RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BONE TUNNEL POSITION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OPEN TECHNIQUE AND ARTHROSCOPY VIA AN ANTEROMEDIAL PORTAL
Objectives: To evaluate and compare bone tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery using the arthroscopic technique and the open technique consisting of arthrotomy. Method: A comparative retrospective study on 70 patients with ACL lesions was conducted. Thirty-fiv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista brasileira de ortopedia (English ed.) 2011-05, Vol.46 (3), p.270-275 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 275 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 270 |
container_title | Revista brasileira de ortopedia (English ed.) |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Dambrós, Jean Marcel Florêncio, Rodrigo Júnior, Osmar Valadão Lopes Kuhn, André Saggin, José de Freitas Spinelli, Leandro |
description | Objectives: To evaluate and compare bone tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery using the arthroscopic technique and the open technique consisting of arthrotomy. Method: A comparative retrospective study on 70 patients with ACL lesions was conducted. Thirty-five patients underwent ACL reconstruction by means of the open technique and 35 by means of the arthroscopic technique using an anteromedial portal. All the patients underwent ACL reconstruction using an autologous graft from the middle third of the patellar tendon, fixed using interference screws. The postoperative radiographs were reviewed and the positioning of the femoral tunnel was evaluated using the methods proposed by Harner et al. and Aglietti et al., while the tibial tunnel was assessed using the method proposed by Rauschning and Stäubli. Results: Fifty-four of the patients were male and 16 were female. Their mean age at the time of the procedure was 34 years and 3 months, with a range from 17 to 58 years. The arthroscopic technique was shown to be more accurate than the open technique for positioning both the femoral and the tibial bone tunnels. Conclusions: Radiological analysis on the knees subjected to ACL reconstruction showed that the positioning of both the femoral and the tibial bone tunnels presented less variation when the surgery was performed arthroscopically. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30194-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4799154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2255497115301944</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777486207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3124-db008e308de42df3621c902ee758664536adc6476d970095937672eab3506ab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUV1v0zAUjRCITWM_AeTH8RCwE380PIC81GstpXFxHFCfrDRxIahtRtJO2v_aDyRpSzWekCz56vjcc-718by3CH5AENGPWRAQ4uOIoRtE3ocQRdjHL7zLM_zyWX3hXXfdLwj7RoJpgF97FwGD_UHRpfek-ViqRE1kzBPAU54sMpkBdQduVSqAydNUJGCuMmmkSoFMe44RWioNYp3HkhsBEjnhM5EaoEWs0sz0-IGc5Xoi9OITiNVszrXMeuxWmO9CpMBMBVDzoRDxNJVfc9ELjwHXZqpVFqv5AnyTvMeOfmomxpIPg2jDkzfeq1Wx7tz16b7y8jth4ql_2sMvQxRgv1pCOHIhHFUOB9UqpAEqIxg4x8iIUkxCWlQlxYxWEYMwIlHIKAtcsQwJpMUSh1fe56Pu_X65cVXptru2WNv7tt4U7aNtitr--7Ktf9ofzYPFLIoQGQRuTgJt83vvup3d1F3p1uti65p9ZxFjDI9oAFlPJUdq2TZd17rV2QZBO4RuD6HbIVGLiD2EbgeLd89nPHf9jbgnfDkSXP9TD7VrbVfWblu6qm5dubNVU__H4g87rq6I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777486207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BONE TUNNEL POSITION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OPEN TECHNIQUE AND ARTHROSCOPY VIA AN ANTEROMEDIAL PORTAL</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dambrós, Jean Marcel ; Florêncio, Rodrigo ; Júnior, Osmar Valadão Lopes ; Kuhn, André ; Saggin, José ; de Freitas Spinelli, Leandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Dambrós, Jean Marcel ; Florêncio, Rodrigo ; Júnior, Osmar Valadão Lopes ; Kuhn, André ; Saggin, José ; de Freitas Spinelli, Leandro</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To evaluate and compare bone tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery using the arthroscopic technique and the open technique consisting of arthrotomy. Method: A comparative retrospective study on 70 patients with ACL lesions was conducted. Thirty-five patients underwent ACL reconstruction by means of the open technique and 35 by means of the arthroscopic technique using an anteromedial portal. All the patients underwent ACL reconstruction using an autologous graft from the middle third of the patellar tendon, fixed using interference screws. The postoperative radiographs were reviewed and the positioning of the femoral tunnel was evaluated using the methods proposed by Harner et al. and Aglietti et al., while the tibial tunnel was assessed using the method proposed by Rauschning and Stäubli. Results: Fifty-four of the patients were male and 16 were female. Their mean age at the time of the procedure was 34 years and 3 months, with a range from 17 to 58 years. The arthroscopic technique was shown to be more accurate than the open technique for positioning both the femoral and the tibial bone tunnels. Conclusions: Radiological analysis on the knees subjected to ACL reconstruction showed that the positioning of both the femoral and the tibial bone tunnels presented less variation when the surgery was performed arthroscopically.