Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development

•Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug discovery today 2016-03, Vol.21 (3), p.445-453
Hauptverfasser: Roiser, Jonathan P., Nathan, Pradeep J., Mander, Adrian P., Adusei, Gabriel, Zavitz, Kenton H., Blackwell, Andrew D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 453
container_issue 3
container_start_page 445
container_title Drug discovery today
container_volume 21
creator Roiser, Jonathan P.
Nathan, Pradeep J.
Mander, Adrian P.
Adusei, Gabriel
Zavitz, Kenton H.
Blackwell, Andrew D.
description •Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive measurements.•Benchmarking is a useful method for quantifying and communicating cognitive risk. Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognised as an important potential adverse effect of medication. However, many drug development programmes do not incorporate sensitive cognitive measurements. Here, we review the rationale for cognitive safety assessment, and explain several basic methodological principles for measuring cognition during clinical drug development, including study design and statistical analysis, from Phase I through to postmarketing. The crucial issue of how cognition should be assessed is emphasized, especially the sensitivity of measurement. We also consider how best to interpret the magnitude of any identified effects, including comparison with benchmarks. We conclude by discussing strategies for the effective communication of cognitive risks. This keynote review outlines the rationale, study design, and methods for cognitive safety assessment during clinical drug development, as well as strategies for interpreting and communicating cognitive risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4863933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359644615004225</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1359644615004225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-7798e0cbd45526e61a51391351c81300711065651bf7a7bdb3230b7bf8e814143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUheIHEne8gGQSjFExS80esl2Z3ULWlSdtNC394t1ao3Xs3A8B_mI-QaaAYU5O0ys35jXchyCiIDyChlJ2QMqlCpUCw_jTsTZSo5lyNyEcKSUshLIc_JKJcSKAc5JnfTEDCEFXZD0jeJ6RedG9wWk1A1OOwS1yWmdZ0zVZvEvEVicYttv94LLslZU7UBr77mhLw_PrzNntP569PLbDpPDZdsSIuiVEhNbbkQuUQJlQBWxm5gFDBKCwAqhRRQN0VV1LZmOaN1UTcKFXDgbELuD77rTb1Ca2K0r1q99m5V-Z3uK6f_Xjr3oRf9VnMlWclYNOAHA-P7EDw2Ry1QvYepl_oAU-9hagAdYUbZze_co-ib3k8xjN9vHXodjMPOoHUezaBt7_5P-AQFoIgK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Roiser, Jonathan P. ; Nathan, Pradeep J. ; Mander, Adrian P. ; Adusei, Gabriel ; Zavitz, Kenton H. ; Blackwell, Andrew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roiser, Jonathan P. ; Nathan, Pradeep J. ; Mander, Adrian P. ; Adusei, Gabriel ; Zavitz, Kenton H. ; Blackwell, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><description>•Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive measurements.•Benchmarking is a useful method for quantifying and communicating cognitive risk. Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognised as an important potential adverse effect of medication. However, many drug development programmes do not incorporate sensitive cognitive measurements. Here, we review the rationale for cognitive safety assessment, and explain several basic methodological principles for measuring cognition during clinical drug development, including study design and statistical analysis, from Phase I through to postmarketing. The crucial issue of how cognition should be assessed is emphasized, especially the sensitivity of measurement. We also consider how best to interpret the magnitude of any identified effects, including comparison with benchmarks. We conclude by discussing strategies for the effective communication of cognitive risks. This keynote review outlines the rationale, study design, and methods for cognitive safety assessment during clinical drug development, as well as strategies for interpreting and communicating cognitive risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-6446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26610416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognition - drug effects ; Cognition Disorders - chemically induced ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology ; Humans ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Research Design</subject><ispartof>Drug discovery today, 2016-03, Vol.21 (3), p.445-453</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-7798e0cbd45526e61a51391351c81300711065651bf7a7bdb3230b7bf8e814143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-7798e0cbd45526e61a51391351c81300711065651bf7a7bdb3230b7bf8e814143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26610416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roiser, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathan, Pradeep J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mander, Adrian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adusei, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavitz, Kenton H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development</title><title>Drug discovery today</title><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><description>•Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive measurements.•Benchmarking is a useful method for quantifying and communicating cognitive risk. Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognised as an important potential adverse effect of medication. However, many drug development programmes do not incorporate sensitive cognitive measurements. Here, we review the rationale for cognitive safety assessment, and explain several basic methodological principles for measuring cognition during clinical drug development, including study design and statistical analysis, from Phase I through to postmarketing. The crucial issue of how cognition should be assessed is emphasized, especially the sensitivity of measurement. We also consider how best to interpret the magnitude of any identified effects, including comparison with benchmarks. We conclude by discussing strategies for the effective communication of cognitive risks. This keynote review outlines the rationale, study design, and methods for cognitive safety assessment during clinical drug development, as well as strategies for interpreting and communicating cognitive risk.</description><subject>Cognition - drug effects</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - chemically induced</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><issn>1359-6446</issn><issn>1878-5832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUheIHEne8gGQSjFExS80esl2Z3ULWlSdtNC394t1ao3Xs3A8B_mI-QaaAYU5O0ys35jXchyCiIDyChlJ2QMqlCpUCw_jTsTZSo5lyNyEcKSUshLIc_JKJcSKAc5JnfTEDCEFXZD0jeJ6RedG9wWk1A1OOwS1yWmdZ0zVZvEvEVicYttv94LLslZU7UBr77mhLw_PrzNntP569PLbDpPDZdsSIuiVEhNbbkQuUQJlQBWxm5gFDBKCwAqhRRQN0VV1LZmOaN1UTcKFXDgbELuD77rTb1Ca2K0r1q99m5V-Z3uK6f_Xjr3oRf9VnMlWclYNOAHA-P7EDw2Ry1QvYepl_oAU-9hagAdYUbZze_co-ib3k8xjN9vHXodjMPOoHUezaBt7_5P-AQFoIgK</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Roiser, Jonathan P.</creator><creator>Nathan, Pradeep J.</creator><creator>Mander, Adrian P.</creator><creator>Adusei, Gabriel</creator><creator>Zavitz, Kenton H.</creator><creator>Blackwell, Andrew D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development</title><author>Roiser, Jonathan P. ; Nathan, Pradeep J. ; Mander, Adrian P. ; Adusei, Gabriel ; Zavitz, Kenton H. ; Blackwell, Andrew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-7798e0cbd45526e61a51391351c81300711065651bf7a7bdb3230b7bf8e814143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cognition - drug effects</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - chemically induced</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roiser, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathan, Pradeep J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mander, Adrian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adusei, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavitz, Kenton H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roiser, Jonathan P.</au><au>Nathan, Pradeep J.</au><au>Mander, Adrian P.</au><au>Adusei, Gabriel</au><au>Zavitz, Kenton H.</au><au>Blackwell, Andrew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development</atitle><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>445-453</pages><issn>1359-6446</issn><eissn>1878-5832</eissn><abstract>•Commonly-used medications are associated with cognitive impairment.•Cognitive safety is rarely investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).•Statistical power is a critical issue when assessing cognitive impairment in RCTs.•Cognitive assessments in RCTs need to use appropriate and sensitive measurements.•Benchmarking is a useful method for quantifying and communicating cognitive risk. Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognised as an important potential adverse effect of medication. However, many drug development programmes do not incorporate sensitive cognitive measurements. Here, we review the rationale for cognitive safety assessment, and explain several basic methodological principles for measuring cognition during clinical drug development, including study design and statistical analysis, from Phase I through to postmarketing. The crucial issue of how cognition should be assessed is emphasized, especially the sensitivity of measurement. We also consider how best to interpret the magnitude of any identified effects, including comparison with benchmarks. We conclude by discussing strategies for the effective communication of cognitive risks. This keynote review outlines the rationale, study design, and methods for cognitive safety assessment during clinical drug development, as well as strategies for interpreting and communicating cognitive risk.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26610416</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-6446
ispartof Drug discovery today, 2016-03, Vol.21 (3), p.445-453
issn 1359-6446
1878-5832
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4863933
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Cognition - drug effects
Cognition Disorders - chemically induced
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology
Humans
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research Design
title Assessment of cognitive safety in clinical drug development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T17%3A36%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20cognitive%20safety%20in%20clinical%20drug%20development&rft.jtitle=Drug%20discovery%20today&rft.au=Roiser,%20Jonathan%20P.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=445-453&rft.issn=1359-6446&rft.eissn=1878-5832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.11.003&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES1359644615004225%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/26610416&rft_els_id=S1359644615004225&rfr_iscdi=true