Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro
Purpose In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2016-02, Vol.33 (2), p.247-253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice Novara, Paola V. Coticchio, Giovanni Mignini Renzini, Mario Brambillasca, Fausta Brigante, Claudio De Ponti, Elena Fadini, Rubens |
description | Purpose
In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro, testing the hypothesis that IVM affects preimplantation development. Furthermore, we extended the morphokinetic analysis of these embryos by a comparison with embryos obtained in stimulated assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles.
Methods
In IVM cycles primed with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/hCG, prior to sperm microinjection, oocytes surrounded by an expanded cumulus at retrieval and presumably mature (EC-MII) were incubated for 6 h, while immature oocytes enclosed in a compact cumulus (CC) were matured in vitro for 30 h. The morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation, derived from EC-MII and CC oocytes, were comparatively and retrospectively analyzed in terms of cleavage times (t2, t3, t4, t5, and t8) and intervals (cc2, cc3, s2, s3). For further comparison, the morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation (ICSI) or giving rise to ongoing pregnancies (model) in stimulated ART cycles was also assessed.
Results
The morphokinetic behavior of EC-MII and CC embryos was entirely comparable, as suggested by the absence of statistical differences in the averages of all cleavage times and intervals. Almost all cleavage and interval times were also similar between EC-MII, CC, ICSI, and model groups, with the exception of t4 and s2, which were delayed and longer, respectively, in embryos generated in IVM cycles (EC-MII and CC).
Conclusions
These findings do not support the hypothesis that maturation in vitro affects embryo morphokinetics, while they suggest only marginal differences in the morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro in IVM cycles and embryos developed from mature oocytes recovered in stimulated cycles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10815-015-0625-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4759010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3973826981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-cdcff2c3e462c2262941cfdcb987c3c38752e99724bfdb416011e5ed61fbe87a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq0KVCjtD-gFReLCJe34O74goRW0lai4wNlKnPESSOLFTlbaf1-vlqIFqVIPI1szz7wz9kvIVwrfKID-nihUVJawDcVkaT6QYyo1LzXncJDvIKsShKqOyKeUHgHAVIx_JEdMKa65gWNy-TvE1UN46kacOpeK4AscmrgJqWhxjX1YYVv4GIYiBLeZMBVDPc0xJ7uxWHdTDJ_Joa_7hF9ezhNyf311t_hZ3tz--LW4vCld3mgqXeu8Z46jUMwxppgR1PnWNabSjjteacnQGM1E49tGUAWUosRWUd9gpWt-Qi52uqu5GbB1OE6x7u0qdkMdNzbUnX1bGbsHuwxrK7Q0QCELnL8IxPA8Y5rs0CWHfV-PGOZkqdZKyTxY_QeqNGgjhMjo2Tv0McxxzD-xFaSMSyp4puiOcjGkFNG_7k3Bbr20Oy8tbCN7aU3uOd1_8GvHX_MywHZAyqVxiXFv9D9V_wC_HapF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771235143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice ; Novara, Paola V. ; Coticchio, Giovanni ; Mignini Renzini, Mario ; Brambillasca, Fausta ; Brigante, Claudio ; De Ponti, Elena ; Fadini, Rubens</creator><creatorcontrib>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice ; Novara, Paola V. ; Coticchio, Giovanni ; Mignini Renzini, Mario ; Brambillasca, Fausta ; Brigante, Claudio ; De Ponti, Elena ; Fadini, Rubens</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro, testing the hypothesis that IVM affects preimplantation development. Furthermore, we extended the morphokinetic analysis of these embryos by a comparison with embryos obtained in stimulated assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles.
Methods
In IVM cycles primed with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/hCG, prior to sperm microinjection, oocytes surrounded by an expanded cumulus at retrieval and presumably mature (EC-MII) were incubated for 6 h, while immature oocytes enclosed in a compact cumulus (CC) were matured in vitro for 30 h. The morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation, derived from EC-MII and CC oocytes, were comparatively and retrospectively analyzed in terms of cleavage times (t2, t3, t4, t5, and t8) and intervals (cc2, cc3, s2, s3). For further comparison, the morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation (ICSI) or giving rise to ongoing pregnancies (model) in stimulated ART cycles was also assessed.
