Transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Evolution® mechanical dilator sheath: a single center confirmatory experience

Objective In recent years there has been an increase in clinical situations requiring lead extraction procedures of implanted cardiac devices. In our clinic, extraction procedures are performed with Evolution® mechanical lead extraction system. In this manuscript we aimed to evaluate our lead extrac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SpringerPlus 2016-03, Vol.5 (1), p.356-356, Article 356
Hauptverfasser: Kocabaş, Uğur, Duygu, Hamza, Eren, Nihan Kahya, Akyıldız, Zehra İlke, Özyıldırım, Serhan, Tülüce, Selcen Yakar, Kırış, Tuncay, Nazlı, Cem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue 1
container_start_page 356
container_title SpringerPlus
container_volume 5
creator Kocabaş, Uğur
Duygu, Hamza
Eren, Nihan Kahya
Akyıldız, Zehra İlke
Özyıldırım, Serhan
Tülüce, Selcen Yakar
Kırış, Tuncay
Nazlı, Cem
description Objective In recent years there has been an increase in clinical situations requiring lead extraction procedures of implanted cardiac devices. In our clinic, extraction procedures are performed with Evolution® mechanical lead extraction system. In this manuscript we aimed to evaluate our lead extraction procedures. Methods We retrospectively evaluated lead extraction procedures carried out on 41 patients [30 male, 11 female patient; mean age 61.5 ± 18.5 median 67 (23–85)] between 2008 and 2015 using Evolution® system. Procedural success, major and minor complications are determined according to previously published guidelines. Results Mean duration of the lead implantation was 88.4 ± 62.5 months (6–240). Implanted device was a pacemaker in 27 (65.8 %) and ICD in 14 (34.2 %) of patients. Total 67 leads were extracted from the patients, 22 (32.8 %) were atrial, 30 (44.2 %) were ventricular, 14 (21.5 %) were dual coil defibrillator and 1 (1.5 %) was coronary sinus lead. Indications for lead removal were pacemaker decubitis and infection in 29 (70.8 %), lead dysfunction in 11 (26.8 %) and subclavian vein thrombosis in 1 (2.4 %) patient. Success rate with Evolution® system without using snare was 85.3 %. Clinical success rate was 97.5 % procedural success rate was 95.1 % and failure occured in one patient. Major complications occured in 2 (4.8 %) patients, 1 (2.4 %) was procedure related mortality. Minor complications were seen in 5 (12.2 %) of patients. Conclusions In our single center study it is shown that extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads of relatively long implantation duration and in an older age patient group may be successfully carried out using the Evolution® system. However due to potentially serious complications it is adviced to be done by experienced operators in centers with cardiovascular surgery backup.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40064-016-1987-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4803708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1780813089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-43e92d9d35534782a645f9c0fd4e54f03d1538027289392114635da6d04017953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEotXQB2CDLLFhE7BjxxcWSKgqF6kSm7K2PPbJjEtiBzsZTR-JDQ_Bk-EopRqQ8MaWznf-c_FfVc8Jfk2I5G8yw5izGhNeEyVFfXxUnTdE0ZpITB6fvM-qi5xvcTlcECbw0-qsEZhzytV59eMmmZAPEOKcERynZOzkY0CxQ6OxMJhvkJAJDvlh7E2YzLYHZE1yPh4gTSXooPPb5PveTDGhHozLaM4-7NDVIfbzovbrJxrA7k3w1vTI-RXNezDT_i0yaKEXWQiLoI2h82lYmLvS0gjJQ7DwrHrSmT7Dxf29qb5-uLq5_FRff_n4-fL9dW3LbFPNKKjGKUfbljIhG8NZ2ymLO8egZR2mjrRU4kY0UlHVEMI4bZ3hDjNMhGrppnq36o7zdgC3NJVMr8fkB5PudDRe_x0Jfq938aCZxFRgWQRe3Quk-H2GPOnBZwtlQQHKljUREktCcam_qV7-g97GOYUyXqFEixVvOC0UWSmbYs4JuodmCNaLF_TqBV28oBcv6GPJeXE6xUPGn58vQLMCuYTCDtJJ6f-q_gYxycSG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1775096263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Evolution® mechanical dilator sheath: a single center confirmatory experience</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kocabaş, Uğur ; Duygu, Hamza ; Eren, Nihan Kahya ; Akyıldız, Zehra İlke ; Özyıldırım, Serhan ; Tülüce, Selcen Yakar ; Kırış, Tuncay ; Nazlı, Cem</creator><creatorcontrib>Kocabaş, Uğur ; Duygu, Hamza ; Eren, Nihan Kahya ; Akyıldız, Zehra İlke ; Özyıldırım, Serhan ; Tülüce, Selcen Yakar ; Kırış, Tuncay ; Nazlı, Cem</creatorcontrib><description>Objective In recent years there has been an increase in clinical situations requiring lead extraction procedures of implanted cardiac devices. In our clinic, extraction procedures are performed with Evolution® mechanical lead extraction system. In this manuscript we aimed to evaluate our lead extraction procedures. Methods We retrospectively evaluated lead extraction procedures carried out on 41 patients [30 male, 11 female patient; mean age 61.5 ± 18.5 median 67 (23–85)] between 2008 and 2015 using Evolution® system. Procedural success, major and minor complications are determined according to previously published guidelines. Results Mean duration of the lead implantation was 88.4 ± 62.5 months (6–240). Implanted device was a pacemaker in 27 (65.8 %) and ICD in 14 (34.2 %) of patients. Total 67 leads were extracted from the patients, 22 (32.8 %) were atrial, 30 (44.2 %) were ventricular, 14 (21.5 %) were dual coil defibrillator and 1 (1.5 %) was coronary sinus