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2255-4971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2255-4971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30194-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27027019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Elsevier Editora Ltda</publisher><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament/anatomy & histology ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament/injuries ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament/radiography ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery ; Knee ; Original ; Tendons</subject><ispartof>Revista brasileira de ortopedia (English ed.), 2011-05, Vol.46 (3), p.270-275</ispartof><rights>2011 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia</rights><rights>2011 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2011</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3124-db008e308de42df3621c902ee758664536adc6476d970095937672eab3506ab43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3124-db008e308de42df3621c902ee758664536adc6476d970095937672eab3506ab43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799154/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799154/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27027019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dambrós, Jean Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florêncio, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Júnior, Osmar Valadão Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhn, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saggin, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Freitas Spinelli, Leandro</creatorcontrib><title>RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BONE TUNNEL POSITION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OPEN TECHNIQUE AND ARTHROSCOPY VIA AN ANTEROMEDIAL PORTAL</title><title>Revista brasileira de ortopedia (English ed.)</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ortop</addtitle><description>Objectives: To evaluate and compare bone tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery using the arthroscopic technique and the open technique consisting of arthrotomy. Method: A comparative retrospective study on 70 patients with ACL lesions was conducted. Thirty-five patients underwent ACL reconstruction by means of the open technique and 35 by means of the arthroscopic technique using an anteromedial portal. All the patients underwent ACL reconstruction using an autologous graft from the middle third of the patellar tendon, fixed using interference screws. The postoperative radiographs were reviewed and the positioning of the femoral tunnel was evaluated using the methods proposed by Harner et al. and Aglietti et al., while the tibial tunnel was assessed using the method proposed by Rauschning and Stäubli. Results: Fifty-four of the patients were male and 16 were female. Their mean age at the time of the procedure was 34 years and 3 months, with a range from 17 to 58 years. The arthroscopic technique was shown to be more accurate than the open technique for positioning both the femoral and the tibial bone tunnels. Conclusions: Radiological analysis on the knees subjected to ACL reconstruction showed that the positioning of both the femoral and the tibial bone tunnels presented less variation when the surgery was performed arthroscopically.</description><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament/anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament/injuries</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament/radiography</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Tendons</subject><issn>2255-4971</issn><issn>2255-4971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUV1v0zAUjRCITWM_AeTH8RCwE380PIC81GstpXFxHFCfrDRxIahtRtJO2v_aDyRpSzWekCz56vjcc-718by3CH5AENGPWRAQ4uOIoRtE3ocQRdjHL7zLM_zyWX3hXXfdLwj7RoJpgF97FwGD_UHRpfek-ViqRE1kzBPAU54sMpkBdQduVSqAydNUJGCuMmmkSoFMe44RWioNYp3HkhsBEjnhM5EaoEWs0sz0-IGc5Xoi9OITiNVszrXMeuxWmO9CpMBMBVDzoRDxNJVfc9ELjwHXZqpVFqv5AnyTvMeOfmomxpIPg2jDkzfeq1Wx7tz16b7y8jth4ql_2sMvQxRgv1pCOHIhHFUOB9UqpAEqIxg4x8iIUkxCWlQlxYxWEYMwIlHIKAtcsQwJpMUSh1fe56Pu_X65cVXptru2WNv7tt4U7aNtitr--7Ktf9ofzYPFLIoQGQRuTgJt83vvup3d1F3p1uti65p9ZxFjDI9oAFlPJUdq2TZd17rV2QZBO4RuD6HbIVGLiD2EbgeLd89nPHf9jbgnfDkSXP9TD7VrbVfWblu6qm5dubNVU__H4g87rq6I</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Dambrós, Jean Marcel</creator><creator>Florêncio, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Júnior, Osmar Valadão Lopes</creator><creator>Kuhn, André</creator><creator>Saggin, José</creator><creator>de Freitas Spinelli, Leandro</creator><general>Elsevier