Results
The morphokinetic behavior of EC-MII and CC embryos was entirely comparable, as suggested by the absence of statistical differences in the averages of all cleavage times and intervals. Almost all cleavage and interval times were also similar between EC-MII, CC, ICSI, and model groups, with the exception of t4 and s2, which were delayed and longer, respectively, in embryos generated in IVM cycles (EC-MII and CC).
Conclusions
These findings do not support the hypothesis that maturation in vitro affects embryo morphokinetics, while they suggest only marginal differences in the morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro in IVM cycles and embryos developed from mature oocytes recovered in stimulated cycles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0625-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26637390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage ; Cryopreservation ; Embryo Biology ; Embryo Culture Techniques - methods ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryonic Development - drug effects ; Embryos ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - metabolism ; Follicles ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Microscopy ; Oocytes - drug effects ; Oocytes - growth & development ; Ovarian Follicle - drug effects ; Ovarian Follicle - growth & development ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Reproductive Medicine ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016-02, Vol.33 (2), p.247-253</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-cdcff2c3e462c2262941cfdcb987c3c38752e99724bfdb416011e5ed61fbe87a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-cdcff2c3e462c2262941cfdcb987c3c38752e99724bfdb416011e5ed61fbe87a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1635-9205</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759010/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759010/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novara, Paola V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coticchio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignini Renzini, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brambillasca, Fausta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigante, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Ponti, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadini, Rubens</creatorcontrib><title>Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose
In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro, testing the hypothesis that IVM affects preimplantation development. Furthermore, we extended the morphokinetic analysis of these embryos by a comparison with embryos obtained in stimulated assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles.
Methods
In IVM cycles primed with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/hCG, prior to sperm microinjection, oocytes surrounded by an expanded cumulus at retrieval and presumably mature (EC-MII) were incubated for 6 h, while immature oocytes enclosed in a compact cumulus (CC) were matured in vitro for 30 h. The morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation, derived from EC-MII and CC oocytes, were comparatively and retrospectively analyzed in terms of cleavage times (t2, t3, t4, t5, and t8) and intervals (cc2, cc3, s2, s3). For further comparison, the morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation (ICSI) or giving rise to ongoing pregnancies (model) in stimulated ART cycles was also assessed.
Results
The morphokinetic behavior of EC-MII and CC embryos was entirely comparable, as suggested by the absence of statistical differences in the averages of all cleavage times and intervals. Almost all cleavage and interval times were also similar between EC-MII, CC, ICSI, and model groups, with the exception of t4 and s2, which were delayed and longer, respectively, in embryos generated in IVM cycles (EC-MII and CC).
Conclusions
These findings do not support the hypothesis that maturation in vitro affects embryo morphokinetics, while they suggest only marginal differences in the morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro in IVM cycles and embryos developed from mature oocytes recovered in stimulated cycles.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Embryo Biology</subject><subject>Embryo Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryonic Development - drug effects</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - metabolism</subject><subject>Follicles</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Oocytes - drug effects</subject><subject>Oocytes - growth & development</subject><subject>Ovarian Follicle - drug effects</subject><subject>Ovarian Follicle - growth & development</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq0KVCjtD-gFReLCJe34O74goRW0lai4wNlKnPESSOLFTlbaf1-vlqIFqVIPI1szz7wz9kvIVwrfKID-nihUVJawDcVkaT6QYyo1LzXncJDvIKsShKqOyKeUHgHAVIx_JEdMKa65gWNy-TvE1UN46kacOpeK4AscmrgJqWhxjX1YYVv4GIYiBLeZMBVDPc0xJ7uxWHdTDJ_Joa_7hF9ezhNyf311t_hZ3tz--LW4vCld3mgqXeu8Z46jUMwxppgR1PnWNabSjjteacnQGM1E49tGUAWUosRWUd9gpWt-Qi52uqu5GbB1OE6x7u0qdkMdNzbUnX1bGbsHuwxrK7Q0QCELnL8IxPA8Y5rs0CWHfV-PGOZkqdZKyTxY_QeqNGgjhMjo2Tv0McxxzD-xFaSMSyp4puiOcjGkFNG_7k3Bbr20Oy8tbCN7aU3uOd1_8GvHX_MywHZAyqVxiXFv9D9V_wC_HapF</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice</creator><creator>Novara, Paola V.