Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization

Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise sup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2016-05, Vol.43 (5), p.2676-2686
Hauptverfasser: Harms, Joseph, Wang, Tonghe, Petrongolo, Michael, Niu, Tianye, Zhu, Lei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2686
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2676
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 43
creator Harms, Joseph
Wang, Tonghe
Petrongolo, Michael
Niu, Tianye
Zhu, Lei
description Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise suppression algorithm via penalized weighted least-square optimization with edge-preservation regularization (PWLS-EPR). In this paper, the authors improve method performance using the same framework of penalized weighted least-square optimization but with similarity-based regularization (PWLS-SBR), which substantially enhances the quality of decomposed images by retaining a more uniform noise power spectrum (NPS). Methods: The design of PWLS-SBR is based on the fact that averaging pixels of similar materials gives a low-noise image. For each pixel, the authors calculate the similarity to other pixels in its neighborhood by comparing CT values. Using an empirical Gaussian model, the authors assign high/low similarity value to one neighboring pixel if its CT value is close/far to the CT value of the pixel of interest. These similarity values are organized in matrix form, such that multiplication of the similarity matrix to the image vector reduces image noise. The similarity matrices are calculated on both high- and low-energy CT images and averaged. In PWLS-SBR, the authors include a regularization term to minimize the L-2 norm of the difference between the images without and with noise suppression via similarity matrix multiplication. By using all pixel information of the initial CT images rather than just those lying on or near edges, PWLS-SBR is superior to the previously developed PWLS-EPR, as supported by comparison studies on phantoms and a head-and-neck patient. Results: On the line-pair slice of the Catphan©600 phantom, PWLS-SBR outperforms PWLS-EPR and retains spatial resolution of 8 lp/cm, comparable to the original CT images, even at 90% reduction in noise standard deviation (STD). Similar performance on spatial resolution is observed on an anthropomorphic head phantom. In addition, results of PWLS-SBR show substantially improved image quality due to preservation of image NPS. On the Catphan©600 phantom, NPS using PWLS-SBR has a correlation of 93% with that via direct matrix inversion, while the correlation drops to −52% for PWLS-EPR. Electron density measurement studies indicate high accuracy of PWLS-SBR. On seven different materials, the measured elect
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4947485
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4859835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1787471023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-51cd778072048175b8726aa8fe4745b18918ac0f21c5967c3682dbffae75de483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV2P1CAUhonRuOPqhX_ANPHGmHQFCoXemJiJX8n6cbFeE0pPZzBM6QKdycyvl9pxs17o1QHOw8vLexB6TvAVIUS-IVesYYJJ_gCtKBNVyShuHqIVxg0rKcP8Aj2J8SfGuK44fowuqCAZE_UKnb56G6GI0zgGiNH6oeh9KLpJuxIGCJtjsb4p9lYXIwza2RN0xQHsZpvywoGOqYy3kw5Q-DHZnT3pNGscbNoWMe-dDjYdy1bHzAfYTPPBAj1Fj3rtIjw710v048P7m_Wn8vrbx8_rd9elYULwkhPTCSGxoJhJIngrBa21lj3kL_OWyIZIbXBPieFNLUxVS9q1fa9B8A6YrC7R20V3nNoddAaGFLRTY7A7HY7Ka6v-7gx2qzZ-r3Kgjax4Fni5CPiYrIrGJjBb44cBTFKU1jlswjL16vxM8LcTxKR2NhpwTg_gp6iIkIIJgmmV0Rf3Hd1Z-TOWDJQLcLAOjnd9gtU8b0XUed7qy_e5ZP71ws_mfof77zv_g_c-3BMfu776BZdduuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787471023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Harms, Joseph ; Wang, Tonghe ; Petrongolo, Michael ; Niu, Tianye ; Zhu, Lei</creator><creatorcontrib>Harms, Joseph ; Wang, Tonghe ; Petrongolo, Michael ; Niu, Tianye ; Zhu, Lei</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise suppression algorithm via penalized weighted least-square optimization with edge-preservation regularization (PWLS-EPR). In this paper, the authors improve method performance using the same framework of penalized weighted least-square optimization but with similarity-based regularization (PWLS-SBR), which substantially enhances the quality of decomposed images by retaining a more uniform noise power spectrum (NPS). Methods: The design of PWLS-SBR is based on the fact that averaging pixels of similar materials gives a low-noise image. For each pixel, the authors calculate the similarity to other pixels in its neighborhood by comparing CT values. Using an empirical Gaussian model, the authors assign high/low similarity value to one neighboring pixel if its CT value is close/far to the CT value of the pixel of interest. These similarity values are organized in matrix form, such that multiplication of the similarity matrix to the image vector reduces image noise. The similarity matrices are calculated on both high- and low-energy CT images and averaged. In PWLS-SBR, the authors include a regularization term to minimize the L-2 norm of the difference between the images without and with noise suppression via similarity matrix multiplication. By using all pixel information of the initial CT images rather than just those lying on or near edges, PWLS-SBR is superior to the previously developed PWLS-EPR, as supported by comparison studies on phantoms and a head-and-neck patient. Results: On the line-pair slice of the Catphan©600 phantom, PWLS-SBR outperforms PWLS-EPR and retains spatial resolution of 8 lp/cm, comparable to the original