Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study

Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study

The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of different materials and techniques in current use on peripheral shaping of complete denture impression. The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the maxillary border morphology produced using tissue conditioner as control and low fusing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2015-04, Vol.15 (2), p.102-110
Hauptverfasser: Arora, Aman Kumar, Goyal, Itanshu, Sehgal, Monilka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Dentures
Edentulism
Original
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110
container_issue 2
container_start_page 102
container_title The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
container_volume 15
creator Arora, Aman Kumar
Goyal, Itanshu
Sehgal, Monilka
description The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of different materials and techniques in current use on peripheral shaping of complete denture impression. The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the maxillary border morphology produced using tissue conditioner as control and low fusing impression compound, Polyether, Pattern resin and periphery wax as border molding materials. The study was carried out on 15 denture wearer patients with well formed, rounded edentulous maxillary arch with adequate width and height. On each patient, border moldings were done, with tissue conditioner which was loaded on the borders of previous maxillary denture of the patient (control group), low fusing impression compound (Group 1), polyether (Group 2), Pattern resin (Group 3) and Peripheral wax (Group 4), respectively on special tray made for the patient. Sulcus width height and area was then measured for each group using stereomicroscope. Based on the study it is concluded that the polyether was the best material for border molding which will give most accurate borders to a denture.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/0972-4052.155030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4762307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A488469956</galeid><sourcerecordid>A488469956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5030-3cefbfdbacbd7437dc6e0020e577fb6b666ea1e550b5c4c5ea71769b97cf99223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk2LFDEQbURxx9W7JwkI4mXWdDrd6XgQhsEvWPCi55CPykyWdKdNugfml_h3TZh13BHJIUnVe69SlVdVL2t8Q2vcvMOckTXFLbmp2xY3-FG1qjnvS4g9rlbn9FX1LKU7jNse9_RpdUU6Tjjl7ar6tQ3DJKOc3QEQHKRf8jGMKFgUYYrBLNop5918LKEJopv2EKVHs0tpgYROGDBIHZFx1kKEcUYqRAMRDcEbN-7QIOfMlD4hNyIwGbH4sGRyLpYv6T3ajCV1cIeA0ryY4_Pqic14eHG_X1c_Pn38vv2yvv32-et2c7vWpd91o8Eqa5TUyjDaMKM7wJhgaBmzqlNd14GsIQ9HtZrqFiSrWccVZ9pyTkhzXX046U6LGsDo_JrcnZiiG2Q8iiCduMyMbi924SAo60iDWRZ4ey8Qw888kFkMLmnwXo6QWxSlHO8JoV2Gvv4HeheWOOb2RN0z1vSkp-1f1E56EG60IdfVRVRsaN_TLNcWrZv_oPIyMDgdRrAuxy8Ibx4Q9iD9vE_BL-W30yUQn4A6hpQi2PMwaiyK60SxlSi2EifXZcqrh0M8E_7YrPkN3bLVRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877382845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Arora, Aman Kumar ; Goyal, Itanshu ; Sehgal, Monilka</creator><creatorcontrib>Arora, Aman Kumar ; Goyal, Itanshu ; Sehgal, Monilka</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of different materials and techniques in current use on peripheral shaping of complete denture impression. The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the maxillary border morphology produced using tissue conditioner as control and low fusing impression compound, Polyether, Pattern resin and periphery wax as border molding materials. The study was carried out on 15 denture wearer patients with well formed, rounded edentulous maxillary arch with adequate width and height. On each patient, border moldings were done, with tissue conditioner which was loaded on the borders of previous maxillary denture of the patient (control group), low fusing impression compound (Group 1), polyether (Group 2), Pattern resin (Group 3) and Peripheral wax (Group 4), respectively on special tray made for the patient. Sulcus width height and area was then measured for each group using stereomicroscope. Based on the study it is concluded that the polyether was the best material for border molding which will give most accurate borders to a denture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-4052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.155030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26929495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Dentures ; Edentulism ; Original</subject><ispartof>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2015-04, Vol.15 (2), p.102-110</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Apr-Jun 2015</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2015 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5030-3cefbfdbacbd7437dc6e0020e577fb6b666ea1e550b5c4c5ea71769b97cf99223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762307/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4762307/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929495$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arora, Aman Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Itanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehgal, Monilka</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study</title><title>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><description>The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of