Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization
Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise sup...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2016-05, Vol.43 (5), p.2676-2686 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2686 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2676 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Harms, Joseph Wang, Tonghe Petrongolo, Michael Niu, Tianye Zhu, Lei |
description | Purpose:
Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise suppression algorithm via penalized weighted least-square optimization with edge-preservation regularization (PWLS-EPR). In this paper, the authors improve method performance using the same framework of penalized weighted least-square optimization but with similarity-based regularization (PWLS-SBR), which substantially enhances the quality of decomposed images by retaining a more uniform noise power spectrum (NPS).
Methods:
The design of PWLS-SBR is based on the fact that averaging pixels of similar materials gives a low-noise image. For each pixel, the authors calculate the similarity to other pixels in its neighborhood by comparing CT values. Using an empirical Gaussian model, the authors assign high/low similarity value to one neighboring pixel if its CT value is close/far to the CT value of the pixel of interest. These similarity values are organized in matrix form, such that multiplication of the similarity matrix to the image vector reduces image noise. The similarity matrices are calculated on both high- and low-energy CT images and averaged. In PWLS-SBR, the authors include a regularization term to minimize the L-2 norm of the difference between the images without and with noise suppression via similarity matrix multiplication. By using all pixel information of the initial CT images rather than just those lying on or near edges, PWLS-SBR is superior to the previously developed PWLS-EPR, as supported by comparison studies on phantoms and a head-and-neck patient.
Results:
On the line-pair slice of the Catphan©600 phantom, PWLS-SBR outperforms PWLS-EPR and retains spatial resolution of 8 lp/cm, comparable to the original CT images, even at 90% reduction in noise standard deviation (STD). Similar performance on spatial resolution is observed on an anthropomorphic head phantom. In addition, results of PWLS-SBR show substantially improved image quality due to preservation of image NPS. On the Catphan©600 phantom, NPS using PWLS-SBR has a correlation of 93% with that via direct matrix inversion, while the correlation drops to −52% for PWLS-EPR. Electron density measurement studies indicate high accuracy of PWLS-SBR. On seven different materials, the measured elect |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.4947485 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4859835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1787471023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-51cd778072048175b8726aa8fe4745b18918ac0f21c5967c3682dbffae75de483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV2P1CAUhonRuOPqhX_ANPHGmHQFCoXemJiJX8n6cbFeE0pPZzBM6QKdycyvl9pxs17o1QHOw8vLexB6TvAVIUS-IVesYYJJ_gCtKBNVyShuHqIVxg0rKcP8Aj2J8SfGuK44fowuqCAZE_UKnb56G6GI0zgGiNH6oeh9KLpJuxIGCJtjsb4p9lYXIwza2RN0xQHsZpvywoGOqYy3kw5Q-DHZnT3pNGscbNoWMe-dDjYdy1bHzAfYTPPBAj1Fj3rtIjw710v048P7m_Wn8vrbx8_rd9elYULwkhPTCSGxoJhJIngrBa21lj3kL_OWyIZIbXBPieFNLUxVS9q1fa9B8A6YrC7R20V3nNoddAaGFLRTY7A7HY7Ka6v-7gx2qzZ-r3Kgjax4Fni5CPiYrIrGJjBb44cBTFKU1jlswjL16vxM8LcTxKR2NhpwTg_gp6iIkIIJgmmV0Rf3Hd1Z-TOWDJQLcLAOjnd9gtU8b0XUed7qy_e5ZP71ws_mfof77zv_g_c-3BMfu776BZdduuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787471023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Harms, Joseph ; Wang, Tonghe ; Petrongolo, Michael ; Niu, Tianye ; Zhu, Lei</creator><creatorcontrib>Harms, Joseph ; Wang, Tonghe ; Petrongolo, Michael ; Niu, Tianye ; Zhu, Lei</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise suppression algorithm via penalized weighted least-square optimization with edge-preservation regularization (PWLS-EPR). In this paper, the authors improve method performance using the same framework of penalized weighted least-square optimization but with similarity-based regularization (PWLS-SBR), which substantially enhances the quality of decomposed images by retaining a more uniform noise power spectrum (NPS).
Methods:
The design of PWLS-SBR is based on the fact that averaging pixels of similar materials gives a low-noise image. For each pixel, the authors calculate the similarity to other pixels in its neighborhood by comparing CT values. Using an empirical Gaussian model, the authors assign high/low similarity value to one neighboring pixel if its CT value is close/far to the CT value of the pixel of interest. These similarity values are organized in matrix form, such that multiplication of the similarity matrix to the image vector reduces image noise. The similarity matrices are calculated on both high- and low-energy CT images and averaged. In PWLS-SBR, the authors include a regularization term to minimize the L-2 norm of the difference between the images without and with noise suppression via similarity matrix multiplication. By using all pixel information of the initial CT images rather than just those lying on or near edges, PWLS-SBR is superior to the previously developed PWLS-EPR, as supported by comparison studies on phantoms and a head-and-neck patient.
