Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy
Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2016-04, Vol.22 (15), p.3945-3951 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3951 |
---|---|
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 3945 |
container_title | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Ogura, Takeshi Higuchi, Kazuhide |
description | Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastric approach for intrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided hepaticogastrostomy(EUS-HGS). These procedures have several effects, such as internal drainage and avoiding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) pancreatitis, and they are indicated for an inaccessible ampulla of Vater due to duodenal obstruction or surgical anatomy. EUS-HGS has particularly wide indications and clinical impact as an alternative biliary drainage method. In this procedure, it is necessary to dilate the fistula, and several devices and approaches have been reported. Stent selection is also important. In previous reports, the overall technical success rate was 82%(221/270), the clinical success rate was 97%(218/225), and the overall adverse event rate for EUS-HGS was 23%(62/270). Adverse events of EUS-biliary drainage are still high compared with ERCP or PTCD. EUSHGS should continue to be performed by experienced endoscopists who can use various strategies when adverse events occur. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4823244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>90888889504849544953484853</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1783922633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-a4407049c32c267230fb76d694f63def4914b13a4ae32486269ec23ec42d9a6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtLxDAQh4Mouj7unqRHL13TmWnTXARZfIHgRc8hm6bdSLepTav435vFddFAHpDffJl8jJ1nfI6CyqvPt2b-ATB3WT5HSfkemwFkMoWS-D6bZZyLVCKII3YcwhvngJjDITsCwaUkFDO2eLFm1Tmj22R0fUhqPyS2q3wwvncmmdpx0MFPXZU2k6tslaxsr0dnfKPDOPgw-vXXKTuodRvs2XY_Ya93ty-Lh_Tp-f5xcfOUGiI-pjqugpM0CAYKAcjrpSiqQlJdYGVrkhktM9SkLQKVBRTSGkBrCCqpC4Mn7PqH20_Lta2M7WJzreoHt9bDl_Laqf83nVupxn8oKiESKQIut4DBv082jGrtgrFtqzvrp6AyUaIEKBBjlP9ETfxkGGy9eybjauNeRfcqulfRvdq4jyUXf9vbFfzKjgHcMle-a95d1-wykpebIXNOJcmc4sR4KnPEb2mlkdI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1783922633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ogura, Takeshi ; Higuchi, Kazuhide</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Takeshi ; Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><description>Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastric approach for intrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided hepaticogastrostomy(EUS-HGS). These procedures have several effects, such as internal drainage and avoiding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) pancreatitis, and they are indicated for an inaccessible ampulla of Vater due to duodenal obstruction or surgical anatomy. EUS-HGS has particularly wide indications and clinical impact as an alternative biliary drainage method. In this procedure, it is necessary to dilate the fistula, and several devices and approaches have been reported. Stent selection is also important. In previous reports, the overall technical success rate was 82%(221/270), the clinical success rate was 97%(218/225), and the overall adverse event rate for EUS-HGS was 23%(62/270). Adverse events of EUS-biliary drainage are still high compared with ERCP or PTCD. EUSHGS should continue to be performed by experienced endoscopists who can use various strategies when adverse events occur.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27099437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Cholestasis - diagnostic imaging ; Cholestasis - etiology ; Cholestasis - therapy ; Drainage - adverse effects ; Drainage - instrumentation ; Drainage - methods ; Endoscopic ; Endosonography ; Gastrostomy - adverse effects ; Gastrostomy - instrumentation ; Gastrostomy - methods ; guided ; hepaticogastrostomy;Endoscopic ; Humans ; Minireviews ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; ultrasound ; ultrasound;Endoscopic</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2016-04, Vol.22 (15), p.3945-3951</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2016</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-a4407049c32c267230fb76d694f63def4914b13a4ae32486269ec23ec42d9a6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-a4407049c32c267230fb76d694f63def4914b13a4ae32486269ec23ec42d9a6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84123X/84123X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823244/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823244/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><title>Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastric approach for intrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided hepaticogastrostomy(EUS-HGS). These procedures have several effects, such as internal drainage and avoiding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) pancreatitis, and they are indicated for an inaccessible ampulla of Vater due to duodenal obstruction or surgical anatomy. EUS-HGS has particularly wide indications and clinical impact as an alternative biliary drainage method. In this procedure, it is necessary to dilate the fistula, and several devices and approaches have been reported. Stent selection is also important. In previous reports, the overall technical success rate was 82%(221/270), the clinical success rate was 97%(218/225), and the overall adverse event rate for EUS-HGS was 23%(62/270). Adverse events of EUS-biliary drainage are still high compared with ERCP or PTCD. EUSHGS should continue to be performed by experienced endoscopists who can use various strategies when adverse events occur.