The effect of facilitated tucking during endotracheal suctioning on procedural pain in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled crossover study

Premature infants not only feel and understand the pain, but also respond more intensively compared with term infants. Non-pharmacological methods of pain control are suitable to relieve pain in painful procedures. The facilitated tucking position is considered as a non-pharmacological method of pai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global journal of health science 2014-05, Vol.6 (4), p.278-284
Hauptverfasser: Alinejad-Naeini, Mona, Mohagheghi, Parisa, Peyrovi, Hamid, Mehran, Abbas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 284
container_issue 4
container_start_page 278
container_title Global journal of health science
container_volume 6
creator Alinejad-Naeini, Mona
Mohagheghi, Parisa
Peyrovi, Hamid
Mehran, Abbas
description Premature infants not only feel and understand the pain, but also respond more intensively compared with term infants. Non-pharmacological methods of pain control are suitable to relieve pain in painful procedures. The facilitated tucking position is considered as a non-pharmacological method of pain control in infants; however, its impact on frequent and repeated procedural pain such as endotracheal suctioning remains to be studied. This paper is the report of a study that examined the impact of facilitated tucking position on behavioral pain during suctioning in premature neonates. This was a clinical trial study with a crossover design. The study was conducted in a level II Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, located in a teaching hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Thirty four infants were enrolled in this study based on the following inclusion criteria: age between 29 to 37 weeks of gestational age, birth weight 1200 grams or more, having an endotracheal tube, no congenital anomalies, no seizures diagnosis, no chest tubes, no intracranial hemorrhage higher than degree II, not receiving opiates and sedatives four hours before intervention and not receiving any painful procedure at least half an hour before the intervention. The samples were randomly received a sequence of suctioning with/without or suctioning without/with facilitated tucking. Preterm Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) was used to collect the data. SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. While 38.2% of infants experienced severe pain during suctioning without intervention, only 8.8% of them experienced severe pain during suctioning with intervention. The results of the paired t-test show that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean scores of pain between non-intervention and intervention cases (p < 0.001), and the mean pain score substantially reduced in cases with intervention. Given the multiplicity of endotracheal suctioning frequency and the impossibility of frequent use of pharmacological methods of pain relief, the facilitated tucking position can be used as a safe non-pharmacological method for procedural pain management. 
doi_str_mv 10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4825219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1543683183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-4f85f45fba375eca2e8ecef32d4ef702a8d28efa3c1a314df6c9a793d48d14f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtv1TAQhS0EoqWwZIu8ZJMSvxKbBRKqeEmV2JS15drje10SO9jOlcqv6E_Goe0VrGY0c_TNGR2EXpP-XAim3u1u9uX8MES-0FE-QadEkaFTI-dPjz0bTtCLUm76fhgEEc_RCeVKKcLlKbq72gMG78FWnDz2xoYpVFPB4branyHusFvzViC6VLOxezATLqutIcVtniJecrLQZG2xmBBx2EZQIc84QoqNVt5jg7NpiDn8bmybYs1pmrY2p1LSATIudXW3L9Ezb6YCrx7qGfrx-dPVxdfu8vuXbxcfLzvLqKod91J4Lvy1YaMAayhIsOAZdRz82FMjHZXgDbPEMMKdH6wyo2KOS0e4V-wMfbjnLuv1DM5CM2QmveQwm3yrkwn6_00Me71LB80lFZRsgLcPgJx-rVCqnkOxME2m_bwWTQRng2REsibt7qV_f83gj2dIr7cU9Zaifkyx6d_86-2ofoyN_QGdFKDt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1543683183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of facilitated tucking during endotracheal suctioning on procedural pain in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled crossover study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Alinejad-Naeini, Mona ; Mohagheghi, Parisa ; Peyrovi, Hamid ; Mehran, Abbas</creator><creatorcontrib>Alinejad-Naeini, Mona ; Mohagheghi, Parisa ; Peyrovi, Hamid ; Mehran, Abbas</creatorcontrib><description>Premature infants not only feel and understand the pain, but also respond more intensively compared with term infants. Non-pharmacological methods of pain control are suitable to relieve pain in painful procedures. The facilitated tucking position is considered as a non-pharmacological method of pain control in infants; however, its impact on frequent and repeated procedural pain such as endotracheal suctioning remains to be studied. This paper is the report of a study that examined the impact of facilitated tucking position on behavioral pain during suctioning in premature neonates. This was a clinical trial study with a crossover design. The study was conducted in a level II Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, located in a teaching hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Thirty four infants were enrolled in this study based on the following inclusion criteria: age between 29 to 37 weeks of gestational age, birth weight 1200 grams or more, having an endotracheal tube, no congenital anomalies, no seizures diagnosis, no chest tubes, no intracranial hemorrhage higher than degree II, not receiving opiates