A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
Objectives To compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine with adrenaline with that of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline on pain, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar. Study design All the patients who underwent surgical remov...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery 2016-03, Vol.15 (1), p.99-105 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 105 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 99 |
| container_title | Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Shyamala, M. Ramesh, C. Yuvaraj, V. Suresh, V. SathyaNarayanan, R. Balaji, T. S. Neil Dominic, M. Nithin Joseph Jude, B. |
| description | Objectives
To compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine with adrenaline with that of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline on pain, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.
Study design
All the patients who underwent surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and who fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1st June 2013 to 30th June 2014 were included in our study. Patients who were diagnosed as having impacted mandibular third molar were randomly allocated to two groups namely group A (bupivacaine with adrenaline), group B (carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline). Pain during deposition of local anesthetic, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia were compared between the two groups. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis by Chi Square test, Mann–Whitney U test.
Results and conclusion
The efficacy of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline is more compared with bupivacaine with adrenaline in decreasing pain on deposition of local anesthetic solution and in rapid onset of anesthesia. The duration of anesthesia for carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline and bupivacaine with adrenaline had no significant difference. The use of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline will reduce the patient discomfort both intra-operatively and post-operatively. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12663-015-0791-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4759020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1769984291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1aa36938822f5d694cbe859a441ccb3ab61ba63bb68cb0df780c5c1b3f409f183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdtq3DAQhk1paUKaB-hNEfSmN251sizdFDZLD4GUQJNC78RIlncVbGkr2RvyKnnaaLtpeoBUNzPSfPOPpL-qXhL8lmDcvsuECsFqTJoat4rU_El1iFXLa8Xp96c_c1pL2qqD6jjnK1wWI0wx8rw6oEJR1Qh8WN0u0DKOG0gw-a1DF9Pc3aATN107F9DJvPFbsOCDQ9d-WqNFl1yAYbeH0KElJBMDTK77L9rHhC7mtPIWBvTVjXFbYuzRaZlrd81fipg38wAJXa59Kgex5C-qZz0M2R3fx6Pq28cPl8vP9dn5p9Pl4qy2vMVTTQCYUExKSvumE4pb42SjgHNirWFgBDEgmDFCWoO7vpXYNpYY1nOseiLZUfV-r7uZzeg668KUYNCb5EdINzqC139Xgl_rVdxq3jYKU1wE3twLpPhjdnnSo8_WDQMEF-esSSuUkpwqUtDX_6BXcU7ln7IuZaVIgyUrFNlTNsWck-sfLkOw3pmv9-brYr7ema956Xn15yseOn5ZXQC6B3IphZVLv0c_rnoHXuW9Cg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919915083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar</title><source>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</source><source>SpringerLink</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Shyamala, M. ; Ramesh, C. ; Yuvaraj, V. ; Suresh, V. ; SathyaNarayanan, R. ; Balaji, T. S. ; Neil Dominic, M. ; Nithin Joseph Jude, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shyamala, M. ; Ramesh, C. ; Yuvaraj, V. ; Suresh, V. ; SathyaNarayanan, R. ; Balaji, T. S. ; Neil Dominic, M. ; Nithin Joseph Jude, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine with adrenaline with that of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline on pain, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.
Study design
All the patients who underwent surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and who fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1st June 2013 to 30th June 2014 were included in our study. Patients who were diagnosed as having impacted mandibular third molar were randomly allocated to two groups namely group A (bupivacaine with adrenaline), group B (carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline). Pain during deposition of local anesthetic, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia were compared between the two groups. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis by Chi Square test, Mann–Whitney U test.
Results and conclusion
The efficacy of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline is more compared with bupivacaine with adrenaline in decreasing pain on deposition of local anesthetic solution and in rapid onset of anesthesia. The duration of anesthesia for carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline and bupivacaine with adrenaline had no significant difference. The use of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline will reduce the patient discomfort both intra-operatively and post-operatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-8279</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-942X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12663-015-0791-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26929560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Comparative Study ; Dentistry ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Pain ; Patients ; Plastic Surgery ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2016-03, Vol.15 (1), p.99-105</ispartof><rights>The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2015</rights><rights>The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1aa36938822f5d694cbe859a441ccb3ab61ba63bb68cb0df780c5c1b3f409f183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1aa36938822f5d694cbe859a441ccb3ab61ba63bb68cb0df780c5c1b3f409f183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759020/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919915083?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,21369,21370,27905,27906,33511,33512,33725,33726,41469,42538,43640,43786,51300,53772,53774,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929560$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shyamala, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuvaraj, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SathyaNarayanan, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaji, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neil Dominic, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nithin Joseph Jude, B.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar</title><title>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</title><addtitle>J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Maxillofac Oral Surg</addtitle><description>Objectives
To compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine with adrenaline with that of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline on pain, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.