</description><subject>Cholestasis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cholestasis - etiology</subject><subject>Cholestasis - therapy</subject><subject>Drainage - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drainage - instrumentation</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopic</subject><subject>Endosonography</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - methods</subject><subject>guided</subject><subject>hepaticogastrostomy;Endoscopic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Minireviews</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><subject>ultrasound;Endoscopic</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtLxDAQh4Mouj7unqRHL13TmWnTXARZfIHgRc8hm6bdSLepTav435vFddFAHpDffJl8jJ1nfI6CyqvPt2b-ATB3WT5HSfkemwFkMoWS-D6bZZyLVCKII3YcwhvngJjDITsCwaUkFDO2eLFm1Tmj22R0fUhqPyS2q3wwvncmmdpx0MFPXZU2k6tslaxsr0dnfKPDOPgw-vXXKTuodRvs2XY_Ya93ty-Lh_Tp-f5xcfOUGiI-pjqugpM0CAYKAcjrpSiqQlJdYGVrkhktM9SkLQKVBRTSGkBrCCqpC4Mn7PqH20_Lta2M7WJzreoHt9bDl_Laqf83nVupxn8oKiESKQIut4DBv082jGrtgrFtqzvrp6AyUaIEKBBjlP9ETfxkGGy9eybjauNeRfcqulfRvdq4jyUXf9vbFfzKjgHcMle-a95d1-wykpebIXNOJcmc4sR4KnPEb2mlkdI</recordid><startdate>20160421</startdate><enddate>20160421</enddate><creator>Ogura, Takeshi</creator><creator>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160421</creationdate><title>Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy</title><author>Ogura, Takeshi ; Higuchi, Kazuhide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-a4407049c32c267230fb76d694f63def4914b13a4ae32486269ec23ec42d9a6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cholestasis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cholestasis - etiology</topic><topic>Cholestasis - therapy</topic><topic>Drainage - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drainage - instrumentation</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopic</topic><topic>Endosonography</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - methods</topic><topic>guided</topic><topic>hepaticogastrostomy;Endoscopic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Minireviews</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><topic>ultrasound;Endoscopic</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogura, Takeshi</au><au>Higuchi, Kazuhide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2016-04-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>3945</spage><epage>3951</epage><pages>3945-3951</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastric approach for intrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided hepaticogastrostomy(EUS-HGS). These procedures have several effects, such as internal drainage and avoiding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) pancreatitis, and they are indicated for an inaccessible ampulla of Vater due to duodenal obstruction or surgical anatomy. EUS-HGS has particularly wide indications and clinical impact as an alternative biliary drainage method. In this procedure, it is necessary to dilate the fistula, and several devices and approaches have been reported. Stent selection is also important. In previous reports, the overall technical success rate was 82%(221/270), the clinical success rate was 97%(218/225), and the overall adverse event rate for EUS-HGS was 23%(62/270). Adverse events of EUS-biliary drainage are still high compared with ERCP or PTCD. EUSHGS should continue to be performed by experienced endoscopists who can use various strategies when adverse events occur.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>27099437</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1007-9327 |
ispartof | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2016-04, Vol.22 (15), p.3945-3951 |
issn | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4823244 |
source | MEDLINE; Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cholestasis - diagnostic imaging Cholestasis - etiology Cholestasis - therapy Drainage - adverse effects Drainage - instrumentation Drainage - methods Endoscopic Endosonography Gastrostomy - adverse effects Gastrostomy - instrumentation Gastrostomy - methods guided hepaticogastrostomy Endoscopic Humans Minireviews Stents Treatment Outcome Ultrasonography, Interventional ultrasound ultrasound Endoscopic |
title | Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T01%3A05%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20tips%20for%20endoscopic%20ultrasound-guided%20hepaticogastrostomy&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=Ogura,%20Takeshi&rft.date=2016-04-21&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=3945&rft.epage=3951&rft.pages=3945-3951&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1783922633%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1783922633&rft_id=info:pmid/27099437&rft_cqvip_id=90888889504849544953484853&rfr_iscdi=true |