Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera
To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma. The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Int...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgery 2011-04, Vol.253 (4), p.774-778 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 778 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 774 |
container_title | Annals of surgery |
container_volume | 253 |
creator | DENGEL, Lynn T MORE, Mitali J JUDY, Patricia G PETRONI, Gina R SMOLKIN, Mark E REHM, Patrice K MAJEWSKI, Stan WILLIAMS, Mark B SLINGLUFF, Craig L |
description | To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma.
The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Intraoperative imaging may aid in detection of SLN near the primary site, in ambiguous locations, and after excision of each SLN. The present pilot study reports outcomes with a prototype MGC designed for rapid intraoperative image acquisition. We hypothesized that intraoperative use of the MGC would be feasible and that sensitivity would be at least 90%.
From April to September 2008, 20 patients underwent Tc99 sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and SLNB was performed with use of a conventional fixed gamma camera (FGC), and gamma probe followed by intraoperative MGC imaging. Sensitivity was calculated for each detection method. Intraoperative logistical challenges were scored. Cases in which MGC provided clinical benefit were recorded.
Sensitivity for detecting SLN basins was 97% for the FGC and 90% for the MGC. A total of 46 SLN were identified: 32 (70%) were identified as distinct hot spots by preoperative FGC imaging, 31 (67%) by preoperative MGC imaging, and 43 (93%) by MGC imaging pre- or intraoperatively. The gamma probe identified 44 (96%) independent of MGC imaging. The MGC provided defined clinical benefit as an addition to standard practice in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. Mean score for MGC logistic feasibility was 2 on a scale of 1-9 (1 = best).
Intraoperative MGC imaging provides additional information when standard techniques fail or are ambiguous. Sensitivity is 90% and can be increased. This pilot study has identified ways to improve the usefulness of an MGC for intraoperative imaging, which holds promise for reducing false negatives of SLNB for melanoma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f9b709 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4775232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>861207619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c4d96f341d276e59b62e944293895d70a50176c95b8ef2e08ba0fb06cb1615233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtvEzEUhS0EoqHwDxCykBCrKdePsccbpBJBiJTConRtPJ47qdGMHcaTSv33OEooj5Ul-zvH99xDyEsGFwyMfpcHdwEtMIGCNaw3rQbziCxYzZuKMQmPyQIARCWN4GfkWc4_AJhsQD8lZ5xJXQMzC_J9HefJpR1Obg53SNej24a4pat96Fz0SPs00WuMc4g40C-pQ_ohpF2-pyHSKxxcTKOjN_mgcfQqtWFAunJjuVy6sbg-J096N2R8cTrPyc2nj9-Wn6vN19V6ebmpfC1grrzsjOqFZB3XCmvTKo5GSm5EY-pOgyvjauVN3TbYc4SmddC3oHzLVIksxDl5f_Td7dsRO4-HXIPdTWF0071NLth_X2K4tdt0Z6XWRc-LweujQcpzsNmHGf2tTzGiny0DUdfsAL09_TKln3vMsx1D9jiUPWDaZ9soxkErZgopj6SfUs4T9g-jMLCHAu315tL-X2CRvfo7xoPod2MFeHMCXPZu6KfSUsh_OAlcKs3FLy22pI4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861207619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>DENGEL, Lynn T ; MORE, Mitali J ; JUDY, Patricia G ; PETRONI, Gina R ; SMOLKIN, Mark E ; REHM, Patrice K ; MAJEWSKI, Stan ; WILLIAMS, Mark B ; SLINGLUFF, Craig L</creator><creatorcontrib>DENGEL, Lynn T ; MORE, Mitali J ; JUDY, Patricia G ; PETRONI, Gina R ; SMOLKIN, Mark E ; REHM, Patrice K ; MAJEWSKI, Stan ; WILLIAMS, Mark B ; SLINGLUFF, Craig L ; Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma.
The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Intraoperative imaging may aid in detection of SLN near the primary site, in ambiguous locations, and after excision of each SLN. The present pilot study reports outcomes with a prototype MGC designed for rapid intraoperative image acquisition. We hypothesized that intraoperative use of the MGC would be feasible and that sensitivity would be at least 90%.
From April to September 2008, 20 patients underwent Tc99 sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and SLNB was performed with use of a conventional fixed gamma camera (FGC), and gamma probe followed by intraoperative MGC imaging. Sensitivity was calculated for each detection method. Intraoperative logistical challenges were scored. Cases in which MGC provided clinical benefit were recorded.
