A comparative study in fixation methods of medial malleolus fractures between tension bands wiring and screw fixation

Objectives The aim of this study is to compare two methods of internal fixations of fractured medial malleolus which are simple screw fixation and tension band wiring. Patients and methods Over 5 years we grouped 20 patients with fractured medial malleolus into two groups of operative treatments, gr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SpringerPlus 2016-04, Vol.5 (1), p.530-530, Article 530
Hauptverfasser: Mohammed, Ayyoub A., Abbas, Khalid Ahmed, Mawlood, Ammar Salah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 530
container_issue 1
container_start_page 530
container_title SpringerPlus
container_volume 5
creator Mohammed, Ayyoub A.
Abbas, Khalid Ahmed
Mawlood, Ammar Salah
description Objectives The aim of this study is to compare two methods of internal fixations of fractured medial malleolus which are simple screw fixation and tension band wiring. Patients and methods Over 5 years we grouped 20 patients with fractured medial malleolus into two groups of operative treatments, group1 treated by malleolar screw fixation and group2 by tension band wiring. The patients were with same age group, gender, fracture type, and etiology. We use statistical analysis for make a comparative study between the two ways of surgical treatment. Results The mean time for radiologic bone union was 11.8 weeks in group1 patients and 9.4 weeks in group2 patients (P = 0.03). No patients had any sign of fixation failure or Kirschner wires migration. According to the modified ankle scoring system of Olerud and Molander, excellent and good results were achieved in 80 % in group1 patients and 90 % in group2 patients (P = 0.049). Conclusions Tension-band wiring may be better treatment option for internal fixation of medial malleolar fractures than screw fixation. Recommendations From these findings we recommend a further randomized clinical trial of larger number of cases and longer follow-up duration in order to regard tension-band wiring a better operative option for fixation of medial malleolar fractures.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40064-016-2155-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4844571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4034520901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-e5591676037d021555efc912370b852d20e9c70da4283090973297c16135ac033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1r3DAUFKWlCWl-QC9F0EsvbvX0YVmXQgj9gkAv7Vlo5edEwZa2kp1N8usrs-myLVQXPaSZ0YyGkNfA3gN07YciGWtlw6BtOCjVPD4jpxyMaKBj8PxoPiHnpdyyuloNUrOX5ITrqiCNPCXLBfVp2rrs5nCHtMxL_0BDpEO4rycp0gnnm9QXmoY69sGNdHLjiGlcCh2y8_OSsdANzjvESGeMZWVtXKycXcghXtM60-Iz7g6qr8iLwY0Fz5_2M_Lz86cfl1-bq-9fvl1eXDW--pwbVMpAq1smdM_WkAoHb4ALzTad4j1naLxmvZO8E8wwowU32kMLQjnPhDgjH_e622VT3XuMc3aj3eYwufxgkwv275sYbux1urOyk1JpqALvngRy-rVgme0UisdxdBHTUizozmjVcWMq9O0_0Nu05FjjrSjJBFRDFQV7lM-plIzDwQwwu_Zq973a2qtdI9vHynlznOLA-NNiBfA9oGzXD8d89PR_VX8D2SGu_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784031033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study in fixation methods of medial malleolus fractures between tension bands wiring and screw fixation</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mohammed, Ayyoub A. ; Abbas, Khalid Ahmed ; Mawlood, Ammar Salah</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Ayyoub A. ; Abbas, Khalid Ahmed ; Mawlood, Ammar Salah</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The aim of this study is to compare two methods of internal fixations of fractured medial malleolus which are simple screw fixation and tension band wiring. Patients and methods Over 5 years we grouped 20 patients with fractured medial malleolus into two groups of operative treatments, group1 treated by malleolar screw fixation and group2 by tension band wiring. The patients were with same age group, gender, fracture type, and etiology. We use statistical analysis for make a comparative study between the two ways of surgical treatment. Results The mean time for radiologic bone union was 11.8 weeks in group1 patients and 9.4 weeks in group2 patients (P = 0.03). No patients had any sign of fixation failure or Kirschner wires migration. According to the modified ankle scoring system of Olerud and Molander, excellent and good results were achieved in 80 % in group1 patients and 90 % in group2 patients (P = 0.049). Conclusions Tension-band wiring may be better treatment option for internal fixation of medial malleolar fractures than screw fixation. Recommendations From these findings we recommend a further randomized clinical trial of larger number of cases and longer follow-up duration in order to regard tension-band wiring a better operative option for fixation of medial malleolar fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-1801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-1801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2155-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27186494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences ; Medicine ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>SpringerPlus, 2016-04, Vol.5 (1), p.530-530, Article 530</ispartof><rights>Mohammed et al. 