CT images, even at 90% reduction in noise standard deviation (STD). Similar performance on spatial resolution is observed on an anthropomorphic head phantom. In addition, results of PWLS-SBR show substantially improved image quality due to preservation of image NPS. On the Catphan©600 phantom, NPS using PWLS-SBR has a correlation of 93% with that via direct matrix inversion, while the correlation drops to −52% for PWLS-EPR. Electron density measurement studies indicate high accuracy of PWLS-SBR. On seven different materials, the measured electron densities calculated from the decomposed material images using PWLS-SBR have a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.20%, while the results of PWLS-EPR have a RMSE of 2.21%. In the study on a head-and-neck patient, PWLS-SBR is shown to reduce noise STD by a factor of 3 on material images with image qualities comparable to CT images, whereas fine structures are lost in the PWLS-EPR result. Additionally, PWLS-SBR better preserves low contrast on the tissue image. Conclusions: The authors propose improvements to the regularization term of an optimization framework which performs iterative image-domain decomposition for DECT with noise suppression. The regularization term avoids calculation of image gradient and is based on pixel similarity. The proposed method not only achieves a high decomposition accuracy, but also improves over the previous algorithm on NPS as well as spatial resolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4947485</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27147376</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; ACCURACY ; ALGORITHMS ; ANIMAL TISSUES ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY ; Computed tomography ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; CORRELATIONS ; Density measurement ; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING (IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING) ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; dual‐energy CT ; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE ; Gaussian processes ; General statistical methods ; HEAD ; Head - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; image denoising ; Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image ; IMAGE PROCESSING ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; image resolution ; image‐domain decomposition ; INHIBITION ; ITERATIVE METHODS ; least mean squares methods ; LEAST SQUARE FIT ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Matrix inversion ; Medical image noise ; medical image processing ; Medical image reconstruction ; Medical image spatial resolution ; Models, Anatomic ; NECK ; Noise ; noise suppression ; Numerical optimization ; optimisation ; OPTIMIZATION ; penalized weighted least‐square optimization ; PHANTOMS ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Probability theory ; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY ; SPATIAL RESOLUTION ; Tissues ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-05, Vol.43 (5), p.2676-2686</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-51cd778072048175b8726aa8fe4745b18918ac0f21c5967c3682dbffae75de483</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4947485$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4947485$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22620914$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harms, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tonghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrongolo, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Tianye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Lei</creatorcontrib><title>Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise suppression algorithm via penalized weighted least-square optimization with edge-preservation regularization (PWLS-EPR). In this paper, the authors improve method performance using the same framework of penalized weighted least-square optimization but with similarity-based regularization (PWLS-SBR), which substantially enhances the quality of decomposed images by retaining a more uniform noise power spectrum (NPS). Methods: The design of PWLS-SBR is based on the fact that averaging pixels of similar materials gives a low-noise image. For each pixel, the authors calculate the similarity to other pixels in its neighborhood by comparing CT values. Using an empirical Gaussian model, the authors assign high/low similarity value to one neighboring pixel if its CT value is close/far to the CT value of the pixel of interest. These similarity values are organized in matrix form, such that multiplication of the similarity matrix to the image vector reduces image noise. The similarity matrices are calculated on both high- and low-energy CT images and averaged. In PWLS-SBR, the authors include a regularization term to minimize the L-2 norm of the difference between the images without and with noise suppression via similarity matrix multiplication. By using all pixel information of the initial CT images rather than just those lying on or near edges, PWLS-SBR is superior to the previously developed PWLS-EPR, as supported by comparison studies on phantoms and a head-and-neck patient. Results: On the line-pair slice of the Catphan©600 phantom, PWLS-SBR outperforms PWLS-EPR and retains spatial resolution of 8 lp/cm, comparable to the original CT images, even at 90% reduction in noise standard deviation (STD). Similar performance on spatial resolution is observed on an anthropomorphic head phantom. In addition, results of PWLS-SBR show substantially improved image quality due to preservation of image NPS. On the Catphan©600 