Sensitivity for detecting SLN basins was 97% for the FGC and 90% for the MGC. A total of 46 SLN were identified: 32 (70%) were identified as distinct hot spots by preoperative FGC imaging, 31 (67%) by preoperative MGC imaging, and 43 (93%) by MGC imaging pre- or intraoperatively. The gamma probe identified 44 (96%) independent of MGC imaging. The MGC provided defined clinical benefit as an addition to standard practice in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. Mean score for MGC logistic feasibility was 2 on a scale of 1-9 (1 = best).
Intraoperative MGC imaging provides additional information when standard techniques fail or are ambiguous. Sensitivity is 90% and can be increased. This pilot study has identified ways to improve the usefulness of an MGC for intraoperative imaging, which holds promise for reducing false negatives of SLNB for melanoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f9b709</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21475019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANSUA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; Adult ; Aged ; BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ; Biological and medical sciences ; BIOPSY ; COLLOIDS ; Confidence Intervals ; Dermatology ; DETECTION ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; GAMMA CAMERAS ; General aspects ; HOT SPOTS ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care - methods ; LYMPH NODES ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma - pathology ; Melanoma - surgery ; MELANOMAS ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; PATIENTS ; Pilot Projects ; PROBES ; Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation ; Radionuclide Imaging - methods ; SENSITIVITY ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - instrumentation ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods ; Skin Neoplasms - pathology ; Skin Neoplasms - surgery ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; SULFUR ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2011-04, Vol.253 (4), p.774-778</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c4d96f341d276e59b62e944293895d70a50176c95b8ef2e08ba0fb06cb1615233</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775232/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775232/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,887,27931,27932,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24024672$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1035512$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DENGEL, Lynn T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORE, Mitali J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUDY, Patricia G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETRONI, Gina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMOLKIN, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REHM, Patrice K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAJEWSKI, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, Mark B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLINGLUFF, Craig L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma.
The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Intraoperative imaging may aid in detection of SLN near the primary site, in ambiguous locations, and after excision of each SLN. The present pilot study reports outcomes with a prototype MGC designed for rapid intraoperative image acquisition. We hypothesized that intraoperative use of the MGC would be feasible and that sensitivity would be at least 90%.
From April to September 2008, 20 patients underwent Tc99 sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and SLNB was performed with use of a conventional fixed gamma camera (FGC), and gamma probe followed by intraoperative MGC imaging. Sensitivity was calculated for each detection method. Intraoperative logistical challenges were scored. Cases in which MGC provided clinical benefit were recorded.
Sensitivity for detecting SLN basins was 97% for the FGC and 90% for the MGC. A total of 46 SLN were identified: 32 (70%) were identified as distinct hot spots by preoperative FGC imaging, 31 (67%) by preoperative MGC imaging, and 43 (93%) by MGC imaging pre- or intraoperatively. The gamma probe identified 44 (96%) independent of MGC imaging. The MGC provided defined clinical benefit as an addition to standard practice in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. Mean score for MGC logistic feasibility was 2 on a scale of 1-9 (1 = best).
Intraoperative MGC imaging provides additional information when standard techniques fail or are ambiguous. Sensitivity is 90% and can be increased. This pilot study has identified ways to improve the usefulness of an MGC for intraoperative imaging, which holds promise for reducing false negatives of SLNB for melanoma.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BIOPSY</subject><subject>COLLOIDS</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>GAMMA CAMERAS</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>HOT SPOTS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>LYMPH NODES</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Melanoma - surgery</subject><subject>MELANOMAS</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>PROBES</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</subject><subject>SENSITIVITY</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>SULFUR</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtvEzEUhS0EoqHwDxCykBCrKdePsccbpBJBiJTConRtPJ47qdGMHcaTSv33OEooj5Ul-zvH99xDyEsGFwyMfpcHdwEtMIGCNaw3rQbziCxYzZuKMQmPyQIARCWN4GfkWc4_AJhsQD8lZ5xJXQMzC_J9HefJpR1Obg53SNej24a4pat96Fz0SPs00WuMc4g40C-pQ_ohpF2-pyHSKxxcTKOjN_mgcfQqtWFAunJjuVy6sbg-J096N2R8cTrPyc2nj9-Wn6vN19V6ebmpfC1grrzsjOqFZB3XCmvTKo5GSm5EY-pOgyvjauVN3TbYc4SmddC3oHzLVIksxDl5f_Td7dsRO4-HXIPdTWF0071NLth_X2K4tdt0Z6XWRc-LweujQcpzsNmHGf2tTzGiny0DUdfsAL09_TKln3vMsx1D9jiUPWDaZ9soxkErZgopj6SfUs4T9g-jMLCHAu315tL-X2CRvfo7xoPod2MFeHMCXPZu6KfSUsh_OAlcKs3FLy22pI4</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>DENGEL, Lynn T</creator><creator>MORE, Mitali J</creator><creator>JUDY, Patricia G</creator><creator>PETRONI, Gina R</creator><creator>SMOLKIN, Mark E</creator><creator>REHM, Patrice K</creator><creator>MAJEWSKI, Stan</creator><creator>WILLIAMS, Mark