Impact of Different Target Sequences on Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) loci encode an adaptive immune system of prokaryotes. Within these loci, sequences intercalated between repeats known as "spacers" specify the targets of CRISPR immunity. The majority of spacers match sequences present in ph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bacteriology 2016-01, Vol.198 (6), p.941-950
Hauptverfasser: Maniv, Inbal, Jiang, Wenyan, Bikard, David, Marraffini, Luciano A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 950
container_issue 6
container_start_page 941
container_title Journal of bacteriology
container_volume 198
creator Maniv, Inbal
Jiang, Wenyan
Bikard, David
Marraffini, Luciano A
description Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) loci encode an adaptive immune system of prokaryotes. Within these loci, sequences intercalated between repeats known as "spacers" specify the targets of CRISPR immunity. The majority of spacers match sequences present in phages and plasmids; however, it is not known whether there are differences in the immunity provided against these diverse invaders. We studied this issue using the Staphylococcus epidermidis CRISPR system, which harbors spacers matching both phages and plasmids. We determined that this CRISPR system provides similar levels of defense against the conjugative plasmid pG0400 and the bacteriophage CNPX. However, whereas antiplasmid immunity was very sensitive to the introduction of mismatches in the target sequence, mutations in the phage target were largely tolerated. Placing the phage and plasmid targets into a vector that can be both conjugated and transduced, we demonstrated that the route of entry of the target has no impact on the effect of the mismatches on immunity. Instead, we established that the specific sequences of each spacer/target determine the susceptibility of the S. epidermidis CRISPR system to mutations. Therefore, spacers that are more resistant to mismatches would provide long-term immunity against phages and plasmids that otherwise would escape CRISPR targeting through the accumulation of mutations in the target sequence. These results uncover an unexpected complexity in the arms race between CRISPR-Cas systems and prokaryotic infectious genetic elements. CRISPR-Cas loci protect bacteria and archaea from both phage infection and plasmid invasion. These loci harbor short sequences of phage and plasmid origin known as "spacers" that specify the targets of CRISPR-Cas immunity. The presence of a spacer sequence matching a phage or plasmid ensures host immunity against infection by these genetic elements. In turn, phages and plasmids constantly mutate their targets to avoid recognition by the spacers of the CRISPR-Cas immune system. In this study, we demonstrated that different spacer sequences vary in their ability to tolerate target mutations that allow phages and plasmids to escape from CRISPR-Cas immunity. These results uncover an unexpected complexity in the arms race between CRISPR-Cas systems and prokaryotic infectious genetic elements.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JB.00897-15
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4772595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1769981853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b434b78eb5727fd2fe3415e2f14e7eac7e2d036c794c626e6386f7579527d1093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctPFEEQxjtGIyt68m468WJiBvr9uJjAgjBkEwys505vbzUM2XnYPUOy_z2NC0Q51aF-9dVX9SH0mZIDSpk5vDg-IMRYXVH5Bs0osaaSkpO3aEYIo5Wllu-hDznfEUKFkOw92mNKS6k4m6GTuh18GHEf8UkTIyToRrz06QZGfA1_JugCZNx3eLkdANd1jedX9fWvq2ruM67bduqacfsRvYt-k-HTU91Hv3-eLufn1eLyrJ4fLaogjB2rleBipQ2spGY6rlkELqgEFqkADT5oYGvCVdBWBMUUKG5U1FJbyfS63MX30Y-d7jCtWliH4jX5jRtS0_q0db1v3P-drrl1N_29E1ozaWURqHYCt6_Gzo8WbvB5hCk5Qo2yhpN7WvhvTwtTX36RR9c2OcBm4zvop-yoVtYaaiQv6NdX6F0_pa68o1CaUW450YX6vqNC6nNOEF9cUOIe03QXx-5vmo4-2v3y770v7HN8_AES25dV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772139307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Different Target Sequences on Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Maniv, Inbal ; Jiang, Wenyan ; Bikard, David ; Marraffini, Luciano A</creator><contributor>O'Toole, G. A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maniv, Inbal ; Jiang, Wenyan ; Bikard, David ; Marraffini, Luciano A ; O'Toole, G. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) loci encode an adaptive immune system of prokaryotes. Within these loci, sequences intercalated between repeats known as "spacers" specify the targets of CRISPR immunity. The majority of spacers match sequences present in phages and plasmids; however, it is not known whether there are differences in the immunity provided against these diverse invaders. We studied this issue using the Staphylococcus epidermidis CRISPR system, which harbors spacers matching both phages and plasmids. We determined that this CRISPR system provides similar levels of defense against the conjugative plasmid pG0400 and the bacteriophage CNPX. However, whereas antiplasmid immunity was very sensitive to the introduction of mismatches in the target sequence, mutations in the phage target were largely tolerated. Placing the phage and plasmid targets into a vector that can be both conjugated and transduced, we demonstrated that the route of entry of the target has no impact on the effect of the mismatches on immunity. Instead, we established that the specific sequences of each spacer/target determine the susceptibility of the S. epidermidis CRISPR system to mutations. Therefore, spacers that are more resistant to mismatches would provide long-term immunity against phages and plasmids that otherwise would escape CRISPR targeting through the accumulation of mutations in the target sequence. These results uncover an unexpected complexity in the arms race between CRISPR-Cas systems and prokaryotic infectious