Using Computer Vision and Depth Sensing to Measure Healthcare Worker-Patient Contacts and Personal Protective Equipment Adherence Within Hospital Rooms

This prospective study of cellulitis identified β-hemolytic streptococci as the dominating cause in all investigated subgroups. Group C/G streptococci were more frequently detected than group A streptococci. No single clinical feature substantially increased the probability of confirmed streptococca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Open forum infectious diseases 2016-01, Vol.3 (1), p.ofv200-ofv200
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Junyang, Cremer, James F., Zarei, Kasra, Segre, Alberto M., Polgreen, Philip M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page ofv200
container_issue 1
container_start_page ofv200
container_title Open forum infectious diseases
container_volume 3
creator Chen, Junyang
Cremer, James F.
Zarei, Kasra
Segre, Alberto M.
Polgreen, Philip M.
description This prospective study of cellulitis identified β-hemolytic streptococci as the dominating cause in all investigated subgroups. Group C/G streptococci were more frequently detected than group A streptococci. No single clinical feature substantially increased the probability of confirmed streptococcal etiology. Background.  We determined the feasibility of using computer vision and depth sensing to detect healthcare worker (HCW)-patient contacts to estimate both hand hygiene (HH) opportunities and personal protective equipment (PPE) adherence. Methods.  We used multiple Microsoft Kinects to track the 3-dimensional movement of HCWs and their hands within hospital rooms. We applied computer vision techniques to recognize and determine the position of fiducial markers attached to the patient's bed to determine the location of the HCW's hands with respect to the bed. To measure our system's ability to detect HCW-patient contacts, we counted each time a HCW's hands entered a virtual rectangular box aligned with a patient bed. To measure PPE adherence, we identified the hands, torso, and face of each HCW on room entry, determined the color of each body area, and compared it with the color of gloves, gowns, and face masks. We independently examined a ground truth video recording and compared it with our system's results. Results.  Overall, for touch detection, the sensitivity was 99.7%, with a positive predictive value of 98.7%. For gowned entrances, sensitivity was 100.0% and specificity was 98.15%. For masked entrances, sensitivity was 100.0% and specificity was 98.75%; for gloved entrances, the sensitivity was 86.21% and specificity was 98.28%. Conclusions.  Using computer vision and depth sensing, we can estimate potential HH opportunities at the bedside and also estimate adherence to PPE. Our fine-grained estimates of how and how often HCWs interact directly with patients can inform a wide range of patient-safety research.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ofid/ofv200
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4757761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ofid/ofv200</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1771449218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-927ab03e23d6fd61af779a58707a1ab9b5f963b8188844a850e994594fcba4c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEolXpiTvyCSGhgJ04cXxBqpbCIhWx6hdHa-JMGkNip7azEr-Ev4u3W6py4eIZaR4_M9KbZS8ZfceoLN-73nTp2RaUPskOi7Jo8kZW4umj_iA7DuEHpZQxWlEhn2cHRS25FKw4zH5fBWNvyMpN8xLRk2sTjLMEbEc-4hwHcoH2joiOfEUIi0eyRhjjoCG1353_iT7fQDRoY9LYCDqGu_8b9MFZGMnGu4g6mi2S09vFzNMOPekG9Gh1cpg4GEvWLswmJvzcuSm8yJ71MAY8vq9H2dWn08vVOj_79vnL6uQs15wVMZeFgJaWWJRd3Xc1g14ICVUjqAAGrWyrXtZl27CmaTiHpqIoJa8k73ULXIvyKPuw985LO2Gn02keRjV7M4H_pRwY9e_EmkHduK3iohKiZknw5l7g3e2CIarJBI3jCBbdEhQTgnEuC9Yk9O0e1d6F4LF_WMOo2qWpdmmqfZqJfvX4sgf2b3YJeL0H3DL_1_QHuZWs9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771449218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Computer Vision and Depth Sensing to Measure Healthcare Worker-Patient Contacts and Personal Protective Equipment Adherence Within Hospital Rooms</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chen, Junyang ; Cremer, James F. ; Zarei, Kasra ; Segre, Alberto M. ; Polgreen, Philip M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junyang ; Cremer, James F. ; Zarei, Kasra ; Segre, Alberto M. ; Polgreen, Philip M.</creatorcontrib><description>This prospective study of cellulitis identified β-hemolytic streptococci as the dominating cause in all investigated subgroups. Group C/G streptococci were more frequently detected than group A streptococci. No single clinical feature substantially increased the probability of confirmed streptococcal etiology. Background.  We determined the feasibility of using computer vision and depth sensing to detect healthcare worker (HCW)-patient contacts to estimate both hand hygiene (HH) opportunities and personal protective equipment (PPE) adherence. Methods.  