lead. Indications for lead removal were pacemaker decubitis and infection in 29 (70.8 %), lead dysfunction in 11 (26.8 %) and subclavian vein thrombosis in 1 (2.4 %) patient. Success rate with Evolution® system without using snare was 85.3 %. Clinical success rate was 97.5 % procedural success rate was 95.1 % and failure occured in one patient. Major complications occured in 2 (4.8 %) patients, 1 (2.4 %) was procedure related mortality. Minor complications were seen in 5 (12.2 %) of patients. Conclusions In our single center study it is shown that extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads of relatively long implantation duration and in an older age patient group may be successfully carried out using the Evolution® system. However due to potentially serious complications it is adviced to be done by experienced operators in centers with cardiovascular surgery backup.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-1801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-1801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-1987-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27066369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences ; Medicine ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>SpringerPlus, 2016-03, Vol.5 (1), p.356-356, Article 356</ispartof><rights>Kocabaş et al. 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-43e92d9d35534782a645f9c0fd4e54f03d1538027289392114635da6d04017953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-43e92d9d35534782a645f9c0fd4e54f03d1538027289392114635da6d04017953</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9868-206X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803708/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803708/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kocabaş, Uğur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duygu, Hamza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eren, Nihan Kahya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akyıldız, Zehra İlke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özyıldırım, Serhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tülüce, Selcen Yakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırış, Tuncay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazlı, Cem</creatorcontrib><title>Transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Evolution® mechanical dilator sheath: a single center confirmatory experience</title><title>SpringerPlus</title><addtitle>SpringerPlus</addtitle><addtitle>Springerplus</addtitle><description>Objective In recent years there has been an increase in clinical situations requiring lead extraction procedures of implanted cardiac devices. In our clinic, extraction procedures are performed with Evolution® mechanical lead extraction system. In this manuscript we aimed to evaluate our lead extraction procedures. Methods We retrospectively evaluated lead extraction procedures carried out on 41 patients [30 male, 11 female patient; mean age 61.5 ± 18.5 median 67 (23–85)] between 2008 and 2015 using Evolution® system. Procedural success, major and minor complications are determined according to previously published guidelines. Results Mean duration of the lead implantation was 88.4 ± 62.5 months (6–240). Implanted device was a pacemaker in 27 (65.8 %) and ICD in 14 (34.2 %) of patients. Total 67 leads were extracted from the patients, 22 (32.8 %) were atrial, 30 (44.2 %) were ventricular, 14 (21.5 %) were dual coil defibrillator and 1 (1.5 %) was coronary sinus lead. Indications for lead removal were pacemaker decubitis and infection in 29 (70.8 %), lead dysfunction in 11 (26.8 %) and subclavian vein thrombosis in 1 (2.4 %) patient. Success rate with Evolution® system without using snare was 85.3 %. Clinical success rate was 97.5 % procedural success rate was 95.1 % and failure occured in one patient. Major complications occured in 2 (4.8 %) patients, 1 (2.4 %) was procedure related mortality. Minor complications were seen in 5 (12.2 %) of patients. Conclusions In our single center study it is shown that extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads of relatively long implantation duration and in an older age patient group may be successfully carried out using the Evolution® system. However due to potentially serious complications it is adviced to be done by experienced operators in centers with cardiovascular surgery backup.</description><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2193-1801</issn><issn>2193-1801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEotXQB2CDLLFhE7BjxxcWSKgqF6kSm7K2PPbJjEtiBzsZTR-JDQ_Bk-EopRqQ8MaWznf-c_FfVc8Jfk2I5G8yw5izGhNeEyVFfXxUnTdE0ZpITB6fvM-qi5xvcTlcECbw0-qsEZhzytV59eMmmZAPEOKcERynZOzkY0CxQ6OxMJhvkJAJDvlh7E2YzLYHZE1yPh4gTSXooPPb5PveTDGhHozLaM4-7NDVIfbzovbrJxrA7k3w1vTI-RXNezDT_i0yaKEXWQiLoI2h82lYmLvS0gjJQ7DwrHrSmT7Dxf29qb5-uLq5_FRff_n4-fL9dW3LbFPNKKjGKUfbljIhG8NZ2ymLO8egZR2mjrRU4kY0UlHVEMI4bZ3hDjNMhGrppnq36o7zdgC3NJVMr8fkB5PudDRe_x0Jfq938aCZxFRgWQRe3Quk-H2GPOnBZwtlQQHKljUREktCcam_qV7-g97GOYUyXqFEixVvOC0UWSmbYs4JuodmCNaLF_TqBV28oBcv6GPJeXE6xUPGn58vQLMCuYTCDtJJ6f-q_gYxycSG</recordid><startdate>20160322</startdate><enddate>20160322</enddate><creator>Kocabaş, Uğur</creator><creator>Duygu, Hamza</creator><creator>Eren, Nihan Kahya</creator><creator>Akyıldız, Zehra