Serum estradiol:oocyte ratio as a predictor of reproductive outcome: an analysis of data from >9000 IVF cycles in the Republic of Ireland

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the serum estradiol (E2) per oocyte ratio (EOR) as a function of selected embryology events and reproductive outcomes with IVF. Methods This retrospective analysis included all IVF cycles where oocyte collection and fresh transfer occurred between Ja...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2016-04, Vol.33 (4), p.481-488
Hauptverfasser: Vaughan, Denis A., Harrity, Conor, Sills, E. Scott, Mocanu, Edgar V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 488
container_issue 4
container_start_page 481
container_title Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
container_volume 33
creator Vaughan, Denis A.
Harrity, Conor
Sills, E. Scott
Mocanu, Edgar V.
description Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the serum estradiol (E2) per oocyte ratio (EOR) as a function of selected embryology events and reproductive outcomes with IVF. Methods This retrospective analysis included all IVF cycles where oocyte collection and fresh transfer occurred between January 2001 and November 2012 at a single institution. Patients were divided by three age groups ( 1500 was 3.4 ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10815-016-0664-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4818638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1780525383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-d731202e474a53390bf4e6b78b71da5b6bc522baf827212b3b6c0688558ec1f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt1qFTEUhQdRbK0-gDcS8Mab0Z1k8jO9KEixeqAg-HcbksyeNmVmckxmSs8j-NZmPLVUQRACCewva--1WVX1nMJrCqDeZAqaihqorEHKpr55UB1SoXitOIeH5Q1C19BIfVA9yfkKAFrN-OPqgEktGOPssPrxGdMyEsxzsl2Iw3GMfjcjSXYOkdhMLNkm7IKfYyKxJwm3KXaLn8M1krjMPo54TOxUjh12OeQV6uxsSZ_iSE7a0pRsvp0Rv_MDZhImMl8i-YTbxQ3Br_Qm4WCn7mn1qLdDxme391H19ezdl9MP9fnH95vTt-e1F8DnulOcMmDYqMYKzltwfYPSKe0U7axw0vlizdleM8Uoc9xJD1JrITR62rf8qDrZ65YJRuw8TsX6YLYpjDbtTLTB_FmZwqW5iNem0VRLrovAq1uBFL8vZXNmDNnjUExgXLKhSoNgopD_gSrN27aRsqAv_0Kv4pLKUn9RSjNo6UrRPeVTzDlhfzc3BbNmwuwzYUomzJoJc1P-vLhv-O7H7xAUgO2BXErTBaZ7rf-p-hNpmMJ-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777820916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serum estradiol:oocyte ratio as a predictor of reproductive outcome: an analysis of data from &gt;9000 IVF cycles in the Republic of Ireland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Vaughan, Denis A. ; Harrity, Conor ; Sills, E. Scott ; Mocanu, Edgar V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Denis A. ; Harrity, Conor ; Sills, E. Scott ; Mocanu, Edgar V.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the serum estradiol (E2) per oocyte ratio (EOR) as a function of selected embryology events and reproductive outcomes with IVF. Methods This retrospective analysis included all IVF cycles where oocyte collection and fresh transfer occurred between January 2001 and November 2012 at a single institution. Patients were divided by three age groups (&lt;35, 35–39, and ≥40 years) and further stratified into nine groups based on EOR (measured in pmol/L/oocyte). Terminal serum E2 (pmol/mL) was recorded on day of hCG trigger administration, and fertilization rate, cleavage rate, number of good quality embryos, and reproductive outcomes were recorded for each IVF cycle. Results During the study interval, 9109 oocyte retrievals were performed for 5499 IVF patients (mean = 1.7 cycles/patient). A total of 63.4 % of transfers were performed on day 3 ( n  = 4926), while 36.6 % were carried out on day 5 ( n  = 2843). Clinical pregnancy rates were highest in patients with EOR of 250–750 and declined as this ratio increased, independent of patient age. While the odds ratio (OR) for clinical pregnancy where EOR = 250–750 vs. EOR &gt; 1500 was 3.4 ( p  &lt; 0.001; 95 % CI 2.67–4.34), no statistically significant correlation was seen in fertilization, cleavage rates or number of good quality embryos as a function of EOR. Conclusions Predicting reproductive outcomes with IVF has great utility both for patients and providers. The former have the opportunity to build realistic expectations, and the latter are better able to counsel according to measured clinical parameters. A better understanding of follicular dynamics and ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation could optimize IVF treatments going forward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0664-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26852232</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Assisted