Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications

Until now, up‐to‐date, comprehensive, spatial, national‐scale data on hydraulic fracturing water volumes have been lacking. Water volumes used (injected) to hydraulically fracture over 263,859 oil and gas wells drilled between 2000 and 2014 were compiled and used to create the first U.S. map of hydr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2015-07, Vol.51 (7), p.5839-5845
Hauptverfasser: Gallegos, Tanya J., Varela, Brian A., Haines, Seth S., Engle, Mark A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5845
container_issue 7
container_start_page 5839
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 51
creator Gallegos, Tanya J.
Varela, Brian A.
Haines, Seth S.
Engle, Mark A.
description Until now, up‐to‐date, comprehensive, spatial, national‐scale data on hydraulic fracturing water volumes have been lacking. Water volumes used (injected) to hydraulically fracture over 263,859 oil and gas wells drilled between 2000 and 2014 were compiled and used to create the first U.S. map of hydraulic fracturing water use. Although median annual volumes of 15,275 m3 and 19,425 m3 of water per well was used to hydraulically fracture individual horizontal oil and gas wells, respectively, in 2014, about 42% of wells were actually either vertical or directional, which required less than 2600 m3 water per well. The highest average hydraulic fracturing water usage (10,000−36,620 m3 per well) in watersheds across the United States generally correlated with shale‐gas areas (versus coalbed methane, tight oil, or tight gas) where the greatest proportion of hydraulically fractured wells were horizontally drilled, reflecting that the natural reservoir properties influence water use. This analysis also demonstrates that many oil and gas resources within a given basin are developed using a mix of horizontal, vertical, and some directional wells, explaining why large volume hydraulic fracturing water usage is not widespread. This spatial variability in hydraulic fracturing water use relates to the potential for environmental impacts such as water availability, water quality, wastewater disposal, and possible wastewater injection‐induced earthquakes. Key Points: A U.S. map of water volumes used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells, 2011–2014 Hydraulic fracturing water volumes differ regionally across the U.S. Discussion of variation in water use and potential environmental implications
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2015WR017278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4758395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1712770416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5416-19a6e95bf064e324a6088a05b7a27d36189b8566681ee2e57d0ce366a00e92bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1v1DAQxS0EokvhxhlZ4sIl4I_Yji9IKIJtpQqkhSrcLCeZ7bokzmI7W_a_r6stq8IBTtZofu_Jb2YQeknJW0oIe8cIFc2KUMVU9QgtqC7LQmnFH6MFISUvKNfqBD2L8ZoQWgqpnqITJjVXRMgF2pzt-2DnwXV4HWyX5uD8Fb6xCQKeI-CdDc62bnBpj53HaQP40rsEPf6aMhSx9T3eTgl8cnbA4HcuTH7MZa7cuM3GNrnJx-foydoOEV7cv6fo8tPHb_VZcfFleV5_uCisKKksqLYStGjXRJbAWWklqSpLRKssUz2XtNJtJaSUFQVgIFRPOuBSWkJAs7bnp-j9wXc7tyP0Xf5JsIPZBjfasDeTdebPjncbczXtTKlExbXIBm_uDcL0c4aYzOhiB8NgPUxzNLRiUgrBNf8_qihTiuRcGX39F3o9zcHnSRjGacmo1tnxHxTNPkozJe-oVw8jHrP93moG-AG4cQPsj31KzN3FmIcXY5pVvWI0TzSrioPKxQS_jiobfhipuBKm-bw03-umWVayMjW_BcILwhE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1704792769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Gallegos, Tanya J. ; Varela, Brian A. ; Haines, Seth S. ; Engle, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallegos, Tanya J. ; Varela, Brian A. ; Haines, Seth S. ; Engle, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>Until now, up‐to‐date, comprehensive, spatial, national‐scale data on hydraulic fracturing water volumes have been lacking. Water volumes used (injected) to hydraulically fracture over 263,859 oil and gas wells drilled between 2000 and 2014 were compiled and used to create the first U.S. map of hydraulic fracturing water use. Although median annual volumes of 15,275 m3 and 19,425 m3 of water per well was used to hydraulically fracture individual horizontal oil and gas wells, respectively, in 2014, about 42% of wells were actually either vertical or directional, which required less than 2600 m3 water per well. The highest average hydraulic fracturing water usage (10,000−36,620 m3 per well) in watersheds across the United States generally correlated with shale‐gas areas (versus coalbed methane, tight oil, or tight gas) where the greatest proportion of hydraulically fractured wells were horizontally drilled, reflecting that the natural reservoir properties influence water use. This analysis also demonstrates that many oil and gas resources within a given basin are developed using a mix of horizontal, vertical, and some directional wells, explaining why large volume hydraulic fracturing water usage is not widespread. This