Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries
In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a les...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of mental health systems 2016-04, Vol.10 (30), p.30-30, Article 30 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 30 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | International journal of mental health systems |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Petersen, Inge Evans-Lacko, Sara Semrau, Maya Barry, Margaret M Chisholm, Dan Gronholm, Petra Egbe, Catherine O Thornicroft, Graham |
description | In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs.
A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence.
At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders.
Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4827227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A449252427</galeid><sourcerecordid>A449252427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-af93b30712f662ab797a13c84365b7c0c696a834945f6f58020f16256739b2bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kttqFDEcxgdRbK0-gDcSEEShU3OYSTJeCKV4KBQUD9chk8nspmSSNYdq-1w-oJndte6KSC5y-n1f8k--qnqM4AlCnL6MiEBCaohoDSGF9c2d6hCxFtdN0_K7O-OD6kGMlxC2jFF0vzrADNKuhfSw-vkx-Mkn490xWAV9pd08BtINZeqTVvP0FTAu6bDdjEAmkJYarPwqWzkv1WuB8tOUnUnXtS1GNoLRBzAVkbTHwOkcvPULo6Rd0zH3MUmnNMhRg8FEHwYdYjkKWP994ziZYbC6Nq5Y6-KfXQpGx4fVvVHaqB9t-6Pq69s3X87e1xcf3p2fnV7UquUs1XLsSE8gQ3ikFMuedUwionhDaNszBRXtqOSk6Zp2pGPLIYYjoriljHQ97kdyVL3e-K5yP-lBlVKCtGIVzCTDtfDSiP0dZ5Zi4a9EwzHDmBWD51uD4L9lHZOYTFTaWum0z1EgxiFHBEFe0Kd_oZc-B1fKE7h8Nmk56sj_KFTKo03HGftDLaTVwrjRl9up-Whx2jQdbnGzvtzJP6jSBj0Z5Z0eTVnfE7zYExQm6R9pIXOM4vzzp3322Q671NKmZfQ2rwO0D6INqIKPMejx9nkRFHPKxSbloqRczCkXN0XzZPdfbhW_Y01-ATUJ-LY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797649877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Petersen, Inge ; Evans-Lacko, Sara ; Semrau, Maya ; Barry, Margaret M ; Chisholm, Dan ; Gronholm, Petra ; Egbe, Catherine O ; Thornicroft, Graham</creator><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Inge ; Evans-Lacko, Sara ; Semrau, Maya ; Barry, Margaret M ; Chisholm, Dan ; Gronholm, Petra ; Egbe, Catherine O ; Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><description>In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs.
A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence.
At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders.
Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS disorders. The importance of inter-sectoral engagement and the need for further research on interventions at these levels in LMICs is highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-4458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-4458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27069506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Care and treatment ; Caregivers ; Children ; Cognition & reasoning ; Community ; Cost analysis ; Cysticercosis ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Drug use ; Experiments ; Families & family life ; Health promotion ; Intervention ; Low income groups ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental illness ; Neurological diseases ; Population ; Prevention ; Rehabilitation ; Review ; Schizophrenia ; Substance abuse ; Substance use disorder ; Suicide ; Training</subject><ispartof>International journal of mental health systems, 2016-04, Vol.10 (30), p.30-30, Article 30</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Petersen et al. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-af93b30712f662ab797a13c84365b7c0c696a834945f6f58020f16256739b2bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-af93b30712f662ab797a13c84365b7c0c696a834945f6f58020f16256739b2bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827227/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827227/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069506$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans-Lacko, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semrau, Maya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Margaret M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronholm, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbe, Catherine O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><title>Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries</title><title>International journal of mental health systems</title><addtitle>Int J Ment Health Syst</addtitle><description>In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs.
A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence.
At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders.
Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS disorders. The importance of inter-sectoral engagement and the need for further research on interventions at these levels in LMICs is highlighted.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cysticercosis</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Neurological diseases</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance use disorder</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1752-4458</issn><issn>1752-4458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kttqFDEcxgdRbK0-gDcSEEShU3OYSTJeCKV4KBQUD9chk8nspmSSNYdq-1w-oJndte6KSC5y-n1f8k--qnqM4AlCnL6MiEBCaohoDSGF9c2d6hCxFtdN0_K7O-OD6kGMlxC2jFF0vzrADNKuhfSw-vkx-Mkn490xWAV9pd08BtINZeqTVvP0FTAu6bDdjEAmkJYarPwqWzkv1WuB8tOUnUnXtS1GNoLRBzAVkbTHwOkcvPULo6Rd0zH3MUmnNMhRg8FEHwYdYjkKWP994ziZYbC6Nq5Y6-KfXQpGx4fVvVHaqB9t-6Pq69s3X87e1xcf3p2fnV7UquUs1XLsSE8gQ3ikFMuedUwionhDaNszBRXtqOSk6Zp2pGPLIYYjoriljHQ97kdyVL3e-K5yP-lBlVKCtGIVzCTDtfDSiP0dZ5Zi4a9EwzHDmBWD51uD4L9lHZOYTFTaWum0z1EgxiFHBEFe0Kd_oZc-B1fKE7h8Nmk56sj_KFTKo03HGftDLaTVwrjRl9up-Whx2jQdbnGzvtzJP6jSBj0Z5Z0eTVnfE7zYExQm6R9pIXOM4vzzp3322Q671NKmZfQ2rwO0D6INqIKPMejx9nkRFHPKxSbloqRczCkXN0XzZPdfbhW_Y01-ATUJ-LY</recordid><startdate>20160411</startdate><enddate>20160411</enddate><creator>Petersen, Inge</creator><creator>Evans-Lacko, Sara</creator><creator>Semrau, Maya</creator><creator>Barry, Margaret M</creator><creator>Chisholm, Dan</creator><creator>Gronholm, Petra</creator><creator>Egbe, Catherine O</creator><creator>Thornicroft, Graham</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160411</creationdate><title>Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries</title><author>Petersen, Inge ; Evans-Lacko, Sara ; Semrau, Maya ; Barry, Margaret M ; Chisholm, Dan ; Gronholm, Petra ; Egbe, Catherine O ; Thornicroft, Graham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-af93b30712f662ab797a13c84365b7c0c696a834945f6f58020f16256739b2bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cysticercosis</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Neurological diseases</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance use disorder</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans-Lacko, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semrau, Maya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Margaret M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gronholm, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbe, Catherine O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of mental health systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, Inge</au><au>Evans-Lacko, Sara</au><au>Semrau, Maya</au><au>Barry, Margaret M</au><au>Chisholm, Dan</au><au>Gronholm, Petra</au><au>Egbe, Catherine O</au><au>Thornicroft, Graham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries</atitle><jtitle>International journal of mental health systems</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Ment Health Syst</addtitle><date>2016-04-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>30</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>30-30</pages><artnum>30</artnum><issn>1752-4458</issn><eissn>1752-4458</eissn><abstract>In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs.
A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence.
At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders.
Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS disorders. The importance of inter-sectoral engagement and the need for further research on interventions at these levels in LMICs is highlighted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27069506</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1752-4458 |
ispartof | International journal of mental health systems, 2016-04, Vol.10 (30), p.30-30, Article 30 |
issn | 1752-4458 1752-4458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4827227 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Best practice Care and treatment Caregivers Children Cognition & reasoning Community Cost analysis Cysticercosis Disease control Disease prevention Drug use Experiments Families & family life Health promotion Intervention Low income groups Mental disorders Mental health Mental illness Neurological diseases Population Prevention Rehabilitation Review Schizophrenia Substance abuse Substance use disorder Suicide Training |
title | Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T18%3A05%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Promotion,%20prevention%20and%20protection:%20interventions%20at%20the%20population-%20and%20community-levels%20for%20mental,%20neurological%20and%20substance%20use%20disorders%20in%20low-%20and%20middle-income%20countries&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20mental%20health%20systems&rft.au=Petersen,%20Inge&rft.date=2016-04-11&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=30&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=30-30&rft.artnum=30&rft.issn=1752-4458&rft.eissn=1752-4458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA449252427%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797649877&rft_id=info:pmid/27069506&rft_galeid=A449252427&rfr_iscdi=true |