A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients
Introduction Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in therapy 2016-04, Vol.33 (4), p.626-642 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 642 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 626 |
container_title | Advances in therapy |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Chastek, Benjamin White, John Van Voorhis, Damon Tang, Derek Stolshek, Bradley S. |
description | Introduction
Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment for these conditions.
Methods
Data were obtained from the Optum Research Database. Patients were aged 18–63 years with diagnosis of moderate to severe RA, PsO, PsA, and/or AS and first (index) claim for biologics abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab or non-biologic tofacitinib between March 1, 2011 and February 28, 2013. One-year treatment costs were based on observed paid amounts and used to impute dosing. Treatment patterns (persistence, switching, discontinuing, restarting) were evaluated.
Results
Data from 20,159 patients were analyzed for index medications abatacept (
n
= 583), adalimumab (
n
= 6521), certolizumab pegol (
n
= 415), etanercept (
n
= 9116), golimumab (
n
= 231), infliximab (
n
= 1906), rituximab (
n
= 295), tocilizumab (
n
= 165), ustekinumab (
n
= 922), and tofacitinib (
n
= 5). For patients with RA only, costs were lowest for tofacitinib ($18,769), rituximab ($19,569), or abatacept ($21,877), and ranged from $23,682 to $30,269 for all other medications. For patients with PsO only, costs were lowest for adalimumab ($29,186), etanercept ($31,212), and infliximab ($32,409) compared with ustekinumab ($53,746). For patients with PsA only, costs were lowest for etanercept ($26,916), followed by golimumab ($27,987), adalimumab ($28,749), and infliximab ($31,974). Costs were lowest with etanercept for RA plus PsA ($25,477) and for PsO plus PsA ($29,376), and with golimumab for AS only ($24,225). Across indications, annual costs were $29,521, $27,488, and $28,672 for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively; persistence was greatest with infliximab (range 66–79%) compared with 11–59% for all other biologics.
Conclusion
One-year treatment costs varied considerably between medications and indications. Some newly approved agents had lower costs but further research is needed to confirm these estimates as more patients are treated.
Funding
Immunex (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc.) and Wyeth (acquired by Pfizer). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4846706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1785213137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-318f62b84845f03e5ea91796444a295b8b573eab08b84f3f75c609ff24bf07313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEotPCA7BBXrIJ2E4cOxukYURhoAhEOxI7y0nsGVeJHWynUvpoPB13fqhgw8KyrHPu-ax7suwFwa8JxvxNJLSgLMekynFBaD4_yhZEVCyHQx9nC8xLktNC_DjLzmO8xZhizsTT7IxWNcc1E4vs1xJ91yn4OOo22TuNVn7nQ0LXaepmeAyjCtZt0SbZ3t6rZL1DynWgxBSRN-id9b3f2hbd7HRQo9XxoH9afkZrt7ONTT6ctBktWyBFdOmnsM8eIGztTK-GQYFthkdn2wMkIuvQspv6hDbX6ItyaquBqoJG38CgXYrPsidG9VE_P90X2eby_c3qY3719cN6tbzKW4ZFygsiTEUbUYqSGVxoplVNeF2VZalozRrRMF5o1WABHlMYztoK18bQsjGYF6S4yN4ec8epGXTXAjuoXo7BDirM0isr_1Wc3cmtv5NArDiuIODVKSD4n5OOSQ42trrvldN-ipJwwSgBEgcrOVoPiwraPGAIlvvO5bFzCZ3LfedyhpmXf__vYeJPyWCgR0Mc913qIG-hAAc7-0_qbw7Su6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785213137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Chastek, Benjamin ; White, John ; Van Voorhis, Damon ; Tang, Derek ; Stolshek, Bradley S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chastek, Benjamin ; White, John ; Van Voorhis, Damon ; Tang, Derek ; Stolshek, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment for these conditions.
Methods
Data were obtained from the Optum Research Database. Patients were aged 18–63 years with diagnosis of moderate to severe RA, PsO, PsA, and/or AS and first (index) claim for biologics abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab or non-biologic tofacitinib between March 1, 2011 and February 28, 2013. One-year treatment costs were based on observed paid amounts and used to impute dosing. Treatment patterns (persistence, switching, discontinuing, restarting) were evaluated.