phantom, NPS using PWLS-SBR has a correlation of 93% with that via direct matrix inversion, while the correlation drops to −52% for PWLS-EPR. Electron density measurement studies indicate high accuracy of PWLS-SBR. On seven different materials, the measured electron densities calculated from the decomposed material images using PWLS-SBR have a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.20%, while the results of PWLS-EPR have a RMSE of 2.21%. In the study on a head-and-neck patient, PWLS-SBR is shown to reduce noise STD by a factor of 3 on material images with image qualities comparable to CT images, whereas fine structures are lost in the PWLS-EPR result. Additionally, PWLS-SBR better preserves low contrast on the tissue image. Conclusions: The authors propose improvements to the regularization term of an optimization framework which performs iterative image-domain decomposition for DECT with noise suppression. The regularization term avoids calculation of image gradient and is based on pixel similarity. The proposed method not only achieves a high decomposition accuracy, but also improves over the previous algorithm on NPS as well as spatial resolution.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>ANIMAL TISSUES</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>CORRELATIONS</subject><subject>Density measurement</subject><subject>DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING (IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING)</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>dual‐energy CT</subject><subject>ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE</subject><subject>Gaussian processes</subject><subject>General statistical methods</subject><subject>HEAD</subject><subject>Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>image denoising</subject><subject>Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image</subject><subject>IMAGE PROCESSING</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>image resolution</subject><subject>image‐domain decomposition</subject><subject>INHIBITION</subject><subject>ITERATIVE METHODS</subject><subject>least mean squares methods</subject><subject>LEAST SQUARE FIT</subject><subject>Least-Squares Analysis</subject><subject>Matrix inversion</subject><subject>Medical image noise</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical image spatial resolution</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>NECK</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>noise suppression</subject><subject>Numerical optimization</subject><subject>optimisation</subject><subject>OPTIMIZATION</subject><subject>penalized weighted least‐square optimization</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>SPATIAL RESOLUTION</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV2P1CAUhonRuOPqhX_ANPHGmHQFCoXemJiJX8n6cbFeE0pPZzBM6QKdycyvl9pxs17o1QHOw8vLexB6TvAVIUS-IVesYYJJ_gCtKBNVyShuHqIVxg0rKcP8Aj2J8SfGuK44fowuqCAZE_UKnb56G6GI0zgGiNH6oeh9KLpJuxIGCJtjsb4p9lYXIwza2RN0xQHsZpvywoGOqYy3kw5Q-DHZnT3pNGscbNoWMe-dDjYdy1bHzAfYTPPBAj1Fj3rtIjw710v048P7m_Wn8vrbx8_rd9elYULwkhPTCSGxoJhJIngrBa21lj3kL_OWyIZIbXBPieFNLUxVS9q1fa9B8A6YrC7R20V3nNoddAaGFLRTY7A7HY7Ka6v-7gx2qzZ-r3Kgjax4Fni5CPiYrIrGJjBb44cBTFKU1jlswjL16vxM8LcTxKR2NhpwTg_gp6iIkIIJgmmV0Rf3Hd1Z-TOWDJQLcLAOjnd9gtU8b0XUed7qy_e5ZP71ws_mfof77zv_g_c-3BMfu776BZdduuc</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Harms, Joseph</creator><creator>Wang, Tonghe</creator><creator>Petrongolo, Michael</creator><creator>Niu, Tianye</creator><creator>Zhu, Lei</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization</title><author>Harms, Joseph ; Wang, Tonghe ; Petrongolo, Michael ; Niu, Tianye ; Zhu, Lei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-51cd778072048175b8726aa8fe4745b18918ac0f21c5967c3682dbffae75de483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>ANIMAL TISSUES</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>CORRELATIONS</topic><topic>Density measurement</topic><topic>DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING (IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING)</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>dual‐energy CT</topic><topic>ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE</topic><topic>Gaussian processes</topic><topic>General statistical methods</topic><topic>HEAD</topic><topic>Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>image denoising</topic><topic>Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image</topic><topic>IMAGE PROCESSING</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>image resolution</topic><topic>image‐domain decomposition</topic><topic>INHIBITION</topic><topic>ITERATIVE METHODS</topic><topic>least mean squares methods</topic><topic>LEAST SQUARE FIT</topic><topic>Least-Squares Analysis</topic><topic>Matrix inversion</topic><topic>Medical image noise</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical image spatial resolution</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>NECK</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>noise suppression</topic><topic>Numerical optimization</topic><topic>optimisation</topic><topic>OPTIMIZATION</topic><topic>penalized weighted least‐square optimization</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>SPATIAL RESOLUTION</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harms, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tonghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrongolo, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Tianye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Lei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harms, Joseph</au><au>Wang, Tonghe</au><au>Petrongolo, Michael</au><au>Niu, Tianye</au><au>Zhu, Lei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2676</spage><epage>2686</epage><pages>2676-2686</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise