Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance

AIM:To examine whether addition of 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mp MRI)to an active surveillance protocol could detect aggressive or progressive prostate cancer.METHODS:Twenty-three patients with low risk disease were enrolled on this active surveillance study,all of which had Gleas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of radiology 2016-04, Vol.8 (4), p.410-418
Hauptverfasser: Vos, Larissa J, Janoski, Michele, Wachowicz, Keith, Yahya, Atiyah, Boychak, Oleksandr, Amanie, John, Pervez, Nadeem, Parliament, Matthew B, Pituskin, Edith, Fallone, B Gino, Usmani, Nawaid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 418
container_issue 4
container_start_page 410
container_title World journal of radiology
container_volume 8
creator Vos, Larissa J
Janoski, Michele
Wachowicz, Keith
Yahya, Atiyah
Boychak, Oleksandr
Amanie, John
Pervez, Nadeem
Parliament, Matthew B
Pituskin, Edith
Fallone, B Gino
Usmani, Nawaid
description AIM:To examine whether addition of 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mp MRI)to an active surveillance protocol could detect aggressive or progressive prostate cancer.METHODS:Twenty-three patients with low risk disease were enrolled on this active surveillance study,all of which had Gleason score 6 or less disease.All patients had clinical assessments,including digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen(PSA)testing,every 6 mo with annual 3T mp MRI scans with gadolinium contrast and minimum sextant prostate biopsies.The MRI images were anonymized of patient identifiers and clinical information and each scan underwentradiological review without the other results known.Descriptive statistics for demographics and follow-up as well as the sensitivity and specificity of mp MRI to identify prostate cancer and progressive disease were calculated.RESULTS:During follow-up(median 24.8 mo)11 of 23 patients with low-risk prostate cancer had disease progression and were taken off study to receive definitive treatment.Disease progression was identified through upstaging of Gleason score on subsequent biopsies for all 11 patients with only 2 patients also having a PSA doubling time of less than 2 years.All 23 patients had biopsy confirmed prostate cancer but only 10 had a positive index of suspicion on mp MRI scans at baseline(43.5% sensitivity).Aggressive disease prediction from baseline mpM RI scans had satisfactory specificity(81.8%)but low sensitivity(58.3%).Twentytwo patients had serial mp MRI scans and evidence of disease progression was seen for 3 patients all of whom had upstaging of Gleason score on biopsy(30% specificity and 100% sensitivity).CONCLUSION:Addition of mp MRI imaging in active surveillance decision making may help in identifying aggressive disease amongst men with indolent prostate cancer earlier than traditional methods.
doi_str_mv 10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4840199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>87748279504849544852484857</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1787936063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f364820c49a00ebd839a7a4e0faf5debc5faef48580bc4f124dead1741fcdd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1r3DAQFaWlCUmOuRYde_FWssaWdCmU0C8IFEp6VrTyaKNgWxtJdum_r5Zsl1QXDTOPN2_eI-Sasw2IVn_4_Zg2q9oE2ABnr8g516AbBZK9flGfkaucH1l9AL2W6i05ayXvFLTqnNz_jCPS6GnGFOxIp2UsYW-TnbCk4OhkdzOWWiTMcbazQxpqL8w7Gma6TzEXW5C6wyRR60pYkeYlrRjG8dC8JG-8HTNeHf8L8uvL57ubb83tj6_fbz7dNk70vDSdFz2oljnQljHcDkpoKy0g89Z3A25d5y16UJ1iWweetzCgHbgE7t0w9OKCfHzm3S_bCQeHc0l2NPtU5aY_Jtpg_p_M4cHs4mpAAeNaV4L3R4IUnxbMxUwhOzxcgXHJhksltehZLyq0eYa6en9O6E9rODOHYEwNxqzKBDA1mIp_91LbCf0vhgoQR8KHOO-eqrsnjJKy-iJ1x6pQ3UF1oK2V6qT4C3JXnbU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787936063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance</title><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Vos, Larissa J ; Janoski, Michele ; Wachowicz, Keith ; Yahya, Atiyah ; Boychak, Oleksandr ; Amanie, John ; Pervez, Nadeem ; Parliament, Matthew B ; Pituskin, Edith ; Fallone, B Gino ; Usmani, Nawaid</creator><creatorcontrib>Vos, Larissa J ; Janoski, Michele ; Wachowicz, Keith ; Yahya, Atiyah ; Boychak, Oleksandr ; Amanie, John ; Pervez, Nadeem ; Parliament, Matthew B ; Pituskin, Edith ; Fallone, B Gino ; Usmani, Nawaid</creatorcontrib><description>AIM:To examine whether addition of 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mp MRI)to an active surveillance protocol could detect aggressive or progressive prostate cancer.METHODS:Twenty-three patients with low risk disease were enrolled on this active surveillance study,all of which had Gleason score 6 or less disease.All patients had clinical assessments,including digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen(PSA)testing,every 6 mo with annual 3T mp MRI scans with gadolinium contrast and minimum sextant prostate biopsies.The MRI images were anonymized of patient identifiers and clinical information and each scan underwentradiological review without the other results known.Descriptive statistics for demographics and follow-up as well as the sensitivity and specificity of mp MRI to identify prostate cancer and progressive disease were calculated.RESULTS:During follow-up(median 24.8 mo)11 of 23 patients with low-risk prostate cancer had disease progression and were taken off study to receive definitive treatment.Disease progression was identified through upstaging of Gleason score on