Results
Data from 20,159 patients were analyzed for index medications abatacept (
n
= 583), adalimumab (
n
= 6521), certolizumab pegol (
n
= 415), etanercept (
n
= 9116), golimumab (
n
= 231), infliximab (
n
= 1906), rituximab (
n
= 295), tocilizumab (
n
= 165), ustekinumab (
n
= 922), and tofacitinib (
n
= 5). For patients with RA only, costs were lowest for tofacitinib ($18,769), rituximab ($19,569), or abatacept ($21,877), and ranged from $23,682 to $30,269 for all other medications. For patients with PsO only, costs were lowest for adalimumab ($29,186), etanercept ($31,212), and infliximab ($32,409) compared with ustekinumab ($53,746). For patients with PsA only, costs were lowest for etanercept ($26,916), followed by golimumab ($27,987), adalimumab ($28,749), and infliximab ($31,974). Costs were lowest with etanercept for RA plus PsA ($25,477) and for PsO plus PsA ($29,376), and with golimumab for AS only ($24,225). Across indications, annual costs were $29,521, $27,488, and $28,672 for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively; persistence was greatest with infliximab (range 66–79%) compared with 11–59% for all other biologics.
Conclusion
One-year treatment costs varied considerably between medications and indications. Some newly approved agents had lower costs but further research is needed to confirm these estimates as more patients are treated.
Funding
Immunex (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc.) and Wyeth (acquired by Pfizer).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26970958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - classification ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - economics ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents - classification ; Antirheumatic Agents - economics ; Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Psoriatic - drug therapy ; Arthritis, Psoriatic - economics ; Arthritis, Psoriatic - immunology ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - economics ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology ; Biological Therapy - economics ; Biological Therapy - methods ; Biological Therapy - utilization ; Cardiology ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Janus Kinases - antagonists & inhibitors ; Male ; Managed Care Programs - statistics & numerical data ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Original Research ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Retrospective Studies ; Rheumatology ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - economics ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - immunology ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2016-04, Vol.33 (4), p.626-642</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-318f62b84845f03e5ea91796444a295b8b573eab08b84f3f75c609ff24bf07313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-318f62b84845f03e5ea91796444a295b8b573eab08b84f3f75c609ff24bf07313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26970958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chastek, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Voorhis, Damon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolshek, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction
Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment for these conditions.
Methods
Data were obtained from the Optum Research Database. Patients were aged 18–63 years with diagnosis of moderate to severe RA, PsO, PsA, and/or AS and first (index) claim for biologics abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab or non-biologic tofacitinib between March 1, 2011 and February 28, 2013. One-year treatment costs were based on observed paid amounts and used to impute dosing. Treatment patterns (persistence, switching, discontinuing, restarting) were evaluated.
Results
Data from 20,159 patients were analyzed for index medications abatacept (
n
= 583), adalimumab (
n
= 6521), certolizumab pegol (
n
= 415), etanercept (
n
= 9116), golimumab (
n
= 231), infliximab (
n
= 1906), rituximab (
n
= 295), tocilizumab (
n
= 165), ustekinumab (
n
= 922), and tofacitinib (
n
= 5). For patients with RA only, costs were lowest for tofacitinib ($18,769), rituximab ($19,569), or abatacept ($21,877), and ranged from $23,682 to $30,269 for all other medications. For patients with PsO only, costs were lowest for adalimumab ($29,186), etanercept ($31,212), and infliximab ($32,409) compared with ustekinumab ($53,746). For patients with PsA only, costs were lowest for etanercept ($26,916), followed by golimumab ($27,987), adalimumab ($28,749), and infliximab ($31,974). Costs were lowest with etanercept for RA plus PsA ($25,477) and for PsO plus PsA ($29,376), and with golimumab for AS only ($24,225). Across indications, annual costs were $29,521, $27,488, and $28,672 for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively; persistence was greatest with infliximab (range 66–79%) compared with 11–59% for all other biologics.
Conclusion
One-year treatment costs varied considerably between medications and indications. Some newly approved agents had lower costs but further research is needed to confirm these estimates as more patients are treated.
