Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature

After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons. From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our dep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery 2015-11, Vol.36 (6), p.243-246
Hauptverfasser: Zanghì, G, Leanza, V, Vecchio, R, Malaguarnera, M, Romano, G, Rinzivillo, N M A, Catania, V, Basile, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 246
container_issue 6
container_start_page 243
container_title Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery
container_volume 36
creator Zanghì, G
Leanza, V
Vecchio, R
Malaguarnera, M
Romano, G
Rinzivillo, N M A
Catania, V
Basile, F
description After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons. From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our department 320 cholecystectomy: 27 in laparotomy and 293 in laparoscopy. Of these, 88 underwent to Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), namely the Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), in recruited patients aged between 19-65 years; 56 patients were females and 32 were males. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the SILS methodology is a safe technique. Respect to multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC), we have cosmetic advances. The pain is less in extraumbilical sites, and the major umbilical pain can be prevented by local anaesthesia. The times are slightly longer, especially at the beginning of training, but after a few of operations it is reduced to about one hour. We didn't found any other difference in vantage and advantage between the two technics, only a case of postoperative umbilical hernia in SILS. We found the SILS a safe and effective technique for the cholecystectomy.
doi_str_mv 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.243
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4767369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1767073627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-860b314c541017aff88c69aab37e97f91648b2b3440b907f1ebff65bd90bcc113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxS0EoqvSb4BQjlyy9cSO_3BAQisolVbiAJW4WbZ3vGuUjYOdFPbb17SlgrnMYd68Gb0fIa-BrgGAqcu9P8R82VHo10ysxbrj7BlZgZbQAu-_PycryjS0mtL-jFyU8oPWEtBxLV-Ss04opYRWK3LzNY77Advr0ccS09hs7WRzKj5N0TebQxrQn8qMfk7H07smLbnB3xPmiKPHxo67JuNtxF9NCs0QZ8x2XjK-Ii-CHQpePPZzcvPp47fN53b75ep682Hbek7V3CpBHQPuew4UpA1BKS-0tY5J1DJoEFy5zjHOqdNUBkAXgujdTlPnfc3hnLx_8J0Wd8Sdx3HOdjBTjkebTybZaP6fjPFg9unWcCkkE7oavH00yOnngmU2x1g8DoMdMS3FQNXRquxklfIHqa_xlIzh6QxQcw_F3EMxf6AYJowwFUpde_Pvi09LfxGwO4zZi_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1767073627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zanghì, G ; Leanza, V ; Vecchio, R ; Malaguarnera, M ; Romano, G ; Rinzivillo, N M A ; Catania, V ; Basile, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Zanghì, G ; Leanza, V ; Vecchio, R ; Malaguarnera, M ; Romano, G ; Rinzivillo, N M A ; Catania, V ; Basile, F</creatorcontrib><description>After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons. From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our department 320 cholecystectomy: 27 in laparotomy and 293 in laparoscopy. Of these, 88 underwent to Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), namely the Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), in recruited patients aged between 19-65 years; 56 patients were females and 32 were males. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the SILS methodology is a safe technique. Respect to multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC), we have cosmetic advances. The pain is less in extraumbilical sites, and the major umbilical pain can be prevented by local anaesthesia. The times are slightly longer, especially at the beginning of training, but after a few of operations it is reduced to about one hour. We didn't found any other difference in vantage and advantage between the two technics, only a case of postoperative umbilical hernia in SILS. We found the SILS a safe and effective technique for the cholecystectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-9005</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1971-145X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1971-145X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.243</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26888698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: CIC Edizioni Internationali</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Female ; Gallstones - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mini-Review ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery, 2015-11, Vol.36 (6), p.243-246</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015, CIC Edizioni Internazionali 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-860b314c541017aff88c69aab37e97f91648b2b3440b907f1ebff65bd90bcc113</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767369/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4767369/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zanghì, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leanza, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vecchio, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malaguarnera, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinzivillo, N M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catania, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basile, F</creatorcontrib><title>Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature</title><title>Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery</title><addtitle>G Chir</addtitle><description>After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons. From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our department 320 cholecystectomy: 27 in laparotomy and 293 in laparoscopy. Of these, 88 underwent to Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), namely the Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), in recruited patients aged between 19-65 years; 56 patients were females and 32 were males. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the SILS methodology is a safe technique. Respect to multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC), we have cosmetic advances. The pain is less in extraumbilical sites, and the major umbilical pain can be prevented by local anaesthesia. The times are slightly longer, especially at the beginning of training, but after a few of operations it is reduced to about one hour. We didn't found any other difference in vantage and advantage between the two technics, only a case of postoperative umbilical hernia in SILS. We found the SILS a safe and effective technique for the cholecystectomy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallstones - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mini-Review</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0391-9005</issn><issn>1971-145X</issn><issn>1971-145X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxS0EoqvSb4BQjlyy9cSO_3BAQisolVbiAJW4WbZ3vGuUjYOdFPbb17SlgrnMYd68Gb0fIa-BrgGAqcu9P8R82VHo10ysxbrj7BlZgZbQAu-_PycryjS0mtL-jFyU8oPWEtBxLV-Ss04opYRWK3LzNY77Advr0ccS09hs7WRzKj5N0TebQxrQn8qMfk7H07smLbnB3xPmiKPHxo67JuNtxF9NCs0QZ8x2XjK-Ii-CHQpePPZzcvPp47fN53b75ep682Hbek7V3CpBHQPuew4UpA1BKS-0tY5J1DJoEFy5zjHOqdNUBkAXgujdTlPnfc3hnLx_8J0Wd8Sdx3HOdjBTjkebTybZaP6fjPFg9unWcCkkE7oavH00yOnngmU2x1g8DoMdMS3FQNXRquxklfIHqa_xlIzh6QxQcw_F3EMxf6AYJowwFUpde_Pvi09LfxGwO4zZi_w</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Zanghì, G</creator><creator>Leanza, V</creator><creator>Vecchio, R</creator><creator>Malaguarnera, M</creator><creator>Romano, G</creator><creator>Rinzivillo, N M A</creator><creator>Catania, V</creator><creator>Basile, F</creator><general>CIC Edizioni Internationali</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature</title><author>Zanghì, G ; Leanza, V ; Vecchio, R ; Malaguarnera, M ; Romano, G ; Rinzivillo, N M A ; Catania, V ; Basile, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-860b314c541017aff88c69aab37e97f91648b2b3440b907f1ebff65bd90bcc113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallstones - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mini-Review</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zanghì, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leanza, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vecchio, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malaguarnera, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinzivillo, N M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catania, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basile, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zanghì, G</au><au>Leanza, V</au><au>Vecchio, R</au><au>Malaguarnera, M</au><au>Romano, G</au><au>Rinzivillo, N M A</au><au>Catania, V</au><au>Basile, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature</atitle><jtitle>Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>G Chir</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>243-246</pages><issn>0391-9005</issn><issn>1971-145X</issn><eissn>1971-145X</eissn><abstract>After the revolution in the surgery of gallbladder stones represented by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we tried a new technique that further maximize the aesthetic results and that at the same time is of easy learning for young surgeons. From January 2011 to December 2012 we performed at our department 320 cholecystectomy: 27 in laparotomy and 293 in laparoscopy. Of these, 88 underwent to Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), namely the Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), in recruited patients aged between 19-65 years; 56 patients were females and 32 were males. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the SILS methodology is a safe technique. Respect to multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC), we have cosmetic advances. The pain is less in extraumbilical sites, and the major umbilical pain can be prevented by local anaesthesia. The times are slightly longer, especially at the beginning of training, but after a few of operations it is reduced to about one hour. We didn't found any other difference in vantage and advantage between the two technics, only a case of postoperative umbilical hernia in SILS. We found the SILS a safe and effective technique for the cholecystectomy.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>CIC Edizioni Internationali</pub><pmid>26888698</pmid><doi>10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.243</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0391-9005
ispartof Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of Surgery, 2015-11, Vol.36 (6), p.243-246
issn 0391-9005
1971-145X
1971-145X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4767369
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods
Female
Gallstones - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mini-Review
Young Adult
title Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: our experience and review of literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A25%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-Incision%20Laparoscopic%20Cholecystectomy:%20our%20experience%20and%20review%20of%20literature&rft.jtitle=Giornale%20di%20Chirurgia%20-%20Journal%20of%20Surgery&rft.au=Zangh%C3%AC,%20G&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=243-246&rft.issn=0391-9005&rft.eissn=1971-145X&rft_id=info:doi/10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1767073627%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1767073627&rft_id=info:pmid/26888698&rfr_iscdi=true