A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients

Introduction Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in therapy 2016-04, Vol.33 (4), p.626-642
Hauptverfasser: Chastek, Benjamin, White, John, Van Voorhis, Damon, Tang, Derek, Stolshek, Bradley S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 642
container_issue 4
container_start_page 626
container_title Advances in therapy
container_volume 33
creator Chastek, Benjamin
White, John
Van Voorhis, Damon
Tang, Derek
Stolshek, Bradley S.
description Introduction Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment for these conditions. Methods Data were obtained from the Optum Research Database. Patients were aged 18–63 years with diagnosis of moderate to severe RA, PsO, PsA, and/or AS and first (index) claim for biologics abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab or non-biologic tofacitinib between March 1, 2011 and February 28, 2013. One-year treatment costs were based on observed paid amounts and used to impute dosing. Treatment patterns (persistence, switching, discontinuing, restarting) were evaluated. Results Data from 20,159 patients were analyzed for index medications abatacept ( n  = 583), adalimumab ( n  = 6521), certolizumab pegol ( n  = 415), etanercept ( n  = 9116), golimumab ( n  = 231), infliximab ( n  = 1906), rituximab ( n  = 295), tocilizumab ( n  = 165), ustekinumab ( n  = 922), and tofacitinib ( n  = 5). For patients with RA only, costs were lowest for tofacitinib ($18,769), rituximab ($19,569), or abatacept ($21,877), and ranged from $23,682 to $30,269 for all other medications. For patients with PsO only, costs were lowest for adalimumab ($29,186), etanercept ($31,212), and infliximab ($32,409) compared with ustekinumab ($53,746). For patients with PsA only, costs were lowest for etanercept ($26,916), followed by golimumab ($27,987), adalimumab ($28,749), and infliximab ($31,974). Costs were lowest with etanercept for RA plus PsA ($25,477) and for PsO plus PsA ($29,376), and with golimumab for AS only ($24,225). Across indications, annual costs were $29,521, $27,488, and $28,672 for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively; persistence was greatest with infliximab (range 66–79%) compared with 11–59% for all other biologics. Conclusion One-year treatment costs varied considerably between medications and indications. Some newly approved agents had lower costs but further research is needed to confirm these estimates as more patients are treated. Funding Immunex (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc.) and Wyeth (acquired by Pfizer).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4846706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1785213137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-318f62b84845f03e5ea91796444a295b8b573eab08b84f3f75c609ff24bf07313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEotPCA7BBXrIJ2E4cOxukYURhoAhEOxI7y0nsGVeJHWynUvpoPB13fqhgw8KyrHPu-ax7suwFwa8JxvxNJLSgLMekynFBaD4_yhZEVCyHQx9nC8xLktNC_DjLzmO8xZhizsTT7IxWNcc1E4vs1xJ91yn4OOo22TuNVn7nQ0LXaepmeAyjCtZt0SbZ3t6rZL1DynWgxBSRN-id9b3f2hbd7HRQo9XxoH9afkZrt7ONTT6ctBktWyBFdOmnsM8eIGztTK-GQYFthkdn2wMkIuvQspv6hDbX6ItyaquBqoJG38CgXYrPsidG9VE_P90X2eby_c3qY3719cN6tbzKW4ZFygsiTEUbUYqSGVxoplVNeF2VZalozRrRMF5o1WABHlMYztoK18bQsjGYF6S4yN4ec8epGXTXAjuoXo7BDirM0isr_1Wc3cmtv5NArDiuIODVKSD4n5OOSQ42trrvldN-ipJwwSgBEgcrOVoPiwraPGAIlvvO5bFzCZ3LfedyhpmXf__vYeJPyWCgR0Mc913qIG-hAAc7-0_qbw7Su6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785213137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Chastek, Benjamin ; White, John ; Van Voorhis, Damon ; Tang, Derek ; Stolshek, Bradley S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chastek, Benjamin ; White, John ; Van Voorhis, Damon ; Tang, Derek ; Stolshek, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment for these conditions. Methods Data were obtained from the Optum Research Database. Patients were aged 18–63 years with diagnosis of moderate to severe RA, PsO, PsA, and/or AS and first (index) claim for biologics abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab or non-biologic tofacitinib between March 1, 2011 and February 28, 2013. One-year treatment costs were based on observed paid amounts and used to impute dosing. Treatment patterns (persistence, switching, discontinuing, restarting) were evaluated. Results Data from 20,159 patients were analyzed for index medications abatacept ( n  = 583), adalimumab ( n  = 6521), certolizumab pegol ( n  = 415), etanercept ( n  = 9116), golimumab ( n  = 231), infliximab ( n  = 1906), rituximab ( n  = 295), tocilizumab ( n  = 165), ustekinumab ( n  = 922), and tofacitinib ( n  = 5). For patients with RA only, costs were lowest for tofacitinib ($18,769), rituximab ($19,569), or abatacept ($21,877), and ranged from $23,682 to $30,269 for all other medications. For patients with PsO only, costs were lowest for adalimumab ($29,186), etanercept ($31,212), and infliximab ($32,409) compared with ustekinumab ($53,746). For patients with PsA only, costs were lowest for etanercept ($26,916), followed by golimumab ($27,987), adalimumab ($28,749), and infliximab ($31,974). Costs were lowest with etanercept for RA plus PsA ($25,477) and for PsO plus PsA ($29,376), and with golimumab for AS only ($24,225). Across indications, annual costs were $29,521, $27,488, and $28,672 for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively; persistence was greatest with infliximab (range 66–79%) compared with 11–59% for all other biologics. Conclusion One-year treatment costs varied considerably between medications and indications. Some newly approved agents had lower costs but further research is needed to confirm these estimates as more patients are treated. Funding Immunex (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc.) and Wyeth (acquired by Pfizer).