genetic elements. CRISPR-Cas loci protect bacteria and archaea from both phage infection and plasmid invasion. These loci harbor short sequences of phage and plasmid origin known as "spacers" that specify the targets of CRISPR-Cas immunity. The presence of a spacer sequence matching a phage or plasmid ensures host immunity against infection by these genetic elements. In turn, phages and plasmids constantly mutate their targets to avoid recognition by the spacers of the CRISPR-Cas immune system. In this study, we demonstrated that different spacer sequences vary in their ability to tolerate target mutations that allow phages and plasmids to escape from CRISPR-Cas immunity. These results uncover an unexpected complexity in the arms race between CRISPR-Cas systems and prokaryotic infectious genetic elements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-5530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JB.00897-15</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26755632</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOBAAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Bacteriology ; Bacteriophages ; Bacteriophages - genetics ; CRISPR-Cas Systems ; Gram-positive bacteria ; Immune system ; Life Sciences ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Mutation ; Plasmids ; Prokaryotes ; Recombination, Genetic ; Spotlight ; Staphylococcus epidermidis ; Staphylococcus epidermidis - genetics</subject><ispartof>Journal of bacteriology, 2016-01, Vol.198 (6), p.941-950</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Microbiology Mar 2016</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. 2016 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b434b78eb5727fd2fe3415e2f14e7eac7e2d036c794c626e6386f7579527d1093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b434b78eb5727fd2fe3415e2f14e7eac7e2d036c794c626e6386f7579527d1093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5729-1211</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772595/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772595/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26755632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://pasteur.hal.science/pasteur-01869830$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>O'Toole, G. A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maniv, Inbal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wenyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bikard, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marraffini, Luciano A</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Different Target Sequences on Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity</title><title>Journal of bacteriology</title><addtitle>J Bacteriol</addtitle><description>Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) loci encode an adaptive immune system of prokaryotes. Within these loci, sequences intercalated between repeats known as "spacers" specify the targets of CRISPR immunity. The majority of spacers match sequences present in phages and plasmids; however, it is not known whether there are differences in the immunity provided against these diverse invaders. We studied this issue using the Staphylococcus epidermidis CRISPR system, which harbors spacers matching both phages and plasmids. We determined that this CRISPR system provides similar levels of defense against the conjugative plasmid pG0400 and the bacteriophage CNPX. However, whereas antiplasmid immunity was very sensitive to the introduction of mismatches in the target sequence, mutations in the phage target were largely tolerated. Placing the phage and plasmid targets into a vector that can be both conjugated and transduced, we demonstrated that the route of entry of the target has no impact on the effect of the mismatches on immunity. Instead, we established that the specific sequences of each spacer/target determine the susceptibility of the S. epidermidis CRISPR system to mutations. Therefore, spacers that are more resistant to mismatches would provide long-term immunity against phages and plasmids that otherwise would escape CRISPR targeting through the accumulation of mutations in the target sequence. These results uncover an unexpected complexity in the arms race between CRISPR-Cas systems and prokaryotic infectious genetic elements. CRISPR-Cas loci protect bacteria and archaea from both phage infection and plasmid invasion. These loci harbor short sequences of phage and plasmid origin known as "spacers" that specify the targets of CRISPR-Cas immunity. The presence of a spacer sequence matching a phage or plasmid ensures host immunity against infection by these genetic elements. In turn, phages and plasmids constantly mutate their targets to avoid recognition by the spacers of the CRISPR-Cas immune system. In this study, we demonstrated that different spacer sequences vary in their ability to tolerate target mutations that allow phages and plasmids to escape from CRISPR-Cas immunity. These results uncover an unexpected complexity in the arms race between CRISPR-Cas systems and prokaryotic infectious genetic elements.