Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries

In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a les...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of mental health systems 2016-04, Vol.10 (30), p.30-30, Article 30
Hauptverfasser: Petersen, Inge, Evans-Lacko, Sara, Semrau, Maya, Barry, Margaret M, Chisholm, Dan, Gronholm, Petra, Egbe, Catherine O, Thornicroft, Graham
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue 30
container_start_page 30
container_title International journal of mental health systems
container_volume 10
creator Petersen, Inge
Evans-Lacko, Sara
Semrau, Maya
Barry, Margaret M
Chisholm, Dan
Gronholm, Petra
Egbe, Catherine O
Thornicroft, Graham
description In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs. A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence. At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders. Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4827227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A449252427</galeid><sourcerecordid>A449252427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-af93b30712f662ab797a13c84365b7c0c696a834945f6f58020f16256739b2bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kttqFDEcxgdRbK0-gDcSEEShU3OYSTJeCKV4KBQUD9chk8nspmSSNYdq-1w-oJndte6KSC5y-n1f8k--qnqM4AlCnL6MiEBCaohoDSGF9c2d6hCxFtdN0_K7O-OD6kGMlxC2jFF0vzrADNKuhfSw-vkx-Mkn490xWAV9pd08BtINZeqTVvP0FTAu6bDdjEAmkJYarPwqWzkv1WuB8tOUnUnXtS1GNoLRBzAVkbTHwOkcvPULo6Rd0zH3MUmnNMhRg8FEHwYdYjkKWP994ziZYbC6Nq5Y6-KfXQpGx4fVvVHaqB9t-6Pq69s3X87e1xcf3p2fnV7UquUs1XLsSE8gQ3ikFMuedUwionhDaNszBRXtqOSk6Zp2pGPLIYYjoriljHQ97kdyVL3e-K5yP-lBlVKCtGIVzCTDtfDSiP0dZ5Zi4a9EwzHDmBWD51uD4L9lHZOYTFTaWum0z1EgxiFHBEFe0Kd_oZc-B1fKE7h8Nmk56sj_KFTKo03HGftDLaTVwrjRl9up-Whx2jQdbnGzvtzJP6jSBj0Z5Z0eTVnfE7zYExQm6R9pIXOM4vzzp3322Q671NKmZfQ2rwO0D6INqIKPMejx9nkRFHPKxSbloqRczCkXN0XzZPdfbhW_Y01-ATUJ-LY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797649877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Petersen, Inge ; Evans-Lacko, Sara ; Semrau, Maya ; Barry, Margaret M ; Chisholm, Dan ; Gronholm, Petra ; Egbe, Catherine O ; Thornicroft, Graham</creator><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Inge ; Evans-Lacko, Sara ; Semrau, Maya ; Barry, Margaret M ; Chisholm, Dan ; Gronholm, Petra ; Egbe, Catherine O ; Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><description>In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs. A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence. At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders. Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS disorders. The importance of inter-sectoral engagement and the need for further research on interventions at these levels in LMICs is highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-4458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-4458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27069506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Care and treatment ; Caregivers ; Children ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Community ; Cost analysis ; Cysticercosis ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Drug use ; Experiments ; Families &amp; family life ; Health promotion ; Intervention ; Low income groups ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental illness ; Neurological diseases ; Population ; Prevention ; Rehabilitation ; Review ; Schizophrenia ; Substance abuse ; Substance use disorder ; Suicide ; Training</subject><ispartof>International journal of mental health systems, 2016-04, Vol.10 (30), p.30-30, Article 30</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Petersen et al. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-af93b30712f662ab797a13c84365b7c0c696a834945f6f58020f16256739b2bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-af93b30712f662ab797a13c84365b7c0c696a834945f6f58020f16256739b2bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827227/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827227/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069506$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans-Lacko, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semrau, Maya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Margaret M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronholm, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbe, Catherine O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><title>Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries</title><title>International journal of mental health systems</title><addtitle>Int J Ment Health Syst</addtitle><description>In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs. A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence. At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders. Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS disorders. The importance of inter-sectoral engagement and the need for further research on interventions at these levels in LMICs is highlighted.