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-e5591676037d021555efc912370b852d20e9c70da4283090973297c16135ac033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-e5591676037d021555efc912370b852d20e9c70da4283090973297c16135ac033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844571/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844571/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,41099,42168,51555,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Ayyoub A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Khalid Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawlood, Ammar Salah</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study in fixation methods of medial malleolus fractures between tension bands wiring and screw fixation</title><title>SpringerPlus</title><addtitle>SpringerPlus</addtitle><addtitle>Springerplus</addtitle><description>Objectives The aim of this study is to compare two methods of internal fixations of fractured medial malleolus which are simple screw fixation and tension band wiring. Patients and methods Over 5 years we grouped 20 patients with fractured medial malleolus into two groups of operative treatments, group1 treated by malleolar screw fixation and group2 by tension band wiring. The patients were with same age group, gender, fracture type, and etiology. We use statistical analysis for make a comparative study between the two ways of surgical treatment. Results The mean time for radiologic bone union was 11.8 weeks in group1 patients and 9.4 weeks in group2 patients (P = 0.03). No patients had any sign of fixation failure or Kirschner wires migration. According to the modified ankle scoring system of Olerud and Molander, excellent and good results were achieved in 80 % in group1 patients and 90 % in group2 patients (P = 0.049). Conclusions Tension-band wiring may be better treatment option for internal fixation of medial malleolar fractures than screw fixation. Recommendations From these findings we recommend a further randomized clinical trial of larger number of cases and longer follow-up duration in order to regard tension-band wiring a better operative option for fixation of medial malleolar fractures.</description><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2193-1801</issn><issn>2193-1801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1r3DAUFKWlCWl-QC9F0EsvbvX0YVmXQgj9gkAv7Vlo5edEwZa2kp1N8usrs-myLVQXPaSZ0YyGkNfA3gN07YciGWtlw6BtOCjVPD4jpxyMaKBj8PxoPiHnpdyyuloNUrOX5ITrqiCNPCXLBfVp2rrs5nCHtMxL_0BDpEO4rycp0gnnm9QXmoY69sGNdHLjiGlcCh2y8_OSsdANzjvESGeMZWVtXKycXcghXtM60-Iz7g6qr8iLwY0Fz5_2M_Lz86cfl1-bq-9fvl1eXDW--pwbVMpAq1smdM_WkAoHb4ALzTad4j1naLxmvZO8E8wwowU32kMLQjnPhDgjH_e622VT3XuMc3aj3eYwufxgkwv275sYbux1urOyk1JpqALvngRy-rVgme0UisdxdBHTUizozmjVcWMq9O0_0Nu05FjjrSjJBFRDFQV7lM-plIzDwQwwu_Zq973a2qtdI9vHynlznOLA-NNiBfA9oGzXD8d89PR_VX8D2SGu_w</recordid><startdate>20160426</startdate><enddate>20160426</enddate><creator>Mohammed, Ayyoub A.</creator><creator>Abbas, Khalid Ahmed</creator><creator>Mawlood, Ammar Salah</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160426</creationdate><title>A comparative study in fixation methods of medial malleolus fractures between tension bands wiring and screw fixation</title><author>Mohammed, Ayyoub A. ; Abbas, Khalid Ahmed ; Mawlood, Ammar Salah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-e5591676037d021555efc912370b852d20e9c70da4283090973297c16135ac033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Ayyoub A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Khalid Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawlood, Ammar Salah</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>SpringerPlus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohammed, Ayyoub A.</au><au>Abbas, Khalid Ahmed</au><au>Mawlood, Ammar Salah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study in fixation methods of medial malleolus fractures between tension bands wiring and screw fixation</atitle><jtitle>SpringerPlus</jtitle><stitle>SpringerPlus</stitle><addtitle>Springerplus</addtitle><date>2016-04-26</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>530</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>530-530</pages><artnum>530</artnum><issn>2193-1801</issn><eissn>2193-1801</eissn><abstract>Objectives The aim of this study is to compare two methods of internal fixations of fractured medial malleolus which are simple screw fixation and tension band wiring. Patients and methods Over 5 years we grouped 20 patients with fractured medial malleolus into two groups of operative treatments, group1 treated by malleolar screw fixation and group2 by tension band wiring. The patients were with same age group, gender, fracture type, and etiology. We use statistical analysis for make a comparative study between the two ways of surgical treatment. Results The mean time for radiologic bone union was 11.8 weeks in group1 patients and 9.4 weeks in group2 patients (P = 0.03). No patients had any sign of fixation failure or Kirschner wires migration. According to the modified ankle scoring system of Olerud and Molander, excellent and good results were achieved in 80 % in group1 patients and 90 % in group2 patients (P = 0.049). Conclusions Tension-band wiring may be better treatment option for internal fixation of medial malleolar fractures than screw fixation. Recommendations From these findings we recommend a further randomized clinical trial of larger number of cases and longer follow-up duration in order to regard tension-band wiring a better operative option for fixation of medial malleolar fractures.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>27186494</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40064-016-2155-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2193-1801
ispartof SpringerPlus, 2016-04, Vol.5 (1), p.530-530, Article 530
issn 2193-1801
2193-1801
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4844571
source PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Humanities and Social Sciences
Medicine
multidisciplinary
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title A comparative study in fixation methods of medial malleolus fractures between tension bands wiring and screw fixation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T00%3A59%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20in%20fixation%20methods%20of%20medial%20malleolus%20fractures%20between%20tension%20bands%20wiring%20and%20screw%20fixation&rft.jtitle=SpringerPlus&rft.au=Mohammed,%20Ayyoub%20A.&rft.date=2016-04-26&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=530&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=530-530&rft.artnum=530&rft.issn=2193-1801&rft.eissn=2193-1801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40064-016-2155-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4034520901%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784031033&rft_id=info:pmid/27186494&rfr_iscdi=true