Bystanders, parcelling, and an absence of trust in the grooming interactions of wild male chimpanzees

The evolution of cooperation remains a central issue in socio-biology with the fundamental problem of how individuals minimize the risks of being short-changed (‘cheated’) should their behavioural investment in another not be returned. Economic decisions that individuals make during interactions may...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2016-02, Vol.6 (1), p.20634-20634, Article 20634
Hauptverfasser: Kaburu, Stefano S. K., Newton-Fisher, Nicholas E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20634
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20634
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 6
creator Kaburu, Stefano S. K.
Newton-Fisher, Nicholas E.
description The evolution of cooperation remains a central issue in socio-biology with the fundamental problem of how individuals minimize the risks of being short-changed (‘cheated’) should their behavioural investment in another not be returned. Economic decisions that individuals make during interactions may depend upon the presence of potential partners nearby, which offers co operators a temptation to defect from the current partner. The parcelling model posits that donors subdivide services into parcels to force cooperation, and that this is contingent on opportunities for defection; that is, the presence of bystanders. Here we test this model and the effect of bystander presence using grooming interactions of wild chimpanzees. We found that with more bystanders, initiators gave less grooming at the beginning of the bout and were more likely to abandon a grooming bout, while bouts were less likely to be reciprocated. We also found that the groomer’s initial investment was not higher among frequent groomers or stronger reciprocators, suggesting that contrary to current assumptions, grooming decisions are not based on trust, or bonds, within dyads. Our work highlights the importance of considering immediate social context and the influence of bystanders for understanding the evolution of the behavioural strategies that produce cooperation.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/srep20634
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4746632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1899020017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-65975e3554185ac7a8e39519f8c583f6c5d089b27e69c3ce3e7b704f547c68c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkV1rVDEQhoNYbNn2wj8gAW9UuprvjxtBi1qh4E3vQzY7ZzflnOSYnFOpv94sW5fVBoZMMg9vZvIi9JKS95Rw86EWGBlRXDxDZ4wIuWScsedH-Sm6qPWOtCWZFdS-QKdMGam4pmcIPj_Uyac1lHqJR18C9H1Mm0vc7lpgv6qQAuDc4anMdcIx4WkLeFNyHhrYzhMUH6aYU91Rv2K_xoPvAYdtHEaffgPUc3TS-b7CxeO-QLdfv9xeXS9vfnz7fvXpZhkEN9NSSaslcCkFNdIH7Q1wK6ntTJCGdyrINTF2xTQoG3gADnqlieik0EGZwBfo4152nFcDrAOkqfjejSUOvjy47KP7t5Li1m3yvRNaKMVZE3jzKFDyzxnq5IZYd1_iE-S5OqqV4IJSzRv6-j_0Ls8ltekcNdYSRkjDFujtngol1-ZUd2iGErezzx3sa-yr4-4P5F-zGvBuD9RWShsoR08-UfsD99ekgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899020017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bystanders, parcelling, and an absence of trust in the grooming interactions of wild male chimpanzees</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kaburu, Stefano S. K. ; Newton-Fisher, Nicholas E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaburu, Stefano S. K. ; Newton-Fisher, Nicholas E.</creatorcontrib><description>The evolution of cooperation remains a central issue in socio-biology with the fundamental problem of how individuals minimize the risks of being short-changed (‘cheated’) should their behavioural investment in another not be returned. Economic decisions that individuals make during interactions may depend upon the presence of potential partners nearby, which offers co operators a temptation to defect from the current partner. The parcelling model posits that donors subdivide services into parcels to force cooperation, and that this is contingent on opportunities for defection; that is, the presence of bystanders. Here we test this model and the effect of bystander presence using grooming interactions of wild chimpanzees. We found that with more bystanders, initiators gave less grooming at the beginning of the bout and were more likely to abandon a grooming bout, while bouts were less likely to be reciprocated. We also found that the groomer’s initial investment was not higher among frequent groomers or stronger reciprocators, suggesting that contrary to current assumptions, grooming decisions are not based on trust, or bonds, within dyads. Our work highlights the importance of considering immediate social context and the influence of bystanders for understanding the evolution of the behavioural strategies that produce cooperation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep20634</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26856371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158/856 ; 631/601/18 ; Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Cooperation ; Grooming ; Grooming - physiology ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Male ; multidisciplinary ; Pan troglodytes - physiology ; Pan troglodytes - psychology ; Risk reduction ; Science ; Social Behavior ; Trust - psychology</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2016-02, Vol.6 (1), p.20634-20634, Article 20634</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-65975e3554185ac7a8e39519f8c583f6c5d089b27e69c3ce3e7b704f547c68c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-65975e3554185ac7a8e39519f8c583f6c5d089b27e69c3ce3e7b704f547c68c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746632/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4746632/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26856371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaburu, Stefano S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton-Fisher, Nicholas E.