Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program

To compare the recall and cancer detection rates (CDRs) at screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with those at screening with two-dimensional (2D) mammography and to evaluate variations in the recall rate (RR) according to patient age, risk factors, and breast density and among individua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2016-03, Vol.278 (3), p.698-706
Hauptverfasser: Sharpe, Jr, Richard E, Venkataraman, Shambavi, Phillips, Jordana, Dialani, Vandana, Fein-Zachary, Valerie J, Prakash, Seema, Slanetz, Priscilla J, Mehta, Tejas S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 706
container_issue 3
container_start_page 698
container_title Radiology
container_volume 278
creator Sharpe, Jr, Richard E
Venkataraman, Shambavi
Phillips, Jordana
Dialani, Vandana
Fein-Zachary, Valerie J
Prakash, Seema
Slanetz, Priscilla J
Mehta, Tejas S
description To compare the recall and cancer detection rates (CDRs) at screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with those at screening with two-dimensional (2D) mammography and to evaluate variations in the recall rate (RR) according to patient age, risk factors, and breast density and among individual radiologists at a single U.S. academic medical center. This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study with a retrospective cohort included 85 852 asymptomatic women who presented for breast cancer screening over a 3-year period beginning in 2011. A DBT unit was introduced into the existing 2D mammography screening program, and patients were assigned to the first available machine. Ten breast-subspecialized radiologists interpreted approximately 90% of the examinations. RRs were calculated overall and according to patient age, breast density, and individual radiologist. CDRs were calculated. Single and multiple mixed-effect logistic regression analyses, χ(2) tests, and Bonferroni correction were utilized, as appropriate. The study included 5703 (6.6%) DBT examinations and 80 149 (93.4%) 2D mammography examinations. The DBT subgroup contained a higher proportion of patients with risk factors for breast cancer and baseline examinations. DBT was used to detect 54.3% more carcinomas (+1.9 per 1000, P < .0018) than 2D mammography. The RR was 7.51% for 2D mammography and 6.10% for DBT (absolute change, 1.41%; relative change, -18.8%; P < .0001). The DBT subgroup demonstrated a significantly lower RR for patients with extremely or heterogeneously dense breasts and for patients in their 5th and 7th decades. Implementing DBT into a U.S. breast cancer screening program significantly decreased the screening RR overall and for certain patient subgroups, while significantly increasing the CDR. These findings may encourage more widespread adoption and reimbursement of DBT and facilitate improved patient selection.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/radiol.2015142036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4770944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1767072672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-74a5c591cfdcf30d4fc9c9d2850aac77831e807ad6f1c21369c540522b0716283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwAGyQl2ym-G_GMxskSPiJVIkqFLbWjedOauSxg-2p1HfiIZkkpcDKlu853z3WIeQlZxecq_ZNgt5FfyEYr7kSTDaPyILXQldc8voxWTAmZdUq3p2RZzn_YIyrutVPyZlo5otgzYL8WgebEDL2dAnBYqIrLGiLi4FuoCCF0NPvkBwcnjJ1gZYbpBu04P1JscE8-eLCjg4pjnQ97j2OGMrRQeNA5Yqu3M4V8PT9YVeh13GM-S7MpOwOzBIp0Ku4n_zRVG2Pgb7OyTAcwFcp7hKMz8mTAXzGF_fnOfn28cP18nN1-eXTevnusrKy60qlFdS27rgdejtI1qvBdrbrRVszAKt1Kzm2TEPfDNwKLpvO1orVQmyZ5o1o5Tl5e-Lup-2IvZ0_k8CbfXIjpDsTwZn_J8HdmF28NUpr1ik1A17fA1L8OWEuZnTZovcQME7ZcN1opkWjxSzlJ6lNMeeEw8MazsyhZXNq2fxtefa8-jffg-NPrfI3liioaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1767072672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sharpe, Jr, Richard E ; Venkataraman, Shambavi ; Phillips, Jordana ; Dialani, Vandana ; Fein-Zachary, Valerie J ; Prakash, Seema ; Slanetz, Priscilla J ; Mehta, Tejas S</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharpe, Jr, Richard E ; Venkataraman, Shambavi ; Phillips, Jordana ; Dialani, Vandana ; Fein-Zachary, Valerie J ; Prakash, Seema ; Slanetz, Priscilla J ; Mehta, Tejas S</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the recall and cancer detection rates (CDRs) at screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with those at screening with two-dimensional (2D) mammography and to evaluate variations in the recall rate (RR) according to patient age, risk factors, and breast density and among individual radiologists at a single U.S. academic medical center. This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study with a retrospective cohort included 85 852 asymptomatic women who presented for breast cancer screening over a 3-year period beginning in 2011. A DBT unit was introduced into the existing 2D mammography screening program, and patients were assigned to the