different materials and techniques in current use on peripheral shaping of complete denture impression. The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the maxillary border morphology produced using tissue conditioner as control and low fusing impression compound, Polyether, Pattern resin and periphery wax as border molding materials. The study was carried out on 15 denture wearer patients with well formed, rounded edentulous maxillary arch with adequate width and height. On each patient, border moldings were done, with tissue conditioner which was loaded on the borders of previous maxillary denture of the patient (control group), low fusing impression compound (Group 1), polyether (Group 2), Pattern resin (Group 3) and Peripheral wax (Group 4), respectively on special tray made for the patient. Sulcus width height and area was then measured for each group using stereomicroscope. Based on the study it is concluded that the polyether was the best material for border molding which will give most accurate borders to a denture.</description><subject>Dentures</subject><subject>Edentulism</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>0972-4052</issn><issn>1998-4057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk2LFDEQbURxx9W7JwkI4mXWdDrd6XgQhsEvWPCi55CPykyWdKdNugfml_h3TZh13BHJIUnVe69SlVdVL2t8Q2vcvMOckTXFLbmp2xY3-FG1qjnvS4g9rlbn9FX1LKU7jNse9_RpdUU6Tjjl7ar6tQ3DJKOc3QEQHKRf8jGMKFgUYYrBLNop5918LKEJopv2EKVHs0tpgYROGDBIHZFx1kKEcUYqRAMRDcEbN-7QIOfMlD4hNyIwGbH4sGRyLpYv6T3ajCV1cIeA0ryY4_Pqic14eHG_X1c_Pn38vv2yvv32-et2c7vWpd91o8Eqa5TUyjDaMKM7wJhgaBmzqlNd14GsIQ9HtZrqFiSrWccVZ9pyTkhzXX046U6LGsDo_JrcnZiiG2Q8iiCduMyMbi924SAo60iDWRZ4ey8Qw888kFkMLmnwXo6QWxSlHO8JoV2Gvv4HeheWOOb2RN0z1vSkp-1f1E56EG60IdfVRVRsaN_TLNcWrZv_oPIyMDgdRrAuxy8Ibx4Q9iD9vE_BL-W30yUQn4A6hpQi2PMwaiyK60SxlSi2EifXZcqrh0M8E_7YrPkN3bLVRg</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Arora, Aman Kumar</creator><creator>Goyal, Itanshu</creator><creator>Sehgal, Monilka</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study</title><author>Arora, Aman Kumar ; Goyal, Itanshu ; Sehgal, Monilka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5030-3cefbfdbacbd7437dc6e0020e577fb6b666ea1e550b5c4c5ea71769b97cf99223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Dentures</topic><topic>Edentulism</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arora, Aman Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Itanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sehgal, Monilka</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arora, Aman Kumar</au><au>Goyal, Itanshu</au><au>Sehgal, Monilka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study</atitle><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>102-110</pages><issn>0972-4052</issn><eissn>1998-4057</eissn><abstract>The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of different materials and techniques in current use on peripheral shaping of complete denture impression. The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the maxillary border morphology produced using tissue conditioner as control and low fusing impression compound, Polyether, Pattern resin and periphery wax as border molding materials. The study was carried out on 15 denture wearer patients with well formed, rounded edentulous maxillary arch with adequate width and height. On each patient, border moldings were done, with tissue conditioner which was loaded on the borders of previous maxillary denture of the patient (control group), low fusing impression compound (Group 1), polyether (Group 2), Pattern resin (Group 3) and Peripheral wax (Group 4), respectively on special tray made for the patient. Sulcus width height and area was then measured for each group using stereomicroscope. Based on the study it is concluded that the polyether was the best material for border molding which will give most accurate borders to a denture.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>26929495</pmid><doi>10.4103/0972-4052.155030</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-4052
ispartof The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2015-04, Vol.15 (2), p.102-110
issn 0972-4052
1998-4057
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4762307
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Dentures
Edentulism
Original
title Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A53%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20reproducibility%20of%20peripheral%20tissues%20produced%20by%20different%20border%20molding%20materials%20in%20edentulous%20patients:%20An%20in%20vivo%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20Indian%20Prosthodontic%20Society&rft.au=Arora,%20Aman%20Kumar&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=102-110&rft.issn=0972-4052&rft.eissn=1998-4057&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0972-4052.155030&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA488469956%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877382845&rft_id=info:pmid/26929495&rft_galeid=A488469956&rfr_iscdi=true