Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera

To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma. The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Int...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2011-04, Vol.253 (4), p.774-778
Hauptverfasser: DENGEL, Lynn T, MORE, Mitali J, JUDY, Patricia G, PETRONI, Gina R, SMOLKIN, Mark E, REHM, Patrice K, MAJEWSKI, Stan, WILLIAMS, Mark B, SLINGLUFF, Craig L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 778
container_issue 4
container_start_page 774
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 253
creator DENGEL, Lynn T
MORE, Mitali J
JUDY, Patricia G
PETRONI, Gina R
SMOLKIN, Mark E
REHM, Patrice K
MAJEWSKI, Stan
WILLIAMS, Mark B
SLINGLUFF, Craig L
description To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma. The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Intraoperative imaging may aid in detection of SLN near the primary site, in ambiguous locations, and after excision of each SLN. The present pilot study reports outcomes with a prototype MGC designed for rapid intraoperative image acquisition. We hypothesized that intraoperative use of the MGC would be feasible and that sensitivity would be at least 90%. From April to September 2008, 20 patients underwent Tc99 sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and SLNB was performed with use of a conventional fixed gamma camera (FGC), and gamma probe followed by intraoperative MGC imaging. Sensitivity was calculated for each detection method. Intraoperative logistical challenges were scored. Cases in which MGC provided clinical benefit were recorded. Sensitivity for detecting SLN basins was 97% for the FGC and 90% for the MGC. A total of 46 SLN were identified: 32 (70%) were identified as distinct hot spots by preoperative FGC imaging, 31 (67%) by preoperative MGC imaging, and 43 (93%) by MGC imaging pre- or intraoperatively. The gamma probe identified 44 (96%) independent of MGC imaging. The MGC provided defined clinical benefit as an addition to standard practice in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. Mean score for MGC logistic feasibility was 2 on a scale of 1-9 (1 = best). Intraoperative MGC imaging provides additional information when standard techniques fail or are ambiguous. Sensitivity is 90% and can be increased. This pilot study has identified ways to improve the usefulness of an MGC for intraoperative imaging, which holds promise for reducing false negatives of SLNB for melanoma.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f9b709
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4775232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>861207619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c4d96f341d276e59b62e944293895d70a50176c95b8ef2e08ba0fb06cb1615233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtvEzEUhS0EoqHwDxCykBCrKdePsccbpBJBiJTConRtPJ47qdGMHcaTSv33OEooj5Ul-zvH99xDyEsGFwyMfpcHdwEtMIGCNaw3rQbziCxYzZuKMQmPyQIARCWN4GfkWc4_AJhsQD8lZ5xJXQMzC_J9HefJpR1Obg53SNej24a4pat96Fz0SPs00WuMc4g40C-pQ_ohpF2-pyHSKxxcTKOjN_mgcfQqtWFAunJjuVy6sbg-J096N2R8cTrPyc2nj9-Wn6vN19V6ebmpfC1grrzsjOqFZB3XCmvTKo5GSm5EY-pOgyvjauVN3TbYc4SmddC3oHzLVIksxDl5f_Td7dsRO4-HXIPdTWF0071NLth_X2K4tdt0Z6XWRc-LweujQcpzsNmHGf2tTzGiny0DUdfsAL09_TKln3vMsx1D9jiUPWDaZ9soxkErZgopj6SfUs4T9g-jMLCHAu315tL-X2CRvfo7xoPod2MFeHMCXPZu6KfSUsh_OAlcKs3FLy22pI4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861207619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>DENGEL, Lynn T ; MORE, Mitali J ; JUDY, Patricia G ; PETRONI, Gina R ; SMOLKIN, Mark E ; REHM, Patrice K ; MAJEWSKI, Stan ; WILLIAMS, Mark B ; SLINGLUFF, Craig L</creator><creatorcontrib>DENGEL, Lynn T ; MORE, Mitali J ; JUDY, Patricia G ; PETRONI, Gina R ; SMOLKIN, Mark E ; REHM, Patrice K ; MAJEWSKI, Stan ; WILLIAMS, Mark B ; SLINGLUFF, Craig L ; Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma. The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Intraoperative imaging may aid in detection of SLN near the primary site, in ambiguous locations, and after excision of each SLN. The present pilot study reports outcomes with a prototype MGC designed for rapid intraoperative image acquisition. We hypothesized that intraoperative use of the MGC would be feasible and that sensitivity would be at least 90%. From April to September 2008, 20 patients underwent Tc99 sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and SLNB was performed with use of a conventional fixed gamma camera (FGC), and gamma probe followed by intraoperative MGC imaging. Sensitivity was calculated for each detection method. Intraoperative logistical challenges were scored. Cases in which MGC provided clinical benefit were recorded. Sensitivity for detecting SLN basins was 97% for the FGC and 90% for the MGC. A total of 46 SLN were identified: 32 (70%) were identified as distinct hot spots by preoperative FGC imaging, 31 (67%) by preoperative MGC imaging, and 43 (93%) by MGC imaging pre- or intraoperatively. The gamma probe identified 44 (96%) independent of MGC imaging. The MGC provided defined clinical benefit as an addition to standard practice in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. Mean score for MGC logistic feasibility was 2 on a scale of 1-9 (1 = best). Intraoperative MGC imaging provides additional information when standard techniques fail or are ambiguous. Sensitivity is 90% and can be increased. This pilot study has identified ways to improve the usefulness of an MGC for intraoperative imaging, which holds promise for reducing false negatives of SLNB for melanoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f9b709</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21475019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANSUA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; Adult ; Aged ; BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ; Biological and medical sciences ; BIOPSY ; COLLOIDS ; Confidence Intervals ; Dermatology ; DETECTION ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; GAMMA CAMERAS ; General aspects ; HOT SPOTS ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care - methods ; LYMPH NODES ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma - pathology ; Melanoma - surgery ; MELANOMAS ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; PATIENTS ; Pilot Projects ; PROBES ; Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation ; Radionuclide Imaging - methods ; SENSITIVITY ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - instrumentation ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods ; Skin Neoplasms - pathology ; Skin Neoplasms - surgery ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; SULFUR ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2011-04, Vol.253 (4), p.774-778</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c4d96f341d276e59b62e944293895d70a50176c95b8ef2e08ba0fb06cb1615233</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775232/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775232/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,887,27931,27932,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24024672$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1035512$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DENGEL, Lynn T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORE, Mitali J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUDY, Patricia G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETRONI, Gina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMOLKIN, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REHM, Patrice K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAJEWSKI, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, Mark B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLINGLUFF, Craig L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma. The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Intraoperative imaging may aid in detection of SLN near the primary site, in ambiguous locations, and after excision of each SLN. The present pilot study reports outcomes with a prototype MGC designed for rapid intraoperative image acquisition. We hypothesized that intraoperative use of the MGC would be feasible and that sensitivity would be at least 90%. From April to September 2008, 20 patients underwent Tc99 sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and SLNB was performed with use of a conventional fixed gamma camera (FGC), and gamma probe followed by intraoperative MGC imaging. Sensitivity was calculated for each detection method. Intraoperative logistical challenges were scored. Cases in which MGC provided clinical benefit were recorded. Sensitivity for detecting SLN basins was 97% for the FGC and 90% for the MGC. A total of 46 SLN were identified: 32 (70%) were identified as distinct hot spots by preoperative FGC imaging, 31 (67%) by preoperative MGC imaging, and 43 (93%) by MGC imaging pre- or intraoperatively. The gamma probe identified 44 (96%) independent of MGC imaging. The MGC provided defined clinical benefit as an addition to standard practice in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. Mean score for MGC logistic feasibility was 2 on a scale of 1-9 (1 = best). Intraoperative MGC imaging provides additional information when standard techniques fail or are ambiguous. Sensitivity is 90% and can be increased. This pilot study has identified ways to improve the usefulness of an MGC for intraoperative imaging, which holds promise for reducing false negatives of SLNB for melanoma.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BIOPSY</subject><subject>COLLOIDS</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>GAMMA CAMERAS</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>HOT SPOTS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>LYMPH NODES</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Melanoma - surgery</subject><subject>MELANOMAS</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>PROBES</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</subject><subject>SENSITIVITY</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>SULFUR</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtvEzEUhS0EoqHwDxCykBCrKdePsccbpBJBiJTConRtPJ47qdGMHcaTSv33OEooj5Ul-zvH99xDyEsGFwyMfpcHdwEtMIGCNaw3rQbziCxYzZuKMQmPyQIARCWN4GfkWc4_AJhsQD8lZ5xJXQMzC_J9HefJpR1Obg53SNej24a4pat96Fz0SPs00WuMc4g40C-pQ_ohpF2-pyHSKxxcTKOjN_mgcfQqtWFAunJjuVy6sbg-J096N2R8cTrPyc2nj9-Wn6vN19V6ebmpfC1grrzsjOqFZB3XCmvTKo5GSm5EY-pOgyvjauVN3TbYc4SmddC3oHzLVIksxDl5f_Td7dsRO4-HXIPdTWF0071NLth_X2K4tdt0Z6XWRc-LweujQcpzsNmHGf2tTzGiny0DUdfsAL09_TKln3vMsx1D9jiUPWDaZ9soxkErZgopj6SfUs4T9g-jMLCHAu315tL-X2CRvfo7xoPod2MFeHMCXPZu6KfSUsh_OAlcKs3FLy22pI4</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>DENGEL, Lynn T</creator><creator>MORE, Mitali J</creator><creator>JUDY, Patricia G</creator><creator>PETRONI, Gina R</creator><creator>SMOLKIN, Mark E</creator><creator>REHM, Patrice K</creator><creator>MAJEWSKI, Stan</creator><creator>WILLIAMS, Mark B</creator><creator>SLINGLUFF, Craig L</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera</title><author>DENGEL, Lynn T ; MORE, Mitali J ; JUDY, Patricia G ; PETRONI, Gina R ; SMOLKIN, Mark E ; REHM, Patrice K ; MAJEWSKI, Stan ; WILLIAMS, Mark B ; SLINGLUFF, Craig