suppression algorithm via penalized weighted least-square optimization with edge-preservation regularization (PWLS-EPR). In this paper, the authors improve method performance using the same framework of penalized weighted least-square optimization but with similarity-based regularization (PWLS-SBR), which substantially enhances the quality of decomposed images by retaining a more uniform noise power spectrum (NPS). Methods: The design of PWLS-SBR is based on the fact that averaging pixels of similar materials gives a low-noise image. For each pixel, the authors calculate the similarity to other pixels in its neighborhood by comparing CT values. Using an empirical Gaussian model, the authors assign high/low similarity value to one neighboring pixel if its CT value is close/far to the CT value of the pixel of interest. These similarity values are organized in matrix form, such that multiplication of the similarity matrix to the image vector reduces image noise. The similarity matrices are calculated on both high- and low-energy CT images and averaged. In PWLS-SBR, the authors include a regularization term to minimize the L-2 norm of the difference between the images without and with noise suppression via similarity matrix multiplication. By using all pixel information of the initial CT images rather than just those lying on or near edges, PWLS-SBR is superior to the previously developed PWLS-EPR, as supported by comparison studies on phantoms and a head-and-neck patient. Results: On the line-pair slice of the Catphan©600 phantom, PWLS-SBR outperforms PWLS-EPR and retains spatial resolution of 8 lp/cm, comparable to the original CT images, even at 90% reduction in noise standard deviation (STD). Similar performance on spatial resolution is observed on an anthropomorphic head phantom. In addition, results of PWLS-SBR show substantially improved image quality due to preservation of image NPS. On the Catphan©600 phantom, NPS using PWLS-SBR has a correlation of 93% with that via direct matrix inversion, while the correlation drops to −52% for PWLS-EPR. Electron density measurement studies indicate high accuracy of PWLS-SBR. On seven different materials, the measured electron densities calculated from the decomposed material images using PWLS-SBR have a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.20%, while the results of PWLS-EPR have a RMSE of 2.21%. In the study on a head-and-neck patient, PWLS-SBR is shown to reduce noise STD by a factor of 3 on material images with image qualities comparable to CT images, whereas fine structures are lost in the PWLS-EPR result. Additionally, PWLS-SBR better preserves low contrast on the tissue image. Conclusions: The authors propose improvements to the regularization term of an optimization framework which performs iterative image-domain decomposition for DECT with noise suppression. The regularization term avoids calculation of image gradient and is based on pixel similarity. The proposed method not only achieves a high decomposition accuracy, but also improves over the previous algorithm on NPS as well as spatial resolution.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>27147376</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4947485</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-05, Vol.43 (5), p.2676-2686
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4859835
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
ACCURACY
ALGORITHMS
ANIMAL TISSUES
Biological material, e.g. blood, urine
Haemocytometers
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY
Computed tomography
Computerised tomographs
computerised tomography
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
CORRELATIONS
Density measurement
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING (IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING)
Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
dual‐energy CT
ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE
Gaussian processes
General statistical methods
HEAD
Head - diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image data processing or generation, in general
image denoising
Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image
IMAGE PROCESSING
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
image resolution
image‐domain decomposition
INHIBITION
ITERATIVE METHODS
least mean squares methods
LEAST SQUARE FIT
Least-Squares Analysis
Matrix inversion
Medical image noise
medical image processing
Medical image reconstruction
Medical image spatial resolution
Models, Anatomic
NECK
Noise
noise suppression
Numerical optimization
optimisation
OPTIMIZATION
penalized weighted least‐square optimization
PHANTOMS
Phantoms, Imaging
Probability theory
RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
SPATIAL RESOLUTION
Tissues
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T08%3A31%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Noise%20suppression%20for%20dual-energy%20CT%20via%20penalized%20weighted%20least-square%20optimization%20with%20similarity-based%20regularization&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Harms,%20Joseph&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2676&rft.epage=2686&rft.pages=2676-2686&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4947485&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1787471023%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787471023&rft_id=info:pmid/27147376&rfr_iscdi=true