subsequent biopsies for all 11 patients with only 2 patients also having a PSA doubling time of less than 2 years.All 23 patients had biopsy confirmed prostate cancer but only 10 had a positive index of suspicion on mp MRI scans at baseline(43.5% sensitivity).Aggressive disease prediction from baseline mpM RI scans had satisfactory specificity(81.8%)but low sensitivity(58.3%).Twentytwo patients had serial mp MRI scans and evidence of disease progression was seen for 3 patients all of whom had upstaging of Gleason score on biopsy(30% specificity and 100% sensitivity).CONCLUSION:Addition of mp MRI imaging in active surveillance decision making may help in identifying aggressive disease amongst men with indolent prostate cancer earlier than traditional methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-8470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-8470</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27158428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Active ; cancer ; Clinical Trials Study ; disease;Prostate ; imaging;Indolent ; resonance ; surveillance;Treatment ; triaging;Magnetic</subject><ispartof>World journal of radiology, 2016-04, Vol.8 (4), p.410-418</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2016</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f364820c49a00ebd839a7a4e0faf5debc5faef48580bc4f124dead1741fcdd63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f364820c49a00ebd839a7a4e0faf5debc5faef48580bc4f124dead1741fcdd63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/71423X/71423X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4840199/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4840199/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27158428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vos, Larissa J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janoski, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wachowicz, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahya, Atiyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boychak, Oleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amanie, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pervez, Nadeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parliament, Matthew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pituskin, Edith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallone, B Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usmani, Nawaid</creatorcontrib><title>Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance</title><title>World journal of radiology</title><addtitle>World Journal of Radiology</addtitle><description>AIM:To examine whether addition of 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mp MRI)to an active surveillance protocol could detect aggressive or progressive prostate cancer.METHODS:Twenty-three patients with low risk disease were enrolled on this active surveillance study,all of which had Gleason score 6 or less disease.All patients had clinical assessments,including digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen(PSA)testing,every 6 mo with annual 3T mp MRI scans with gadolinium contrast and minimum sextant prostate biopsies.The MRI images were anonymized of patient identifiers and clinical information and each scan underwentradiological review without the other results known.Descriptive statistics for demographics and follow-up as well as the sensitivity and specificity of mp MRI to identify prostate cancer and progressive disease were calculated.RESULTS:During follow-up(median 24.8 mo)11 of 23 patients with low-risk prostate cancer had disease progression and were taken off study to receive definitive treatment.Disease progression was identified through upstaging of Gleason score on subsequent biopsies for all 11 patients with only 2 patients also having a PSA doubling time of less than 2 years.All 23 patients had biopsy confirmed prostate cancer but only 10 had a positive index of suspicion on mp MRI scans at baseline(43.5% sensitivity).Aggressive disease prediction from baseline mpM RI scans had satisfactory specificity(81.8%)but low sensitivity(58.3%).Twentytwo patients had serial mp MRI scans and evidence of disease progression was seen for 3 patients all of whom had upstaging of Gleason score on biopsy(30% specificity and 100% sensitivity).CONCLUSION:Addition of mp MRI imaging in active surveillance decision making may help in identifying aggressive disease amongst men with indolent prostate cancer earlier than traditional methods.</description><subject>Active</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Clinical Trials Study</subject><subject>disease;Prostate</subject><subject>imaging;Indolent</subject><subject>resonance</subject><subject>surveillance;Treatment</subject><subject>triaging;Magnetic</subject><issn>1949-8470</issn><issn>1949-8470</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1r3DAQFaWlCUmOuRYde_FWssaWdCmU0C8IFEp6VrTyaKNgWxtJdum_r5Zsl1QXDTOPN2_eI-Sasw2IVn_4_Zg2q9oE2ABnr8g516AbBZK9flGfkaucH1l9AL2W6i05ayXvFLTqnNz_jCPS6GnGFOxIp2UsYW-TnbCk4OhkdzOWWiTMcbazQxpqL8w7Gma6TzEXW5C6wyRR60pYkeYlrRjG8dC8JG-8HTNeHf8L8uvL57ubb83tj6_fbz7dNk70vDSdFz2oljnQljHcDkpoKy0g89Z3A25d5y16UJ1iWweetzCgHbgE7t0w9OKCfHzm3S_bCQeHc0l2NPtU5aY_Jtpg_p_M4cHs4mpAAeNaV4L3R4IUnxbMxUwhOzxcgXHJhksltehZLyq0eYa6en9O6E9rODOHYEwNxqzKBDA1mIp_91LbCf0vhgoQR8KHOO-eqrsnjJKy-iJ1x6pQ3UF1oK2V6qT4C3JXnbU</recordid><startdate>20160428</startdate><enddate>20160428</enddate><creator>Vos, Larissa