L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c4d96f341d276e59b62e944293895d70a50176c95b8ef2e08ba0fb06cb1615233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BIOPSY</topic><topic>COLLOIDS</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>GAMMA CAMERAS</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>HOT SPOTS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>LYMPH NODES</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Melanoma - surgery</topic><topic>MELANOMAS</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>PROBES</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</topic><topic>SENSITIVITY</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>SULFUR</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DENGEL, Lynn T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORE, Mitali J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUDY, Patricia G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETRONI, Gina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMOLKIN, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REHM, Patrice K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAJEWSKI, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, Mark B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLINGLUFF, Craig L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DENGEL, Lynn T</au><au>MORE, Mitali J</au><au>JUDY, Patricia G</au><au>PETRONI, Gina R</au><au>SMOLKIN, Mark E</au><au>REHM, Patrice K</au><au>MAJEWSKI, Stan</au><au>WILLIAMS, Mark B</au><au>SLINGLUFF, Craig L</au><aucorp>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>253</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>774</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>774-778</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><coden>ANSUA5</coden><abstract>To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma. The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Intraoperative imaging may aid in detection of SLN near the primary site, in ambiguous locations, and after excision of each SLN. The present pilot study reports outcomes with a prototype MGC designed for rapid intraoperative image acquisition. We hypothesized that intraoperative use of the MGC would be feasible and that sensitivity would be at least 90%. From April to September 2008, 20 patients underwent Tc99 sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and SLNB was performed with use of a conventional fixed gamma camera (FGC), and gamma probe followed by intraoperative MGC imaging. Sensitivity was calculated for each detection method. Intraoperative logistical challenges were scored. Cases in which MGC provided clinical benefit were recorded. Sensitivity for detecting SLN basins was 97% for the FGC and 90% for the MGC. A total of 46 SLN were identified: 32 (70%) were identified as distinct hot spots by preoperative FGC imaging, 31 (67%) by preoperative MGC imaging, and 43 (93%) by MGC imaging pre- or intraoperatively. The gamma probe identified 44 (96%) independent of MGC imaging. The MGC provided defined clinical benefit as an addition to standard practice in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. Mean score for MGC logistic feasibility was 2 on a scale of 1-9 (1 = best). Intraoperative MGC imaging provides additional information when standard techniques fail or are ambiguous. Sensitivity is 90% and can be increased. This pilot study has identified ways to improve the usefulness of an MGC for intraoperative imaging, which holds promise for reducing false negatives of SLNB for melanoma.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>21475019</pmid><doi>10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f9b709</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2011-04, Vol.253 (4), p.774-778
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4775232
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
Adult
Aged
BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Biological and medical sciences
BIOPSY
COLLOIDS
Confidence Intervals
Dermatology
DETECTION
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
GAMMA CAMERAS
General aspects
HOT SPOTS
Humans
Intraoperative Care - methods
LYMPH NODES
Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Male
Medical sciences
Melanoma - pathology
Melanoma - surgery
MELANOMAS
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
PATIENTS
Pilot Projects
PROBES
Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation
Radionuclide Imaging - methods
SENSITIVITY
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - instrumentation
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods
Skin Neoplasms - pathology
Skin Neoplasms - surgery
Statistics, Nonparametric
SULFUR
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions
title Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T18%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Imaging%20Guidance%20for%20Sentinel%20Node%20Biopsy%20in%20Melanoma%20Using%20a%20Mobile%20Gamma%20Camera&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=DENGEL,%20Lynn%20T&rft.aucorp=Thomas%20Jefferson%20National%20Accelerator%20Facility,%20Newport%20News,%20VA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=253&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=774&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=774-778&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.coden=ANSUA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f9b709&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E861207619%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861207619&rft_id=info:pmid/21475019&rfr_iscdi=true