Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro

Purpose In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2016-02, Vol.33 (2), p.247-253
Hauptverfasser: Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice, Novara, Paola V., Coticchio, Giovanni, Mignini Renzini, Mario, Brambillasca, Fausta, Brigante, Claudio, De Ponti, Elena, Fadini, Rubens
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue 2
container_start_page 247
container_title Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
container_volume 33
creator Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice
Novara, Paola V.
Coticchio, Giovanni
Mignini Renzini, Mario
Brambillasca, Fausta
Brigante, Claudio
De Ponti, Elena
Fadini, Rubens
description Purpose In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro, testing the hypothesis that IVM affects preimplantation development. Furthermore, we extended the morphokinetic analysis of these embryos by a comparison with embryos obtained in stimulated assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles. Methods In IVM cycles primed with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/hCG, prior to sperm microinjection, oocytes surrounded by an expanded cumulus at retrieval and presumably mature (EC-MII) were incubated for 6 h, while immature oocytes enclosed in a compact cumulus (CC) were matured in vitro for 30 h. The morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation, derived from EC-MII and CC oocytes, were comparatively and retrospectively analyzed in terms of cleavage times (t2, t3, t4, t5, and t8) and intervals (cc2, cc3, s2, s3). For further comparison, the morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation (ICSI) or giving rise to ongoing pregnancies (model) in stimulated ART cycles was also assessed. Results The morphokinetic behavior of EC-MII and CC embryos was entirely comparable, as suggested by the absence of statistical differences in the averages of all cleavage times and intervals. Almost all cleavage and interval times were also similar between EC-MII, CC, ICSI, and model groups, with the exception of t4 and s2, which were delayed and longer, respectively, in embryos generated in IVM cycles (EC-MII and CC). Conclusions These findings do not support the hypothesis that maturation in vitro affects embryo morphokinetics, while they suggest only marginal differences in the morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro in IVM cycles and embryos developed from mature oocytes recovered in stimulated cycles.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10815-015-0625-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4759010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3973826981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-cdcff2c3e462c2262941cfdcb987c3c38752e99724bfdb416011e5ed61fbe87a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq0KVCjtD-gFReLCJe34O74goRW0lai4wNlKnPESSOLFTlbaf1-vlqIFqVIPI1szz7wz9kvIVwrfKID-nihUVJawDcVkaT6QYyo1LzXncJDvIKsShKqOyKeUHgHAVIx_JEdMKa65gWNy-TvE1UN46kacOpeK4AscmrgJqWhxjX1YYVv4GIYiBLeZMBVDPc0xJ7uxWHdTDJ_Joa_7hF9ezhNyf311t_hZ3tz--LW4vCld3mgqXeu8Z46jUMwxppgR1PnWNabSjjteacnQGM1E49tGUAWUosRWUd9gpWt-Qi52uqu5GbB1OE6x7u0qdkMdNzbUnX1bGbsHuwxrK7Q0QCELnL8IxPA8Y5rs0CWHfV-PGOZkqdZKyTxY_QeqNGgjhMjo2Tv0McxxzD-xFaSMSyp4puiOcjGkFNG_7k3Bbr20Oy8tbCN7aU3uOd1_8GvHX_MywHZAyqVxiXFv9D9V_wC_HapF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771235143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice ; Novara, Paola V. ; Coticchio, Giovanni ; Mignini Renzini, Mario ; Brambillasca, Fausta ; Brigante, Claudio ; De Ponti, Elena ; Fadini, Rubens</creator><creatorcontrib>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice ; Novara, Paola V. ; Coticchio, Giovanni ; Mignini Renzini, Mario ; Brambillasca, Fausta ; Brigante, Claudio ; De Ponti, Elena ; Fadini, Rubens</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro, testing the hypothesis that IVM affects preimplantation development. Furthermore, we extended the morphokinetic analysis of these embryos by a comparison with embryos obtained in stimulated assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles. Methods In IVM cycles primed with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/hCG, prior to sperm microinjection, oocytes surrounded by an expanded cumulus at retrieval and presumably mature (EC-MII) were incubated for 6 h, while immature oocytes enclosed in a compact cumulus (CC) were matured in vitro for 30 h. The morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation, derived from EC-MII and CC oocytes, were comparatively and retrospectively analyzed in terms of cleavage times (t2, t3, t4, t5, and t8) and intervals (cc2, cc3, s2, s3). For further comparison, the morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation (ICSI) or giving rise to ongoing pregnancies (model) in stimulated ART cycles was also assessed. Results The morphokinetic behavior of EC-MII and CC embryos was entirely comparable, as suggested by the absence of statistical differences in the averages of all cleavage times and intervals. Almost all cleavage and interval times were also similar between EC-MII, CC, ICSI, and model groups, with the exception of t4 and s2, which were delayed and longer, respectively, in embryos generated in IVM cycles (EC-MII and CC). Conclusions