Funding
Immunex (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc.) and Wyeth (acquired by Pfizer).</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - classification</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - economics</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - classification</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - economics</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthritis, Psoriatic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Arthritis, Psoriatic - economics</subject><subject>Arthritis, Psoriatic - immunology</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - economics</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology</subject><subject>Biological Therapy - economics</subject><subject>Biological Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Biological Therapy - utilization</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Janus Kinases - antagonists & inhibitors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - economics</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - immunology</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEotPCA7BBXrIJ2E4cOxukYURhoAhEOxI7y0nsGVeJHWynUvpoPB13fqhgw8KyrHPu-ax7suwFwa8JxvxNJLSgLMekynFBaD4_yhZEVCyHQx9nC8xLktNC_DjLzmO8xZhizsTT7IxWNcc1E4vs1xJ91yn4OOo22TuNVn7nQ0LXaepmeAyjCtZt0SbZ3t6rZL1DynWgxBSRN-id9b3f2hbd7HRQo9XxoH9afkZrt7ONTT6ctBktWyBFdOmnsM8eIGztTK-GQYFthkdn2wMkIuvQspv6hDbX6ItyaquBqoJG38CgXYrPsidG9VE_P90X2eby_c3qY3719cN6tbzKW4ZFygsiTEUbUYqSGVxoplVNeF2VZalozRrRMF5o1WABHlMYztoK18bQsjGYF6S4yN4ec8epGXTXAjuoXo7BDirM0isr_1Wc3cmtv5NArDiuIODVKSD4n5OOSQ42trrvldN-ipJwwSgBEgcrOVoPiwraPGAIlvvO5bFzCZ3LfedyhpmXf__vYeJPyWCgR0Mc913qIG-hAAc7-0_qbw7Su6c</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Chastek, Benjamin</creator><creator>White, John</creator><creator>Van Voorhis, Damon</creator><creator>Tang, Derek</creator><creator>Stolshek, Bradley S.</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients</title><author>Chastek, Benjamin ; White, John ; Van Voorhis, Damon ; Tang, Derek ; Stolshek, Bradley S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-318f62b84845f03e5ea91796444a295b8b573eab08b84f3f75c609ff24bf07313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - classification</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - economics</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - classification</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - economics</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthritis, Psoriatic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Arthritis, Psoriatic - economics</topic><topic>Arthritis, Psoriatic - immunology</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - economics</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology</topic><topic>Biological Therapy - economics</topic><topic>Biological Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Biological Therapy - utilization</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Janus Kinases - antagonists & inhibitors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - economics</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - immunology</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chastek, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Voorhis, Damon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolshek, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chastek, Benjamin</au><au>White, John</au><au>Van Voorhis, Damon</au><au>Tang, Derek</au><au>Stolshek, Bradley S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><stitle>Adv Ther</stitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>642</epage><pages>626-642</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment for these conditions.
Methods
Data were obtained from the Optum Research Database. Patients were aged 18–63 years with diagnosis of moderate to severe RA, PsO, PsA, and/or AS and first (index) claim for biologics abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab or non-biologic tofacitinib between March 1, 2011 and February 28, 2013. One-year treatment costs were based on observed paid amounts and used to impute dosing. Treatment patterns (persistence, switching, discontinuing, restarting) were evaluated.
Results
Data from 20,159 patients were analyzed for index medications abatacept (
n
= 583), adalimumab (
n
= 6521), certolizumab pegol (
n
= 415), etanercept (
n
= 9116), golimumab (
n
= 231), infliximab (
n
= 1906), rituximab (
n
= 295), tocilizumab (
n
= 165), ustekinumab (
n
= 922), and tofacitinib (
n
= 5). For patients with RA only, costs were lowest for tofacitinib ($18,769), rituximab ($19,569), or abatacept ($21,877), and ranged from $23,682 to $30,269 for all other medications. For patients with PsO only, costs were lowest for adalimumab ($29,186), etanercept ($31,212), and infliximab ($32,409) compared with ustekinumab ($53,746). For patients with PsA only, costs were lowest for etanercept ($26,916), followed by golimumab ($27,987), adalimumab ($28,749), and infliximab ($31,974). Costs were lowest with etanercept for RA plus PsA ($25,477) and for PsO plus PsA ($29,376), and with golimumab for AS only ($24,225). Across indications, annual costs were $29,521, $27,488, and $28,672 for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively; persistence was greatest with infliximab (range 66–79%) compared with 11–59% for all other biologics.
Conclusion
One-year treatment costs varied considerably between medications and indications. Some newly approved agents had lower costs but further research is needed to confirm these estimates as more patients are treated.
Funding
Immunex (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc.) and Wyeth (acquired by Pfizer).</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>26970958</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-238X |
ispartof | Advances in therapy, 2016-04, Vol.33 (4), p.626-642 |
issn | 0741-238X 1865-8652 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4846706 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - classification Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - economics Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use Antirheumatic Agents - classification Antirheumatic Agents - economics Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use Arthritis, Psoriatic - drug therapy Arthritis, Psoriatic - economics Arthritis, Psoriatic - immunology Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy Arthritis, Rheumatoid - economics Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology Biological Therapy - economics Biological Therapy - methods Biological Therapy - utilization Cardiology Endocrinology Female Health Care Costs Health technology assessment Humans Internal Medicine Janus Kinases - antagonists & inhibitors Male Managed Care Programs - statistics & numerical data Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Oncology Original Research Pharmacology/Toxicology Retrospective Studies Rheumatology Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy Spondylitis, Ankylosing - economics Spondylitis, Ankylosing - immunology United States - epidemiology |
title | A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T10%3A15%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study%20Comparing%20Utilization%20and%20Costs%20of%20Biologic%20Therapies%20and%20JAK%20Inhibitor%20Therapy%20Across%20Four%20Common%20Inflammatory%20Indications%20in%20Adult%20US%20Managed%20Care%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=Chastek,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=642&rft.pages=626-642&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1785213137%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785213137&rft_id=info:pmid/26970958&rfr_iscdi=true |