Reproduction Technologies ; Embryo Transfer ; Embryos ; Estradiol - blood ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - methods ; Gynecology ; Hospitals ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Obstetrics ; Oocyte Retrieval ; Oocytes - cytology ; Ovaries ; Ovulation Induction ; Patients ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Progesterone - blood ; Reproductive Medicine ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted ; Success ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016-04, Vol.33 (4), p.481-488</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-d731202e474a53390bf4e6b78b71da5b6bc522baf827212b3b6c0688558ec1f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-d731202e474a53390bf4e6b78b71da5b6bc522baf827212b3b6c0688558ec1f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7334-1031</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818638/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4818638/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26852232$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Denis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrity, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sills, E. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mocanu, Edgar V.</creatorcontrib><title>Serum estradiol:oocyte ratio as a predictor of reproductive outcome: an analysis of data from &gt;9000 IVF cycles in the Republic of Ireland</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the serum estradiol (E2) per oocyte ratio (EOR) as a function of selected embryology events and reproductive outcomes with IVF. Methods This retrospective analysis included all IVF cycles where oocyte collection and fresh transfer occurred between January 2001 and November 2012 at a single institution. Patients were divided by three age groups (&lt;35, 35–39, and ≥40 years) and further stratified into nine groups based on EOR (measured in pmol/L/oocyte). Terminal serum E2 (pmol/mL) was recorded on day of hCG trigger administration, and fertilization rate, cleavage rate, number of good quality embryos, and reproductive outcomes were recorded for each IVF cycle. Results During the study interval, 9109 oocyte retrievals were performed for 5499 IVF patients (mean = 1.7 cycles/patient). A total of 63.4 % of transfers were performed on day 3 ( n  = 4926), while 36.6 % were carried out on day 5 ( n  = 2843). Clinical pregnancy rates were highest in patients with EOR of 250–750 and declined as this ratio increased, independent of patient age. While the odds ratio (OR) for clinical pregnancy where EOR = 250–750 vs. EOR &gt; 1500 was 3.4 ( p  &lt; 0.001; 95 % CI 2.67–4.34), no statistically significant correlation was seen in fertilization, cleavage rates or number of good quality embryos as a function of EOR. Conclusions Predicting reproductive outcomes with IVF has great utility both for patients and providers. The former have the opportunity to build realistic expectations, and the latter are better able to counsel according to measured clinical parameters. A better understanding of follicular dynamics and ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation could optimize IVF treatments going forward.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Assisted Reproduction Technologies</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Estradiol - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval</subject><subject>Oocytes - cytology</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Progesterone - blood</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt1qFTEUhQdRbK0-gDcS8Mab0Z1k8jO9KEixeqAg-HcbksyeNmVmckxmSs8j-NZmPLVUQRACCewva--1WVX1nMJrCqDeZAqaihqorEHKpr55UB1SoXitOIeH5Q1C19BIfVA9yfkKAFrN-OPqgEktGOPssPrxGdMyEsxzsl2Iw3GMfjcjSXYOkdhMLNkm7IKfYyKxJwm3KXaLn8M1krjMPo54TOxUjh12OeQV6uxsSZ_iSE7a0pRsvp0Rv_MDZhImMl8i-YTbxQ3Br_Qm4WCn7mn1qLdDxme391H19ezdl9MP9fnH95vTt-e1F8DnulOcMmDYqMYKzltwfYPSKe0U7axw0vlizdleM8Uoc9xJD1JrITR62rf8qDrZ65YJRuw8TsX6YLYpjDbtTLTB_FmZwqW5iNem0VRLrovAq1uBFL8vZXNmDNnjUExgXLKhSoNgopD_gSrN27aRsqAv_0Kv4pLKUn9RSjNo6UrRPeVTzDlhfzc3BbNmwuwzYUomzJoJc1P-vLhv-O7H7xAUgO2BXErTBaZ7rf-p-hNpmMJ-</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Vaughan, Denis A.</creator><creator>Harrity, Conor</creator><creator>Sills, E. Scott</creator><creator>Mocanu, Edgar V.