Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy

Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2016-04, Vol.22 (15), p.3945-3951
Hauptverfasser: Ogura, Takeshi, Higuchi, Kazuhide
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3951
container_issue 15
container_start_page 3945
container_title World journal of gastroenterology : WJG
container_volume 22
creator Ogura, Takeshi
Higuchi, Kazuhide
description Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastric approach for intrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided hepaticogastrostomy(EUS-HGS). These procedures have several effects, such as internal drainage and avoiding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) pancreatitis, and they are indicated for an inaccessible ampulla of Vater due to duodenal obstruction or surgical anatomy. EUS-HGS has particularly wide indications and clinical impact as an alternative biliary drainage method. In this procedure, it is necessary to dilate the fistula, and several devices and approaches have been reported. Stent selection is also important. In previous reports, the overall technical success rate was 82%(221/270), the clinical success rate was 97%(218/225), and the overall adverse event rate for EUS-HGS was 23%(62/270). Adverse events of EUS-biliary drainage are still high compared with ERCP or PTCD. EUSHGS should continue to be performed by experienced endoscopists who can use various strategies when adverse events occur.
doi_str_mv 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4823244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>90888889504849544953484853</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1783922633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-a4407049c32c267230fb76d694f63def4914b13a4ae32486269ec23ec42d9a6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtLxDAQh4Mouj7unqRHL13TmWnTXARZfIHgRc8hm6bdSLepTav435vFddFAHpDffJl8jJ1nfI6CyqvPt2b-ATB3WT5HSfkemwFkMoWS-D6bZZyLVCKII3YcwhvngJjDITsCwaUkFDO2eLFm1Tmj22R0fUhqPyS2q3wwvncmmdpx0MFPXZU2k6tslaxsr0dnfKPDOPgw-vXXKTuodRvs2XY_Ya93ty-Lh_Tp-f5xcfOUGiI-pjqugpM0CAYKAcjrpSiqQlJdYGVrkhktM9SkLQKVBRTSGkBrCCqpC4Mn7PqH20_Lta2M7WJzreoHt9bDl_Laqf83nVupxn8oKiESKQIut4DBv082jGrtgrFtqzvrp6AyUaIEKBBjlP9ETfxkGGy9eybjauNeRfcqulfRvdq4jyUXf9vbFfzKjgHcMle-a95d1-wykpebIXNOJcmc4sR4KnPEb2mlkdI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1783922633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ogura, Takeshi ; Higuchi, Kazuhide</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Takeshi ; Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><description>Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastric approach for intrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided hepaticogastrostomy(EUS-HGS). These procedures have several effects, such as internal drainage and avoiding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) pancreatitis, and they are indicated for an inaccessible ampulla of Vater due to duodenal obstruction or surgical anatomy. EUS-HGS has particularly wide indications and clinical impact as an alternative biliary drainage method. In this procedure, it is necessary to dilate the fistula, and several devices and approaches have been reported. Stent selection is also important. In previous reports, the overall technical success rate was 82%(221/270), the clinical success rate was 97%(218/225), and the overall adverse event rate for EUS-HGS was 23%(62/270). Adverse events of EUS-biliary drainage are still high compared with ERCP or PTCD. EUSHGS should continue to be performed by experienced endoscopists who can use various strategies when adverse events occur.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27099437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Cholestasis - diagnostic imaging ; Cholestasis - etiology ; Cholestasis - therapy ; Drainage - adverse effects ; Drainage - instrumentation ; Drainage - methods ; Endoscopic ; Endosonography ; Gastrostomy - adverse effects ; Gastrostomy - instrumentation ; Gastrostomy - methods ; guided ; hepaticogastrostomy;Endoscopic ; Humans ; Minireviews ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; ultrasound ; ultrasound;Endoscopic</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2016-04, Vol.22 (15), p.3945-3951</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2016</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-a4407049c32c267230fb76d694f63def4914b13a4ae32486269ec23ec42d9a6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-a4407049c32c267230fb76d694f63def4914b13a4ae32486269ec23ec42d9a6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84123X/84123X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823244/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4823244/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><title>Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastric approach for intrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided hepaticogastrostomy(EUS-HGS). These procedures have several effects, such as internal drainage and avoiding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) pancreatitis, and they are indicated for an inaccessible ampulla of Vater due to duodenal obstruction or surgical anatomy. EUS-HGS has particularly wide indications and clinical impact as an alternative biliary drainage method. In this procedure, it is necessary to dilate the fistula, and several devices and approaches have been reported. Stent selection is also important. In previous reports, the overall technical success rate was 82%(221/270), the clinical success rate was 97%(218/225), and the overall adverse event rate for EUS-HGS was 23%(62/270). Adverse events of EUS-biliary drainage are still high compared with ERCP or PTCD. EUSHGS should continue to be performed by experienced endoscopists who can use various strategies when adverse events occur.