Diabetes mellitus as a compelling indication for use of renin angiotensin system blockers: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
Objective To evaluate the outcomes with use of renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers compared with other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes.Design Meta-analysis.Data sources and study selection PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases for random...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ (Online) 2016-02, Vol.352, p.i438-i438 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | i438 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | i438 |
container_title | BMJ (Online) |
container_volume | 352 |
creator | Bangalore, Sripal Fakheri, Robert Toklu, Bora Messerli, Franz H |
description | Objective To evaluate the outcomes with use of renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers compared with other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes.Design Meta-analysis.Data sources and study selection PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases for randomized trials of RAS blockers versus other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes mellitus. Outcomes were death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, heart failure, revascularization, and end stage renal disease.Results The search yielded 19 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 25 414 participants with diabetes for a total of 95 910 patient years of follow-up. When compared with other antihypertensive agents, RAS blockers were associated with a similar risk of death (relative risk 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.05), cardiovascular death (1.02, 0.83 to 1.24), myocardial infarction (0.87, 0.64 to 1.18), angina pectoris (0.80, 0.58 to 1.11), stroke (1.04, 0.92 to 1.17), heart failure (0.90, 0.76 to 1.07), and revascularization (0.97, 0.77 to 1.22). There was also no difference in the hard renal outcome of end stage renal disease (0.99, 0.78 to 1.28) (power of 94% to show a 23% reduction in end stage renal disease).Conclusions In people with diabetes, RAS blockers are not superior to other antihypertensive drug classes such as thiazides, calcium channel blockers, and β blockers at reducing the risk of hard cardiovascular and renal endpoints. These findings support the recommendations of the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension and eighth Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure to also use other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes but without kidney disease. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.i438 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4772784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008181271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b494t-7a5973e67b1f0442943dc3fb408315c94252b337e211e7ce923512e9d8a4c72c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9qFTEQxoMottSCTyABb7zZmn-7SbwQpFoVCt7odchmZ4857ibHJNtyfA1fuFk9tlUQAjNMfvPNMB9CTyk5o5R3L_t5e-YFVw_QMZVt11DF-cN7-RE6zXlLCGFcKt21j9ER61SnKJfH6Odbb3sokPEM0-TLkrGtD7s479ZC2GAfBu9s8THgMSa8ZMBxxAmCD9iGjY8FQq553ucCM-6n6L5Byq8OhdrpKn3l4briQ51TbGODnfbZ519KtRpn_wMGXJK3U36CHo01wOkhnqAvF-8-n39oLj-9_3j-5rLphRalkbbVkkMnezoSIZgWfHB87AVRnLZOC9aynnMJjFKQDjTjLWWgB2WFk8zxE_T6t-5u6WcYHISS7GR2yc827U203vz9E_xXs4lXRkjJpBJV4MVBIMXvC-RiZp9dPZsNEJdsqOxaSpnmrKLP_0G3cUn1CislpWKaKHIn6FLMOcF4uwwlZjXbVLPNanZFn91f_hb8Y-3dxLXlvzI3tauzsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777829080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diabetes mellitus as a compelling indication for use of renin angiotensin system blockers: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Bangalore, Sripal ; Fakheri, Robert ; Toklu, Bora ; Messerli, Franz H</creator><creatorcontrib>Bangalore, Sripal ; Fakheri, Robert ; Toklu, Bora ; Messerli, Franz H</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the outcomes with use of renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers compared with other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes.Design Meta-analysis.Data sources and study selection PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases for randomized trials of RAS blockers versus other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes mellitus. Outcomes were death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, heart failure, revascularization, and end stage renal disease.Results The search yielded 19 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 25 414 participants with diabetes for a total of 95 910 patient years of follow-up. When compared with other antihypertensive agents, RAS blockers were associated with a similar risk of death (relative risk 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.05), cardiovascular death (1.02, 0.83 to 1.24), myocardial infarction (0.87, 0.64 to 1.18), angina pectoris (0.80, 0.58 to 1.11), stroke (1.04, 0.92 to 1.17), heart failure (0.90, 0.76 to 1.07), and revascularization (0.97, 0.77 to 1.22). There was also no difference in the hard renal outcome of end stage renal disease (0.99, 0.78 to 1.28) (power of 94% to show a 23% reduction in end stage renal disease).Conclusions In people with diabetes, RAS blockers are not superior to other antihypertensive drug classes such as thiazides, calcium channel blockers, and β blockers at reducing the risk of hard cardiovascular and renal endpoints. These findings support the recommendations of the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension and eighth Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure to also use other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes but without kidney disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i438</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26868137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; Bias ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control ; Clinical trials ; Collaboration ; Diabetes ; Diabetic Angiopathies - prevention & control ; Diabetic Nephropathies - prevention & control ; Disease prevention ; Diuretics ; Fasting ; Heart attacks ; Heart failure ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Kidney diseases ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - prevention & control ; Patients ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Renin-Angiotensin System - drug effects ; Studies</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2016-02, Vol.352, p.i438-i438</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Feb 11, 2016</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to 2016 BMJ</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b494t-7a5973e67b1f0442943dc3fb408315c94252b337e211e7ce923512e9d8a4c72c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i438.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i438.