first available machine. Ten breast-subspecialized radiologists interpreted approximately 90% of the examinations. RRs were calculated overall and according to patient age, breast density, and individual radiologist. CDRs were calculated. Single and multiple mixed-effect logistic regression analyses, χ(2) tests, and Bonferroni correction were utilized, as appropriate. The study included 5703 (6.6%) DBT examinations and 80 149 (93.4%) 2D mammography examinations. The DBT subgroup contained a higher proportion of patients with risk factors for breast cancer and baseline examinations. DBT was used to detect 54.3% more carcinomas (+1.9 per 1000, P &lt; .0018) than 2D mammography. The RR was 7.51% for 2D mammography and 6.10% for DBT (absolute change, 1.41%; relative change, -18.8%; P &lt; .0001). The DBT subgroup demonstrated a significantly lower RR for patients with extremely or heterogeneously dense breasts and for patients in their 5th and 7th decades. Implementing DBT into a U.S. breast cancer screening program significantly decreased the screening RR overall and for certain patient subgroups, while significantly increasing the CDR. These findings may encourage more widespread adoption and reimbursement of DBT and facilitate improved patient selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26458206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Continuity of Patient Care ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Mammography - methods ; Mass Screening - methods ; Middle Aged ; Original Research ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2016-03, Vol.278 (3), p.698-706</ispartof><rights>2015 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-74a5c591cfdcf30d4fc9c9d2850aac77831e807ad6f1c21369c540522b0716283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-74a5c591cfdcf30d4fc9c9d2850aac77831e807ad6f1c21369c540522b0716283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26458206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharpe, Jr, Richard E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkataraman, Shambavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dialani, Vandana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fein-Zachary, Valerie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Seema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slanetz, Priscilla J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Tejas S</creatorcontrib><title>Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>To compare the recall and cancer detection rates (CDRs) at screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with those at screening with two-dimensional (2D) mammography and to evaluate variations in the recall rate (RR) according to patient age, risk factors, and breast density and among individual radiologists at a single U.S. academic medical center. This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study with a retrospective cohort included 85 852 asymptomatic women who presented for breast cancer screening over a 3-year period beginning in 2011. A DBT unit was introduced into the existing 2D mammography screening program, and patients were assigned to the first available machine. Ten breast-subspecialized radiologists interpreted approximately 90% of the examinations. RRs were calculated overall and according to patient age, breast density, and individual radiologist. CDRs were calculated. Single and multiple mixed-effect logistic regression analyses, χ(2) tests, and Bonferroni correction were utilized, as appropriate. The study included 5703 (6.6%) DBT examinations and 80 149 (93.4%) 2D mammography examinations. The DBT subgroup contained a higher proportion of patients with risk factors for breast cancer and baseline examinations. DBT was used to detect 54.3% more carcinomas (+1.9 per 1000, P &lt; .0018) than 2D mammography. The RR was 7.51% for 2D mammography and 6.10% for DBT (absolute change, 1.41%; relative change, -18.8%; P &lt; .0001). The DBT subgroup demonstrated a significantly lower RR for patients with extremely or heterogeneously dense breasts and for patients in their 5th and 7th decades. Implementing DBT into a U.S. breast cancer screening program significantly decreased the screening RR overall and for certain patient subgroups, while significantly increasing the CDR. These findings may encourage more widespread adoption and reimbursement of DBT and facilitate improved patient selection.