The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format
OBJECTIVES:The literature increasingly demonstrates the importance of gait speed (GS) in the frailty assessment of patients aged 60 years and older. Conventional GS measurement, however, maybe contraindicated in settings such as trauma where the patient is temporarily immobilized. We devised a Walki...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2016-04, Vol.30 (4), p.e132-e137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e137 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e132 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic trauma |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Cong, Guang-Ting Cohn, Matthew R Villa, Jordan C Kerwin, Lewis J Rosen, Natalie Fang, Xiu Zhen Christos, Paul J Evrony, Ayelet Chen, Jin Torres, Ashley Lane, Joseph M |
description | OBJECTIVES:The literature increasingly demonstrates the importance of gait speed (GS) in the frailty assessment of patients aged 60 years and older. Conventional GS measurement, however, maybe contraindicated in settings such as trauma where the patient is temporarily immobilized. We devised a Walking Speed Questionnaire (WSQ) to allow assessment of preinjury baseline GS, in meters per second, in a self-reported manner, to overcome the inability to directly test the patientsʼ walking speed.
DESIGN:Four questions comprise the WSQ, and were derived using previously published questionnaires and expert opinion of 6 physician-researchers.
SETTING:Four ambulatory clinics.
PARTICIPANTS:Ambulating individuals aged 60–95 (mean age, 73.2 ± 8.1 years, 86.1% female, n = 101).
INTERVENTION:Participants completed the WSQ and underwent GS measurement for comparison.
ANALYSIS:WSQ score correlation to true GS, receiver operating characteristics, and validation statistics were performed.
RESULTS:All 4 questions of the WSQ independently predicted true GS significantly (P < 0.001). The WSQ sufficiently predicted true GS with r = 0.696 and ρ = 0.717.
CONCLUSIONS:The WSQ is an effective tool for assessing baseline walking speed in patients aged 60 years and older in a self-reported manner. It permits gait screening in health care environments where conventional GS testing is contraindicated due to temporary immobilization and maybe used to provide baseline targets for goal-oriented post-trauma care. Given its ability to capture GS in patients who are unable to ambulate, it may open doors for frailty research in previously unattainable populations.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000476 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4801662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1775382640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3606-2a6a10df9d936fe66ba66923ea028c2a2ba54b14b5d346d463c8df37ce2d8cd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwhlySbgRzJxWCAB4iVVQkARS8uJJ23AjYudgvh7UhWqwgJvRvI9c8eeS8g-o0eM5tnx-d3oiK6fJIMN0mepYDHnOdskfSpzGqdC5D2yE8JLx0jK-TbpcUghZxL65GE0wehZ29e6GUePM0QT3c8xtLVrGl17PInOQsAQFvJvrG4iHT2irWKPM-fb7urK-alud8lWpW3Ave86IE9Xl6OLm3h4d317cTaMSwEUYq5BM2qq3OQCKgQoNEDOBWrKZck1L3SaFCwpUiMSMAmIUppKZCVyI0uTigE5XfrO5sUUTYlN67VVM19Ptf9UTtfqt9LUEzV27yqRlAHwzuDw28C7t8Wn1bQOJVqrG3TzoFiWpUJySGiHJku09C4Ej9VqDKNqEYfq4lB_4-jaDtafuGr62X8HyCXw4WyLPrza-Qd6NUFt28n_3l8S85fB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1775382640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Cong, Guang-Ting ; Cohn, Matthew R ; Villa, Jordan C ; Kerwin, Lewis J ; Rosen, Natalie ; Fang, Xiu Zhen ; Christos, Paul J ; Evrony, Ayelet ; Chen, Jin ; Torres, Ashley ; Lane, Joseph M</creator><creatorcontrib>Cong, Guang-Ting ; Cohn, Matthew R ; Villa, Jordan C ; Kerwin, Lewis J ; Rosen, Natalie ; Fang, Xiu Zhen ; Christos, Paul J ; Evrony, Ayelet ; Chen, Jin ; Torres, Ashley ; Lane, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:The literature increasingly demonstrates the importance of gait speed (GS) in the frailty assessment of patients aged 60 years and older. Conventional GS measurement, however, maybe contraindicated in settings such as trauma where the patient is temporarily immobilized. We devised a Walking Speed Questionnaire (WSQ) to allow assessment of preinjury baseline GS, in meters per second, in a self-reported manner, to overcome the inability to directly test the patientsʼ walking speed.