</creator><creator>Coticchio, Giovanni</creator><creator>Mignini Renzini, Mario</creator><creator>Brambillasca, Fausta</creator><creator>Brigante, Claudio</creator><creator>De Ponti, Elena</creator><creator>Fadini, Rubens</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9205</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro</title><author>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice ; Novara, Paola V. ; Coticchio, Giovanni ; Mignini Renzini, Mario ; Brambillasca, Fausta ; Brigante, Claudio ; De Ponti, Elena ; Fadini, Rubens</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-cdcff2c3e462c2262941cfdcb987c3c38752e99724bfdb416011e5ed61fbe87a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Embryo Biology</topic><topic>Embryo Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryonic Development - drug effects</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - metabolism</topic><topic>Follicles</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Oocytes - drug effects</topic><topic>Oocytes - growth & development</topic><topic>Ovarian Follicle - drug effects</topic><topic>Ovarian Follicle - growth & development</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novara, Paola V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coticchio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignini Renzini, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brambillasca, Fausta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigante, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Ponti, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadini, Rubens</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice</au><au>Novara, Paola V.</au><au>Coticchio, Giovanni</au><au>Mignini Renzini, Mario</au><au>Brambillasca, Fausta</au><au>Brigante, Claudio</au><au>De Ponti, Elena</au><au>Fadini, Rubens</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>247-253</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose
In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro, testing the hypothesis that IVM affects preimplantation development. Furthermore, we extended the morphokinetic analysis of these embryos by a comparison with embryos obtained in stimulated assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles.
Methods
In IVM cycles primed with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/hCG, prior to sperm microinjection, oocytes surrounded by an expanded cumulus at retrieval and presumably mature (EC-MII) were incubated for 6 h, while immature oocytes enclosed in a compact cumulus (CC) were matured in vitro for 30 h. The morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation, derived from EC-MII and CC oocytes, were comparatively and retrospectively analyzed in terms of cleavage times (t2, t3, t4, t5, and t8) and intervals (cc2, cc3, s2, s3). For further comparison, the morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation (ICSI) or giving rise to ongoing pregnancies (model) in stimulated ART cycles was also assessed.
Results
The morphokinetic behavior of EC-MII and CC embryos was entirely comparable, as suggested by the absence of statistical differences in the averages of all cleavage times and intervals. Almost all cleavage and interval times were also similar between EC-MII, CC, ICSI, and model groups, with the exception of t4 and s2, which were delayed and longer, respectively, in embryos generated in IVM cycles (EC-MII and CC).
Conclusions
These findings do not support the hypothesis that maturation in vitro affects embryo morphokinetics, while they suggest only marginal differences in the morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro in IVM cycles and embryos developed from mature oocytes recovered in stimulated cycles.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26637390</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-015-0625-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9205</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-0468 |
ispartof | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016-02, Vol.33 (2), p.247-253 |
issn | 1058-0468 1573-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4759010 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage Cryopreservation Embryo Biology Embryo Culture Techniques - methods Embryo Transfer - methods Embryonic Development - drug effects Embryos Female Fertilization in Vitro Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage Follicle Stimulating Hormone - metabolism Follicles Gynecology Human Genetics Humans Hypotheses In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques Medicine Medicine & Public Health Microscopy Oocytes - drug effects Oocytes - growth & development Ovarian Follicle - drug effects Ovarian Follicle - growth & development Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Reproductive Medicine Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic |
title | Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A03%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphokinetics%20of%20embryos%20developed%20from%20oocytes%20matured%20in%20vitro&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Dal%20Canto,%20Mariabeatrice&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=247-253&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-015-0625-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3973826981%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771235143&rft_id=info:pmid/26637390&rfr_iscdi=true |