</description><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwAGyQl2ym-G_GMxskSPiJVIkqFLbWjedOauSxg-2p1HfiIZkkpcDKlu853z3WIeQlZxecq_ZNgt5FfyEYr7kSTDaPyILXQldc8voxWTAmZdUq3p2RZzn_YIyrutVPyZlo5otgzYL8WgebEDL2dAnBYqIrLGiLi4FuoCCF0NPvkBwcnjJ1gZYbpBu04P1JscE8-eLCjg4pjnQ97j2OGMrRQeNA5Yqu3M4V8PT9YVeh13GM-S7MpOwOzBIp0Ku4n_zRVG2Pgb7OyTAcwFcp7hKMz8mTAXzGF_fnOfn28cP18nN1-eXTevnusrKy60qlFdS27rgdejtI1qvBdrbrRVszAKt1Kzm2TEPfDNwKLpvO1orVQmyZ5o1o5Tl5e-Lup-2IvZ0_k8CbfXIjpDsTwZn_J8HdmF28NUpr1ik1A17fA1L8OWEuZnTZovcQME7ZcN1opkWjxSzlJ6lNMeeEw8MazsyhZXNq2fxtefa8-jffg-NPrfI3liioaQ</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Sharpe, Jr, Richard E</creator><creator>Venkataraman, Shambavi</creator><creator>Phillips, Jordana</creator><creator>Dialani, Vandana</creator><creator>Fein-Zachary, Valerie J</creator><creator>Prakash, Seema</creator><creator>Slanetz, Priscilla J</creator><creator>Mehta, Tejas S</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program</title><author>Sharpe, Jr, Richard E ; Venkataraman, Shambavi ; Phillips, Jordana ; Dialani, Vandana ; Fein-Zachary, Valerie J ; Prakash, Seema ; Slanetz, Priscilla J ; Mehta, Tejas S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-74a5c591cfdcf30d4fc9c9d2850aac77831e807ad6f1c21369c540522b0716283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharpe, Jr, Richard E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkataraman, Shambavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dialani, Vandana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fein-Zachary, Valerie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Seema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slanetz, Priscilla J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Tejas S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharpe, Jr, Richard E</au><au>Venkataraman, Shambavi</au><au>Phillips, Jordana</au><au>Dialani, Vandana</au><au>Fein-Zachary, Valerie J</au><au>Prakash, Seema</au><au>Slanetz, Priscilla J</au><au>Mehta, Tejas S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>278</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>698</spage><epage>706</epage><pages>698-706</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>To compare the recall and cancer detection rates (CDRs) at screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with those at screening with two-dimensional (2D) mammography and to evaluate variations in the recall rate (RR) according to patient age, risk factors, and breast density and among individual radiologists at a single U.S. academic medical center. This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study with a retrospective cohort included 85 852 asymptomatic women who presented for breast cancer screening over a 3-year period beginning in 2011. A DBT unit was introduced into the existing 2D mammography screening program, and patients were assigned to the first available machine. Ten breast-subspecialized radiologists interpreted approximately 90% of the examinations. RRs were calculated overall and according to patient age, breast density, and individual radiologist. CDRs were calculated. Single and multiple mixed-effect logistic regression analyses, χ(2) tests, and Bonferroni correction were utilized, as appropriate. The study included 5703 (6.6%) DBT examinations and 80 149 (93.4%) 2D mammography examinations. The DBT subgroup contained a higher proportion of patients with risk factors for breast cancer and baseline examinations. DBT was used to detect 54.3% more carcinomas (+1.9 per 1000, P &lt; .0018) than 2D mammography. The RR was 7.51% for 2D mammography and 6.10% for DBT (absolute change, 1.41%; relative change, -18.8%; P &lt; .0001). The DBT subgroup demonstrated a significantly lower RR for patients with extremely or heterogeneously dense breasts and for patients in their 5th and 7th decades. Implementing DBT into a U.S. breast cancer screening program significantly decreased the screening RR overall and for certain patient subgroups, while significantly increasing the CDR. These findings may encourage more widespread adoption and reimbursement of DBT and facilitate improved patient selection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>26458206</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.2015142036</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8419
ispartof Radiology, 2016-03, Vol.278 (3), p.698-706
issn 0033-8419
1527-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4770944
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Continuity of Patient Care
Female
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Mammography - methods
Mass Screening - methods
Middle Aged
Original Research
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
title Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T13%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20Cancer%20Detection%20Rate%20and%20Variations%20in%20the%20Recall%20Rate%20Resulting%20from%20Implementation%20of%203D%20Digital%20Breast%20Tomosynthesis%20into%20a%20Population-based%20Screening%20Program&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Sharpe,%20Jr,%20Richard%20E&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=278&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=698&rft.epage=706&rft.pages=698-706&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2015142036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1767072672%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1767072672&rft_id=info:pmid/26458206&rfr_iscdi=true