and sedatives four hours before intervention and not receiving any painful procedure at least half an hour before the intervention. The samples were randomly received a sequence of suctioning with/without or suctioning without/with facilitated tucking. Preterm Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) was used to collect the data. SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. While 38.2% of infants experienced severe pain during suctioning without intervention, only 8.8% of them experienced severe pain during suctioning with intervention. The results of the paired t-test show that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean scores of pain between non-intervention and intervention cases (p &lt; 0.001), and the mean pain score substantially reduced in cases with intervention. Given the multiplicity of endotracheal suctioning frequency and the impossibility of frequent use of pharmacological methods of pain relief, the facilitated tucking position can be used as a safe non-pharmacological method for procedural pain management. </description><identifier>ISSN: 1916-9736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-9744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p278</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24999148</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Canadian Center of Science and Education</publisher><subject>Cross-Over Studies ; Facilitated Tucking - methods ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Iran ; Male ; Pain - prevention &amp; control ; Pain Management - methods ; Suction - methods</subject><ispartof>Global journal of health science, 2014-05, Vol.6 (4), p.278-284</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-4f85f45fba375eca2e8ecef32d4ef702a8d28efa3c1a314df6c9a793d48d14f93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825219/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4825219/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999148$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alinejad-Naeini, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohagheghi, Parisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyrovi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehran, Abbas</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of facilitated tucking during endotracheal suctioning on procedural pain in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled crossover study</title><title>Global journal of health science</title><addtitle>Glob J Health Sci</addtitle><description>Premature infants not only feel and understand the pain, but also respond more intensively compared with term infants. Non-pharmacological methods of pain control are suitable to relieve pain in painful procedures. The facilitated tucking position is considered as a non-pharmacological method of pain control in infants; however, its impact on frequent and repeated procedural pain such as endotracheal suctioning remains to be studied. This paper is the report of a study that examined the impact of facilitated tucking position on behavioral pain during suctioning in premature neonates. This was a clinical trial study with a crossover design. The study was conducted in a level II Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, located in a teaching hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Thirty four infants were enrolled in this study based on the following inclusion criteria: age between 29 to 37 weeks of gestational age, birth weight 1200 grams or more, having an endotracheal tube, no congenital anomalies, no seizures diagnosis, no chest tubes, no intracranial hemorrhage higher than degree II, not receiving opiates and sedatives four hours before intervention and not receiving any painful procedure at least half an hour before the intervention. The samples were randomly received a sequence of suctioning with/without or suctioning without/with facilitated tucking. Preterm Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) was used to collect the data. SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. While 38.2% of infants experienced severe pain during suctioning without intervention, only 8.8% of them experienced severe pain during suctioning with intervention. The results of the paired t-test show that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean scores of pain between non-intervention and intervention cases (p &lt; 0.001), and the mean pain score substantially reduced in cases with intervention. Given the multiplicity of endotracheal suctioning frequency and the impossibility of frequent use of pharmacological methods of pain relief, the facilitated tucking position can be used as a safe non-pharmacological method for procedural pain management. </description><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Facilitated Tucking - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pain - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Suction - methods</subject><issn>1916-9736</issn><issn>1916-9744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtv1TAQhS0EoqWwZIu8ZJMSvxKbBRKqeEmV2JS15drje10SO9jOlcqv6E_Goe0VrGY0c_TNGR2EXpP-XAim3u1u9uX8MES-0FE-QadEkaFTI-dPjz0bTtCLUm76fhgEEc_RCeVKKcLlKbq72gMG78FWnDz2xoYpVFPB4branyHusFvzViC6VLOxezATLqutIcVtniJecrLQZG2xmBBx2EZQIc84QoqNVt5jg7NpiDn8bmybYs1pmrY2p1LSATIudXW3L9Ezb6YCrx7qGfrx-dPVxdfu8vuXbxcfLzvLqKod91J4Lvy1YaMAayhIsOAZdRz82FMjHZXgDbPEMMKdH6wyo2KOS0e4V-wMfbjnLuv1DM5CM2QmveQwm3yrkwn6_00Me71LB80lFZRsgLcPgJx-rVCqnkOxME2m_bwWTQRng2REsibt7qV_f83gj2dIr7cU9Zaifkyx6d_86-2ofoyN_QGdFKDt</recordid><startdate>20140504</startdate><enddate>20140504</enddate><creator>Alinejad-Naeini, Mona</creator><creator>Mohagheghi, Parisa</creator><creator>Peyrovi, Hamid</creator><creator>Mehran, Abbas</creator><general>Canadian