Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes

A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behaviour research and therapy 2016-02, Vol.77, p.52-61
Hauptverfasser: Villatte, Jennifer L., Vilardaga, Roger, Villatte, Matthieu, Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C., Atkins, David C., Hayes, Steven C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue
container_start_page 52
container_title Behaviour research and therapy
container_volume 77
creator Villatte, Jennifer L.
Vilardaga, Roger
Villatte, Matthieu
Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C.
Atkins, David C.
Hayes, Steven C.
description A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet there is little evidence for how components function independent of their treatment packages when employed in clinical service settings. This study aimed to demonstrate the specificity of treatment effects for two components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a promising candidate for modularization. A randomized, nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline across participants design was used to examine component effects on treatment processes and outcomes in 15 adults seeking mental health treatment. The ACT OPEN module targeted acceptance and cognitive defusion; the ACT ENGAGED module targeted values-based activation and persistence. According to Tau-U analyses, both modules produced significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and targeted therapeutic processes. ACT ENGAGED demonstrated greater improvements in quality of life and values-based activation. ACT OPEN showed greater improvements in symptom severity, acceptance, and defusion. Both modules improved awareness and non-reactivity, which were mutually targeted, though using distinct intervention procedures. Both interventions demonstrated high treatment acceptability, completion, and patient satisfaction. Treatment effects were maintained at 3-month follow up. ACT components should be considered for inclusion in a modular approach to implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adults. •ACT component modules were examined for specificity of treatment effects in adults.•Both modules improved symptom severity and life quality, but effect sizes differed.•The OPEN module had larger effects on symptoms, cognitive defusion, and acceptance.•The ENGAGED module had larger effects on life quality and values-based activation.•Both modules improved awareness and nonreactivity to thoughts, feelings, sensations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4752868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0005796715300668</els_id><sourcerecordid>1765108839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-be53e4ba1e7d25eb30a67830c6ae6a41d1d86618e462bda9c3b4ba05be22432f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9Ay5kwI2bGfMxyWRECuX60ULBTQV3IZOcsblMJmOSKfTfm9tbi3YhXYVwnvNwznkRek1wQzAR73fNEHVuKCa8IbTBmDxBGyI7VgtKfzxFG4wxr7tedEfoRUq78mWS4ufoiIqOiJ7RDRpOjYEl69lApWdbbYP3LnuYc3V5BVEvN5UPdp0gfag-uXGEWEpOT5Xziza5CnOVI-hDxxKDgZQg3arCmk3wkF6iZ6OeEry6e4_R9y-fL7dn9cW3r-fb04vacCJyPQBn0A6aQGcph4FhLTrJsBEahG6JJVYKQSS0gg5W94YNhcZ8AEpbRkd2jE4O3mUdPFhTJop6Ukt0XscbFbRT_1Zmd6V-hmvVdpxKIYvg3Z0ghl8rpKy8SwamSc8Q1qRI1-Ne8K5_DCo4wVKyvqBvH6C7sMa5XGJPSSIlvxXSA2ViSCnCeD83wWqfttqpfdpqn7YiVJW0S9Obvze-b_kTbwE-HgAod792EFUyDkrW1kUwWdng_uf_Dd5WvVE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768188598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Villatte, Jennifer L. ; Vilardaga, Roger ; Villatte, Matthieu ; Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C. ; Atkins, David C. ; Hayes, Steven C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Jennifer L. ; Vilardaga, Roger ; Villatte, Matthieu ; Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C. ; Atkins, David C. ; Hayes, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><description>A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet there is little evidence for how components function independent of their treatment packages when employed in clinical service settings. This study aimed to demonstrate the specificity of treatment effects for two components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a promising candidate for modularization. A randomized, nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline across participants design was used to examine component effects on treatment processes and outcomes in 15 adults seeking mental health treatment. The ACT OPEN module targeted acceptance and cognitive defusion; the ACT ENGAGED module targeted values-based activation and persistence. According to Tau-U analyses, both modules produced significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and targeted therapeutic processes. ACT ENGAGED demonstrated greater improvements in quality of life and values-based activation. ACT OPEN showed greater improvements in symptom severity, acceptance, and defusion. Both modules improved awareness and non-reactivity, which were mutually targeted, though using distinct intervention procedures. Both interventions demonstrated high treatment acceptability, completion, and patient satisfaction. Treatment effects were maintained at 3-month follow up. ACT components should be considered for inclusion in a modular approach to implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adults. •ACT component modules were examined for specificity of treatment effects in adults.•Both modules improved symptom severity and life quality, but effect sizes differed.•The OPEN module had larger effects on symptoms, cognitive defusion, and acceptance.•The ENGAGED module had larger effects on life quality and values-based activation.