Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management

Managing water for sustainable use and economic development is both a technical and a governance challenge in which knowledge production and sharing play a central role. This article evaluates and compares the role of participatory governance and scientific information in decision-making in four bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2016-04, Vol.113 (17), p.4591-4596
Hauptverfasser: Jacobs, Katharine, Lebel, Louis, Buizer, James, Addams, Lee, Matson, Pamela, McCullough, Ellen, Garden, Po, Saliba, George, Finan, Timothy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4596
container_issue 17
container_start_page 4591
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 113
creator Jacobs, Katharine
Lebel, Louis
Buizer, James
Addams, Lee
Matson, Pamela
McCullough, Ellen
Garden, Po
Saliba, George
Finan, Timothy
description Managing water for sustainable use and economic development is both a technical and a governance challenge in which knowledge production and sharing play a central role. This article evaluates and compares the role of participatory governance and scientific information in decision-making in four basins in Brazil, Mexico, Thailand, and the United States. Water management institutions in each of the basins have evolved during the last 10–20 years from a relatively centralized water-management structure at the state or national level to a decision structure that involves engaging water users within the basins and the development of participatory processes. This change is consistent with global trends in which states increasingly are expected to gain public acceptance for larger water projects and policy changes. In each case, expanded citizen engagement in identifying options and in decision-making processes has resulted in more complexity but also has expanded the culture of integrated learning. International funding for water infrastructure has been linked to requirements for participatory management processes, but, ironically, this study finds that participatory processes appear to work better in the context of decisions that are short-term and easily adjusted, such as water-allocation decisions, and do not work so well for longer-term, high-stakes decisions regarding infrastructure. A second important observation is that the costs of capacity building to allow meaningful stakeholder engagement in water-man-agement decision processes are not widely recognized. Failure to appreciate the associated costs and complexities may contribute to the lack of successful engagement of citizens in decisions regarding infrastructure.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.0813125107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4855563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26469394</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26469394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e08673ba0de4012fab0e8dbdf829351713c64ba95d6c67e61df5660de00346c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1v1DAQBmALgei2cOYEWOqFS9px_BH7UglVfEkrcQGulpM4u94m9mI7VPx7HO2yBU6cLNnPvJ7RIPSCwBWBhl7vvUlXIAklNS8Xj9CKgCKVYAoeoxVA3VSS1ewMnae0AwDFJTxFZzWABEHICn1bO3_n_Abf-XA_2n5j8b3LW2y67ILHzuO8tXg_xzS7jMOA05yycd60Y5Em21hFm8IcO5vwZLzZ2Mn6_Aw9GcyY7PPjeYG-vn_35fZjtf784dPt23XVMcVzZUGKhrYGesuA1INpwcq-7QdZK8pJQ2gnWGsU70UnGitIP3AhigagTHQ1vUA3h9z93E6278rX0Yx6H91k4k8djNN_v3i31ZvwQzPJORe0BLw5BsTwfbYp68mlzo6j8TbMSZNG8prQplno5T90V-b2ZbxFKU6phPo_VOm8qOuD6mJIKdrh1DIBvWxWL5vVD5stFa_-nPTkf6-ygNdHsFSe4ggt_2rG1SJeHsQu5RAfEgQTiipGfwEG8bN5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789533346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Jacobs, Katharine ; Lebel, Louis ; Buizer, James ; Addams, Lee ; Matson, Pamela ; McCullough, Ellen ; Garden, Po ; Saliba, George ; Finan, Timothy</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Katharine ; Lebel, Louis ; Buizer, James ; Addams, Lee ; Matson, Pamela ; McCullough, Ellen ; Garden, Po ; Saliba, George ; Finan, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>Managing water for sustainable use and economic development is both a technical and a governance challenge in which knowledge production and sharing play a central role. This article evaluates and compares the role of participatory governance and scientific information in decision-making in four basins in Brazil, Mexico, Thailand, and the United States. Water management institutions in each of the basins have evolved during the last 10–20 years from a relatively centralized water-management structure at the state or national level to a decision structure that involves engaging water users within the basins and the development of participatory processes. This change is consistent with global trends in which states increasingly are expected to gain public acceptance for larger water projects and policy changes. In each case, expanded citizen engagement in identifying options and in decision-making processes has resulted in more complexity but also has expanded the culture of integrated learning. International funding for water infrastructure has been linked to requirements for participatory management processes, but, ironically, this study finds that participatory processes appear to work better in the context of decisions that are short-term and easily adjusted, such as water-allocation decisions, and do not work so well for longer-term, high-stakes decisions regarding infrastructure. A second important observation is that the costs of capacity building to allow meaningful stakeholder engagement in water-man-agement decision processes are not widely recognized. Failure to appreciate the associated costs and complexities may contribute to the lack of successful engagement of citizens in decisions regarding infrastructure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0813125107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20080611</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Basins ; Brazil ; Community Participation ; Comparative analysis ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Decision Making ; Economic development ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Mexico ; Physical Sciences ; Social Sciences ; Thailand ; Uncertainty ; United States ; Water Resources ; Water resources management</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2016-04, Vol.113 (17), p.4591-4596</ispartof><rights>Volumes 1–89 and 106–113, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Apr 26, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e08673ba0de4012fab0e8dbdf829351713c64ba95d6c67e61df5660de00346c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e08673ba0de4012fab0e8dbdf829351713c64ba95d6c67e61df5660de00346c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/113/17.