Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature
After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons. From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our dep...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery 2015-11, Vol.36 (6), p.243-246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 246 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 243 |
container_title | Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Zanghì, G Leanza, V Vecchio, R Malaguarnera, M Romano, G Rinzivillo, N M A Catania, V Basile, F |
description | After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons.
From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our department 320 cholecystectomy: 27 in laparotomy and 293 in laparoscopy. Of these, 88 underwent to Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), namely the Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), in recruited patients aged between 19-65 years; 56 patients were females and 32 were males.
The laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the SILS methodology is a safe technique. Respect to multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC), we have cosmetic advances. The pain is less in extraumbilical sites, and the major umbilical pain can be prevented by local anaesthesia. The times are slightly longer, especially at the beginning of training, but after a few of operations it is reduced to about one hour. We didn't found any other difference in vantage and advantage between the two technics, only a case of postoperative umbilical hernia in SILS.
We found the SILS a safe and effective technique for the cholecystectomy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.243 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4767369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1767073627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-860b314c541017aff88c69aab37e97f91648b2b3440b907f1ebff65bd90bcc113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxS0EoqvSb4BQjlyy9cSO_3BAQisolVbiAJW4WbZ3vGuUjYOdFPbb17SlgrnMYd68Gb0fIa-BrgGAqcu9P8R82VHo10ysxbrj7BlZgZbQAu-_PycryjS0mtL-jFyU8oPWEtBxLV-Ss04opYRWK3LzNY77Advr0ccS09hs7WRzKj5N0TebQxrQn8qMfk7H07smLbnB3xPmiKPHxo67JuNtxF9NCs0QZ8x2XjK-Ii-CHQpePPZzcvPp47fN53b75ep682Hbek7V3CpBHQPuew4UpA1BKS-0tY5J1DJoEFy5zjHOqdNUBkAXgujdTlPnfc3hnLx_8J0Wd8Sdx3HOdjBTjkebTybZaP6fjPFg9unWcCkkE7oavH00yOnngmU2x1g8DoMdMS3FQNXRquxklfIHqa_xlIzh6QxQcw_F3EMxf6AYJowwFUpde_Pvi09LfxGwO4zZi_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1767073627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zanghì, G ; Leanza, V ; Vecchio, R ; Malaguarnera, M ; Romano, G ; Rinzivillo, N M A ; Catania, V ; Basile, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Zanghì, G ; Leanza, V ; Vecchio, R ; Malaguarnera, M ; Romano, G ; Rinzivillo, N M A ; Catania, V ; Basile, F</creatorcontrib><description>After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons.
From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our department 320 cholecystectomy: 27 in laparotomy and 293 in laparoscopy. Of these, 88 underwent to Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), namely the Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), in recruited patients aged between 19-65 years; 56 patients were females and 32 were males.
The laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the SILS methodology is a safe technique. Respect to multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC), we have cosmetic advances. The pain is less in extraumbilical sites, and the major umbilical pain can be prevented by local anaesthesia. The times are slightly longer, especially at the beginning of training, but after a few of operations it is reduced to about one hour. We didn't found any other difference in vantage and advantage between the two technics, only a case of postoperative umbilical hernia in SILS.
We found the SILS a safe and effective technique for the cholecystectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-9005</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1971-145X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1971-145X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.243</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26888698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: CIC Edizioni Internationali</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Female ; Gallstones - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mini-Review ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery, 2015-11, Vol.36 (6), p.243-246</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015, CIC Edizioni Internazionali 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-860b314c541017aff88c69aab37e97f91648b2b3440b907f1ebff65bd90bcc113</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767369/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767369/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zanghì, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leanza, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vecchio, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malaguarnera, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinzivillo, N M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catania, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basile, F</creatorcontrib><title>Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature</title><title>Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery</title><addtitle>G Chir</addtitle><description>After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons.
From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our department 320 cholecystectomy: 27 in laparotomy and 293 in laparoscopy. Of these, 88 underwent to Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), namely the Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), in recruited patients aged between 19-65 years; 56 patients were females and 32 were males.
The laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the SILS methodology is a safe technique. Respect to multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC), we have cosmetic advances. The pain is less in extraumbilical sites, and the major umbilical pain can be prevented by local anaesthesia. The times are slightly longer, especially at the beginning of training, but after a few of operations it is reduced to about one hour. We didn't found any other difference in vantage and advantage between the two technics, only a case of postoperative umbilical hernia in SILS.
We found the SILS a safe and effective technique for the cholecystectomy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallstones - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mini-Review</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0391-9005</issn><issn>1971-145X</issn><issn>1971-145X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxS0EoqvSb4BQjlyy9cSO_3BAQisolVbiAJW4WbZ3vGuUjYOdFPbb17SlgrnMYd68Gb0fIa-BrgGAqcu9P8R82VHo10ysxbrj7BlZgZbQAu-_PycryjS0mtL-jFyU8oPWEtBxLV-Ss04opYRWK3LzNY77Advr0ccS09hs7WRzKj5N0TebQxrQn8qMfk7H07smLbnB3xPmiKPHxo67JuNtxF9NCs0QZ8x2XjK-Ii-CHQpePPZzcvPp47fN53b75ep682Hbek7V3CpBHQPuew4UpA1BKS-0tY5J1DJoEFy5zjHOqdNUBkAXgujdTlPnfc3hnLx_8J0Wd8Sdx3HOdjBTjkebTybZaP6fjPFg9unWcCkkE7oavH00yOnngmU2x1g8DoMdMS3FQNXRquxklfIHqa_xlIzh6QxQcw_F3EMxf6AYJowwFUpde_Pvi09LfxGwO4zZi_w</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Zanghì, G</creator><creator>Leanza, V</creator><creator>Vecchio, R</creator><creator>Malaguarnera, M</creator><creator>Romano, G</creator><creator>Rinzivillo, N M A</creator><creator>Catania, V</creator><creator>Basile, F</creator><general>CIC Edizioni Internationali</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature</title><author>Zanghì, G ; Leanza, V ; Vecchio, R ; Malaguarnera, M ; Romano, G ; Rinzivillo, N M A ; Catania, V ; Basile, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-860b314c541017aff88c69aab37e97f91648b2b3440b907f1ebff65bd90bcc113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallstones - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mini-Review</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zanghì, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leanza, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vecchio, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malaguarnera, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinzivillo, N M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catania, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basile, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zanghì, G</au><au>Leanza, V</au><au>Vecchio, R</au><au>Malaguarnera, M</au><au>Romano, G</au><au>Rinzivillo, N M A</au><au>Catania, V</au><au>Basile, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature</atitle><jtitle>Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>G Chir</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>243-246</pages><issn>0391-9005</issn><issn>1971-145X</issn><eissn>1971-145X</eissn><abstract>After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons.
From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our department 320 cholecystectomy: 27 in laparotomy and 293 in laparoscopy. Of these, 88 underwent to Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), namely the Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), in recruited patients aged between 19-65 years; 56 patients were females and 32 were males.
The laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the SILS methodology is a safe technique. Respect to multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC), we have cosmetic advances. The pain is less in extraumbilical sites, and the major umbilical pain can be prevented by local anaesthesia. The times are slightly longer, especially at the beginning of training, but after a few of operations it is reduced to about one hour. We didn't found any other difference in vantage and advantage between the two technics, only a case of postoperative umbilical hernia in SILS.
We found the SILS a safe and effective technique for the cholecystectomy.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>CIC Edizioni Internationali</pub><pmid>26888698</pmid><doi>10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.243</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0391-9005 |
ispartof | Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery, 2015-11, Vol.36 (6), p.243-246 |
issn | 0391-9005 1971-145X 1971-145X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4767369 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods Female Gallstones - surgery Humans Male Middle Aged Mini-Review Young Adult |
title | Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A25%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-Incision%20Laparoscopic%20Cholecystectomy:%20our%20experience%20and%20review%20of%20literature&rft.jtitle=Giornale%20di%20Chirurgia%20-%20Journal%20of%20Surgery&rft.au=Zangh%C3%AC,%20G&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=243-246&rft.issn=0391-9005&rft.eissn=1971-145X&rft_id=info:doi/10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1767073627%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1767073627&rft_id=info:pmid/26888698&rfr_iscdi=true |