spatial variability in hydraulic fracturing water use relates to the potential for environmental impacts such as water availability, water quality, wastewater disposal, and possible wastewater injection‐induced earthquakes. Key Points: A U.S. map of water volumes used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells, 2011–2014 Hydraulic fracturing water volumes differ regionally across the U.S. Discussion of variation in water use and potential environmental implications</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015WR017278</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26937056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biogeosciences ; Coalbed methane ; Earthquakes ; Environmental impact ; Gas wells ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Hydrology ; Oil wells ; Policy Sciences ; Regional Planning ; Sedimentary rocks ; Seismic activity ; Shale ; Shale gas ; Spatial data ; Spatial variability ; Spatial variations ; Technical Reports: Data ; unconventional oil and gas ; Wastewater ; Wastewater disposal ; Water ; Water availability ; Water Budgets ; Water consumption ; Water Management ; Water quality ; Water Supply ; Water use ; Water/Energy Interactions ; Watersheds ; well stimulation ; Wells</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2015-07, Vol.51 (7), p.5839-5845</ispartof><rights>2015. The Authors.</rights><rights>2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5416-19a6e95bf064e324a6088a05b7a27d36189b8566681ee2e57d0ce366a00e92bd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015WR017278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015WR017278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46443,46867</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallegos, Tanya J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varela, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Seth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engle, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications</title><title>Water resources research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>Until now, up‐to‐date, comprehensive, spatial, national‐scale data on hydraulic fracturing water volumes have been lacking. Water volumes used (injected) to hydraulically fracture over 263,859 oil and gas wells drilled between 2000 and 2014 were compiled and used to create the first U.S. map of hydraulic fracturing water use. Although median annual volumes of 15,275 m3 and 19,425 m3 of water per well was used to hydraulically fracture individual horizontal oil and gas wells, respectively, in 2014, about 42% of wells were actually either vertical or directional, which required less than 2600 m3 water per well. The highest average hydraulic fracturing water usage (10,000−36,620 m3 per well) in watersheds across the United States generally correlated with shale‐gas areas (versus coalbed methane, tight oil, or tight gas) where the greatest proportion of hydraulically fractured wells were horizontally drilled, reflecting that the natural reservoir properties influence water use. This analysis also demonstrates that many oil and gas resources within a given basin are developed using a mix of horizontal, vertical, and some directional wells, explaining why large volume hydraulic fracturing water usage is not widespread. This spatial variability in hydraulic fracturing water use relates to the potential for environmental impacts such as water availability, water quality, wastewater disposal, and possible wastewater injection‐induced earthquakes. Key Points: A U.S. map of water volumes used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells, 2011–2014 Hydraulic fracturing water volumes differ regionally across the U.S. Discussion of variation in water use and potential environmental implications</description><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Coalbed methane</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Oil wells</subject><subject>Policy Sciences</subject><subject>Regional Planning</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Spatial variability</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Technical Reports: Data</subject><subject>unconventional oil and gas</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater disposal</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Water Budgets</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water/Energy Interactions</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>well stimulation</subject><subject>Wells</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1v1DAQxS0EokvhxhlZ4sIl4I_Yji9IKIJtpQqkhSrcLCeZ7bokzmI7W_a_r6stq8IBTtZofu_Jb2YQeknJW0oIe8cIFc2KUMVU9QgtqC7LQmnFH6MFISUvKNfqBD2L8ZoQWgqpnqITJjVXRMgF2pzt-2DnwXV4HWyX5uD8Fb6xCQKeI-CdDc62bnBpj53HaQP40rsEPf6aMhSx9T3eTgl8cnbA4HcuTH7MZa7cuM3GNrnJx-foydoOEV7cv6fo8tPHb_VZcfFleV5_uCisKKksqLYStGjXRJbAWWklqSpLRKssUz2XtNJtJaSUFQVgIFRPOuBSWkJAs7bnp-j9wXc7tyP0Xf5JsIPZBjfasDeTdebPjncbczXtTKlExbXIBm_uDcL0c4aYzOhiB8NgPUxzNLRiUgrBNf8_qihTiuRcGX39F3o9zcHnSRjGacmo1tnxHxTNPkozJe-oVw8jHrP93moG-AG4cQPsj31KzN3FmIcXY5pVvWI0TzSrioPKxQS_jiobfhipuBKm-bw03-umWVayMjW_BcILwhE</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Gallegos, Tanya J.