The influence of contextual reward statistics on risk preference

Decision theories mandate that organisms should adjust their behaviour in the light of the contextual reward statistics. We tested this notion using a gambling choice task involving distinct contexts with different reward distributions. The best fitting model of subjects' behaviour indicated th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2016-03, Vol.128, p.74-84
Hauptverfasser: Rigoli, Francesco, Rutledge, Robb B., Dayan, Peter, Dolan, Raymond J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue
container_start_page 74
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 128
creator Rigoli, Francesco
Rutledge, Robb B.
Dayan, Peter
Dolan, Raymond J.
description Decision theories mandate that organisms should adjust their behaviour in the light of the contextual reward statistics. We tested this notion using a gambling choice task involving distinct contexts with different reward distributions. The best fitting model of subjects' behaviour indicated that the subjective values of options depended on several factors, including a baseline gambling propensity, a gambling preference dependent on reward amount, and a contextual reward adaptation factor. Combining this behavioural model with simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging we probed neural responses in three key regions linked to reward and value, namely ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra (VTA/SN), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and ventral striatum (VST). We show that activity in the VTA/SN reflected contextual reward statistics to the extent that context affected behaviour, activity in the vmPFC represented a value difference between chosen and unchosen options while VST responses reflected a non-linear mapping between the actual objective rewards and their subjective value. The findings highlight a multifaceted basis for choice behaviour with distinct mappings between components of this behaviour and value sensitive brain regions. •We use fMRI and a novel gambling paradigm to study the influence of the contextual reward statistics on decision making under risk•Risk propensity is influenced by the distribution of rewards available in a given temporal context, an effect that relates to activity in ventral tegmental area/substantial nigra•ventral striatum encodes elements of subjective, rather than objective, value during decision making under risk•activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflects the subjective value difference between chosen and unchosen option and not the average value across options
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4767216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811915011295</els_id><sourcerecordid>1767625063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-eaa8fd77846c67892a969728c2f584e59c768362703c89d04ea972edc37b5f033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1PFTEUbYxEEP0LpgkbNzO0nenXxoBEgYTEDa6b0rkDfc5rH20H9d_b4SGCG1Ztes499_QchDAlLSVUHK7aAHOKfm2voWWE8paytgKv0B4lmjeaS_Z6ufOuUZTqXfQ25xUhRNNevUG7TEgilSZ76OjyBrAP4zRDcIDjiF0MBX6V2U44wU-bBpyLLT4X7zKOASeff-BNghHSMvIO7Yx2yvD-4dxH379-uTw5ay6-nZ6fHF80jvekNGCtGgcpVS-cqKuZ1UJLphwbueqBayeF6gSTpHNKD6QHW2EYXCev-Ei6bh992upu5qt1fYdQkp3MJtUQ0m8TrTfPkeBvzHW8M70UklFRBT4-CKR4O0MuZu2zg2myAeKcDa3W-ppVT16mVknBOBGLrYP_qKs4p1CTWFiCaa2oqiy1ZbkUc67ZPfqmxCyNmpX516hZGjWUGXJv-8PTfz8O_q2wEj5vCVDTv_OQTHZ-aWbwCVwxQ_Qvb_kDq7e3AQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766299818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of contextual reward statistics on risk preference</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rigoli, Francesco ; Rutledge, Robb B. ; Dayan, Peter ; Dolan, Raymond J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rigoli, Francesco ; Rutledge, Robb B. ; Dayan, Peter ; Dolan, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><description>Decision theories mandate that organisms should adjust their behaviour in the light of the contextual reward statistics. We tested this notion using a gambling choice task involving distinct contexts with different reward distributions. The best fitting model of subjects' behaviour indicated that the subjective values of options depended on several factors, including a baseline gambling propensity, a gambling preference dependent on reward amount, and a contextual reward adaptation factor. Combining this behavioural model with simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging we probed neural responses in three key regions linked to reward and value, namely ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra (VTA/SN), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and ventral striatum (VST). We show that activity in the VTA/SN reflected contextual reward statistics to the extent that context affected behaviour, activity in the vmPFC represented a value difference between chosen and unchosen options while VST responses reflected a non-linear mapping between the actual objective rewards and their subjective value. The findings highlight a multifaceted basis for choice behaviour with distinct mappings between components of this behaviour and value sensitive brain regions. •We use fMRI and a novel gambling paradigm to study the influence of the contextual reward statistics on decision making under risk•Risk propensity is influenced by the distribution of rewards available in a given temporal context, an effect that relates to activity in ventral tegmental area/substantial nigra•ventral striatum encodes elements of subjective, rather than objective, value during decision making under risk•activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflects the subjective value difference between chosen and unchosen option and not the average value across options</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26707890</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Decision making ; Female ; Gambling ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Preferences ; Reward ; Risk-Taking ; Statistics ; Studies ; Variables ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2016-03, Vol.128, p.74-84</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 1, 2016</rights><rights>2015 The Authors 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-eaa8fd77846c67892a969728c2f584e59c768362703c89d04ea972edc37b5f033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-eaa8fd77846c67892a969728c2f584e59c768362703c89d04ea972edc37b5f033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811915011295$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26707890$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rigoli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Robb B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of