DESIGN:Four questions comprise the WSQ, and were derived using previously published questionnaires and expert opinion of 6 physician-researchers.
SETTING:Four ambulatory clinics.
PARTICIPANTS:Ambulating individuals aged 60–95 (mean age, 73.2 ± 8.1 years, 86.1% female, n = 101).
INTERVENTION:Participants completed the WSQ and underwent GS measurement for comparison.
ANALYSIS:WSQ score correlation to true GS, receiver operating characteristics, and validation statistics were performed.
RESULTS:All 4 questions of the WSQ independently predicted true GS significantly (P < 0.001). The WSQ sufficiently predicted true GS with r = 0.696 and ρ = 0.717.
CONCLUSIONS:The WSQ is an effective tool for assessing baseline walking speed in patients aged 60 years and older in a self-reported manner. It permits gait screening in health care environments where conventional GS testing is contraindicated due to temporary immobilization and maybe used to provide baseline targets for goal-oriented post-trauma care. Given its ability to capture GS in patients who are unable to ambulate, it may open doors for frailty research in previously unattainable populations.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-2291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000476</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26569186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Frail Elderly ; Gait - physiology ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; New York ; Physical Examination - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Report ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Walking - classification ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2016-04, Vol.30 (4), p.e132-e137</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3606-2a6a10df9d936fe66ba66923ea028c2a2ba54b14b5d346d463c8df37ce2d8cd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26569186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cong, Guang-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villa, Jordan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerwin, Lewis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Xiu Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christos, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evrony, Ayelet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><title>The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</title><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:The literature increasingly demonstrates the importance of gait speed (GS) in the frailty assessment of patients aged 60 years and older. Conventional GS measurement, however, maybe contraindicated in settings such as trauma where the patient is temporarily immobilized. We devised a Walking Speed Questionnaire (WSQ) to allow assessment of preinjury baseline GS, in meters per second, in a self-reported manner, to overcome the inability to directly test the patientsʼ walking speed.
DESIGN:Four questions comprise the WSQ, and were derived using previously published questionnaires and expert opinion of 6 physician-researchers.
SETTING:Four ambulatory clinics.
PARTICIPANTS:Ambulating individuals aged 60–95 (mean age, 73.2 ± 8.1 years, 86.1% female, n = 101).
INTERVENTION:Participants completed the WSQ and underwent GS measurement for comparison.
ANALYSIS:WSQ score correlation to true GS, receiver operating characteristics, and validation statistics were performed.
RESULTS:All 4 questions of the WSQ independently predicted true GS significantly (P < 0.001). The WSQ sufficiently predicted true GS with r = 0.696 and ρ = 0.717.
CONCLUSIONS:The WSQ is an effective tool for assessing baseline walking speed in patients aged 60 years and older in a self-reported manner. It permits gait screening in health care environments where conventional GS testing is contraindicated due to temporary immobilization and maybe used to provide baseline targets for goal-oriented post-trauma care. Given its ability to capture GS in patients who are unable to ambulate, it may open doors for frailty research in previously unattainable populations.