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7334-1031</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Serum estradiol:oocyte ratio as a predictor of reproductive outcome: an analysis of data from &gt;9000 IVF cycles in the Republic of Ireland</title><author>Vaughan, Denis A. ; Harrity, Conor ; Sills, E. Scott ; Mocanu, Edgar V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-d731202e474a53390bf4e6b78b71da5b6bc522baf827212b3b6c0688558ec1f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Assisted Reproduction Technologies</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Estradiol - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval</topic><topic>Oocytes - cytology</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Progesterone - blood</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Denis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrity, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sills, E. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mocanu, Edgar V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaughan, Denis A.</au><au>Harrity, Conor</au><au>Sills, E. Scott</au><au>Mocanu, Edgar V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serum estradiol:oocyte ratio as a predictor of reproductive outcome: an analysis of data from &gt;9000 IVF cycles in the Republic of Ireland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>481</spage><epage>488</epage><pages>481-488</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the serum estradiol (E2) per oocyte ratio (EOR) as a function of selected embryology events and reproductive outcomes with IVF. Methods This retrospective analysis included all IVF cycles where oocyte collection and fresh transfer occurred between January 2001 and November 2012 at a single institution. Patients were divided by three age groups (&lt;35, 35–39, and ≥40 years) and further stratified into nine groups based on EOR (measured in pmol/L/oocyte). Terminal serum E2 (pmol/mL) was recorded on day of hCG trigger administration, and fertilization rate, cleavage rate, number of good quality embryos, and reproductive outcomes were recorded for each IVF cycle. Results During the study interval, 9109 oocyte retrievals were performed for 5499 IVF patients (mean = 1.7 cycles/patient). A total of 63.4 % of transfers were performed on day 3 ( n  = 4926), while 36.6 % were carried out on day 5 ( n  = 2843). Clinical pregnancy rates were highest in patients with EOR of 250–750 and declined as this ratio increased, independent of patient age. While the odds ratio (OR) for clinical pregnancy where EOR = 250–750 vs. EOR &gt; 1500 was 3.4 ( p  &lt; 0.001; 95 % CI 2.67–4.34), no statistically significant correlation was seen in fertilization, cleavage rates or number of good quality embryos as a function of EOR. Conclusions Predicting reproductive outcomes with IVF has great utility both for patients and providers. The former have the opportunity to build realistic expectations, and the latter are better able to counsel according to measured clinical parameters. A better understanding of follicular dynamics and ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation could optimize IVF treatments going forward.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26852232</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-016-0664-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7334-1031</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0468
ispartof Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016-04, Vol.33 (4), p.481-488
issn 1058-0468
1573-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4818638
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Embryo Transfer
Embryos
Estradiol - blood
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - methods
Gynecology
Hospitals
Human Genetics
Humans
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Obstetrics
Oocyte Retrieval
Oocytes - cytology
Ovaries
Ovulation Induction
Patients
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Progesterone - blood
Reproductive Medicine
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
Success
Ultrasonic imaging
title Serum estradiol:oocyte ratio as a predictor of reproductive outcome: an analysis of data from >9000 IVF cycles in the Republic of Ireland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A32%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serum%20estradiol:oocyte%20ratio%20as%20a%20predictor%20of%20reproductive%20outcome:%20an%20analysis%20of%20data%20from%20%3E9000%20IVF%20cycles%20in%20the%20Republic%20of%20Ireland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Vaughan,%20Denis%20A.&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=488&rft.pages=481-488&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-016-0664-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1780525383%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777820916&rft_id=info:pmid/26852232&rfr_iscdi=true