Status of diagnostic approaches to AQP4-IgG seronegative NMO and NMO/MS overlap syndromes
Distinguishing aquaporin-4 IgG(AQP4-IgG)-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) from opticospinal predominant multiple sclerosis (MS) is a clinical challenge with important treatment implications. The objective of the study was to examine whether expert clinicians diagnose and trea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurology 2016-01, Vol.263 (1), p.140-149 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 149 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 140 |
container_title | Journal of neurology |
container_volume | 263 |
creator | Juryńczyk, Maciej Weinshenker, Brian Akman-Demir, Gulsen Asgari, Nasrin Barnes, David Boggild, Mike Chaudhuri, Abhijit D’hooghe, Marie Evangelou, Nikos Geraldes, Ruth Illes, Zsolt Jacob, Anu Kim, Ho Jin Kleiter, Ingo Levy, Michael Marignier, Romain McGuigan, Christopher Murray, Katy Nakashima, Ichiro Pandit, Lekha Paul, Friedemann Pittock, Sean Selmaj, Krzysztof de Sèze, Jérôme Siva, Aksel Tanasescu, Radu Vukusic, Sandra Wingerchuk, Dean Wren, Damian Leite, Isabel Palace, Jacqueline |
description | Distinguishing aquaporin-4 IgG(AQP4-IgG)-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) from opticospinal predominant multiple sclerosis (MS) is a clinical challenge with important treatment implications. The objective of the study was to examine whether expert clinicians diagnose and treat NMO/MS overlapping patients in a similar way. 12 AQP4-IgG-negative patients were selected to cover the range of clinical scenarios encountered in an NMO clinic. 27 NMO and MS experts reviewed their clinical vignettes, including relevant imaging and laboratory tests. Diagnoses were categorized into four groups (NMO, MS, indeterminate, other) and management into three groups (MS drugs, immunosuppression, no treatment). The mean proportion of agreement for the diagnosis was low (
p
o
= 0.51) and ranged from 0.25 to 0.73 for individual patients. The majority opinion was divided between NMOSD versus: MS (nine cases), monophasic longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) (1), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (1) and recurrent isolated optic neuritis (RION) (1). Typical NMO features (e.g., LETM) influenced the diagnosis more than features more consistent with MS (e.g., short TM). Agreement on the treatment of patients was higher (
p
o
= 0.64) than that on the diagnosis with immunosuppression being the most common choice not only in patients with the diagnosis of NMO (98 %) but also in those indeterminate between NMO and MS (74 %). The diagnosis in AQP4-IgG-negative NMO/MS overlap syndromes is challenging and diverse. The classification of such patients currently requires new diagnostic categories, which incorporate lesser degrees of diagnostic confidence. Long-term follow-up may identify early features or biomarkers, which can more accurately distinguish the underlying disorder. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00415-015-7952-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4816597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1765983398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-8f7d4af31c7d783b7df7dae7d60f6f1e32d4bcc5c8d1527f1e3aeb0f800c79623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9rFTEQx4Mo9tn6B3iRgBcvaye_NtmLUIrWQmuVtoeeQl6S3W7Zl2yT3Qf9783yaqmC4GEYmPnkOzP5IvSOwCcCIA8zACeighKyEbRSL9CKcEYrwkXzEq2AcagEE3wPvcn5DgBUabxGe7QWDAShK3RzOZlpzji22PWmCzFPvcVmHFM09tZnPEV89PMHr067E5x9isF3Zuq3Hn8_v8AmuCUfnl_iuPVpMCPOD8GluPH5AL1qzZD928e8j66_frk6_ladXZycHh-dVbZmzVSpVjpuWkasdFKxtXSlYLx0NbR1Szyjjq-tFVY5IqhcKsavoVUAVjY1Zfvo8053nNcb76wPUzKDHlO_MelBR9PrPzuhv9Vd3GquSC0aWQQ-PgqkeD_7POlNn60fBhN8nLMmsmCKsRL_gULDKAco6Ie_0Ls4p1B-olCiAVWmLxTZUTbFnJNvn_YmoBeP9c5jXTzWi8d6WeL984OfXvw2tQB0B-TSCp1Pz0b_U_UXlvSxkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1759088160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Status of diagnostic approaches to AQP4-IgG seronegative NMO and NMO/MS overlap syndromes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Juryńczyk, Maciej ; Weinshenker, Brian ; Akman-Demir, Gulsen ; Asgari, Nasrin ; Barnes, David ; Boggild, Mike ; Chaudhuri, Abhijit ; D’hooghe, Marie ; Evangelou, Nikos ; Geraldes, Ruth ; Illes, Zsolt ; Jacob, Anu ; Kim, Ho Jin ; Kleiter, Ingo ; Levy, Michael ; Marignier, Romain ; McGuigan, Christopher ; Murray, Katy ; Nakashima, Ichiro ; Pandit, Lekha ; Paul, Friedemann ; Pittock, Sean ; Selmaj, Krzysztof ; de Sèze, Jérôme ; Siva, Aksel ; Tanasescu, Radu ; Vukusic, Sandra ; Wingerchuk, Dean ; Wren, Damian ; Leite, Isabel ; Palace, Jacqueline</creator><creatorcontrib>Juryńczyk, Maciej ; Weinshenker, Brian ; Akman-Demir, Gulsen ; Asgari, Nasrin ; Barnes, David ; Boggild, Mike ; Chaudhuri, Abhijit ; D’hooghe, Marie ; Evangelou, Nikos ; Geraldes, Ruth ; Illes, Zsolt ; Jacob, Anu ; Kim, Ho Jin ; Kleiter, Ingo ; Levy, Michael ; Marignier, Romain ; McGuigan, Christopher ; Murray, Katy ; Nakashima, Ichiro ; Pandit, Lekha ; Paul, Friedemann ; Pittock, Sean ; Selmaj, Krzysztof ; de Sèze, Jérôme ; Siva, Aksel ; Tanasescu, Radu ; Vukusic, Sandra ; Wingerchuk, Dean ; Wren, Damian ; Leite, Isabel ; Palace, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><description>Distinguishing aquaporin-4 IgG(AQP4-IgG)-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) from opticospinal predominant multiple sclerosis (MS) is a clinical challenge with important treatment implications. The objective of the study was to examine whether expert clinicians diagnose and treat NMO/MS overlapping patients in a similar way. 12 AQP4-IgG-negative patients were selected to cover the range of clinical scenarios encountered in an NMO clinic. 27 NMO and MS experts reviewed their clinical vignettes, including relevant imaging and laboratory tests. Diagnoses were categorized into four groups (NMO, MS, indeterminate, other) and management into three groups (MS drugs, immunosuppression, no treatment). The mean proportion of agreement for the diagnosis was low (
p
o
= 0.51) and ranged from 0.25 to 0.73 for individual patients. The majority opinion was divided between NMOSD versus: MS (nine cases), monophasic longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) (1), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (1) and recurrent isolated optic neuritis (RION) (1). Typical NMO features (e.g., LETM) influenced the diagnosis more than features more consistent with MS (e.g., short TM). Agreement on the treatment of patients was higher (
p
o
= 0.64) than that on the diagnosis with immunosuppression being the most common choice not only in patients with the diagnosis of NMO (98 %) but also in those indeterminate between NMO and MS (74 %). The diagnosis in AQP4-IgG-negative NMO/MS overlap syndromes is challenging and diverse. The classification of such patients currently requires new diagnostic categories, which incorporate lesser degrees of diagnostic confidence. Long-term follow-up may identify early features or biomarkers, which can more accurately distinguish the underlying disorder.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1459</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00415-015-7952-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26530512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Antibodies ; Aquaporin 4 - immunology ; Autoantibodies - blood ; Biomarkers ; Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - diagnosis ; Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - drug therapy ; Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - pathology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin G - immunology ; Internet resources ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Multiple sclerosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - diagnosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy ; Multiple Sclerosis - pathology ; Neurology ; Neuromyelitis Optica - diagnosis ; Neuromyelitis Optica - drug therapy ; Neuromyelitis Optica - pathology ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosciences ; Original Communication ; Patients ; Syndrome</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurology, 2016-01, Vol.263 (1), p.140-149</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-8f7d4af31c7d783b7df7dae7d60f6f1e32d4bcc5c8d1527f1e3aeb0f800c79623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-8f7d4af31c7d783b7df7dae7d60f6f1e32d4bcc5c8d1527f1e3aeb0f800c79623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00415-015-7952-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00415-015-7952-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26530512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Juryńczyk, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinshenker, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akman-Demir, Gulsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asgari, Nasrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggild, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhuri, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’hooghe, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evangelou, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geraldes, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illes, Zsolt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ho Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiter, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marignier, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuigan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Katy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Ichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Lekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittock, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selmaj, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sèze, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siva, Aksel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanasescu, Radu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vukusic, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wingerchuk, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wren, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palace, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><title>Status of diagnostic approaches to AQP4-IgG seronegative NMO and NMO/MS overlap syndromes</title><title>Journal of neurology</title><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><description>Distinguishing aquaporin-4 IgG(AQP4-IgG)-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) from opticospinal predominant multiple sclerosis (MS) is a clinical challenge with important treatment implications. The objective of the study was to examine whether expert clinicians diagnose and treat NMO/MS overlapping patients in a similar way. 12 AQP4-IgG-negative patients were selected to cover the range of clinical scenarios encountered in an NMO clinic. 27 NMO and MS experts reviewed their clinical vignettes, including relevant imaging and laboratory tests. Diagnoses were categorized into four groups (NMO, MS, indeterminate, other) and management into three groups (MS drugs, immunosuppression, no treatment). The mean proportion of agreement for the diagnosis was low (
p
o
= 0.51) and ranged from 0.25 to 0.73 for individual patients. The majority opinion was divided between NMOSD versus: MS (nine cases), monophasic longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) (1), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (1) and recurrent isolated optic neuritis (RION) (1). Typical NMO features (e.g., LETM) influenced the diagnosis more than features more consistent with MS (e.g., short TM). Agreement on the treatment of patients was higher (
p
o
= 0.64) than that on the diagnosis with immunosuppression being the most common choice not only in patients with the diagnosis of NMO (98 %) but also in those indeterminate between NMO and MS (74 %). The diagnosis in AQP4-IgG-negative NMO/MS overlap syndromes is challenging and diverse. The classification of such patients currently requires new diagnostic categories, which incorporate lesser degrees of diagnostic confidence. Long-term follow-up may identify early features or biomarkers, which can more accurately distinguish the underlying disorder.</description><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Aquaporin 4 - immunology</subject><subject>Autoantibodies - blood</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - diagnosis</subject><subject>Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - drug therapy</subject><subject>Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - pathology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</subject><subject>Internet resources</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuromyelitis Optica - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neuromyelitis Optica - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neuromyelitis Optica - pathology</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Communication</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><issn>0340-5354</issn><issn>1432-1459</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9rFTEQx4Mo9tn6B3iRgBcvaye_NtmLUIrWQmuVtoeeQl6S3W7Zl2yT3Qf9783yaqmC4GEYmPnkOzP5IvSOwCcCIA8zACeighKyEbRSL9CKcEYrwkXzEq2AcagEE3wPvcn5DgBUabxGe7QWDAShK3RzOZlpzji22PWmCzFPvcVmHFM09tZnPEV89PMHr067E5x9isF3Zuq3Hn8_v8AmuCUfnl_iuPVpMCPOD8GluPH5AL1qzZD928e8j66_frk6_ladXZycHh-dVbZmzVSpVjpuWkasdFKxtXSlYLx0NbR1Szyjjq-tFVY5IqhcKsavoVUAVjY1Zfvo8053nNcb76wPUzKDHlO_MelBR9PrPzuhv9Vd3GquSC0aWQQ-PgqkeD_7POlNn60fBhN8nLMmsmCKsRL_gULDKAco6Ie_0Ls4p1B-olCiAVWmLxTZUTbFnJNvn_YmoBeP9c5jXTzWi8d6WeL984OfXvw2tQB0B-TSCp1Pz0b_U_UXlvSxkQ</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Juryńczyk, Maciej</creator><creator>Weinshenker, Brian</creator><creator>Akman-Demir, Gulsen</creator><creator>Asgari, Nasrin</creator><creator>Barnes, David</creator><creator>Boggild, Mike</creator><creator>Chaudhuri, Abhijit</creator><creator>D’hooghe, Marie</creator><creator>Evangelou, Nikos</creator><creator>Geraldes, Ruth</creator><creator>Illes, Zsolt</creator><creator>Jacob, Anu</creator><creator>Kim, Ho