Results:
On the line-pair slice of the Catphan©600 phantom, PWLS-SBR outperforms PWLS-EPR and retains spatial resolution of 8 lp/cm, comparable to the original CT images, even at 90% reduction in noise standard deviation (STD). Similar performance on spatial resolution is observed on an anthropomorphic head phantom. In addition, results of PWLS-SBR show substantially improved image quality due to preservation of image NPS. On the Catphan©600 phantom, NPS using PWLS-SBR has a correlation of 93% with that via direct matrix inversion, while the correlation drops to −52% for PWLS-EPR. Electron density measurement studies indicate high accuracy of PWLS-SBR. On seven different materials, the measured electron densities calculated from the decomposed material images using PWLS-SBR have a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.20%, while the results of PWLS-EPR have a RMSE of 2.21%. In the study on a head-and-neck patient, PWLS-SBR is shown to reduce noise STD by a factor of 3 on material images with image qualities comparable to CT images, whereas fine structures are lost in the PWLS-EPR result. Additionally, PWLS-SBR better preserves low contrast on the tissue image.
Conclusions:
The authors propose improvements to the regularization term of an optimization framework which performs iterative image-domain decomposition for DECT with noise suppression. The regularization term avoids calculation of image gradient and is based on pixel similarity. The proposed method not only achieves a high decomposition accuracy, but also improves over the previous algorithm on NPS as well as spatial resolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4947485</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27147376</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; ACCURACY ; ALGORITHMS ; ANIMAL TISSUES ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY ; Computed tomography ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; CORRELATIONS ; Density measurement ; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING (IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING) ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; dual‐energy CT ; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE ; Gaussian processes ; General statistical methods ; HEAD ; Head - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; image denoising ; Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image ; IMAGE PROCESSING ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; image resolution ; image‐domain decomposition ; INHIBITION ; ITERATIVE METHODS ; least mean squares methods ; LEAST SQUARE FIT ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Matrix inversion ; Medical image noise ; medical image processing ; Medical image reconstruction ; Medical image spatial resolution ; Models, Anatomic ; NECK ; Noise ; noise suppression ; Numerical optimization ; optimisation ; OPTIMIZATION ; penalized weighted least‐square optimization ; PHANTOMS ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Probability theory ; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY ; SPATIAL RESOLUTION ; Tissues ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-05, Vol.43 (5), p.2676-2686</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-51cd778072048175b8726aa8fe4745b18918ac0f21c5967c3682dbffae75de483</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4947485$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4947485$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22620914$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harms, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tonghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrongolo, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Tianye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Lei</creatorcontrib><title>Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose:
Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise suppression algorithm via penalized weighted least-square optimization with edge-preservation regularization (PWLS-EPR). In this paper, the authors improve method performance using the same framework of penalized weighted least-square optimization but with similarity-based regularization (PWLS-SBR), which substantially enhances the quality of decomposed images by retaining a more uniform noise power spectrum (NPS).
Methods:
The design of PWLS-SBR is based on the fact that averaging pixels of similar materials gives a low-noise image. For each pixel, the authors calculate the similarity to other pixels in its neighborhood by comparing CT values. Using an empirical Gaussian model, the authors assign high/low similarity value to one neighboring pixel if its CT value is close/far to the CT value of the pixel of interest. These similarity values are organized in matrix form, such that multiplication of the similarity matrix to the image vector reduces image noise. The similarity matrices are calculated on both high- and low-energy CT images and averaged. In PWLS-SBR, the authors include a regularization term to minimize the L-2 norm of the difference between the images without and with noise suppression via similarity matrix multiplication. By using all pixel information of the initial CT images rather than just those lying on or near edges, PWLS-SBR is superior to the previously developed PWLS-EPR, as supported by comparison studies on phantoms and a head-and-neck patient.
