Targeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate has limited additional benefit over background cores for larger MRI-identified tumors
Purpose To compare histological outcomes in patients undergoing MRI–transrectal ultrasound fusion transperineal (MTTP) prostate biopsy and determine the incremental benefit of targeted cores. Methods Seventy-six consecutive patients with 89 MRI-identified targets underwent MTTP biopsy. Separate targ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of urology 2016-04, Vol.34 (4), p.501-508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To compare histological outcomes in patients undergoing MRI–transrectal ultrasound fusion transperineal (MTTP) prostate biopsy and determine the incremental benefit of targeted cores.
Methods
Seventy-six consecutive patients with 89 MRI-identified targets underwent MTTP biopsy. Separate targeted biopsies and background cores were obtained according to a standardized protocol. Target biopsies were considered of added diagnostic value if these cores showed a higher Gleason grade than non-targeted cores taken from the same sector (Group 1,
n
= 41). Conversely, where background cores demonstrated an equal or higher Gleason grade, target cores were considered to be non-beneficial (Group 2,
n
= 48).
Results
There was no significant difference in age, PSA, prostate volume, time-to-biopsy, and number of cores obtained between the groups. A greater proportion of target cores were positive for cancer (158/228; 69.3 %) compared to background (344/1881; 18.38 %). The median target volume was 0.54 cm
3
for Group 1 (range 0.09–2.79 cm
3
) and 1.65 cm
3
for Group 2 (0.3–9.07 cm
3
),
p
1.0 cm. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00345-015-1650-0 |