These findings do not support the hypothesis that maturation in vitro affects embryo morphokinetics, while they suggest only marginal differences in the morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro in IVM cycles and embryos developed from mature oocytes recovered in stimulated cycles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0625-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26637390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration &amp; dosage ; Cryopreservation ; Embryo Biology ; Embryo Culture Techniques - methods ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryonic Development - drug effects ; Embryos ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - metabolism ; Follicles ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Microscopy ; Oocytes - drug effects ; Oocytes - growth &amp; development ; Ovarian Follicle - drug effects ; Ovarian Follicle - growth &amp; development ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Reproductive Medicine ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016-02, Vol.33 (2), p.247-253</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-cdcff2c3e462c2262941cfdcb987c3c38752e99724bfdb416011e5ed61fbe87a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-cdcff2c3e462c2262941cfdcb987c3c38752e99724bfdb416011e5ed61fbe87a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1635-9205</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759010/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4759010/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novara, Paola V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coticchio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignini Renzini, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brambillasca, Fausta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigante, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Ponti, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadini, Rubens</creatorcontrib><title>Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro, testing the hypothesis that IVM affects preimplantation development. Furthermore, we extended the morphokinetic analysis of these embryos by a comparison with embryos obtained in stimulated assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles. Methods In IVM cycles primed with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/hCG, prior to sperm microinjection, oocytes surrounded by an expanded cumulus at retrieval and presumably mature (EC-MII) were incubated for 6 h, while immature oocytes enclosed in a compact cumulus (CC) were matured in vitro for 30 h. The morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation, derived from EC-MII and CC oocytes, were comparatively and retrospectively analyzed in terms of cleavage times (t2, t3, t4, t5, and t8) and intervals (cc2, cc3, s2, s3). For further comparison, the morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation (ICSI) or giving rise to ongoing pregnancies (model) in stimulated ART cycles was also assessed. Results The morphokinetic behavior of EC-MII and CC embryos was entirely comparable, as suggested by the absence of statistical differences in the averages of all cleavage times and intervals. Almost all cleavage and interval times were also similar between EC-MII, CC, ICSI, and model groups, with the exception of t4 and s2, which were delayed and longer, respectively, in embryos generated in IVM cycles (EC-MII and CC). Conclusions These findings do not support the hypothesis that maturation in vitro affects embryo morphokinetics, while they suggest only marginal differences in the morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro in IVM cycles and embryos developed from mature oocytes recovered in stimulated cycles.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Embryo Biology</subject><subject>Embryo Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryonic Development - drug effects</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - metabolism</subject><subject>Follicles</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Oocytes - drug effects</subject><subject>Oocytes - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Ovarian Follicle - drug effects</subject><subject>Ovarian Follicle - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq0KVCjtD-gFReLCJe34O74goRW0lai4wNlKnPESSOLFTlbaf1-vlqIFqVIPI1szz7wz9kvIVwrfKID-nihUVJawDcVkaT6QYyo1LzXncJDvIKsShKqOyKeUHgHAVIx_JEdMKa65gWNy-TvE1UN46kacOpeK4AscmrgJqWhxjX1YYVv4GIYiBLeZMBVDPc0xJ7uxWHdTDJ_Joa_7hF9ezhNyf311t_hZ3tz--LW4vCld3mgqXeu8Z46jUMwxppgR1PnWNabSjjteacnQGM1E49tGUAWUosRWUd9gpWt-Qi52uqu5GbB1OE6x7u0qdkMdNzbUnX1bGbsHuwxrK7Q0QCELnL8IxPA8Y5rs0CWHfV-PGOZkqdZKyTxY_QeqNGgjhMjo2Tv0McxxzD-xFaSMSyp4puiOcjGkFNG_7k3Bbr20Oy8tbCN7aU3uOd1_8GvHX_MywHZAyqVxiXFv9D9V_wC_HapF</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice</creator><creator>Novara, Paola V.