Results:
On the line-pair slice of the Catphan©600 phantom, PWLS-SBR outperforms PWLS-EPR and retains spatial resolution of 8 lp/cm, comparable to the original CT images, even at 90% reduction in noise standard deviation (STD). Similar performance on spatial resolution is observed on an anthropomorphic head phantom. In addition, results of PWLS-SBR show substantially improved image quality due to preservation of image NPS. On the Catphan©600 phantom, NPS using PWLS-SBR has a correlation of 93% with that via direct matrix inversion, while the correlation drops to −52% for PWLS-EPR. Electron density measurement studies indicate high accuracy of PWLS-SBR. On seven different materials, the measured electron densities calculated from the decomposed material images using PWLS-SBR have a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.20%, while the results of PWLS-EPR have a RMSE of 2.21%. In the study on a head-and-neck patient, PWLS-SBR is shown to reduce noise STD by a factor of 3 on material images with image qualities comparable to CT images, whereas fine structures are lost in the PWLS-EPR result. Additionally, PWLS-SBR better preserves low contrast on the tissue image.
Conclusions:
The authors propose improvements to the regularization term of an optimization framework which performs iterative image-domain decomposition for DECT with noise suppression. The regularization term avoids calculation of image gradient and is based on pixel similarity. The proposed method not only achieves a high decomposition accuracy, but also improves over the previous algorithm on NPS as well as spatial resolution.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>ANIMAL TISSUES</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>CORRELATIONS</subject><subject>Density measurement</subject><subject>DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING (IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING)</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>dual‐energy CT</subject><subject>ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE</subject><subject>Gaussian processes</subject><subject>General statistical methods</subject><subject>HEAD</subject><subject>Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>image denoising</subject><subject>Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image</subject><subject>IMAGE PROCESSING</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>image resolution</subject><subject>image‐domain decomposition</subject><subject>INHIBITION</subject><subject>ITERATIVE METHODS</subject><subject>least mean squares methods</subject><subject>LEAST SQUARE FIT</subject><subject>Least-Squares Analysis</subject><subject>Matrix inversion</subject><subject>Medical image noise</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical image spatial resolution</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>NECK</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>noise suppression</subject><subject>Numerical optimization</subject><subject>optimisation</subject><subject>OPTIMIZATION</subject><subject>penalized weighted least‐square optimization</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>SPATIAL RESOLUTION</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV2P1CAUhonRuOPqhX_ANPHGmHQFCoXemJiJX8n6cbFeE0pPZzBM6QKdycyvl9pxs17o1QHOw8vLexB6TvAVIUS-IVesYYJJ_gCtKBNVyShuHqIVxg0rKcP8Aj2J8SfGuK44fowuqCAZE_UKnb56G6GI0zgGiNH6oeh9KLpJuxIGCJtjsb4p9lYXIwza2RN0xQHsZpvywoGOqYy3kw5Q-DHZnT3pNGscbNoWMe-dDjYdy1bHzAfYTPPBAj1Fj3rtIjw710v048P7m_Wn8vrbx8_rd9elYULwkhPTCSGxoJhJIngrBa21lj3kL_OWyIZIbXBPieFNLUxVS9q1fa9B8A6YrC7R20V3nNoddAaGFLRTY7A7HY7Ka6v-7gx2qzZ-r3Kgjax4Fni5CPiYrIrGJjBb44cBTFKU1jlswjL16vxM8LcTxKR2NhpwTg_gp6iIkIIJgmmV0Rf3Hd1Z-TOWDJQLcLAOjnd9gtU8b0XUed7qy_e5ZP71ws_mfof77zv_g_c-3BMfu776BZdduuc</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Harms, Joseph</creator><creator>Wang, Tonghe</creator><creator>Petrongolo, Michael</creator><creator>Niu, Tianye</creator><creator>Zhu, Lei</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization</title><author>Harms, Joseph ; Wang, Tonghe ; Petrongolo, Michael ; Niu, Tianye ; Zhu, Lei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4775-51cd778072048175b8726aa8fe4745b18918ac0f21c5967c3682dbffae75de483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>ANIMAL TISSUES</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>CORRELATIONS</topic><topic>Density measurement</topic><topic>DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING (IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING)</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>dual‐energy CT</topic><topic>ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE</topic><topic>Gaussian processes</topic><topic>General statistical methods</topic><topic>HEAD</topic><topic>Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>image denoising</topic><topic>Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image</topic><topic>IMAGE PROCESSING</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>image resolution</topic><topic>image‐domain decomposition</topic><topic>INHIBITION</topic><topic>ITERATIVE METHODS</topic><topic>least mean squares methods</topic><topic>LEAST SQUARE FIT</topic><topic>Least-Squares Analysis</topic><topic>Matrix inversion</topic><topic>Medical image noise</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical image spatial resolution</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>NECK</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>noise suppression</topic><topic>Numerical optimization</topic><topic>optimisation</topic><topic>OPTIMIZATION</topic><topic>penalized weighted least‐square optimization</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>SPATIAL RESOLUTION</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harms, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tonghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrongolo, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Tianye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Lei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harms, Joseph</au><au>Wang, Tonghe</au><au>Petrongolo, Michael</au><au>Niu, Tianye</au><au>Zhu, Lei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2676</spage><epage>2686</epage><pages>2676-2686</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose:
Dual-energy CT (DECT) expands applications of CT imaging in its capability to decompose CT images into material images. However, decomposition via direct matrix inversion leads to large noise amplification and limits quantitative use of DECT. Their group has previously developed a noise suppression algorithm via penalized weighted least-square optimization with edge-preservation regularization (PWLS-EPR). In this paper, the authors improve method performance using the same framework of penalized weighted least-square optimization but with similarity-based regularization (PWLS-SBR), which substantially enhances the quality of decomposed images by retaining a more uniform noise power spectrum (NPS).