We used multiple Microsoft Kinects to track the 3-dimensional movement of HCWs and their hands within hospital rooms. We applied computer vision techniques to recognize and determine the position of fiducial markers attached to the patient's bed to determine the location of the HCW's hands with respect to the bed. To measure our system's ability to detect HCW-patient contacts, we counted each time a HCW's hands entered a virtual rectangular box aligned with a patient bed. To measure PPE adherence, we identified the hands, torso, and face of each HCW on room entry, determined the color of each body area, and compared it with the color of gloves, gowns, and face masks. We independently examined a ground truth video recording and compared it with our system's results. Results.  Overall, for touch detection, the sensitivity was 99.7%, with a positive predictive value of 98.7%. For gowned entrances, sensitivity was 100.0% and specificity was 98.15%. For masked entrances, sensitivity was 100.0% and specificity was 98.75%; for gloved entrances, the sensitivity was 86.21% and specificity was 98.28%. Conclusions.  Using computer vision and depth sensing, we can estimate potential HH opportunities at the bedside and also estimate adherence to PPE. Our fine-grained estimates of how and how often HCWs interact directly with patients can inform a wide range of patient-safety research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofv200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26949712</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Major</subject><ispartof>Open forum infectious diseases, 2016-01, Vol.3 (1), p.ofv200-ofv200</ispartof><rights>The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-927ab03e23d6fd61af779a58707a1ab9b5f963b8188844a850e994594fcba4c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-927ab03e23d6fd61af779a58707a1ab9b5f963b8188844a850e994594fcba4c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757761/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757761/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1604,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremer, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarei, Kasra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segre, Alberto M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polgreen, Philip M.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Computer Vision and Depth Sensing to Measure Healthcare Worker-Patient Contacts and Personal Protective Equipment Adherence Within Hospital Rooms</title><title>Open forum infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Open Forum Infect Dis</addtitle><description>This prospective study of cellulitis identified β-hemolytic streptococci as the dominating cause in all investigated subgroups. Group C/G streptococci were more frequently detected than group A streptococci. No single clinical feature substantially increased the probability of confirmed streptococcal etiology. Background.  We determined the feasibility of using computer vision and depth sensing to detect healthcare worker (HCW)-patient contacts to estimate both hand hygiene (HH) opportunities and personal protective equipment (PPE) adherence. Methods.  We used multiple Microsoft Kinects to track the 3-dimensional movement of HCWs and their hands within hospital rooms. We applied computer vision techniques to recognize and determine the position of fiducial markers attached to the patient's bed to determine the location of the HCW's hands with respect to the bed. To measure our system's ability to detect HCW-patient contacts, we counted each time a HCW's hands entered a virtual rectangular box aligned with a patient bed. To measure PPE adherence, we identified the hands, torso, and face of each HCW on room entry, determined the color of each body area, and compared it with the color of gloves, gowns, and face masks. We independently examined a ground truth video recording and compared it with our system's results. Results.  Overall, for touch detection, the sensitivity was 99.7%, with a positive predictive value of 98.7%. For gowned entrances, sensitivity was 100.0% and specificity was 98.15%. For masked entrances, sensitivity was 100.0% and specificity was 98.75%; for gloved entrances, the sensitivity was 86.21% and specificity was 98.28%. Conclusions.  Using computer vision and depth sensing, we can estimate potential HH opportunities at the bedside and also estimate adherence to PPE. Our fine-grained estimates of how and how often HCWs interact directly with patients can inform a wide range of patient-safety research.</description><subject>Major</subject><issn>2328-8957</issn><issn>2328-8957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEolXpiTvyCSGhgJ04cXxBqpbCIhWx6hdHa-JMGkNip7azEr-Ev4u3W6py4eIZaR4_M9KbZS8ZfceoLN-73nTp2RaUPskOi7Jo8kZW4umj_iA7DuEHpZQxWlEhn2cHRS25FKw4zH5fBWNvyMpN8xLRk2sTjLMEbEc-4hwHcoH2joiOfEUIi0eyRhjjoCG1353_iT7fQDRoY9LYCDqGu_8b9MFZGMnGu4g6mi2S09vFzNMOPekG9Gh1cpg4GEvWLswmJvzcuSm8yJ71MAY8vq9H2dWn08vVOj_79vnL6uQs15wVMZeFgJaWWJRd3Xc1g14ICVUjqAAGrWyrXtZl27CmaTiHpqIoJa8k73ULXIvyKPuw985LO2Gn02keRjV7M4H_pRwY9e_EmkHduK3iohKiZknw5l7g3e2CIarJBI3jCBbdEhQTgnEuC9Yk9O0e1d6F4LF_WMOo2qWpdmmqfZqJfvX4sgf2b3YJeL0H3DL_1_QHuZWs9w</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Chen, Junyang</creator><creator>Cremer, James F.