Jin</creator><creator>Kleiter, Ingo</creator><creator>Levy, Michael</creator><creator>Marignier, Romain</creator><creator>McGuigan, Christopher</creator><creator>Murray, Katy</creator><creator>Nakashima, Ichiro</creator><creator>Pandit, Lekha</creator><creator>Paul, Friedemann</creator><creator>Pittock, Sean</creator><creator>Selmaj, Krzysztof</creator><creator>de Sèze, Jérôme</creator><creator>Siva, Aksel</creator><creator>Tanasescu, Radu</creator><creator>Vukusic, Sandra</creator><creator>Wingerchuk, Dean</creator><creator>Wren, Damian</creator><creator>Leite, Isabel</creator><creator>Palace, Jacqueline</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Status of diagnostic approaches to AQP4-IgG seronegative NMO and NMO/MS overlap syndromes</title><author>Juryńczyk, Maciej ; Weinshenker, Brian ; Akman-Demir, Gulsen ; Asgari, Nasrin ; Barnes, David ; Boggild, Mike ; Chaudhuri, Abhijit ; D’hooghe, Marie ; Evangelou, Nikos ; Geraldes, Ruth ; Illes, Zsolt ; Jacob, Anu ; Kim, Ho Jin ; Kleiter, Ingo ; Levy, Michael ; Marignier, Romain ; McGuigan, Christopher ; Murray, Katy ; Nakashima, Ichiro ; Pandit, Lekha ; Paul, Friedemann ; Pittock, Sean ; Selmaj, Krzysztof ; de Sèze, Jérôme ; Siva, Aksel ; Tanasescu, Radu ; Vukusic, Sandra ; Wingerchuk, Dean ; Wren, Damian ; Leite, Isabel ; Palace, Jacqueline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-8f7d4af31c7d783b7df7dae7d60f6f1e32d4bcc5c8d1527f1e3aeb0f800c79623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Aquaporin 4 - immunology</topic><topic>Autoantibodies - blood</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - diagnosis</topic><topic>Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - drug therapy</topic><topic>Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - pathology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</topic><topic>Internet resources</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuromyelitis Optica - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neuromyelitis Optica - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neuromyelitis Optica - pathology</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Communication</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Juryńczyk, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinshenker, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akman-Demir, Gulsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asgari, Nasrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggild, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhuri, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’hooghe, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evangelou, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geraldes, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illes, Zsolt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ho Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiter, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marignier, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuigan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Katy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Ichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Lekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittock, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selmaj, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sèze, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siva, Aksel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanasescu, Radu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vukusic, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wingerchuk, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wren, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palace, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Juryńczyk, Maciej</au><au>Weinshenker, Brian</au><au>Akman-Demir, Gulsen</au><au>Asgari, Nasrin</au><au>Barnes, David</au><au>Boggild, Mike</au><au>Chaudhuri, Abhijit</au><au>D’hooghe, Marie</au><au>Evangelou, Nikos</au><au>Geraldes, Ruth</au><au>Illes, Zsolt</au><au>Jacob, Anu</au><au>Kim, Ho