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26469394$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26469394$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20080611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebel, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buizer, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addams, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matson, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garden, Po</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finan, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Managing water for sustainable use and economic development is both a technical and a governance challenge in which knowledge production and sharing play a central role. This article evaluates and compares the role of participatory governance and scientific information in decision-making in four basins in Brazil, Mexico, Thailand, and the United States. Water management institutions in each of the basins have evolved during the last 10–20 years from a relatively centralized water-management structure at the state or national level to a decision structure that involves engaging water users within the basins and the development of participatory processes. This change is consistent with global trends in which states increasingly are expected to gain public acceptance for larger water projects and policy changes. In each case, expanded citizen engagement in identifying options and in decision-making processes has resulted in more complexity but also has expanded the culture of integrated learning. International funding for water infrastructure has been linked to requirements for participatory management processes, but, ironically, this study finds that participatory processes appear to work better in the context of decisions that are short-term and easily adjusted, such as water-allocation decisions, and do not work so well for longer-term, high-stakes decisions regarding infrastructure. A second important observation is that the costs of capacity building to allow meaningful stakeholder engagement in water-man-agement decision processes are not widely recognized. Failure to appreciate the associated costs and complexities may contribute to the lack of successful engagement of citizens in decisions regarding infrastructure.</description><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Community Participation</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Water Resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1v1DAQBmALgei2cOYEWOqFS9px_BH7UglVfEkrcQGulpM4u94m9mI7VPx7HO2yBU6cLNnPvJ7RIPSCwBWBhl7vvUlXIAklNS8Xj9CKgCKVYAoeoxVA3VSS1ewMnae0AwDFJTxFZzWABEHICn1bO3_n_Abf-XA_2n5j8b3LW2y67ILHzuO8tXg_xzS7jMOA05yycd60Y5Em21hFm8IcO5vwZLzZ2Mn6_Aw9GcyY7PPjeYG-vn_35fZjtf784dPt23XVMcVzZUGKhrYGesuA1INpwcq-7QdZK8pJQ2gnWGsU70UnGitIP3AhigagTHQ1vUA3h9z93E6278rX0Yx6H91k4k8djNN_v3i31ZvwQzPJORe0BLw5BsTwfbYp68mlzo6j8TbMSZNG8prQplno5T90V-b2ZbxFKU6phPo_VOm8qOuD6mJIKdrh1DIBvWxWL5vVD5stFa_-nPTkf6-ygNdHsFSe4ggt_2rG1SJeHsQu5RAfEgQTiipGfwEG8bN5</recordid><startdate>20160426</startdate><enddate>20160426</enddate><creator>Jacobs, Katharine</creator><creator>Lebel, Louis</creator><creator>Buizer, James</creator><creator>Addams, Lee</creator><creator>Matson, Pamela</creator><creator>McCullough, Ellen</creator><creator>Garden, Po</creator><creator>Saliba, George</creator><creator>Finan, Timothy</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160426</creationdate><title>Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management</title><author>Jacobs, Katharine ; Lebel, Louis ; Buizer, James ; Addams, Lee ; Matson, Pamela ; McCullough, Ellen ; Garden, Po ; Saliba, George ; Finan, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-e08673ba0de4012fab0e8dbdf829351713c64ba95d6c67e61df5660de00346c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Community Participation</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Water Resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebel, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buizer, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addams, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matson, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garden, Po</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finan, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobs, Katharine</au><au>Lebel, Louis</au><au>Buizer, James</au><au>Addams, Lee</au><au>Matson, Pamela</au><au>McCullough, Ellen</au><au>Garden, Po</au><au>Saliba, George</au><au>Finan, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2016-04-26</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>4591</spage><epage>4596</epage><pages>4591-4596</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Managing water for sustainable use and economic development is both a technical and a governance challenge in which knowledge production and sharing play a central role. This article evaluates and compares the role of participatory governance and scientific information in decision-making in four basins in Brazil, Mexico, Thailand, and the United States. Water management institutions in each of the basins have evolved during the last 10–20 years from a relatively centralized water-management structure at the state or national level to a decision structure that involves engaging water users within the basins and the development of participatory processes. This change is consistent with global trends in which states increasingly are expected to gain public acceptance for larger water projects and policy changes. In each case, expanded citizen engagement in identifying options and in decision-making processes has resulted in more complexity but also has expanded the culture of integrated learning. International funding for water infrastructure has been linked to requirements for participatory management processes, but, ironically, this study finds that participatory processes appear to work better in the context of decisions that are short-term and easily adjusted, such as water-allocation decisions, and do not work so well for longer-term, high-stakes decisions regarding infrastructure. A second important observation is that the costs of capacity building to allow meaningful stakeholder engagement in water-man-agement decision processes are not widely recognized. Failure to appreciate the associated costs and complexities may contribute to the lack of successful engagement of citizens in decisions regarding infrastructure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>20080611</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.0813125107</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2016-04, Vol.113 (17), p.4591-4596
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4855563
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Basins
Brazil
Community Participation
Comparative analysis
Conservation of Natural Resources
Decision Making
Economic development
Humans
Knowledge
Mexico
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Thailand
Uncertainty
United States
Water Resources
Water resources management
title Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A23%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linking%20knowledge%20with%20action%20in%20the%20pursuit%20of%20sustainable%20water-resources%20management&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Jacobs,%20Katharine&rft.date=2016-04-26&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=4591&rft.epage=4596&rft.pages=4591-4596&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.0813125107&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26469394%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789533346&rft_id=info:pmid/20080611&rft_jstor_id=26469394&rfr_iscdi=true