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26970958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - classification ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - economics ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Antirheumatic Agents - classification ; Antirheumatic Agents - economics ; Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Psoriatic - drug therapy ; Arthritis, Psoriatic - economics ; Arthritis, Psoriatic - immunology ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - economics ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology ; Biological Therapy - economics ; Biological Therapy - methods ; Biological Therapy - utilization ; Cardiology ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Janus Kinases - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Male ; Managed Care Programs - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Original Research ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Retrospective Studies ; Rheumatology ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - economics ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - immunology ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2016-04, Vol.33 (4), p.626-642</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-318f62b84845f03e5ea91796444a295b8b573eab08b84f3f75c609ff24bf07313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-318f62b84845f03e5ea91796444a295b8b573eab08b84f3f75c609ff24bf07313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26970958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chastek, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Voorhis, Damon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolshek, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment for these conditions. Methods Data were obtained from the Optum Research Database. Patients were aged 18–63 years with diagnosis of moderate to severe RA, PsO, PsA, and/or AS and first (index) claim for biologics abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab or non-biologic tofacitinib between March 1, 2011 and February 28, 2013. One-year treatment costs were based on observed paid amounts and used to impute dosing. Treatment patterns (persistence, switching, discontinuing, restarting) were evaluated. Results Data from 20,159 patients were analyzed for index medications abatacept ( n  = 583), adalimumab ( n  = 6521), certolizumab pegol ( n  = 415), etanercept ( n  = 9116), golimumab ( n  = 231), infliximab ( n  = 1906), rituximab ( n  = 295), tocilizumab ( n  = 165), ustekinumab ( n  = 922), and tofacitinib ( n  = 5). For patients with RA only, costs were lowest for tofacitinib ($18,769), rituximab ($19,569), or abatacept ($21,877), and ranged from $23,682 to $30,269 for all other medications. For patients with PsO only, costs were lowest for adalimumab ($29,186), etanercept ($31,212), and infliximab ($32,409) compared with ustekinumab ($53,746). For patients with PsA only, costs were lowest for etanercept ($26,916), followed by golimumab ($27,987), adalimumab ($28,749), and infliximab ($31,974). Costs were lowest with etanercept for RA plus PsA ($25,477) and for PsO plus PsA ($29,376), and with golimumab for AS only ($24,225). Across indications, annual costs were $29,521, $27,488, and $28,672 for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively; persistence was greatest with infliximab (range 66–79%) compared with 11–59% for all other biologics. Conclusion One-year treatment costs varied considerably between medications and indications. Some newly approved agents had lower costs but further research is needed to confirm these estimates as more patients are treated. Funding Immunex (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc.) and Wyeth (acquired by Pfizer).</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - classification</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - economics</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - classification</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - economics</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthritis, Psoriatic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Arthritis, Psoriatic - economics</subject><subject>Arthritis, Psoriatic - immunology</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - economics</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology</subject><subject>Biological Therapy - economics</subject><subject>Biological Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Biological Therapy - utilization</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Janus Kinases - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - economics</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - immunology</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEotPCA7BBXrIJ2E4cOxukYURhoAhEOxI7y0nsGVeJHWynUvpoPB13fqhgw8KyrHPu-ax7suwFwa8JxvxNJLSgLMekynFBaD4_yhZEVCyHQx9nC8xLktNC_DjLzmO8xZhizsTT7IxWNcc1E4vs1xJ91yn4OOo22TuNVn7nQ0LXaepmeAyjCtZt0SbZ3t6rZL1DynWgxBSRN-id9b3f2hbd7HRQo9XxoH9afkZrt7ONTT6ctBktWyBFdOmnsM8eIGztTK-GQYFthkdn2wMkIuvQspv6hDbX6ItyaquBqoJG38CgXYrPsidG9VE_P90X2eby_c3qY3719cN6tbzKW4ZFygsiTEUbUYqSGVxoplVNeF2VZalozRrRMF5o1WABHlMYztoK18bQsjGYF6S4yN4ec8epGXTXAjuoXo7BDirM0isr_1Wc3cmtv5NArDiuIODVKSD4n5OOSQ42trrvldN-ipJwwSgBEgcrOVoPiwraPGAIlvvO5bFzCZ3LfedyhpmXf__vYeJPyWCgR0Mc913qIG-hAAc7-0_qbw7Su6c</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Chastek, Benjamin</creator><creator>White, John</creator><creator>Van Voorhis, Damon</creator><creator>Tang, Derek</creator><creator>Stolshek, Bradley S.