Methods:
The design of PWLS-SBR is based on the fact that averaging pixels of similar materials gives a low-noise image. For each pixel, the authors calculate the similarity to other pixels in its neighborhood by comparing CT values. Using an empirical Gaussian model, the authors assign high/low similarity value to one neighboring pixel if its CT value is close/far to the CT value of the pixel of interest. These similarity values are organized in matrix form, such that multiplication of the similarity matrix to the image vector reduces image noise. The similarity matrices are calculated on both high- and low-energy CT images and averaged. In PWLS-SBR, the authors include a regularization term to minimize the L-2 norm of the difference between the images without and with noise suppression via similarity matrix multiplication. By using all pixel information of the initial CT images rather than just those lying on or near edges, PWLS-SBR is superior to the previously developed PWLS-EPR, as supported by comparison studies on phantoms and a head-and-neck patient.
Results:
On the line-pair slice of the Catphan©600 phantom, PWLS-SBR outperforms PWLS-EPR and retains spatial resolution of 8 lp/cm, comparable to the original CT images, even at 90% reduction in noise standard deviation (STD). Similar performance on spatial resolution is observed on an anthropomorphic head phantom. In addition, results of PWLS-SBR show substantially improved image quality due to preservation of image NPS. On the Catphan©600 phantom, NPS using PWLS-SBR has a correlation of 93% with that via direct matrix inversion, while the correlation drops to −52% for PWLS-EPR. Electron density measurement studies indicate high accuracy of PWLS-SBR. On seven different materials, the measured electron densities calculated from the decomposed material images using PWLS-SBR have a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.20%, while the results of PWLS-EPR have a RMSE of 2.21%. In the study on a head-and-neck patient, PWLS-SBR is shown to reduce noise STD by a factor of 3 on material images with image qualities comparable to CT images, whereas fine structures are lost in the PWLS-EPR result. Additionally, PWLS-SBR better preserves low contrast on the tissue image.
Conclusions:
The authors propose improvements to the regularization term of an optimization framework which performs iterative image-domain decomposition for DECT with noise suppression. The regularization term avoids calculation of image gradient and is based on pixel similarity. The proposed method not only achieves a high decomposition accuracy, but also improves over the previous algorithm on NPS as well as spatial resolution.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>27147376</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4947485</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-05, Vol.43 (5), p.2676-2686 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4859835 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ACCURACY ALGORITHMS ANIMAL TISSUES Biological material, e.g. blood, urine Haemocytometers BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY Computed tomography Computerised tomographs computerised tomography COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY CORRELATIONS Density measurement DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING (IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING) Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications dual‐energy CT ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE Gaussian processes General statistical methods HEAD Head - diagnostic imaging Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Humans Image data processing or generation, in general image denoising Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image IMAGE PROCESSING Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods image resolution image‐domain decomposition INHIBITION ITERATIVE METHODS least mean squares methods LEAST SQUARE FIT Least-Squares Analysis Matrix inversion Medical image noise medical image processing Medical image reconstruction Medical image spatial resolution Models, Anatomic NECK Noise noise suppression Numerical optimization optimisation OPTIMIZATION penalized weighted least‐square optimization PHANTOMS Phantoms, Imaging Probability theory RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY SPATIAL RESOLUTION Tissues Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T08%3A31%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Noise%20suppression%20for%20dual-energy%20CT%20via%20penalized%20weighted%20least-square%20optimization%20with%20similarity-based%20regularization&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Harms,%20Joseph&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2676&rft.epage=2686&rft.pages=2676-2686&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4947485&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1787471023%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787471023&rft_id=info:pmid/27147376&rfr_iscdi=true |