Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior as Models of Condom Use: A Meta-Analysis
To examine how well the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior predict condom use, the authors synthesized 96 data sets ( N = 22,594) containing associations between the models' key variables. Consistent with the theory of reasoned action's predictions, (a) condom use was related...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological bulletin 2001-01, Vol.127 (1), p.142-161 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 161 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 142 |
| container_title | Psychological bulletin |
| container_volume | 127 |
| creator | Albarracín, Dolores Johnson, Blair T Fishbein, Martin Muellerleile, Paige A |
| description | To examine how well the theories of reasoned action and planned
behavior predict condom use, the authors synthesized 96 data sets
(
N
= 22,594) containing associations
between the models' key variables. Consistent with the theory of
reasoned action's predictions, (a) condom use was related
to intentions (weighted mean
r
. =
.45), (b) intentions were based on attitudes
(
r
. = .58) and subjective norms
(
r
. = .39), and
(c) attitudes were associated with behavioral beliefs
(
r
. = .56) and norms were
associated with normative beliefs (
r
. =
.46). Consistent with the theory of planned behavior's
predictions, perceived behavioral control was related to condom use
intentions (
r
. = .45) and
condom use (
r
. = .25),
but in contrast to the theory, it did not contribute significantly to
condom use. The strength of these associations, however, was
influenced by the consideration of past behavior. Implications of these
results for HIV prevention efforts are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4780418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39055717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a511t-6239af9a46ddb4bbba15ec3adc7293cc04ca2405e8939c7c24fc654b79d7ce453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl9rFDEUxYModq1-AkEGxb7Nmv-ZvAh10bZQUaR9DneSjDtlNlmTmUK_vRl3WasP7VMg-Z0T7jkXodcELwlm6gPGjNVUY70kVC3JknD6BC2IZromXIinaHEgjtCLnG8wxkpI9hwdkaIgStAFOr9a-5h6n6vYVT885Bi8q07t2MdQQXDV9wHCfPXJr-G2j6mCXH2Nzg9_FKsYXNxU19m_RM86GLJ_tT-P0fWXz1er8_ry29nF6vSyBkHIWEvKNHQauHSu5W3bAhHeMnBWUc2sxdwC5Vj4psxhlaW8s1LwVmmnrOeCHaOPO9_t1G68sz6MCQazTf0G0p2J0Jt_X0K_Nj_jreGqwZw0xeBkb5Dir8nn0Wz6bP1Q5vRxykZhSbDSj4NCScaZJI-CTGMhSt4FfPsfeBOnFEpcRpJixZtSzwMQxawUS-n8JdtBNsWck-8OARBs5u0wc_dm7t6Urg0xZTuK6s397P5q9utQgHd7ALKFoUsQbJ8PXKOxbHCh3u8o2ILZ5jsLaezt4LNpp-Hed78BFWrMrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614364856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior as Models of Condom Use: A Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Albarracín, Dolores ; Johnson, Blair T ; Fishbein, Martin ; Muellerleile, Paige A</creator><creatorcontrib>Albarracín, Dolores ; Johnson, Blair T ; Fishbein, Martin ; Muellerleile, Paige A</creatorcontrib><description>To examine how well the theories of reasoned action and planned
behavior predict condom use, the authors synthesized 96 data sets
(
N
= 22,594) containing associations
between the models' key variables. Consistent with the theory of
reasoned action's predictions, (a) condom use was related
to intentions (weighted mean
r
. =
.45), (b) intentions were based on attitudes
(
r
. = .58) and subjective norms
(
r
. = .39), and
(c) attitudes were associated with behavioral beliefs
(
r
. = .56) and norms were
associated with normative beliefs (
r
. =
.46). Consistent with the theory of planned behavior's
predictions, perceived behavioral control was related to condom use
intentions (
r
. = .45) and
condom use (
r
. = .25),
but in contrast to the theory, it did not contribute significantly to
condom use. The strength of these associations, however, was
influenced by the consideration of past behavior. Implications of these
results for HIV prevention efforts are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11271752</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSBUAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attitude ; Behavior ; Behavior. Attitude ; Behavioural sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Condoms ; Condoms - statistics & numerical data ; Contraception ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health Behavior ; HIV ; Human ; Human behaviour ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Intention ; Meta-analysis ; Models, Psychological ; Motivation ; Planned Behavior ; Planned behaviour theory ; Prediction ; Predictors ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reason ; Reasoned Action ; Reasoned action theory ; Reasoning ; Risk-Taking ; Safe Sex - psychology ; Safe Sex - statistics & numerical data ; Safe sexual practices ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual health ; Sexual Risk Taking ; Social psychology ; Social Values ; Systematic review ; Theories ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2001-01, Vol.127 (1), p.142-161</ispartof><rights>2001 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2001</rights><rights>2001, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a511t-6239af9a46ddb4bbba15ec3adc7293cc04ca2405e8939c7c24fc654b79d7ce453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a511t-6239af9a46ddb4bbba15ec3adc7293cc04ca2405e8939c7c24fc654b79d7ce453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4023,27922,27923,27924,30998,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=890680$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11271752$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albarracín, Dolores</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Blair T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishbein, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muellerleile, Paige A</creatorcontrib><title>Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior as Models of Condom Use: A Meta-Analysis</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>To examine how well the theories of reasoned action and planned
behavior predict condom use, the authors synthesized 96 data sets
(
N
= 22,594) containing associations
between the models' key variables. Consistent with the theory of
reasoned action's predictions, (a) condom use was related
to intentions (weighted mean
r
. =
.45), (b) intentions were based on attitudes
(
r
. = .58) and subjective norms
(
r
. = .39), and
(c) attitudes were associated with behavioral beliefs
(
r
. = .56) and norms were
associated with normative beliefs (