•Both modules improved awareness and nonreactivity to thoughts, feelings, sensations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-622X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26716932</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRTHAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptance ; Acceptance and commitment therapy ; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - methods ; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - standards ; Adult ; Adults ; Approaches ; Awareness ; Candidates ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical outcomes ; Cognitive ability ; Component analysis ; Components ; Evidence based ; Evidence-based medicine ; Female ; Health education ; Help seeking behavior ; Humans ; Impact analysis ; Intervention ; Male ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mental health care ; Mental health services ; Middle Aged ; Mindfulness ; Modular design ; Patient Satisfaction ; Psychiatric symptoms ; Psychosocial factors ; Psychosocial intervention ; Psychotherapy ; Public health ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Reactivity ; Severity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Single case experimental design ; Therapy process ; Treatment Outcome ; Values</subject><ispartof>Behaviour research and therapy, 2016-02, Vol.77, p.52-61</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-be53e4ba1e7d25eb30a67830c6ae6a41d1d86618e462bda9c3b4ba05be22432f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-be53e4ba1e7d25eb30a67830c6ae6a41d1d86618e462bda9c3b4ba05be22432f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2825-9017</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27911,27912,30986,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26716932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilardaga, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkins, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><title>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes</title><title>Behaviour research and therapy</title><addtitle>Behav Res Ther</addtitle><description>A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet there is little evidence for how components function independent of their treatment packages when employed in clinical service settings. This study aimed to demonstrate the specificity of treatment effects for two components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a promising candidate for modularization. A randomized, nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline across participants design was used to examine component effects on treatment processes and outcomes in 15 adults seeking mental health treatment. The ACT OPEN module targeted acceptance and cognitive defusion; the ACT ENGAGED module targeted values-based activation and persistence. According to Tau-U analyses, both modules produced significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and targeted therapeutic processes. ACT ENGAGED demonstrated greater improvements in quality of life and values-based activation. ACT OPEN showed greater improvements in symptom severity, acceptance, and defusion. Both modules improved awareness and non-reactivity, which were mutually targeted, though using distinct intervention procedures. Both interventions demonstrated high treatment acceptability, completion, and patient satisfaction. Treatment effects were maintained at 3-month follow up. ACT components should be considered for inclusion in a modular approach to implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adults. •ACT component modules were examined for specificity of treatment effects in adults.•Both modules improved symptom severity and life quality, but effect sizes differed.•The OPEN module had larger effects on symptoms, cognitive defusion, and acceptance.•The ENGAGED module had larger effects on life quality and values-based activation.•Both modules improved awareness and nonreactivity to thoughts, feelings, sensations.</description><subject>Acceptance</subject><subject>Acceptance and commitment therapy</subject><subject>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - standards</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Approaches</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Component analysis</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>Evidence based</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Help seeking behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mindfulness</subject><subject>Modular design</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Psychiatric symptoms</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Psychosocial intervention</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Reactivity</subject><subject>Severity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Single case experimental design</subject><subject>Therapy process</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0005-7967</issn><issn>1873-622X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9Ay5kwI2bGfMxyWRECuX60ULBTQV3IZOcsblMJmOSKfTfm9tbi3YhXYVwnvNwznkRek1wQzAR73fNEHVuKCa8IbTBmDxBGyI7VgtKfzxFG4wxr7tedEfoRUq78mWS4ufoiIqOiJ7RDRpOjYEl69lApWdbbYP3LnuYc3V5BVEvN5UPdp0gfag-uXGEWEpOT5Xziza5CnOVI-hDxxKDgZQg3arCmk3wkF6iZ6OeEry6e4_R9y-fL7dn9cW3r-fb04vacCJyPQBn0A6aQGcph4FhLTrJsBEahG6JJVYKQSS0gg5W94YNhcZ8AEpbRkd2jE4O3mUdPFhTJop6Ukt0XscbFbRT_1Zmd6V-hmvVdpxKIYvg3Z0ghl8rpKy8SwamSc8Q1qRI1-Ne8K5_DCo4wVKyvqBvH6C7sMa5XGJPSSIlvxXSA2ViSCnCeD83wWqfttqpfdpqn7YiVJW0S9Obvze-b_kTbwE-HgAod792EFUyDkrW1kUwWdng_uf_Dd5WvVE</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Villatte, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Vilardaga, Roger</creator><creator>Villatte, Matthieu</creator><creator>Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C.</creator><creator>Atkins, David C.