Probiotic supplementation does not improve eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection compared to placebo based on standard therapy: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis included eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the aim of determining whether probiotic supplementation can improve H. pylori eradication rates. PUBMED, EBSCO, Web of Science and Ovid databases were searched. We included RCTs that investigated the effect of combining p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2016-03, Vol.6 (1), p.23522-23522, Article 23522
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Chao, Sang, Jianzhong, He, Haijian, Wan, Xingyong, Lin, Yiming, Li, Lan, Li, Youming, Yu, Chaohui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23522
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23522
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 6
creator Lu, Chao
Sang, Jianzhong
He, Haijian
Wan, Xingyong
Lin, Yiming
Li, Lan
Li, Youming
Yu, Chaohui
description This meta-analysis included eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the aim of determining whether probiotic supplementation can improve H. pylori eradication rates. PUBMED, EBSCO, Web of Science and Ovid databases were searched. We included RCTs that investigated the effect of combining probiotics, with or without a placebo, with standard therapy. A total of 21 RCTs that reported standard therapy plus probiotics were included. Compared to the placebo group, the probiotics group was 1.21(OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.69) and 1.28 (OR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.86) times more likely to achieve eradication of H. pylori infection in intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Probiotics with triple therapy plus a 14-day course of treatment did not improve the eradication of H. pylori infection (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 0.87, 2.39) compared to the placebo. Moreover, the placebo plus standard therapy did not improve eradication rates compared to standard therapy alone ( P  = 0.816). However, probiotics did improve the adverse effects of diarrhea and nausea. These pooled data suggest that the use of probiotics plus standard therapy does not improve the eradication rate of H. pylori infection compared to the placebo.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/srep23522
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4800733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1898682899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-598303687ff51c9786d8cf9828193bcf903794951ab2a534d179b5149b93a4c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkd9qFTEQxhdRbKm98AUk4I0Kq_m3J4kXBSnVCgW90Oswm51tU3Y3MckWzrP4sqaeejhqbjLk-_HNTL6mec7oW0aFfpcTRi46zh81x5zKruWC88cH9VFzmvMtrafjRjLztDniG2MUk-a4-fk1hd6H4h3Ja4wTzrgUKD4sZAiYyRIK8XNM4Q4JJhi824kJCpIwkkucvAs9uIKJxO0Ukid-GdH9plyYIyQcSAkkTuCwD6SHXB-qmAssA6Qq3lTnuH1PgMxYoIUFpm32-VnzZIQp4-nDfdJ8_3jx7fyyvfry6fP5h6vWSaFL2xktqNhoNY4dc0bpzaDdaDTXzIi-VlQoI03HoOfQCTkwZfqubt8bAdIpcdKc7Xzj2s84uPoDCSYbk58hbW0Ab_9WFn9jr8OdlZpSJUQ1ePVgkMKPFXOxs88OpwkWDGu2TKlOaKaorOjLf9DbsKa6cKW00Zs6tTGVer2jXAq5Bjzuh2HU3qdu96lX9sXh9HvyT8YVeLMDcpWWa0wHLf9z-wV_brmT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1898682899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probiotic supplementation does not improve eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection compared to placebo based on standard therapy: a meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lu, Chao ; Sang, Jianzhong ; He, Haijian ; Wan, Xingyong ; Lin, Yiming ; Li, Lan ; Li, Youming ; Yu, Chaohui</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chao ; Sang, Jianzhong ; He, Haijian ; Wan, Xingyong ; Lin, Yiming ; Li, Lan ; Li, Youming ; Yu, Chaohui</creatorcontrib><description>This meta-analysis included eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the aim of determining whether probiotic supplementation can improve H. pylori eradication rates. PUBMED, EBSCO, Web of Science and Ovid databases were searched. We included RCTs that investigated the effect of combining probiotics, with or without a placebo, with standard therapy. A total of 21 RCTs that reported standard therapy plus probiotics were included. Compared to the placebo group, the probiotics group was 1.21(OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.69) and 1.28 (OR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.86) times more likely to achieve eradication of H. pylori infection in intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Probiotics with triple therapy plus a 14-day course of treatment did not improve the eradication of H. pylori infection (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 0.87, 2.39) compared to the placebo. Moreover, the placebo plus standard therapy did not improve eradication rates compared to standard therapy alone ( P  = 0.816). However, probiotics did improve the adverse effects of diarrhea and nausea. These pooled data suggest that the use of probiotics plus standard therapy does not improve the eradication rate of H. pylori infection compared to the placebo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep23522</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26997149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/4020/1503/1828/1500 ; 692/699/1503/1828 ; Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Diarrhea ; Dietary Supplements ; Eradication ; Female ; Health risk assessment ; Helicobacter Infections - diet therapy ; Helicobacter pylori - pathogenicity ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Infections ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; Middle Aged ; multidisciplinary ; Nausea ; Placebo Effect ; Placebos ; Probiotics ; Probiotics - adverse effects ; Probiotics - therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Science ; Side effects ; Supplements ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2016-03, Vol.6 (1), p.23522-23522, Article 23522</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-598303687ff51c9786d8cf9828193bcf903794951ab2a534d179b5149b93a4c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-598303687ff51c9786d8cf9828193bcf903794951ab2a534d179b5149b93a4c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800733/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800733/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997149$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang, Jianzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Haijian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Xingyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Youming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chaohui</creatorcontrib><title>Probiotic supplementation does not improve eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection compared to placebo based on standard therapy: a meta-analysis</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>This meta-analysis included eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the aim of determining whether probiotic supplementation can improve H. pylori eradication rates. PUBMED, EBSCO, Web of Science and Ovid databases were searched. We included RCTs that investigated the effect of combining probiotics, with or without a placebo, with standard therapy. A total of 21 RCTs that reported standard therapy plus probiotics were included. Compared to the placebo group, the probiotics group was 1.21(OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.69) and 1.28 (OR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.86) times more likely to achieve eradication of H. pylori infection in intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Probiotics with triple therapy plus a 14-day course of treatment did not improve the eradication of H. pylori infection (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 0.87, 2.39) compared to the placebo. Moreover, the placebo plus standard therapy did not improve eradication rates compared to standard therapy alone ( P  = 0.816). However, probiotics did improve the adverse effects of diarrhea and nausea. These pooled data suggest that the use of probiotics plus standard therapy does not improve the eradication rate of H. pylori infection compared to the placebo.