</creator><creator>Coticchio, Giovanni</creator><creator>Mignini Renzini, Mario</creator><creator>Brambillasca, Fausta</creator><creator>Brigante, Claudio</creator><creator>De Ponti, Elena</creator><creator>Fadini, Rubens</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9205</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro</title><author>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice ; Novara, Paola V. ; Coticchio, Giovanni ; Mignini Renzini, Mario ; Brambillasca, Fausta ; Brigante, Claudio ; De Ponti, Elena ; Fadini, Rubens</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-cdcff2c3e462c2262941cfdcb987c3c38752e99724bfdb416011e5ed61fbe87a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Embryo Biology</topic><topic>Embryo Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryonic Development - drug effects</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - metabolism</topic><topic>Follicles</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Oocytes - drug effects</topic><topic>Oocytes - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Ovarian Follicle - drug effects</topic><topic>Ovarian Follicle - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novara, Paola V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coticchio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignini Renzini, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brambillasca, Fausta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigante, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Ponti, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadini, Rubens</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice</au><au>Novara, Paola V.</au><au>Coticchio, Giovanni</au><au>Mignini Renzini, Mario</au><au>Brambillasca, Fausta</au><au>Brigante, Claudio</au><au>De Ponti, Elena</au><au>Fadini, Rubens</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>247-253</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose In in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles primed with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), both immature and mature oocytes are retrieved from antral follicles sized 8–12 mm. Using time-lapse microscopy, we compared the morphokinetic behavior of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro, testing the hypothesis that IVM affects preimplantation development. Furthermore, we extended the morphokinetic analysis of these embryos by a comparison with embryos obtained in stimulated assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles. Methods In IVM cycles primed with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/hCG, prior to sperm microinjection, oocytes surrounded by an expanded cumulus at retrieval and presumably mature (EC-MII) were incubated for 6 h, while immature oocytes enclosed in a compact cumulus (CC) were matured in vitro for 30 h. The morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation, derived from EC-MII and CC oocytes, were comparatively and retrospectively analyzed in terms of cleavage times (t2, t3, t4, t5, and t8) and intervals (cc2, cc3, s2, s3). For further comparison, the morphokinetics of embryos selected for transfer or cryopreservation (ICSI) or giving rise to ongoing pregnancies (model) in stimulated ART cycles was also assessed. Results The morphokinetic behavior of EC-MII and CC embryos was entirely comparable, as suggested by the absence of statistical differences in the averages of all cleavage times and intervals. Almost all cleavage and interval times were also similar between EC-MII, CC, ICSI, and model groups, with the exception of t4 and s2, which were delayed and longer, respectively, in embryos generated in IVM cycles (EC-MII and CC). Conclusions These findings do not support the hypothesis that maturation in vitro affects embryo morphokinetics, while they suggest only marginal differences in the morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro in IVM cycles and embryos developed from mature oocytes recovered in stimulated cycles.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26637390</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-015-0625-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9205</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0468
ispartof Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016-02, Vol.33 (2), p.247-253
issn 1058-0468
1573-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4759010
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage
Cryopreservation
Embryo Biology
Embryo Culture Techniques - methods
Embryo Transfer - methods
Embryonic Development - drug effects
Embryos
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage
Follicle Stimulating Hormone - metabolism
Follicles
Gynecology
Human Genetics
Humans
Hypotheses
In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Microscopy
Oocytes - drug effects
Oocytes - growth & development
Ovarian Follicle - drug effects
Ovarian Follicle - growth & development
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Reproductive Medicine
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
title Morphokinetics of embryos developed from oocytes matured in vitro
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A03%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphokinetics%20of%20embryos%20developed%20from%20oocytes%20matured%20in%20vitro&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Dal%20Canto,%20Mariabeatrice&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=247-253&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-015-0625-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3973826981%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771235143&rft_id=info:pmid/26637390&rfr_iscdi=true