Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes
A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behaviour research and therapy 2016-02, Vol.77, p.52-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | Behaviour research and therapy |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Villatte, Jennifer L. Vilardaga, Roger Villatte, Matthieu Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C. Atkins, David C. Hayes, Steven C. |
description | A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet there is little evidence for how components function independent of their treatment packages when employed in clinical service settings. This study aimed to demonstrate the specificity of treatment effects for two components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a promising candidate for modularization. A randomized, nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline across participants design was used to examine component effects on treatment processes and outcomes in 15 adults seeking mental health treatment. The ACT OPEN module targeted acceptance and cognitive defusion; the ACT ENGAGED module targeted values-based activation and persistence. According to Tau-U analyses, both modules produced significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and targeted therapeutic processes. ACT ENGAGED demonstrated greater improvements in quality of life and values-based activation. ACT OPEN showed greater improvements in symptom severity, acceptance, and defusion. Both modules improved awareness and non-reactivity, which were mutually targeted, though using distinct intervention procedures. Both interventions demonstrated high treatment acceptability, completion, and patient satisfaction. Treatment effects were maintained at 3-month follow up. ACT components should be considered for inclusion in a modular approach to implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adults.
•ACT component modules were examined for specificity of treatment effects in adults.•Both modules improved symptom severity and life quality, but effect sizes differed.•The OPEN module had larger effects on symptoms, cognitive defusion, and acceptance.•The ENGAGED module had larger effects on life quality and values-based activation.•Both modules improved awareness and nonreactivity to thoughts, feelings, sensations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4752868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0005796715300668</els_id><sourcerecordid>1765108839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-be53e4ba1e7d25eb30a67830c6ae6a41d1d86618e462bda9c3b4ba05be22432f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9Ay5kwI2bGfMxyWRECuX60ULBTQV3IZOcsblMJmOSKfTfm9tbi3YhXYVwnvNwznkRek1wQzAR73fNEHVuKCa8IbTBmDxBGyI7VgtKfzxFG4wxr7tedEfoRUq78mWS4ufoiIqOiJ7RDRpOjYEl69lApWdbbYP3LnuYc3V5BVEvN5UPdp0gfag-uXGEWEpOT5Xziza5CnOVI-hDxxKDgZQg3arCmk3wkF6iZ6OeEry6e4_R9y-fL7dn9cW3r-fb04vacCJyPQBn0A6aQGcph4FhLTrJsBEahG6JJVYKQSS0gg5W94YNhcZ8AEpbRkd2jE4O3mUdPFhTJop6Ukt0XscbFbRT_1Zmd6V-hmvVdpxKIYvg3Z0ghl8rpKy8SwamSc8Q1qRI1-Ne8K5_DCo4wVKyvqBvH6C7sMa5XGJPSSIlvxXSA2ViSCnCeD83wWqfttqpfdpqn7YiVJW0S9Obvze-b_kTbwE-HgAod792EFUyDkrW1kUwWdng_uf_Dd5WvVE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768188598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Villatte, Jennifer L. ; Vilardaga, Roger ; Villatte, Matthieu ; Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C. ; Atkins, David C. ; Hayes, Steven C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Jennifer L. ; Vilardaga, Roger ; Villatte, Matthieu ; Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C. ; Atkins, David C. ; Hayes, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><description>A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet there is little evidence for how components function independent of their treatment packages when employed in clinical service settings. This study aimed to demonstrate the specificity of treatment effects for two components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a promising candidate for modularization. A randomized, nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline across participants design was used to examine component effects on treatment processes and outcomes in 15 adults seeking mental health treatment. The ACT OPEN module targeted acceptance and cognitive defusion; the ACT ENGAGED module targeted values-based activation and persistence. According to Tau-U analyses, both modules produced significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and targeted therapeutic processes. ACT ENGAGED demonstrated greater improvements in quality of life and values-based activation. ACT OPEN showed greater improvements in symptom severity, acceptance, and defusion. Both modules improved awareness and non-reactivity, which were mutually targeted, though using distinct intervention procedures. Both interventions demonstrated high treatment acceptability, completion, and patient satisfaction. Treatment effects were maintained at 3-month follow up. ACT components should be considered for inclusion in a modular approach to implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adults.