Jin</au><au>Kleiter, Ingo</au><au>Levy, Michael</au><au>Marignier, Romain</au><au>McGuigan, Christopher</au><au>Murray, Katy</au><au>Nakashima, Ichiro</au><au>Pandit, Lekha</au><au>Paul, Friedemann</au><au>Pittock, Sean</au><au>Selmaj, Krzysztof</au><au>de Sèze, Jérôme</au><au>Siva, Aksel</au><au>Tanasescu, Radu</au><au>Vukusic, Sandra</au><au>Wingerchuk, Dean</au><au>Wren, Damian</au><au>Leite, Isabel</au><au>Palace, Jacqueline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Status of diagnostic approaches to AQP4-IgG seronegative NMO and NMO/MS overlap syndromes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle><stitle>J Neurol</stitle><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>263</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>140-149</pages><issn>0340-5354</issn><eissn>1432-1459</eissn><abstract>Distinguishing aquaporin-4 IgG(AQP4-IgG)-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) from opticospinal predominant multiple sclerosis (MS) is a clinical challenge with important treatment implications. The objective of the study was to examine whether expert clinicians diagnose and treat NMO/MS overlapping patients in a similar way. 12 AQP4-IgG-negative patients were selected to cover the range of clinical scenarios encountered in an NMO clinic. 27 NMO and MS experts reviewed their clinical vignettes, including relevant imaging and laboratory tests. Diagnoses were categorized into four groups (NMO, MS, indeterminate, other) and management into three groups (MS drugs, immunosuppression, no treatment). The mean proportion of agreement for the diagnosis was low (
p
o
= 0.51) and ranged from 0.25 to 0.73 for individual patients. The majority opinion was divided between NMOSD versus: MS (nine cases), monophasic longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) (1), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (1) and recurrent isolated optic neuritis (RION) (1). Typical NMO features (e.g., LETM) influenced the diagnosis more than features more consistent with MS (e.g., short TM). Agreement on the treatment of patients was higher (
p
o
= 0.64) than that on the diagnosis with immunosuppression being the most common choice not only in patients with the diagnosis of NMO (98 %) but also in those indeterminate between NMO and MS (74 %). The diagnosis in AQP4-IgG-negative NMO/MS overlap syndromes is challenging and diverse. The classification of such patients currently requires new diagnostic categories, which incorporate lesser degrees of diagnostic confidence. Long-term follow-up may identify early features or biomarkers, which can more accurately distinguish the underlying disorder.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26530512</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00415-015-7952-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5354 |
ispartof | Journal of neurology, 2016-01, Vol.263 (1), p.140-149 |
issn | 0340-5354 1432-1459 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4816597 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Antibodies Aquaporin 4 - immunology Autoantibodies - blood Biomarkers Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - diagnosis Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - drug therapy Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated - pathology Hospitals Humans Immunoglobulin G - immunology Internet resources Medicine Medicine & Public Health Multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis - diagnosis Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy Multiple Sclerosis - pathology Neurology Neuromyelitis Optica - diagnosis Neuromyelitis Optica - drug therapy Neuromyelitis Optica - pathology Neuroradiology Neurosciences Original Communication Patients Syndrome |
title | Status of diagnostic approaches to AQP4-IgG seronegative NMO and NMO/MS overlap syndromes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A35%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Status%20of%20diagnostic%20approaches%20to%20AQP4-IgG%20seronegative%20NMO%20and%20NMO/MS%20overlap%20syndromes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Jury%C5%84czyk,%20Maciej&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=263&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=140-149&rft.issn=0340-5354&rft.eissn=1432-1459&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00415-015-7952-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1765983398%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1759088160&rft_id=info:pmid/26530512&rfr_iscdi=true |