</creator><creator>Zarei, Kasra</creator><creator>Segre, Alberto M.</creator><creator>Polgreen, Philip M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Using Computer Vision and Depth Sensing to Measure Healthcare Worker-Patient Contacts and Personal Protective Equipment Adherence Within Hospital Rooms</title><author>Chen, Junyang ; Cremer, James F. ; Zarei, Kasra ; Segre, Alberto M. ; Polgreen, Philip M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-927ab03e23d6fd61af779a58707a1ab9b5f963b8188844a850e994594fcba4c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Major</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremer, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarei, Kasra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segre, Alberto M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polgreen, Philip M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Junyang</au><au>Cremer, James F.</au><au>Zarei, Kasra</au><au>Segre, Alberto M.</au><au>Polgreen, Philip M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Computer Vision and Depth Sensing to Measure Healthcare Worker-Patient Contacts and Personal Protective Equipment Adherence Within Hospital Rooms</atitle><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Open Forum Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>ofv200</spage><epage>ofv200</epage><pages>ofv200-ofv200</pages><issn>2328-8957</issn><eissn>2328-8957</eissn><abstract>This prospective study of cellulitis identified β-hemolytic streptococci as the dominating cause in all investigated subgroups. Group C/G streptococci were more frequently detected than group A streptococci. No single clinical feature substantially increased the probability of confirmed streptococcal etiology. Background.  We determined the feasibility of using computer vision and depth sensing to detect healthcare worker (HCW)-patient contacts to estimate both hand hygiene (HH) opportunities and personal protective equipment (PPE) adherence. Methods.  We used multiple Microsoft Kinects to track the 3-dimensional movement of HCWs and their hands within hospital rooms. We applied computer vision techniques to recognize and determine the position of fiducial markers attached to the patient's bed to determine the location of the HCW's hands with respect to the bed. To measure our system's ability to detect HCW-patient contacts, we counted each time a HCW's hands entered a virtual rectangular box aligned with a patient bed. To measure PPE adherence, we identified the hands, torso, and face of each HCW on room entry, determined the color of each body area, and compared it with the color of gloves, gowns, and face masks. We independently examined a ground truth video recording and compared it with our system's results. Results.  Overall, for touch detection, the sensitivity was 99.7%, with a positive predictive value of 98.7%. For gowned entrances, sensitivity was 100.0% and specificity was 98.15%. For masked entrances, sensitivity was 100.0% and specificity was 98.75%; for gloved entrances, the sensitivity was 86.21% and specificity was 98.28%. Conclusions.  Using computer vision and depth sensing, we can estimate potential HH opportunities at the bedside and also estimate adherence to PPE. Our fine-grained estimates of how and how often HCWs interact directly with patients can inform a wide range of patient-safety research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>26949712</pmid><doi>10.1093/ofid/ofv200</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2328-8957
ispartof Open forum infectious diseases, 2016-01, Vol.3 (1), p.ofv200-ofv200
issn 2328-8957
2328-8957
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4757761
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central
subjects Major
title Using Computer Vision and Depth Sensing to Measure Healthcare Worker-Patient Contacts and Personal Protective Equipment Adherence Within Hospital Rooms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A58%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Computer%20Vision%20and%20Depth%20Sensing%20to%20Measure%20Healthcare%20Worker-Patient%20Contacts%20and%20Personal%20Protective%20Equipment%20Adherence%20Within%20Hospital%20Rooms&rft.jtitle=Open%20forum%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Chen,%20Junyang&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=ofv200&rft.epage=ofv200&rft.pages=ofv200-ofv200&rft.issn=2328-8957&rft.eissn=2328-8957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ofid/ofv200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1771449218%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771449218&rft_id=info:pmid/26949712&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ofid/ofv200&rfr_iscdi=true