•ACT component modules were examined for specificity of treatment effects in adults.•Both modules improved symptom severity and life quality, but effect sizes differed.•The OPEN module had larger effects on symptoms, cognitive defusion, and acceptance.•The ENGAGED module had larger effects on life quality and values-based activation.•Both modules improved awareness and nonreactivity to thoughts, feelings, sensations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-622X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26716932</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRTHAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptance ; Acceptance and commitment therapy ; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - methods ; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - standards ; Adult ; Adults ; Approaches ; Awareness ; Candidates ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical outcomes ; Cognitive ability ; Component analysis ; Components ; Evidence based ; Evidence-based medicine ; Female ; Health education ; Help seeking behavior ; Humans ; Impact analysis ; Intervention ; Male ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mental health care ; Mental health services ; Middle Aged ; Mindfulness ; Modular design ; Patient Satisfaction ; Psychiatric symptoms ; Psychosocial factors ; Psychosocial intervention ; Psychotherapy ; Public health ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Reactivity ; Severity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Single case experimental design ; Therapy process ; Treatment Outcome ; Values</subject><ispartof>Behaviour research and therapy, 2016-02, Vol.77, p.52-61</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-be53e4ba1e7d25eb30a67830c6ae6a41d1d86618e462bda9c3b4ba05be22432f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-be53e4ba1e7d25eb30a67830c6ae6a41d1d86618e462bda9c3b4ba05be22432f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2825-9017</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27911,27912,30986,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26716932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilardaga, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkins, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><title>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes</title><title>Behaviour research and therapy</title><addtitle>Behav Res Ther</addtitle><description>A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet there is little evidence for how components function independent of their treatment packages when employed in clinical service settings. This study aimed to demonstrate the specificity of treatment effects for two components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a promising candidate for modularization. A randomized, nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline across participants design was used to examine component effects on treatment processes and outcomes in 15 adults seeking mental health treatment. The ACT OPEN module targeted acceptance and cognitive defusion; the ACT ENGAGED module targeted values-based activation and persistence. According to Tau-U analyses, both modules produced significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and targeted therapeutic processes. ACT ENGAGED demonstrated greater improvements in quality of life and values-based activation. ACT OPEN showed greater improvements in symptom severity, acceptance, and defusion. Both modules improved awareness and non-reactivity, which were mutually targeted, though using distinct intervention procedures. Both interventions demonstrated high treatment acceptability, completion, and patient satisfaction. Treatment effects were maintained at 3-month follow up. ACT components should be considered for inclusion in a modular approach to implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adults.
•ACT component modules were examined for specificity of treatment effects in adults.•Both modules improved symptom severity and life quality, but effect sizes differed.•The OPEN module had larger effects on symptoms, cognitive defusion, and acceptance.•The ENGAGED module had larger effects on life quality and values-based activation.•Both modules improved awareness and nonreactivity to thoughts, feelings, sensations.</description><subject>Acceptance</subject><subject>Acceptance and commitment therapy</subject><subject>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - standards</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Approaches</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Component analysis</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>Evidence based</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Help seeking behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mindfulness</subject><subject>Modular design</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Psychiatric symptoms</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Psychosocial intervention</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Reactivity</subject><subject>Severity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Single case experimental design</subject><subject>Therapy process</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0005-7967</issn><issn>1873-622X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9Ay5kwI2bGfMxyWRECuX60ULBTQV3IZOcsblMJmOSKfTfm9tbi3YhXYVwnvNwznkRek1wQzAR73fNEHVuKCa8IbTBmDxBGyI7VgtKfzxFG4wxr7tedEfoRUq78mWS4ufoiIqOiJ7RDRpOjYEl69lApWdbbYP3LnuYc3V5BVEvN5UPdp0gfag-uXGEWEpOT5Xziza5CnOVI-hDxxKDgZQg3arCmk3wkF6iZ6OeEry6e4_R9y-fL7dn9cW3r-fb04vacCJyPQBn0A6aQGcph4FhLTrJsBEahG6JJVYKQSS0gg5W94YNhcZ8AEpbRkd2jE4O3mUdPFhTJop6Ukt0XscbFbRT_1Zmd6V-hmvVdpxKIYvg3Z0ghl8rpKy8SwamSc8Q1qRI1-Ne8K5_DCo4wVKyvqBvH6C7sMa5XGJPSSIlvxXSA2ViSCnCeD83wWqfttqpfdpqn7YiVJW0S9Obvze-b_kTbwE-HgAod792EFUyDkrW1kUwWdng_uf_Dd5WvVE</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Villatte, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Vilardaga, Roger</creator><creator>Villatte, Matthieu</creator><creator>Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C.