Editora Ltda</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BONE TUNNEL POSITION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OPEN TECHNIQUE AND ARTHROSCOPY VIA AN ANTEROMEDIAL PORTAL</title><author>Dambrós, Jean Marcel ; Florêncio, Rodrigo ; Júnior, Osmar Valadão Lopes ; Kuhn, André ; Saggin, José ; de Freitas Spinelli, Leandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3124-db008e308de42df3621c902ee758664536adc6476d970095937672eab3506ab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament/anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament/injuries</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament/radiography</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Tendons</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dambrós, Jean Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florêncio, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Júnior, Osmar Valadão Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhn, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saggin, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Freitas Spinelli, Leandro</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Revista brasileira de ortopedia (English ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dambrós, Jean Marcel</au><au>Florêncio, Rodrigo</au><au>Júnior, Osmar Valadão Lopes</au><au>Kuhn, André</au><au>Saggin, José</au><au>de Freitas Spinelli, Leandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BONE TUNNEL POSITION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OPEN TECHNIQUE AND ARTHROSCOPY VIA AN ANTEROMEDIAL PORTAL</atitle><jtitle>Revista brasileira de ortopedia (English ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ortop</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>270</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>270-275</pages><issn>2255-4971</issn><eissn>2255-4971</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate and compare bone tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery using the arthroscopic technique and the open technique consisting of arthrotomy. Method: A comparative retrospective study on 70 patients with ACL lesions was conducted. Thirty-five patients underwent ACL reconstruction by means of the open technique and 35 by means of the arthroscopic technique using an anteromedial portal. All the patients underwent ACL reconstruction using an autologous graft from the middle third of the patellar tendon, fixed using interference screws. The postoperative radiographs were reviewed and the positioning of the femoral tunnel was evaluated using the methods proposed by Harner et al. and Aglietti et al., while the tibial tunnel was assessed using the method proposed by Rauschning and Stäubli. Results: Fifty-four of the patients were male and 16 were female. Their mean age at the time of the procedure was 34 years and 3 months, with a range from 17 to 58 years. The arthroscopic technique was shown to be more accurate than the open technique for positioning both the femoral and the tibial bone tunnels. Conclusions: Radiological analysis on the knees subjected to ACL reconstruction showed that the positioning of both the femoral and the tibial bone tunnels presented less variation when the surgery was performed arthroscopically.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Elsevier Editora Ltda</pub><pmid>27027019</pmid><doi>10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30194-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2255-4971 |
ispartof | Revista brasileira de ortopedia (English ed.), 2011-05, Vol.46 (3), p.270-275 |
issn | 2255-4971 2255-4971 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4799154 |
source | PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anterior Cruciate Ligament/anatomy & histology Anterior Cruciate Ligament/injuries Anterior Cruciate Ligament/radiography Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery Knee Original Tendons |
title | RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BONE TUNNEL POSITION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE OPEN TECHNIQUE AND ARTHROSCOPY VIA AN ANTEROMEDIAL PORTAL |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A14%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RADIOLOGICAL%20ANALYSIS%20OF%20BONE%20TUNNEL%20POSITION%20IN%20ANTERIOR%20CRUCIATE%20LIGAMENT%20RECONSTRUCTION%20SURGERY:%20COMPARISON%20BETWEEN%20THE%20OPEN%20TECHNIQUE%20AND%20ARTHROSCOPY%20VIA%20AN%20ANTEROMEDIAL%20PORTAL&rft.jtitle=Revista%20brasileira%20de%20ortopedia%20(English%20ed.)&rft.au=Dambr%C3%B3s,%20Jean%20Marcel&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=270&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=270-275&rft.issn=2255-4971&rft.eissn=2255-4971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30194-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1777486207%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777486207&rft_id=info:pmid/27027019&rft_els_id=S2255497115301944&rfr_iscdi=true |