Study design
All the patients who underwent surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and who fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1st June 2013 to 30th June 2014 were included in our study. Patients who were diagnosed as having impacted mandibular third molar were randomly allocated to two groups namely group A (bupivacaine with adrenaline), group B (carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline). Pain during deposition of local anesthetic, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia were compared between the two groups. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis by Chi Square test, Mann–Whitney U test.
Results and conclusion
The efficacy of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline is more compared with bupivacaine with adrenaline in decreasing pain on deposition of local anesthetic solution and in rapid onset of anesthesia. The duration of anesthesia for carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline and bupivacaine with adrenaline had no significant difference. The use of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline will reduce the patient discomfort both intra-operatively and post-operatively.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Comparative Study</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0972-8279</issn><issn>0974-942X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdtq3DAQhk1paUKaB-hNEfSmN251sizdFDZLD4GUQJNC78RIlncVbGkr2RvyKnnaaLtpeoBUNzPSfPOPpL-qXhL8lmDcvsuECsFqTJoat4rU_El1iFXLa8Xp96c_c1pL2qqD6jjnK1wWI0wx8rw6oEJR1Qh8WN0u0DKOG0gw-a1DF9Pc3aATN107F9DJvPFbsOCDQ9d-WqNFl1yAYbeH0KElJBMDTK77L9rHhC7mtPIWBvTVjXFbYuzRaZlrd81fipg38wAJXa59Kgex5C-qZz0M2R3fx6Pq28cPl8vP9dn5p9Pl4qy2vMVTTQCYUExKSvumE4pb42SjgHNirWFgBDEgmDFCWoO7vpXYNpYY1nOseiLZUfV-r7uZzeg668KUYNCb5EdINzqC139Xgl_rVdxq3jYKU1wE3twLpPhjdnnSo8_WDQMEF-esSSuUkpwqUtDX_6BXcU7ln7IuZaVIgyUrFNlTNsWck-sfLkOw3pmv9-brYr7ema956Xn15yseOn5ZXQC6B3IphZVLv0c_rnoHXuW9Cg</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Shyamala, M.</creator><creator>Ramesh, C.</creator><creator>Yuvaraj, V.</creator><creator>Suresh, V.</creator><creator>SathyaNarayanan, R.</creator><creator>Balaji, T. S.</creator><creator>Neil Dominic, M.</creator><creator>Nithin Joseph Jude, B.</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar</title><author>Shyamala, M. ; Ramesh, C. ; Yuvaraj, V. ; Suresh, V. ; SathyaNarayanan, R. ; Balaji, T. S. ; Neil Dominic, M. ; Nithin Joseph Jude, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1aa36938822f5d694cbe859a441ccb3ab61ba63bb68cb0df780c5c1b3f409f183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Comparative Study</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shyamala, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuvaraj, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SathyaNarayanan, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaji, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neil Dominic, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nithin Joseph Jude, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shyamala, M.</au><au>Ramesh, C.</au><au>Yuvaraj, V.</au><au>Suresh, V.</au><au>SathyaNarayanan, R.</au><au>Balaji, T. S.</au><au>Neil Dominic, M.</au><au>Nithin Joseph Jude, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar</atitle><jtitle>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</jtitle><stitle>J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Maxillofac Oral Surg</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>99-105</pages><issn>0972-8279</issn><eissn>0974-942X</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine with adrenaline with that of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline on pain, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.
Study design
All the patients who underwent surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar and who fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1st June 2013 to 30th June 2014 were included in our study. Patients who were diagnosed as having impacted mandibular third molar were randomly allocated to two groups namely group A (bupivacaine with adrenaline), group B (carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline). Pain during deposition of local anesthetic, onset of anesthesia and duration of anesthesia were compared between the two groups. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis by Chi Square test, Mann–Whitney U test.
Results and conclusion
The efficacy of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline is more compared with bupivacaine with adrenaline in decreasing pain on deposition of local anesthetic solution and in rapid onset of anesthesia. The duration of anesthesia for carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline and bupivacaine with adrenaline had no significant difference. The use of carbonated bupivacaine with adrenaline will reduce the patient discomfort both intra-operatively and post-operatively.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>26929560</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12663-015-0791-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0972-8279 |
| ispartof | Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2016-03, Vol.15 (1), p.99-105 |
| issn | 0972-8279 0974-942X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4759020 |
| source | AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central; ProQuest Central (Alumni); SpringerLink; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Anesthesia Comparative Study Dentistry Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Otorhinolaryngology Pain Patients Plastic Surgery Surgery |
| title | A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A35%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Study%20Between%20Bupivacaine%20with%20Adrenaline%20and%20Carbonated%20Bupivacaine%20with%20Adrenaline%20for%20Surgical%20Removal%20of%20Impacted%20Mandibular%20Third%20Molar&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20maxillofacial%20and%20oral%20surgery&rft.au=Shyamala,%20M.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=99-105&rft.issn=0972-8279&rft.eissn=0974-942X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12663-015-0791-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1769984291%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919915083&rft_id=info:pmid/26929560&rfr_iscdi=true |