Center of Science and Education</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140504</creationdate><title>The effect of facilitated tucking during endotracheal suctioning on procedural pain in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled crossover study</title><author>Alinejad-Naeini, Mona ; Mohagheghi, Parisa ; Peyrovi, Hamid ; Mehran, Abbas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-4f85f45fba375eca2e8ecef32d4ef702a8d28efa3c1a314df6c9a793d48d14f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Facilitated Tucking - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pain - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Suction - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alinejad-Naeini, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohagheghi, Parisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyrovi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehran, Abbas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global journal of health science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alinejad-Naeini, Mona</au><au>Mohagheghi, Parisa</au><au>Peyrovi, Hamid</au><au>Mehran, Abbas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of facilitated tucking during endotracheal suctioning on procedural pain in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled crossover study</atitle><jtitle>Global journal of health science</jtitle><addtitle>Glob J Health Sci</addtitle><date>2014-05-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>278-284</pages><issn>1916-9736</issn><eissn>1916-9744</eissn><abstract>Premature infants not only feel and understand the pain, but also respond more intensively compared with term infants. Non-pharmacological methods of pain control are suitable to relieve pain in painful procedures. The facilitated tucking position is considered as a non-pharmacological method of pain control in infants; however, its impact on frequent and repeated procedural pain such as endotracheal suctioning remains to be studied. This paper is the report of a study that examined the impact of facilitated tucking position on behavioral pain during suctioning in premature neonates. This was a clinical trial study with a crossover design. The study was conducted in a level II Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, located in a teaching hospital, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Thirty four infants were enrolled in this study based on the following inclusion criteria: age between 29 to 37 weeks of gestational age, birth weight 1200 grams or more, having an endotracheal tube, no congenital anomalies, no seizures diagnosis, no chest tubes, no intracranial hemorrhage higher than degree II, not receiving opiates and sedatives four hours before intervention and not receiving any painful procedure at least half an hour before the intervention. The samples were randomly received a sequence of suctioning with/without or suctioning without/with facilitated tucking. Preterm Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) was used to collect the data. SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. While 38.2% of infants experienced severe pain during suctioning without intervention, only 8.8% of them experienced severe pain during suctioning with intervention. The results of the paired t-test show that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean scores of pain between non-intervention and intervention cases (p &lt; 0.001), and the mean pain score substantially reduced in cases with intervention. Given the multiplicity of endotracheal suctioning frequency and the impossibility of frequent use of pharmacological methods of pain relief, the facilitated tucking position can be used as a safe non-pharmacological method for procedural pain management. </abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Canadian Center of Science and Education</pub><pmid>24999148</pmid><doi>10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p278</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1916-9736
ispartof Global journal of health science, 2014-05, Vol.6 (4), p.278-284
issn 1916-9736
1916-9744
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4825219
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Cross-Over Studies
Facilitated Tucking - methods
Female
Gestational Age
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Intubation, Intratracheal - methods
Iran
Male
Pain - prevention & control
Pain Management - methods
Suction - methods
title The effect of facilitated tucking during endotracheal suctioning on procedural pain in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled crossover study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A36%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20facilitated%20tucking%20during%20endotracheal%20suctioning%20on%20procedural%20pain%20in%20preterm%20neonates:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20crossover%20study&rft.jtitle=Global%20journal%20of%20health%20science&rft.au=Alinejad-Naeini,%20Mona&rft.date=2014-05-04&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=278-284&rft.issn=1916-9736&rft.eissn=1916-9744&rft_id=info:doi/10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1543683183%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1543683183&rft_id=info:pmid/24999148&rfr_iscdi=true