B</creator><creator>SLINGLUFF, Craig L</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera</title><author>DENGEL, Lynn T ; MORE, Mitali J ; JUDY, Patricia G ; PETRONI, Gina R ; SMOLKIN, Mark E ; REHM, Patrice K ; MAJEWSKI, Stan ; WILLIAMS, Mark B ; SLINGLUFF, Craig L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c4d96f341d276e59b62e944293895d70a50176c95b8ef2e08ba0fb06cb1615233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BIOPSY</topic><topic>COLLOIDS</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>GAMMA CAMERAS</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>HOT SPOTS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>LYMPH NODES</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Melanoma - surgery</topic><topic>MELANOMAS</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>PROBES</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</topic><topic>SENSITIVITY</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>SULFUR</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DENGEL, Lynn T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORE, Mitali J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUDY, Patricia G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETRONI, Gina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMOLKIN, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REHM, Patrice K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAJEWSKI, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMS, Mark B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLINGLUFF, Craig L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DENGEL, Lynn T</au><au>MORE, Mitali J</au><au>JUDY, Patricia G</au><au>PETRONI, Gina R</au><au>SMOLKIN, Mark E</au><au>REHM, Patrice K</au><au>MAJEWSKI, Stan</au><au>WILLIAMS, Mark B</au><au>SLINGLUFF, Craig L</au><aucorp>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>253</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>774</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>774-778</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><coden>ANSUA5</coden><abstract>To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma.
The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Intraoperative imaging may aid in detection of SLN near the primary site, in ambiguous locations, and after excision of each SLN. The present pilot study reports outcomes with a prototype MGC designed for rapid intraoperative image acquisition. We hypothesized that intraoperative use of the MGC would be feasible and that sensitivity would be at least 90%.
From April to September 2008, 20 patients underwent Tc99 sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and SLNB was performed with use of a conventional fixed gamma camera (FGC), and gamma probe followed by intraoperative MGC imaging. Sensitivity was calculated for each detection method. Intraoperative logistical challenges were scored. Cases in which MGC provided clinical benefit were recorded.
Sensitivity for detecting SLN basins was 97% for the FGC and 90% for the MGC. A total of 46 SLN were identified: 32 (70%) were identified as distinct hot spots by preoperative FGC imaging, 31 (67%) by preoperative MGC imaging, and 43 (93%) by MGC imaging pre- or intraoperatively. The gamma probe identified 44 (96%) independent of MGC imaging. The MGC provided defined clinical benefit as an addition to standard practice in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. Mean score for MGC logistic feasibility was 2 on a scale of 1-9 (1 = best).
Intraoperative MGC imaging provides additional information when standard techniques fail or are ambiguous. Sensitivity is 90% and can be increased. This pilot study has identified ways to improve the usefulness of an MGC for intraoperative imaging, which holds promise for reducing false negatives of SLNB for melanoma.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>21475019</pmid><doi>10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f9b709</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4932 |
ispartof | Annals of surgery, 2011-04, Vol.253 (4), p.774-778 |
issn | 0003-4932 1528-1140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4775232 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central |
subjects | 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES Adult Aged BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Biological and medical sciences BIOPSY COLLOIDS Confidence Intervals Dermatology DETECTION Feasibility Studies Female Follow-Up Studies GAMMA CAMERAS General aspects HOT SPOTS Humans Intraoperative Care - methods LYMPH NODES Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging Lymph Nodes - pathology Male Medical sciences Melanoma - pathology Melanoma - surgery MELANOMAS Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging PATIENTS Pilot Projects PROBES Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation Radionuclide Imaging - methods SENSITIVITY Sensitivity and Specificity Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - instrumentation Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods Skin Neoplasms - pathology Skin Neoplasms - surgery Statistics, Nonparametric SULFUR Survival Analysis Time Factors Treatment Outcome Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions |
title | Intraoperative Imaging Guidance for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Using a Mobile Gamma Camera |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T18%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Imaging%20Guidance%20for%20Sentinel%20Node%20Biopsy%20in%20Melanoma%20Using%20a%20Mobile%20Gamma%20Camera&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=DENGEL,%20Lynn%20T&rft.aucorp=Thomas%20Jefferson%20National%20Accelerator%20Facility,%20Newport%20News,%20VA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=253&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=774&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=774-778&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.coden=ANSUA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f9b709&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E861207619%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861207619&rft_id=info:pmid/21475019&rfr_iscdi=true |