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Physical Examination - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Walking - classification</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>0890-5339</issn><issn>1531-2291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwhlySbgRzJxWCAB4iVVQkARS8uJJ23AjYudgvh7UhWqwgJvRvI9c8eeS8g-o0eM5tnx-d3oiK6fJIMN0mepYDHnOdskfSpzGqdC5D2yE8JLx0jK-TbpcUghZxL65GE0wehZ29e6GUePM0QT3c8xtLVrGl17PInOQsAQFvJvrG4iHT2irWKPM-fb7urK-alud8lWpW3Ave86IE9Xl6OLm3h4d317cTaMSwEUYq5BM2qq3OQCKgQoNEDOBWrKZck1L3SaFCwpUiMSMAmIUppKZCVyI0uTigE5XfrO5sUUTYlN67VVM19Ptf9UTtfqt9LUEzV27yqRlAHwzuDw28C7t8Wn1bQOJVqrG3TzoFiWpUJySGiHJku09C4Ej9VqDKNqEYfq4lB_4-jaDtafuGr62X8HyCXw4WyLPrza-Qd6NUFt28n_3l8S85fB</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Cong, Guang-Ting</creator><creator>Cohn, Matthew R</creator><creator>Villa, Jordan C</creator><creator>Kerwin, Lewis J</creator><creator>Rosen, Natalie</creator><creator>Fang, Xiu Zhen</creator><creator>Christos, Paul J</creator><creator>Evrony, Ayelet</creator><creator>Chen, Jin</creator><creator>Torres, Ashley</creator><creator>Lane, Joseph M</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format</title><author>Cong, Guang-Ting ; Cohn, Matthew R ; Villa, Jordan C ; Kerwin, Lewis J ; Rosen, Natalie ; Fang, Xiu Zhen ; Christos, Paul J ; Evrony, Ayelet ; Chen, Jin ; Torres, Ashley ; Lane, Joseph M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3606-2a6a10df9d936fe66ba66923ea028c2a2ba54b14b5d346d463c8df37ce2d8cd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Physical Examination - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Walking - classification</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cong, Guang-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villa, Jordan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerwin, Lewis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Xiu Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christos, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evrony, Ayelet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cong, Guang-Ting</au><au>Cohn, Matthew R</au><au>Villa, Jordan C</au><au>Kerwin, Lewis J</au><au>Rosen, Natalie</au><au>Fang, Xiu Zhen</au><au>Christos, Paul J</au><au>Evrony, Ayelet</au><au>Chen, Jin</au><au>Torres, Ashley</au><au>Lane, Joseph M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e132</spage><epage>e137</epage><pages>e132-e137</pages><issn>0890-5339</issn><eissn>1531-2291</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES:The literature increasingly demonstrates the importance of gait speed (GS) in the frailty assessment of patients aged 60 years and older. Conventional GS measurement, however, maybe contraindicated in settings such as trauma where the patient is temporarily immobilized. We devised a Walking Speed Questionnaire (WSQ) to allow assessment of preinjury baseline GS, in meters per second, in a self-reported manner, to overcome the inability to directly test the patientsʼ walking speed.
DESIGN:Four questions comprise the WSQ, and were derived using previously published questionnaires and expert opinion of 6 physician-researchers.
SETTING:Four ambulatory clinics.
PARTICIPANTS:Ambulating individuals aged 60–95 (mean age, 73.2 ± 8.1 years, 86.1% female, n = 101).
INTERVENTION:Participants completed the WSQ and underwent GS measurement for comparison.
ANALYSIS:WSQ score correlation to true GS, receiver operating characteristics, and validation statistics were performed.
RESULTS:All 4 questions of the WSQ independently predicted true GS significantly (P < 0.001). The WSQ sufficiently predicted true GS with r = 0.696 and ρ = 0.717.
CONCLUSIONS:The WSQ is an effective tool for assessing baseline walking speed in patients aged 60 years and older in a self-reported manner. It permits gait screening in health care environments where conventional GS testing is contraindicated due to temporary immobilization and maybe used to provide baseline targets for goal-oriented post-trauma care. Given its ability to capture GS in patients who are unable to ambulate, it may open doors for frailty research in previously unattainable populations.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>26569186</pmid><doi>10.1097/BOT.0000000000000476</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-5339 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2016-04, Vol.30 (4), p.e132-e137 |
issn | 0890-5339 1531-2291 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4801662 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Frail Elderly Gait - physiology Geriatric Assessment - methods Health Status Indicators Humans Male Middle Aged New York Physical Examination - methods Reproducibility of Results Self Report Sensitivity and Specificity Surveys and Questionnaires Walking - classification Walking - physiology |
title | The Walking Speed Questionnaire: Assessing Walking Speed in a Self-reported Format |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Walking%20Speed%20Questionnaire:%20Assessing%20Walking%20Speed%20in%20a%20Self-reported%20Format&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20trauma&rft.au=Cong,%20Guang-Ting&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e132&rft.epage=e137&rft.pages=e132-e137&rft.issn=0890-5339&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000476&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1775382640%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1775382640&rft_id=info:pmid/26569186&rfr_iscdi=true |