contextual reward statistics on risk preference</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Decision theories mandate that organisms should adjust their behaviour in the light of the contextual reward statistics. We tested this notion using a gambling choice task involving distinct contexts with different reward distributions. The best fitting model of subjects' behaviour indicated that the subjective values of options depended on several factors, including a baseline gambling propensity, a gambling preference dependent on reward amount, and a contextual reward adaptation factor. Combining this behavioural model with simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging we probed neural responses in three key regions linked to reward and value, namely ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra (VTA/SN), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and ventral striatum (VST). We show that activity in the VTA/SN reflected contextual reward statistics to the extent that context affected behaviour, activity in the vmPFC represented a value difference between chosen and unchosen options while VST responses reflected a non-linear mapping between the actual objective rewards and their subjective value. The findings highlight a multifaceted basis for choice behaviour with distinct mappings between components of this behaviour and value sensitive brain regions. •We use fMRI and a novel gambling paradigm to study the influence of the contextual reward statistics on decision making under risk•Risk propensity is influenced by the distribution of rewards available in a given temporal context, an effect that relates to activity in ventral tegmental area/substantial nigra•ventral striatum encodes elements of subjective, rather than objective, value during decision making under risk•activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflects the subjective value difference between chosen and unchosen option and not the average value across options</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gambling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1PFTEUbYxEEP0LpgkbNzO0nenXxoBEgYTEDa6b0rkDfc5rH20H9d_b4SGCG1Ztes499_QchDAlLSVUHK7aAHOKfm2voWWE8paytgKv0B4lmjeaS_Z6ufOuUZTqXfQ25xUhRNNevUG7TEgilSZ76OjyBrAP4zRDcIDjiF0MBX6V2U44wU-bBpyLLT4X7zKOASeff-BNghHSMvIO7Yx2yvD-4dxH379-uTw5ay6-nZ6fHF80jvekNGCtGgcpVS-cqKuZ1UJLphwbueqBayeF6gSTpHNKD6QHW2EYXCev-Ei6bh992upu5qt1fYdQkp3MJtUQ0m8TrTfPkeBvzHW8M70UklFRBT4-CKR4O0MuZu2zg2myAeKcDa3W-ppVT16mVknBOBGLrYP_qKs4p1CTWFiCaa2oqiy1ZbkUc67ZPfqmxCyNmpX516hZGjWUGXJv-8PTfz8O_q2wEj5vCVDTv_OQTHZ-aWbwCVwxQ_Qvb_kDq7e3AQ</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Rigoli, Francesco</creator><creator>Rutledge, Robb B.</creator><creator>Dayan, Peter</creator><creator>Dolan, Raymond J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>The influence of contextual reward statistics on risk preference</title><author>Rigoli, Francesco ; Rutledge, Robb B. ; Dayan, Peter ; Dolan, Raymond J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-eaa8fd77846c67892a969728c2f584e59c768362703c89d04ea972edc37b5f033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gambling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rigoli, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Robb B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rigoli, Francesco</au><au>Rutledge, Robb B.</au><au>Dayan, Peter</au><au>Dolan, Raymond J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of contextual reward statistics on risk preference</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>128</volume><spage>74</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>74-84</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Decision theories mandate that organisms should adjust their behaviour in the light of the contextual reward statistics. We tested this notion using a gambling choice task involving distinct contexts with different reward distributions. The best fitting model of subjects' behaviour indicated that the subjective values of options depended on several factors, including a baseline gambling propensity, a gambling preference dependent on reward amount, and a contextual reward adaptation factor. Combining this behavioural model with simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging we probed neural responses in three key regions linked to reward and value, namely ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra (VTA/SN), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and ventral striatum (VST). We show that activity in the VTA/SN reflected contextual reward statistics to the extent that context affected behaviour, activity in the vmPFC represented a value difference between chosen and unchosen options while VST responses reflected a non-linear mapping between the actual objective rewards and their subjective value. The findings highlight a multifaceted basis for choice behaviour with distinct mappings between components of this behaviour and value sensitive brain regions. •We use fMRI and a novel gambling paradigm to study the influence of the contextual reward statistics on decision making under risk•Risk propensity is influenced by the distribution of rewards available in a given temporal context, an effect that relates to activity in ventral tegmental area/substantial nigra•ventral striatum encodes elements of subjective, rather than objective, value during decision making under risk•activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflects the subjective value difference between chosen and unchosen option and not the average value across options</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26707890</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.016</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2016-03, Vol.128, p.74-84
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4767216
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adaptation
Adult
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping
Decision making
Female
Gambling
Humans
Hypotheses
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Preferences
Reward
Risk-Taking
Statistics
Studies
Variables
Young Adult
title The influence of contextual reward statistics on risk preference
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T18%3A02%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20contextual%20reward%20statistics%20on%20risk%20preference&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Rigoli,%20Francesco&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=128&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=74-84&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1767625063%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766299818&rft_id=info:pmid/26707890&rft_els_id=S1053811915011295&rfr_iscdi=true