</creatorcontrib><title>Bystanders, parcelling, and an absence of trust in the grooming interactions of wild male chimpanzees</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>The evolution of cooperation remains a central issue in socio-biology with the fundamental problem of how individuals minimize the risks of being short-changed (‘cheated’) should their behavioural investment in another not be returned. Economic decisions that individuals make during interactions may depend upon the presence of potential partners nearby, which offers co operators a temptation to defect from the current partner. The parcelling model posits that donors subdivide services into parcels to force cooperation, and that this is contingent on opportunities for defection; that is, the presence of bystanders. Here we test this model and the effect of bystander presence using grooming interactions of wild chimpanzees. We found that with more bystanders, initiators gave less grooming at the beginning of the bout and were more likely to abandon a grooming bout, while bouts were less likely to be reciprocated. We also found that the groomer’s initial investment was not higher among frequent groomers or stronger reciprocators, suggesting that contrary to current assumptions, grooming decisions are not based on trust, or bonds, within dyads. Our work highlights the importance of considering immediate social context and the influence of bystanders for understanding the evolution of the behavioural strategies that produce cooperation.</description><subject>631/158/856</subject><subject>631/601/18</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Grooming</subject><subject>Grooming - physiology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes - physiology</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes - psychology</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Trust - psychology</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkV1rVDEQhoNYbNn2wj8gAW9UuprvjxtBi1qh4E3vQzY7ZzflnOSYnFOpv94sW5fVBoZMMg9vZvIi9JKS95Rw86EWGBlRXDxDZ4wIuWScsedH-Sm6qPWOtCWZFdS-QKdMGam4pmcIPj_Uyac1lHqJR18C9H1Mm0vc7lpgv6qQAuDc4anMdcIx4WkLeFNyHhrYzhMUH6aYU91Rv2K_xoPvAYdtHEaffgPUc3TS-b7CxeO-QLdfv9xeXS9vfnz7fvXpZhkEN9NSSaslcCkFNdIH7Q1wK6ntTJCGdyrINTF2xTQoG3gADnqlieik0EGZwBfo4152nFcDrAOkqfjejSUOvjy47KP7t5Li1m3yvRNaKMVZE3jzKFDyzxnq5IZYd1_iE-S5OqqV4IJSzRv6-j_0Ls8ltekcNdYSRkjDFujtngol1-ZUd2iGErezzx3sa-yr4-4P5F-zGvBuD9RWShsoR08-UfsD99ekgQ</recordid><startdate>20160209</startdate><enddate>20160209</enddate><creator>Kaburu, Stefano S. K.</creator><creator>Newton-Fisher, Nicholas E.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160209</creationdate><title>Bystanders, parcelling, and an absence of trust in the grooming interactions of wild male chimpanzees</title><author>Kaburu, Stefano S. K. ; Newton-Fisher, Nicholas E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-65975e3554185ac7a8e39519f8c583f6c5d089b27e69c3ce3e7b704f547c68c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>631/158/856</topic><topic>631/601/18</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Grooming</topic><topic>Grooming - physiology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes - physiology</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes - psychology</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Trust - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaburu, Stefano S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton-Fisher, Nicholas E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaburu, Stefano S. K.</au><au>Newton-Fisher, Nicholas E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bystanders, parcelling, and an absence of trust in the grooming interactions of wild male chimpanzees</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2016-02-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20634</spage><epage>20634</epage><pages>20634-20634</pages><artnum>20634</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>The evolution of cooperation remains a central issue in socio-biology with the fundamental problem of how individuals minimize the risks of being short-changed (‘cheated’) should their behavioural investment in another not be returned. Economic decisions that individuals make during interactions may depend upon the presence of potential partners nearby, which offers co operators a temptation to defect from the current partner. The parcelling model posits that donors subdivide services into parcels to force cooperation, and that this is contingent on opportunities for defection; that is, the presence of bystanders. Here we test this model and the effect of bystander presence using grooming interactions of wild chimpanzees. We found that with more bystanders, initiators gave less grooming at the beginning of the bout and were more likely to abandon a grooming bout, while bouts were less likely to be reciprocated. We also found that the groomer’s initial investment was not higher among frequent groomers or stronger reciprocators, suggesting that contrary to current assumptions, grooming decisions are not based on trust, or bonds, within dyads. Our work highlights the importance of considering immediate social context and the influence of bystanders for understanding the evolution of the behavioural strategies that produce cooperation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>26856371</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep20634</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2016-02, Vol.6 (1), p.20634-20634, Article 20634
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4746632
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects 631/158/856
631/601/18
Animals
Biological Evolution
Cooperation
Grooming
Grooming - physiology
Humanities and Social Sciences
Male
multidisciplinary
Pan troglodytes - physiology
Pan troglodytes - psychology
Risk reduction
Science
Social Behavior
Trust - psychology
title Bystanders, parcelling, and an absence of trust in the grooming interactions of wild male chimpanzees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A35%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bystanders,%20parcelling,%20and%20an%20absence%20of%20trust%20in%20the%20grooming%20interactions%20of%20wild%20male%20chimpanzees&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Kaburu,%20Stefano%20S.%20K.&rft.date=2016-02-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20634&rft.epage=20634&rft.pages=20634-20634&rft.artnum=20634&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep20634&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1899020017%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899020017&rft_id=info:pmid/26856371&rfr_iscdi=true