAc5JnfTEDCEFXZD0jeJ6RedG9wWk1A1OOwS1yWmdZ0zVZvEvEVicYttv94LLslZU7UBr77mhLw_PrzNntP569PLbDpPDZdsSIuiVEhNbbkQuUQJlQBWxm5gFDBKCwAqhRRQN0VV1LZmOaN1UTcKFXDgbELuD77rTb1Ca2K0r1q99m5V-Z3uK6f_Xjr3oRf9VnMlWclYNOAHA-P7EDw2Ry1QvYepl_oAU-9hagAdYUbZze_co-ib3k8xjN9vHXodjMPOoHUezaBt7_5P-AQFoIgK</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Roiser, Jonathan P.</creator><creator>Nathan, Pradeep J.</creator><creator>Mander, Adrian P.</creator><creator>Adusei, Gabriel</creator><creator>Zavitz, Kenton H.</creator><creator>Blackwell, Andrew D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development</title><author>Roiser, Jonathan P. ; Nathan, Pradeep J. ; Mander, Adrian P. ; Adusei, Gabriel ; Zavitz, Kenton H. ; Blackwell, Andrew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-7798e0cbd45526e61a51391351c81300711065651bf7a7bdb3230b7bf8e814143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cognition - drug effects</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - chemically induced</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roiser, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathan, Pradeep J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mander, Adrian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adusei, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavitz, Kenton H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roiser, Jonathan P.</au><au>Nathan, Pradeep J.</au><au>Mander, Adrian P.</au><au>Adusei, Gabriel</au><au>Zavitz, Kenton H.</au><au>Blackwell, Andrew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development</atitle><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>445-453</pages><issn>1359-6446</issn><eissn>1878-5832</eissn><abstract>•Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive measurements.•Benchmarking is a useful method for quantifying and communicating cognitive risk.
Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognised as an important potential adverse effect of medication. However, many drug development programmes do not incorporate sensitive cognitive measurements. Here, we review the rationale for cognitive safety assessment, and explain several basic methodological principles for measuring cognition during clinical drug development, including study design and statistical analysis, from Phase I through to postmarketing. The crucial issue of how cognition should be assessed is emphasized, especially the sensitivity of measurement. We also consider how best to interpret the magnitude of any identified effects, including comparison with benchmarks. We conclude by discussing strategies for the effective communication of cognitive risks.
This keynote review outlines the rationale, study design, and methods for cognitive safety assessment during clinical drug development, as well as strategies for interpreting and communicating cognitive risk.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26610416</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1359-6446 |
ispartof | Drug discovery today, 2016-03, Vol.21 (3), p.445-453 |
issn | 1359-6446 1878-5832 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4863933 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Cognition - drug effects Cognition Disorders - chemically induced Cognition Disorders - diagnosis Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology Humans Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Research Design |
title | Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T17%3A36%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20cognitive%20safety%20in%20clinical%20drug%20development&rft.jtitle=Drug%20discovery%20today&rft.au=Roiser,%20Jonathan%20P.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=445-453&rft.issn=1359-6446&rft.eissn=1878-5832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES1359644615004225%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/26610416&rft_els_id=S1359644615004225&rfr_iscdi=true |