J</creator><creator>Janoski, Michele</creator><creator>Wachowicz, Keith</creator><creator>Yahya, Atiyah</creator><creator>Boychak, Oleksandr</creator><creator>Amanie, John</creator><creator>Pervez, Nadeem</creator><creator>Parliament, Matthew B</creator><creator>Pituskin, Edith</creator><creator>Fallone, B Gino</creator><creator>Usmani, Nawaid</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160428</creationdate><title>Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance</title><author>Vos, Larissa J ; Janoski, Michele ; Wachowicz, Keith ; Yahya, Atiyah ; Boychak, Oleksandr ; Amanie, John ; Pervez, Nadeem ; Parliament, Matthew B ; Pituskin, Edith ; Fallone, B Gino ; Usmani, Nawaid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5f364820c49a00ebd839a7a4e0faf5debc5faef48580bc4f124dead1741fcdd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Active</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Clinical Trials Study</topic><topic>disease;Prostate</topic><topic>imaging;Indolent</topic><topic>resonance</topic><topic>surveillance;Treatment</topic><topic>triaging;Magnetic</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vos, Larissa J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janoski, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wachowicz, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahya, Atiyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boychak, Oleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amanie, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pervez, Nadeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parliament, Matthew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pituskin, Edith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallone, B Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usmani, Nawaid</creatorcontrib><collection>维普_期刊</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>维普中文期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vos, Larissa J</au><au>Janoski, Michele</au><au>Wachowicz, Keith</au><au>Yahya, Atiyah</au><au>Boychak, Oleksandr</au><au>Amanie, John</au><au>Pervez, Nadeem</au><au>Parliament, Matthew B</au><au>Pituskin, Edith</au><au>Fallone, B Gino</au><au>Usmani, Nawaid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance</atitle><jtitle>World journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Radiology</addtitle><date>2016-04-28</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>410</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>410-418</pages><issn>1949-8470</issn><eissn>1949-8470</eissn><abstract>AIM:To examine whether addition of 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mp MRI)to an active surveillance protocol could detect aggressive or progressive prostate cancer.METHODS:Twenty-three patients with low risk disease were enrolled on this active surveillance study,all of which had Gleason score 6 or less disease.All patients had clinical assessments,including digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen(PSA)testing,every 6 mo with annual 3T mp MRI scans with gadolinium contrast and minimum sextant prostate biopsies.The MRI images were anonymized of patient identifiers and clinical information and each scan underwentradiological review without the other results known.Descriptive statistics for demographics and follow-up as well as the sensitivity and specificity of mp MRI to identify prostate cancer and progressive disease were calculated.RESULTS:During follow-up(median 24.8 mo)11 of 23 patients with low-risk prostate cancer had disease progression and were taken off study to receive definitive treatment.Disease progression was identified through upstaging of Gleason score on subsequent biopsies for all 11 patients with only 2 patients also having a PSA doubling time of less than 2 years.All 23 patients had biopsy confirmed prostate cancer but only 10 had a positive index of suspicion on mp MRI scans at baseline(43.5% sensitivity).Aggressive disease prediction from baseline mpM RI scans had satisfactory specificity(81.8%)but low sensitivity(58.3%).Twentytwo patients had serial mp MRI scans and evidence of disease progression was seen for 3 patients all of whom had upstaging of Gleason score on biopsy(30% specificity and 100% sensitivity).CONCLUSION:Addition of mp MRI imaging in active surveillance decision making may help in identifying aggressive disease amongst men with indolent prostate cancer earlier than traditional methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>27158428</pmid><doi>10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1949-8470
ispartof World journal of radiology, 2016-04, Vol.8 (4), p.410-418
issn 1949-8470
1949-8470
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4840199
source Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Active
cancer
Clinical Trials Study
disease
Prostate
imaging
Indolent
resonance
surveillance
Treatment
triaging
Magnetic
title Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T13%3A50%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20serial%20multiparametric%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20prostate%20cancer%20active%20surveillance&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Vos,%20Larissa%20J&rft.date=2016-04-28&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=410-418&rft.issn=1949-8470&rft.eissn=1949-8470&rft_id=info:doi/10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1787936063%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787936063&rft_id=info:pmid/27158428&rft_cqvip_id=87748279504849544852484857&rfr_iscdi=true