</description><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Bacteriophages</subject><subject>Bacteriophages - genetics</subject><subject>CRISPR-Cas Systems</subject><subject>Gram-positive bacteria</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Prokaryotes</subject><subject>Recombination, Genetic</subject><subject>Spotlight</subject><subject>Staphylococcus epidermidis</subject><subject>Staphylococcus epidermidis - genetics</subject><issn>0021-9193</issn><issn>1098-5530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctPFEEQxjtGIyt68m468WJiBvr9uJjAgjBkEwys505vbzUM2XnYPUOy_z2NC0Q51aF-9dVX9SH0mZIDSpk5vDg-IMRYXVH5Bs0osaaSkpO3aEYIo5Wllu-hDznfEUKFkOw92mNKS6k4m6GTuh18GHEf8UkTIyToRrz06QZGfA1_JugCZNx3eLkdANd1jedX9fWvq2ruM67bduqacfsRvYt-k-HTU91Hv3-eLufn1eLyrJ4fLaogjB2rleBipQ2spGY6rlkELqgEFqkADT5oYGvCVdBWBMUUKG5U1FJbyfS63MX30Y-d7jCtWliH4jX5jRtS0_q0db1v3P-drrl1N_29E1ozaWURqHYCt6_Gzo8WbvB5hCk5Qo2yhpN7WvhvTwtTX36RR9c2OcBm4zvop-yoVtYaaiQv6NdX6F0_pa68o1CaUW450YX6vqNC6nNOEF9cUOIe03QXx-5vmo4-2v3y770v7HN8_AES25dV</recordid><startdate>20160111</startdate><enddate>20160111</enddate><creator>Maniv, Inbal</creator><creator>Jiang, Wenyan</creator><creator>Bikard, David</creator><creator>Marraffini, Luciano A</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5729-1211</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160111</creationdate><title>Impact of Different Target Sequences on Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity</title><author>Maniv, Inbal ; Jiang, Wenyan ; Bikard, David ; Marraffini, Luciano A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-b434b78eb5727fd2fe3415e2f14e7eac7e2d036c794c626e6386f7579527d1093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Bacteriophages</topic><topic>Bacteriophages - genetics</topic><topic>CRISPR-Cas Systems</topic><topic>Gram-positive bacteria</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Prokaryotes</topic><topic>Recombination, Genetic</topic><topic>Spotlight</topic><topic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</topic><topic>Staphylococcus epidermidis - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maniv, Inbal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wenyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bikard, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marraffini, Luciano A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of bacteriology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maniv, Inbal</au><au>Jiang, Wenyan</au><au>Bikard, David</au><au>Marraffini, Luciano A</au><au>O'Toole, G. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Different Target Sequences on Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bacteriology</jtitle><addtitle>J Bacteriol</addtitle><date>2016-01-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>941</spage><epage>950</epage><pages>941-950</pages><issn>0021-9193</issn><eissn>1098-5530</eissn><coden>JOBAAY</coden><abstract>Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) loci encode an adaptive immune system of prokaryotes. Within these loci, sequences intercalated between repeats known as "spacers" specify the targets of CRISPR immunity. The majority of spacers match sequences present in phages and plasmids; however, it is not known whether there are differences in the immunity provided against these diverse invaders. We studied this issue using the Staphylococcus epidermidis CRISPR system, which harbors spacers matching both phages and plasmids. We determined that this CRISPR system provides similar levels of defense against the conjugative plasmid pG0400 and the bacteriophage CNPX. However, whereas antiplasmid immunity was very sensitive to the introduction of mismatches in the target sequence, mutations in the phage target were largely tolerated. Placing the phage and plasmid targets into a vector that can be both conjugated and transduced, we demonstrated that the route of entry of the target has no impact on the effect of the mismatches on immunity. Instead, we established that the specific sequences of each spacer/target determine the susceptibility of the S. epidermidis CRISPR system to mutations. Therefore, spacers that are more resistant to mismatches would provide long-term immunity against phages and plasmids that otherwise would escape CRISPR targeting through the accumulation of mutations in the target sequence. These results uncover an unexpected complexity in the arms race between CRISPR-Cas systems and prokaryotic infectious genetic elements. CRISPR-Cas loci protect bacteria and archaea from both phage infection and plasmid invasion. These loci harbor short sequences of phage and plasmid origin known as "spacers" that specify the targets of CRISPR-Cas immunity. The presence of a spacer sequence matching a phage or plasmid ensures host immunity against infection by these genetic elements. In turn, phages and plasmids constantly mutate their targets to avoid recognition by the spacers of the CRISPR-Cas immune system. In this study, we demonstrated that different spacer sequences vary in their ability to tolerate target mutations that allow phages and plasmids to escape from CRISPR-Cas immunity. These results uncover an unexpected complexity in the arms race between CRISPR-Cas systems and prokaryotic infectious genetic elements.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>26755632</pmid><doi>10.1128/JB.00897-15</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5729-1211</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9193
ispartof Journal of bacteriology, 2016-01, Vol.198 (6), p.941-950
issn 0021-9193
1098-5530
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4772595
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Bacteriology
Bacteriophages
Bacteriophages - genetics
CRISPR-Cas Systems
Gram-positive bacteria
Immune system
Life Sciences
Microbiology and Parasitology
Mutation
Plasmids
Prokaryotes
Recombination, Genetic
Spotlight
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus epidermidis - genetics
title Impact of Different Target Sequences on Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A39%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Different%20Target%20Sequences%20on%20Type%20III%20CRISPR-Cas%20Immunity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bacteriology&rft.au=Maniv,%20Inbal&rft.date=2016-01-11&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=941&rft.epage=950&rft.pages=941-950&rft.issn=0021-9193&rft.eissn=1098-5530&rft.coden=JOBAAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JB.00897-15&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1769981853%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772139307&rft_id=info:pmid/26755632&rfr_iscdi=true