</description><subject>692/4020/1503/1828/1500</subject><subject>692/699/1503/1828</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Eradication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - diet therapy</subject><subject>Helicobacter pylori - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Placebo Effect</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Probiotics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Probiotics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Supplements</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkd9qFTEQxhdRbKm98AUk4I0Kq_m3J4kXBSnVCgW90Oswm51tU3Y3MckWzrP4sqaeejhqbjLk-_HNTL6mec7oW0aFfpcTRi46zh81x5zKruWC88cH9VFzmvMtrafjRjLztDniG2MUk-a4-fk1hd6H4h3Ja4wTzrgUKD4sZAiYyRIK8XNM4Q4JJhi824kJCpIwkkucvAs9uIKJxO0Ukid-GdH9plyYIyQcSAkkTuCwD6SHXB-qmAssA6Qq3lTnuH1PgMxYoIUFpm32-VnzZIQp4-nDfdJ8_3jx7fyyvfry6fP5h6vWSaFL2xktqNhoNY4dc0bpzaDdaDTXzIi-VlQoI03HoOfQCTkwZfqubt8bAdIpcdKc7Xzj2s84uPoDCSYbk58hbW0Ab_9WFn9jr8OdlZpSJUQ1ePVgkMKPFXOxs88OpwkWDGu2TKlOaKaorOjLf9DbsKa6cKW00Zs6tTGVer2jXAq5Bjzuh2HU3qdu96lX9sXh9HvyT8YVeLMDcpWWa0wHLf9z-wV_brmT</recordid><startdate>20160321</startdate><enddate>20160321</enddate><creator>Lu, Chao</creator><creator>Sang, Jianzhong</creator><creator>He, Haijian</creator><creator>Wan, Xingyong</creator><creator>Lin, Yiming</creator><creator>Li, Lan</creator><creator>Li, Youming</creator><creator>Yu, Chaohui</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160321</creationdate><title>Probiotic supplementation does not improve eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection compared to placebo based on standard therapy: a meta-analysis</title><author>Lu, Chao ; Sang, Jianzhong ; He, Haijian ; Wan, Xingyong ; Lin, Yiming ; Li, Lan ; Li, Youming ; Yu, Chaohui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-598303687ff51c9786d8cf9828193bcf903794951ab2a534d179b5149b93a4c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>692/4020/1503/1828/1500</topic><topic>692/699/1503/1828</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Eradication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - diet therapy</topic><topic>Helicobacter pylori - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Placebo Effect</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Probiotics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Probiotics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Supplements</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang, Jianzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Haijian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Xingyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Youming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chaohui</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Chao</au><au>Sang, Jianzhong</au><au>He, Haijian</au><au>Wan, Xingyong</au><au>Lin, Yiming</au><au>Li, Lan</au><au>Li, Youming</au><au>Yu, Chaohui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Probiotic supplementation does not improve eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection compared to placebo based on standard therapy: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2016-03-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23522</spage><epage>23522</epage><pages>23522-23522</pages><artnum>23522</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>This meta-analysis included eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the aim of determining whether probiotic supplementation can improve H. pylori eradication rates. PUBMED, EBSCO, Web of Science and Ovid databases were searched. We included RCTs that investigated the effect of combining probiotics, with or without a placebo, with standard therapy. A total of 21 RCTs that reported standard therapy plus probiotics were included. Compared to the placebo group, the probiotics group was 1.21(OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.69) and 1.28 (OR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.86) times more likely to achieve eradication of H. pylori infection in intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Probiotics with triple therapy plus a 14-day course of treatment did not improve the eradication of H. pylori infection (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 0.87, 2.39) compared to the placebo. Moreover, the placebo plus standard therapy did not improve eradication rates compared to standard therapy alone ( P  = 0.816). However, probiotics did improve the adverse effects of diarrhea and nausea. These pooled data suggest that the use of probiotics plus standard therapy does not improve the eradication rate of H. pylori infection compared to the placebo.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>26997149</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep23522</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2016-03, Vol.6 (1), p.23522-23522, Article 23522
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4800733
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects 692/4020/1503/1828/1500
692/699/1503/1828
Adult
Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Diarrhea
Dietary Supplements
Eradication
Female
Health risk assessment
Helicobacter Infections - diet therapy
Helicobacter pylori - pathogenicity
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Infections
Male
Meta-analysis
Middle Aged
multidisciplinary
Nausea
Placebo Effect
Placebos
Probiotics
Probiotics - adverse effects
Probiotics - therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Science
Side effects
Supplements
Treatment Outcome
title Probiotic supplementation does not improve eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection compared to placebo based on standard therapy: a meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probiotic%20supplementation%20does%20not%20improve%20eradication%20rate%20of%20Helicobacter%20pylori%20infection%20compared%20to%20placebo%20based%20on%20standard%20therapy:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Lu,%20Chao&rft.date=2016-03-21&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23522&rft.epage=23522&rft.pages=23522-23522&rft.artnum=23522&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep23522&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1898682899%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1898682899&rft_id=info:pmid/26997149&rfr_iscdi=true