r
. =
.46). Consistent with the theory of planned behavior's
predictions, perceived behavioral control was related to condom use
intentions (
r
. = .45) and
condom use (
r
. = .25),
but in contrast to the theory, it did not contribute significantly to
condom use. The strength of these associations, however, was
influenced by the consideration of past behavior. Implications of these
results for HIV prevention efforts are discussed.</description><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior. Attitude</subject><subject>Behavioural sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Condoms</subject><subject>Condoms - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Planned Behavior</subject><subject>Planned behaviour theory</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Predictors</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reason</subject><subject>Reasoned Action</subject><subject>Reasoned action theory</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Safe Sex - psychology</subject><subject>Safe Sex - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Safe sexual practices</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual health</subject><subject>Sexual Risk Taking</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl9rFDEUxYModq1-AkEGxb7Nmv-ZvAh10bZQUaR9DneSjDtlNlmTmUK_vRl3WasP7VMg-Z0T7jkXodcELwlm6gPGjNVUY70kVC3JknD6BC2IZromXIinaHEgjtCLnG8wxkpI9hwdkaIgStAFOr9a-5h6n6vYVT885Bi8q07t2MdQQXDV9wHCfPXJr-G2j6mCXH2Nzg9_FKsYXNxU19m_RM86GLJ_tT-P0fWXz1er8_ry29nF6vSyBkHIWEvKNHQauHSu5W3bAhHeMnBWUc2sxdwC5Vj4psxhlaW8s1LwVmmnrOeCHaOPO9_t1G68sz6MCQazTf0G0p2J0Jt_X0K_Nj_jreGqwZw0xeBkb5Dir8nn0Wz6bP1Q5vRxykZhSbDSj4NCScaZJI-CTGMhSt4FfPsfeBOnFEpcRpJixZtSzwMQxawUS-n8JdtBNsWck-8OARBs5u0wc_dm7t6Urg0xZTuK6s397P5q9utQgHd7ALKFoUsQbJ8PXKOxbHCh3u8o2ILZ5jsLaezt4LNpp-Hed78BFWrMrA</recordid><startdate>200101</startdate><enddate>200101</enddate><creator>Albarracín, Dolores</creator><creator>Johnson, Blair T</creator><creator>Fishbein, Martin</creator><creator>Muellerleile, Paige A</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200101</creationdate><title>Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior as Models of Condom Use</title><author>Albarracín, Dolores ; Johnson, Blair T ; Fishbein, Martin ; Muellerleile, Paige A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a511t-6239af9a46ddb4bbba15ec3adc7293cc04ca2405e8939c7c24fc654b79d7ce453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior. Attitude</topic><topic>Behavioural sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Condoms</topic><topic>Condoms - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Planned Behavior</topic><topic>Planned behaviour theory</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Predictors</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reason</topic><topic>Reasoned Action</topic><topic>Reasoned action theory</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Safe Sex - psychology</topic><topic>Safe Sex - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Safe sexual practices</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual health</topic><topic>Sexual Risk Taking</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albarracín, Dolores</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Blair T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishbein, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muellerleile, Paige A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albarracín, Dolores</au><au>Johnson, Blair T</au><au>Fishbein, Martin</au><au>Muellerleile, Paige A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior as Models of Condom Use: A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2001-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>142-161</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><coden>PSBUAI</coden><abstract>To examine how well the theories of reasoned action and planned
behavior predict condom use, the authors synthesized 96 data sets
(
N
= 22,594) containing associations
between the models' key variables. Consistent with the theory of
reasoned action's predictions, (a) condom use was related
to intentions (weighted mean
r
. =
.45), (b) intentions were based on attitudes
(
r
. = .58) and subjective norms
(
r
. = .39), and
(c) attitudes were associated with behavioral beliefs
(
r
. = .56) and norms were
associated with normative beliefs (
r
. =
.46). Consistent with the theory of planned behavior's
predictions, perceived behavioral control was related to condom use
intentions (
r
. = .45) and
condom use (
r
. = .25),
but in contrast to the theory, it did not contribute significantly to
condom use. The strength of these associations, however, was
influenced by the consideration of past behavior. Implications of these
results for HIV prevention efforts are discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>11271752</pmid><doi>10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-2909 |
| ispartof | Psychological bulletin, 2001-01, Vol.127 (1), p.142-161 |
| issn | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4780418 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Attitude Behavior Behavior. Attitude Behavioural sciences Biological and medical sciences Condoms Condoms - statistics & numerical data Contraception Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Health Behavior HIV Human Human behaviour Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Intention Meta-analysis Models, Psychological Motivation Planned Behavior Planned behaviour theory Prediction Predictors Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reason Reasoned Action Reasoned action theory Reasoning Risk-Taking Safe Sex - psychology Safe Sex - statistics & numerical data Safe sexual practices Sexual behavior Sexual health Sexual Risk Taking Social psychology Social Values Systematic review Theories Theory |
| title | Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior as Models of Condom Use: A Meta-Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A57%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theories%20of%20Reasoned%20Action%20and%20Planned%20Behavior%20as%20Models%20of%20Condom%20Use:%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Albarrac%C3%ADn,%20Dolores&rft.date=2001-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=142-161&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft.coden=PSBUAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E39055717%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614364856&rft_id=info:pmid/11271752&rfr_iscdi=true |