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cysticercosis</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Neurological diseases</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance use disorder</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1752-4458</issn><issn>1752-4458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kttqFDEcxgdRbK0-gDcSEEShU3OYSTJeCKV4KBQUD9chk8nspmSSNYdq-1w-oJndte6KSC5y-n1f8k--qnqM4AlCnL6MiEBCaohoDSGF9c2d6hCxFtdN0_K7O-OD6kGMlxC2jFF0vzrADNKuhfSw-vkx-Mkn490xWAV9pd08BtINZeqTVvP0FTAu6bDdjEAmkJYarPwqWzkv1WuB8tOUnUnXtS1GNoLRBzAVkbTHwOkcvPULo6Rd0zH3MUmnNMhRg8FEHwYdYjkKWP994ziZYbC6Nq5Y6-KfXQpGx4fVvVHaqB9t-6Pq69s3X87e1xcf3p2fnV7UquUs1XLsSE8gQ3ikFMuedUwionhDaNszBRXtqOSk6Zp2pGPLIYYjoriljHQ97kdyVL3e-K5yP-lBlVKCtGIVzCTDtfDSiP0dZ5Zi4a9EwzHDmBWD51uD4L9lHZOYTFTaWum0z1EgxiFHBEFe0Kd_oZc-B1fKE7h8Nmk56sj_KFTKo03HGftDLaTVwrjRl9up-Whx2jQdbnGzvtzJP6jSBj0Z5Z0eTVnfE7zYExQm6R9pIXOM4vzzp3322Q671NKmZfQ2rwO0D6INqIKPMejx9nkRFHPKxSbloqRczCkXN0XzZPdfbhW_Y01-ATUJ-LY</recordid><startdate>20160411</startdate><enddate>20160411</enddate><creator>Petersen, Inge</creator><creator>Evans-Lacko, Sara</creator><creator>Semrau, Maya</creator><creator>Barry, Margaret M</creator><creator>Chisholm, Dan</creator><creator>Gronholm, Petra</creator><creator>Egbe, Catherine O</creator><creator>Thornicroft, Graham</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160411</creationdate><title>Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries</title><author>Petersen, Inge ; Evans-Lacko, Sara ; Semrau, Maya ; Barry, Margaret M ; Chisholm, Dan ; Gronholm, Petra ; Egbe, Catherine O ; Thornicroft, Graham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-af93b30712f662ab797a13c84365b7c0c696a834945f6f58020f16256739b2bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cysticercosis</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Neurological diseases</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance use disorder</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans-Lacko, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semrau, Maya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Margaret M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronholm, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbe, Catherine O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of mental health systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, Inge</au><au>Evans-Lacko, Sara</au><au>Semrau, Maya</au><au>Barry, Margaret M</au><au>Chisholm, Dan</au><au>Gronholm, Petra</au><au>Egbe, Catherine O</au><au>Thornicroft, Graham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries</atitle><jtitle>International journal of mental health systems</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Ment Health Syst</addtitle><date>2016-04-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>30</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>30-30</pages><artnum>30</artnum><issn>1752-4458</issn><eissn>1752-4458</eissn><abstract>In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs. A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence. At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders. Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS disorders. The importance of inter-sectoral engagement and the need for further research on interventions at these levels in LMICs is highlighted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27069506</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-4458
ispartof International journal of mental health systems, 2016-04, Vol.10 (30), p.30-30, Article 30
issn 1752-4458
1752-4458
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4827227
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Best practice
Care and treatment
Caregivers
Children
Cognition & reasoning
Community
Cost analysis
Cysticercosis
Disease control
Disease prevention
Drug use
Experiments
Families & family life
Health promotion
Intervention
Low income groups
Mental disorders
Mental health
Mental illness
Neurological diseases
Population
Prevention
Rehabilitation
Review
Schizophrenia
Substance abuse
Substance use disorder
Suicide
Training
title Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T18%3A05%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Promotion,%20prevention%20and%20protection:%20interventions%20at%20the%20population-%20and%20community-levels%20for%20mental,%20neurological%20and%20substance%20use%20disorders%20in%20low-%20and%20middle-income%20countries&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20mental%20health%20systems&rft.au=Petersen,%20Inge&rft.date=2016-04-11&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=30&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=30-30&rft.artnum=30&rft.issn=1752-4458&rft.eissn=1752-4458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA449252427%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797649877&rft_id=info:pmid/27069506&rft_galeid=A449252427&rfr_iscdi=true