</description><subject>Cholestasis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cholestasis - etiology</subject><subject>Cholestasis - therapy</subject><subject>Drainage - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drainage - instrumentation</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopic</subject><subject>Endosonography</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - methods</subject><subject>guided</subject><subject>hepaticogastrostomy;Endoscopic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Minireviews</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><subject>ultrasound;Endoscopic</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtLxDAQh4Mouj7unqRHL13TmWnTXARZfIHgRc8hm6bdSLepTav435vFddFAHpDffJl8jJ1nfI6CyqvPt2b-ATB3WT5HSfkemwFkMoWS-D6bZZyLVCKII3YcwhvngJjDITsCwaUkFDO2eLFm1Tmj22R0fUhqPyS2q3wwvncmmdpx0MFPXZU2k6tslaxsr0dnfKPDOPgw-vXXKTuodRvs2XY_Ya93ty-Lh_Tp-f5xcfOUGiI-pjqugpM0CAYKAcjrpSiqQlJdYGVrkhktM9SkLQKVBRTSGkBrCCqpC4Mn7PqH20_Lta2M7WJzreoHt9bDl_Laqf83nVupxn8oKiESKQIut4DBv082jGrtgrFtqzvrp6AyUaIEKBBjlP9ETfxkGGy9eybjauNeRfcqulfRvdq4jyUXf9vbFfzKjgHcMle-a95d1-wykpebIXNOJcmc4sR4KnPEb2mlkdI</recordid><startdate>20160421</startdate><enddate>20160421</enddate><creator>Ogura, Takeshi</creator><creator>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160421</creationdate><title>Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy</title><author>Ogura, Takeshi ; Higuchi, Kazuhide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-a4407049c32c267230fb76d694f63def4914b13a4ae32486269ec23ec42d9a6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cholestasis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cholestasis - etiology</topic><topic>Cholestasis - therapy</topic><topic>Drainage - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drainage - instrumentation</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopic</topic><topic>Endosonography</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - methods</topic><topic>guided</topic><topic>hepaticogastrostomy;Endoscopic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Minireviews</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><topic>ultrasound;Endoscopic</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Kazuhide</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogura, Takeshi</au><au>Higuchi, Kazuhide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2016-04-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>3945</spage><epage>3951</epage><pages>3945-3951</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>Interventional procedures using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) have recently been developed. For biliary drainage, EUS-guided trans-luminal drainage has been reported. In this procedure, the transduodenal approach for extrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided choledochoduodenostomy, and the transgastric approach for intrahepatic bile ducts is called EUSguided hepaticogastrostomy(EUS-HGS). These procedures have several effects, such as internal drainage and avoiding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) pancreatitis, and they are indicated for an inaccessible ampulla of Vater due to duodenal obstruction or surgical anatomy. EUS-HGS has particularly wide indications and clinical impact as an alternative biliary drainage method. In this procedure, it is necessary to dilate the fistula, and several devices and approaches have been reported. Stent selection is also important. In previous reports, the overall technical success rate was 82%(221/270), the clinical success rate was 97%(218/225), and the overall adverse event rate for EUS-HGS was 23%(62/270). Adverse events of EUS-biliary drainage are still high compared with ERCP or PTCD. EUSHGS should continue to be performed by experienced endoscopists who can use various strategies when adverse events occur.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>27099437</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1007-9327
ispartof World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2016-04, Vol.22 (15), p.3945-3951
issn 1007-9327
2219-2840
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4823244
source MEDLINE; Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cholestasis - diagnostic imaging
Cholestasis - etiology
Cholestasis - therapy
Drainage - adverse effects
Drainage - instrumentation
Drainage - methods
Endoscopic
Endosonography
Gastrostomy - adverse effects
Gastrostomy - instrumentation
Gastrostomy - methods
guided
hepaticogastrostomy
Endoscopic
Humans
Minireviews
Stents
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional
ultrasound
ultrasound
Endoscopic
title Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T01%3A05%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20tips%20for%20endoscopic%20ultrasound-guided%20hepaticogastrostomy&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=Ogura,%20Takeshi&rft.date=2016-04-21&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=3945&rft.epage=3951&rft.pages=3945-3951&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1783922633%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1783922633&rft_id=info:pmid/27099437&rft_cqvip_id=90888889504849544953484853&rfr_iscdi=true