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,776,780,881,3182,23551,27903,27904,77347,77378</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26868137$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bangalore, Sripal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakheri, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toklu, Bora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messerli, Franz H</creatorcontrib><title>Diabetes mellitus as a compelling indication for use of renin angiotensin system blockers: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the outcomes with use of renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers compared with other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes.Design Meta-analysis.Data sources and study selection PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases for randomized trials of RAS blockers versus other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes mellitus. Outcomes were death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, heart failure, revascularization, and end stage renal disease.Results The search yielded 19 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 25 414 participants with diabetes for a total of 95 910 patient years of follow-up. When compared with other antihypertensive agents, RAS blockers were associated with a similar risk of death (relative risk 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.05), cardiovascular death (1.02, 0.83 to 1.24), myocardial infarction (0.87, 0.64 to 1.18), angina pectoris (0.80, 0.58 to 1.11), stroke (1.04, 0.92 to 1.17), heart failure (0.90, 0.76 to 1.07), and revascularization (0.97, 0.77 to 1.22). There was also no difference in the hard renal outcome of end stage renal disease (0.99, 0.78 to 1.28) (power of 94% to show a 23% reduction in end stage renal disease).Conclusions In people with diabetes, RAS blockers are not superior to other antihypertensive drug classes such as thiazides, calcium channel blockers, and β blockers at reducing the risk of hard cardiovascular and renal endpoints. These findings support the recommendations of the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension and eighth Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure to also use other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes but without kidney disease.</description><subject>Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic Angiopathies - prevention & control</subject><subject>Diabetic Nephropathies - prevention & control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Diuretics</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - prevention & control</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Renin-Angiotensin System - drug effects</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9qFTEQxoMottSCTyABb7zZmn-7SbwQpFoVCt7odchmZ4857ibHJNtyfA1fuFk9tlUQAjNMfvPNMB9CTyk5o5R3L_t5e-YFVw_QMZVt11DF-cN7-RE6zXlLCGFcKt21j9ER61SnKJfH6Odbb3sokPEM0-TLkrGtD7s479ZC2GAfBu9s8THgMSa8ZMBxxAmCD9iGjY8FQq553ucCM-6n6L5Byq8OhdrpKn3l4briQ51TbGODnfbZ519KtRpn_wMGXJK3U36CHo01wOkhnqAvF-8-n39oLj-9_3j-5rLphRalkbbVkkMnezoSIZgWfHB87AVRnLZOC9aynnMJjFKQDjTjLWWgB2WFk8zxE_T6t-5u6WcYHISS7GR2yc827U203vz9E_xXs4lXRkjJpBJV4MVBIMXvC-RiZp9dPZsNEJdsqOxaSpnmrKLP_0G3cUn1CislpWKaKHIn6FLMOcF4uwwlZjXbVLPNanZFn91f_hb8Y-3dxLXlvzI3tauzsA</recordid><startdate>20160211</startdate><enddate>20160211</enddate><creator>Bangalore, Sripal</creator><creator>Fakheri, Robert</creator><creator>Toklu, Bora</creator><creator>Messerli, Franz H</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160211</creationdate><title>Diabetes mellitus as a compelling indication for use of renin angiotensin system blockers: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials</title><author>Bangalore, Sripal ; Fakheri, Robert ; Toklu, Bora ; Messerli, Franz H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b494t-7a5973e67b1f0442943dc3fb408315c94252b337e211e7ce923512e9d8a4c72c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic Angiopathies - prevention & control</topic><topic>Diabetic Nephropathies - prevention & control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Diuretics</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - prevention & control</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Renin-Angiotensin System - drug effects</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bangalore, Sripal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakheri, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toklu, Bora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messerli, Franz H</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bangalore, Sripal</au><au>Fakheri, Robert</au><au>Toklu, Bora</au><au>Messerli, Franz H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diabetes mellitus as a compelling indication for use of renin angiotensin system blockers: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2016-02-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>352</volume><spage>i438</spage><epage>i438</epage><pages>i438-i438</pages><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>0959-8138</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the outcomes with use of renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers compared with other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes.Design Meta-analysis.Data sources and study selection PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases for randomized trials of RAS blockers versus other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes mellitus. Outcomes were death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, heart failure, revascularization, and end stage renal disease.Results The search yielded 19 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 25 414 participants with diabetes for a total of 95 910 patient years of follow-up. When compared with other antihypertensive agents, RAS blockers were associated with a similar risk of death (relative risk 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.05), cardiovascular death (1.02, 0.83 to 1.24), myocardial infarction (0.87, 0.64 to 1.18), angina pectoris (0.80, 0.58 to 1.11), stroke (1.04, 0.92 to 1.17), heart failure (0.90, 0.76 to 1.07), and revascularization (0.97, 0.77 to 1.22). There was also no difference in the hard renal outcome of end stage renal disease (0.99, 0.78 to 1.28) (power of 94% to show a 23% reduction in end stage renal disease).Conclusions In people with diabetes, RAS blockers are not superior to other antihypertensive drug classes such as thiazides, calcium channel blockers, and β blockers at reducing the risk of hard cardiovascular and renal endpoints. These findings support the recommendations of the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension and eighth Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure to also use other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes but without kidney disease.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>26868137</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.i438</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-1833 |
ispartof | BMJ (Online), 2016-02, Vol.352, p.i438-i438 |
issn | 1756-1833 0959-8138 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4772784 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use Bias Cardiology Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control Clinical trials Collaboration Diabetes Diabetic Angiopathies - prevention & control Diabetic Nephropathies - prevention & control Disease prevention Diuretics Fasting Heart attacks Heart failure Humans Hypertension Kidney diseases Kidney Failure, Chronic - prevention & control Patients Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Renin-Angiotensin System - drug effects Studies |
title | Diabetes mellitus as a compelling indication for use of renin angiotensin system blockers: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A44%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diabetes%20mellitus%20as%20a%20compelling%20indication%20for%20use%20of%20renin%20angiotensin%20system%20blockers:%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20trials&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Bangalore,%20Sripal&rft.date=2016-02-11&rft.volume=352&rft.spage=i438&rft.epage=i438&rft.pages=i438-i438&rft.issn=1756-1833&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.i438&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4008181271%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777829080&rft_id=info:pmid/26868137&rfr_iscdi=true |