</creator><creator>Atkins, David C.</creator><creator>Hayes, Steven C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2825-9017</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes</title><author>Villatte, Jennifer L. ; Vilardaga, Roger ; Villatte, Matthieu ; Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C. ; Atkins, David C. ; Hayes, Steven C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-be53e4ba1e7d25eb30a67830c6ae6a41d1d86618e462bda9c3b4ba05be22432f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acceptance</topic><topic>Acceptance and commitment therapy</topic><topic>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - standards</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Approaches</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Component analysis</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>Evidence based</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Help seeking behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mindfulness</topic><topic>Modular design</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Psychiatric symptoms</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Psychosocial intervention</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Reactivity</topic><topic>Severity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Single case experimental design</topic><topic>Therapy process</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilardaga, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkins, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Behaviour research and therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Villatte, Jennifer L.</au><au>Vilardaga, Roger</au><au>Villatte, Matthieu</au><au>Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C.</au><au>Atkins, David C.</au><au>Hayes, Steven C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Behaviour research and therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Res Ther</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>77</volume><spage>52</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>52-61</pages><issn>0005-7967</issn><eissn>1873-622X</eissn><coden>BRTHAA</coden><abstract>A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet there is little evidence for how components function independent of their treatment packages when employed in clinical service settings. This study aimed to demonstrate the specificity of treatment effects for two components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a promising candidate for modularization. A randomized, nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline across participants design was used to examine component effects on treatment processes and outcomes in 15 adults seeking mental health treatment. The ACT OPEN module targeted acceptance and cognitive defusion; the ACT ENGAGED module targeted values-based activation and persistence. According to Tau-U analyses, both modules produced significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and targeted therapeutic processes. ACT ENGAGED demonstrated greater improvements in quality of life and values-based activation. ACT OPEN showed greater improvements in symptom severity, acceptance, and defusion. Both modules improved awareness and non-reactivity, which were mutually targeted, though using distinct intervention procedures. Both interventions demonstrated high treatment acceptability, completion, and patient satisfaction. Treatment effects were maintained at 3-month follow up. ACT components should be considered for inclusion in a modular approach to implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adults.
•ACT component modules were examined for specificity of treatment effects in adults.•Both modules improved symptom severity and life quality, but effect sizes differed.•The OPEN module had larger effects on symptoms, cognitive defusion, and acceptance.•The ENGAGED module had larger effects on life quality and values-based activation.•Both modules improved awareness and nonreactivity to thoughts, feelings, sensations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26716932</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2825-9017</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0005-7967 |
ispartof | Behaviour research and therapy, 2016-02, Vol.77, p.52-61 |
issn | 0005-7967 1873-622X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4752868 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Acceptance Acceptance and commitment therapy Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - methods Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - standards Adult Adults Approaches Awareness Candidates Clinical medicine Clinical outcomes Cognitive ability Component analysis Components Evidence based Evidence-based medicine Female Health education Help seeking behavior Humans Impact analysis Intervention Male Mental disorders Mental Disorders - therapy Mental health care Mental health services Middle Aged Mindfulness Modular design Patient Satisfaction Psychiatric symptoms Psychosocial factors Psychosocial intervention Psychotherapy Public health Quality of life Quality of Life - psychology Reactivity Severity Severity of Illness Index Single case experimental design Therapy process Treatment Outcome Values |
title | Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acceptance%20and%20Commitment%20Therapy%20modules:%20Differential%20impact%20on%20treatment%20processes%20and%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Behaviour%20research%20and%20therapy&rft.au=Villatte,%20Jennifer%20L.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=77&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=52-61&rft.issn=0005-7967&rft.eissn=1873-622X&rft.coden=BRTHAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1765108839%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768188598&rft_id=info:pmid/26716932&rft_els_id=S0005796715300668&rfr_iscdi=true |