</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients</title><author>Chastek, Benjamin ; White, John ; Van Voorhis, Damon ; Tang, Derek ; Stolshek, Bradley S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-318f62b84845f03e5ea91796444a295b8b573eab08b84f3f75c609ff24bf07313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - classification</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - economics</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - classification</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - economics</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthritis, Psoriatic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Arthritis, Psoriatic - economics</topic><topic>Arthritis, Psoriatic - immunology</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - economics</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology</topic><topic>Biological Therapy - economics</topic><topic>Biological Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Biological Therapy - utilization</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Janus Kinases - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - economics</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - immunology</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chastek, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Voorhis, Damon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolshek, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chastek, Benjamin</au><au>White, John</au><au>Van Voorhis, Damon</au><au>Tang, Derek</au><au>Stolshek, Bradley S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><stitle>Adv Ther</stitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>642</epage><pages>626-642</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>Introduction Biologic therapies are used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data from a commercial claims database were used to evaluate utilization and cost of biologic treatment for these conditions. Methods Data were obtained from the Optum Research Database. Patients were aged 18–63 years with diagnosis of moderate to severe RA, PsO, PsA, and/or AS and first (index) claim for biologics abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, tocilizumab, or ustekinumab or non-biologic tofacitinib between March 1, 2011 and February 28, 2013. One-year treatment costs were based on observed paid amounts and used to impute dosing. Treatment patterns (persistence, switching, discontinuing, restarting) were evaluated. Results Data from 20,159 patients were analyzed for index medications abatacept ( n  = 583), adalimumab ( n  = 6521), certolizumab pegol ( n  = 415), etanercept ( n  = 9116), golimumab ( n  = 231), infliximab ( n  = 1906), rituximab ( n  = 295), tocilizumab ( n  = 165), ustekinumab ( n  = 922), and tofacitinib ( n  = 5). For patients with RA only, costs were lowest for tofacitinib ($18,769), rituximab ($19,569), or abatacept ($21,877), and ranged from $23,682 to $30,269 for all other medications. For patients with PsO only, costs were lowest for adalimumab ($29,186), etanercept ($31,212), and infliximab ($32,409) compared with ustekinumab ($53,746). For patients with PsA only, costs were lowest for etanercept ($26,916), followed by golimumab ($27,987), adalimumab ($28,749), and infliximab ($31,974). Costs were lowest with etanercept for RA plus PsA ($25,477) and for PsO plus PsA ($29,376), and with golimumab for AS only ($24,225). Across indications, annual costs were $29,521, $27,488, and $28,672 for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively; persistence was greatest with infliximab (range 66–79%) compared with 11–59% for all other biologics. Conclusion One-year treatment costs varied considerably between medications and indications. Some newly approved agents had lower costs but further research is needed to confirm these estimates as more patients are treated. Funding Immunex (a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc.) and Wyeth (acquired by Pfizer).</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>26970958</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-238X
ispartof Advances in therapy, 2016-04, Vol.33 (4), p.626-642
issn 0741-238X
1865-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4846706
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - classification
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - economics
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use
Antirheumatic Agents - classification
Antirheumatic Agents - economics
Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use
Arthritis, Psoriatic - drug therapy
Arthritis, Psoriatic - economics
Arthritis, Psoriatic - immunology
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - economics
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology
Biological Therapy - economics
Biological Therapy - methods
Biological Therapy - utilization
Cardiology
Endocrinology
Female
Health Care Costs
Health technology assessment
Humans
Internal Medicine
Janus Kinases - antagonists & inhibitors
Male
Managed Care Programs - statistics & numerical data
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Oncology
Original Research
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Retrospective Studies
Rheumatology
Spondylitis, Ankylosing - drug therapy
Spondylitis, Ankylosing - economics
Spondylitis, Ankylosing - immunology
United States - epidemiology
title A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T10%3A15%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study%20Comparing%20Utilization%20and%20Costs%20of%20Biologic%20Therapies%20and%20JAK%20Inhibitor%20Therapy%20Across%20Four%20Common%20Inflammatory%20Indications%20in%20Adult%20US%20Managed%20Care%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=Chastek,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=642&rft.pages=626-642&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1785213137%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785213137&rft_id=info:pmid/26970958&rfr_iscdi=true