</creator><creator>Hayes, Steven C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2825-9017</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes</title><author>Villatte, Jennifer L. ; Vilardaga, Roger ; Villatte, Matthieu ; Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C. ; Atkins, David C. ; Hayes, Steven C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-be53e4ba1e7d25eb30a67830c6ae6a41d1d86618e462bda9c3b4ba05be22432f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acceptance</topic><topic>Acceptance and commitment therapy</topic><topic>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - standards</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Approaches</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Component analysis</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>Evidence based</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Help seeking behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mindfulness</topic><topic>Modular design</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Psychiatric symptoms</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Psychosocial intervention</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Reactivity</topic><topic>Severity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Single case experimental design</topic><topic>Therapy process</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilardaga, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villatte, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkins, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Behaviour research and therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Villatte, Jennifer L.</au><au>Vilardaga, Roger</au><au>Villatte, Matthieu</au><au>Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C.</au><au>Atkins, David C.</au><au>Hayes, Steven C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Behaviour research and therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Res Ther</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>77</volume><spage>52</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>52-61</pages><issn>0005-7967</issn><eissn>1873-622X</eissn><coden>BRTHAA</coden><abstract>A modular, transdiagnostic approach to treatment design and implementation may increase the public health impact of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Such an approach relies on algorithms for selecting and implementing treatment components intended to have a specific therapeutic effect, yet there is little evidence for how components function independent of their treatment packages when employed in clinical service settings. This study aimed to demonstrate the specificity of treatment effects for two components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a promising candidate for modularization. A randomized, nonconcurrent, multiple-baseline across participants design was used to examine component effects on treatment processes and outcomes in 15 adults seeking mental health treatment. The ACT OPEN module targeted acceptance and cognitive defusion; the ACT ENGAGED module targeted values-based activation and persistence. According to Tau-U analyses, both modules produced significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, and targeted therapeutic processes. ACT ENGAGED demonstrated greater improvements in quality of life and values-based activation. ACT OPEN showed greater improvements in symptom severity, acceptance, and defusion. Both modules improved awareness and non-reactivity, which were mutually targeted, though using distinct intervention procedures. Both interventions demonstrated high treatment acceptability, completion, and patient satisfaction. Treatment effects were maintained at 3-month follow up. ACT components should be considered for inclusion in a modular approach to implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for adults. •ACT component modules were examined for specificity of treatment effects in adults.•Both modules improved symptom severity and life quality, but effect sizes differed.•The OPEN module had larger effects on symptoms, cognitive defusion, and acceptance.•The ENGAGED module had larger effects on life quality and values-based activation.•Both modules improved awareness and nonreactivity to thoughts, feelings, sensations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26716932</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2825-9017</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-7967
ispartof Behaviour research and therapy, 2016-02, Vol.77, p.52-61
issn 0005-7967
1873-622X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4752868
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Acceptance
Acceptance and commitment therapy
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - methods
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy - standards
Adult
Adults
Approaches
Awareness
Candidates
Clinical medicine
Clinical outcomes
Cognitive ability
Component analysis
Components
Evidence based
Evidence-based medicine
Female
Health education
Help seeking behavior
Humans
Impact analysis
Intervention
Male
Mental disorders
Mental Disorders - therapy
Mental health care
Mental health services
Middle Aged
Mindfulness
Modular design
Patient Satisfaction
Psychiatric symptoms
Psychosocial factors
Psychosocial intervention
Psychotherapy
Public health
Quality of life
Quality of Life - psychology
Reactivity
Severity
Severity of Illness Index
Single case experimental design
Therapy process
Treatment Outcome
Values
title Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acceptance%20and%20Commitment%20Therapy%20modules:%20Differential%20impact%20on%20treatment%20processes%20and%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Behaviour%20research%20and%20therapy&rft.au=Villatte,%20Jennifer%20L.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=77&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=52-61&rft.issn=0005-7967&rft.eissn=1873-622X&rft.coden=BRTHAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1765108839%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768188598&rft_id=info:pmid/26716932&rft_els_id=S0005796715300668&rfr_iscdi=true