İlke</creator><creator>Özyıldırım, Serhan</creator><creator>Tülüce, Selcen Yakar</creator><creator>Kırış, Tuncay</creator><creator>Nazlı, Cem</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-206X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160322</creationdate><title>Transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Evolution® mechanical dilator sheath: a single center confirmatory experience</title><author>Kocabaş, Uğur ; Duygu, Hamza ; Eren, Nihan Kahya ; Akyıldız, Zehra İlke ; Özyıldırım, Serhan ; Tülüce, Selcen Yakar ; Kırış, Tuncay ; Nazlı, Cem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-43e92d9d35534782a645f9c0fd4e54f03d1538027289392114635da6d04017953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kocabaş, Uğur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duygu, Hamza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eren, Nihan Kahya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akyıldız, Zehra İlke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özyıldırım, Serhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tülüce, Selcen Yakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırış, Tuncay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazlı, Cem</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>SpringerPlus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kocabaş, Uğur</au><au>Duygu, Hamza</au><au>Eren, Nihan Kahya</au><au>Akyıldız, Zehra İlke</au><au>Özyıldırım, Serhan</au><au>Tülüce, Selcen Yakar</au><au>Kırış, Tuncay</au><au>Nazlı, Cem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Evolution® mechanical dilator sheath: a single center confirmatory experience</atitle><jtitle>SpringerPlus</jtitle><stitle>SpringerPlus</stitle><addtitle>Springerplus</addtitle><date>2016-03-22</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>356</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>356-356</pages><artnum>356</artnum><issn>2193-1801</issn><eissn>2193-1801</eissn><abstract>Objective In recent years there has been an increase in clinical situations requiring lead extraction procedures of implanted cardiac devices. In our clinic, extraction procedures are performed with Evolution® mechanical lead extraction system. In this manuscript we aimed to evaluate our lead extraction procedures. Methods We retrospectively evaluated lead extraction procedures carried out on 41 patients [30 male, 11 female patient; mean age 61.5 ± 18.5 median 67 (23–85)] between 2008 and 2015 using Evolution® system. Procedural success, major and minor complications are determined according to previously published guidelines. Results Mean duration of the lead implantation was 88.4 ± 62.5 months (6–240). Implanted device was a pacemaker in 27 (65.8 %) and ICD in 14 (34.2 %) of patients. Total 67 leads were extracted from the patients, 22 (32.8 %) were atrial, 30 (44.2 %) were ventricular, 14 (21.5 %) were dual coil defibrillator and 1 (1.5 %) was coronary sinus lead. Indications for lead removal were pacemaker decubitis and infection in 29 (70.8 %), lead dysfunction in 11 (26.8 %) and subclavian vein thrombosis in 1 (2.4 %) patient. Success rate with Evolution® system without using snare was 85.3 %. Clinical success rate was 97.5 % procedural success rate was 95.1 % and failure occured in one patient. Major complications occured in 2 (4.8 %) patients, 1 (2.4 %) was procedure related mortality. Minor complications were seen in 5 (12.2 %) of patients. Conclusions In our single center study it is shown that extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads of relatively long implantation duration and in an older age patient group may be successfully carried out using the Evolution® system. However due to potentially serious complications it is adviced to be done by experienced operators in centers with cardiovascular surgery backup.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>27066369</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40064-016-1987-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-206X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2193-1801
ispartof SpringerPlus, 2016-03, Vol.5 (1), p.356-356, Article 356
issn 2193-1801
2193-1801
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4803708
source PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Humanities and Social Sciences
Medicine
multidisciplinary
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title Transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Evolution® mechanical dilator sheath: a single center confirmatory experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transvenous%20extraction%20of%20pacemaker%20and%20implantable%20cardioverter%20defibrillator%20leads%20using%20Evolution%C2%AE%20mechanical%20dilator%20sheath:%20a%20single%20center%20confirmatory%20experience&rft.jtitle=SpringerPlus&rft.au=Kocaba%C5%9F,%20U%C4%9Fur&rft.date=2016-03-22&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=356&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=356-356&rft.artnum=356&rft.issn=2193-1801&rft.eissn=2193-1801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40064-016-1987-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1780813089%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1775096263&rft_id=info:pmid/27066369&rfr_iscdi=true