</creator><creator>Varela, Brian A.</creator><creator>Haines, Seth S.</creator><creator>Engle, Mark A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications</title><author>Gallegos, Tanya J. ; Varela, Brian A. ; Haines, Seth S. ; Engle, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5416-19a6e95bf064e324a6088a05b7a27d36189b8566681ee2e57d0ce366a00e92bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Coalbed methane</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Oil wells</topic><topic>Policy Sciences</topic><topic>Regional Planning</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Spatial variability</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Technical Reports: Data</topic><topic>unconventional oil and gas</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater disposal</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Water Budgets</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water/Energy Interactions</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>well stimulation</topic><topic>Wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallegos, Tanya J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varela, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Seth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engle, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallegos, Tanya J.</au><au>Varela, Brian A.</au><au>Haines, Seth S.</au><au>Engle, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>5839</spage><epage>5845</epage><pages>5839-5845</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Until now, up‐to‐date, comprehensive, spatial, national‐scale data on hydraulic fracturing water volumes have been lacking. Water volumes used (injected) to hydraulically fracture over 263,859 oil and gas wells drilled between 2000 and 2014 were compiled and used to create the first U.S. map of hydraulic fracturing water use. Although median annual volumes of 15,275 m3 and 19,425 m3 of water per well was used to hydraulically fracture individual horizontal oil and gas wells, respectively, in 2014, about 42% of wells were actually either vertical or directional, which required less than 2600 m3 water per well. The highest average hydraulic fracturing water usage (10,000−36,620 m3 per well) in watersheds across the United States generally correlated with shale‐gas areas (versus coalbed methane, tight oil, or tight gas) where the greatest proportion of hydraulically fractured wells were horizontally drilled, reflecting that the natural reservoir properties influence water use. This analysis also demonstrates that many oil and gas resources within a given basin are developed using a mix of horizontal, vertical, and some directional wells, explaining why large volume hydraulic fracturing water usage is not widespread. This spatial variability in hydraulic fracturing water use relates to the potential for environmental impacts such as water availability, water quality, wastewater disposal, and possible wastewater injection‐induced earthquakes. Key Points: A U.S. map of water volumes used to hydraulically fracture oil and gas wells, 2011–2014 Hydraulic fracturing water volumes differ regionally across the U.S. Discussion of variation in water use and potential environmental implications</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26937056</pmid><doi>10.1002/2015WR017278</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2015-07, Vol.51 (7), p.5839-5845
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4758395
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Biogeosciences
Coalbed methane
Earthquakes
Environmental impact
Gas wells
Hydraulic fracturing
Hydrology
Oil wells
Policy Sciences
Regional Planning
Sedimentary rocks
Seismic activity
Shale
Shale gas
Spatial data
Spatial variability
Spatial variations
Technical Reports: Data
unconventional oil and gas
Wastewater
Wastewater disposal
Water
Water availability
Water Budgets
Water consumption
Water Management
Water quality
Water Supply
Water use
Water/Energy Interactions
Watersheds
well stimulation
Wells
title Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A47%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydraulic%20fracturing%20water%20use%20variability%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20potential%20environmental%20implications&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Gallegos,%20Tanya%20J.&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=5839&rft.epage=5845&rft.pages=5839-5845&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015WR017278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1712770416%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1704792769&rft_id=info:pmid/26937056&rfr_iscdi=true