Attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia in small animal practice: impacts of age and gender on views on euthanasia
Euthanasia of pets has been described by veterinarians as "the best and the worst" of the profession. The most commonly mentioned ethical dilemmas veterinarians face in small animal practice are: limited treatment options due to financial constraints, euthanizing of healthy animals and own...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC veterinary research 2016-02, Vol.12 (27), p.26-26, Article 26 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 27 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | BMC veterinary research |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Hartnack, Sonja Springer, Svenja Pittavino, Marta Grimm, Herwig |
description | Euthanasia of pets has been described by veterinarians as "the best and the worst" of the profession. The most commonly mentioned ethical dilemmas veterinarians face in small animal practice are: limited treatment options due to financial constraints, euthanizing of healthy animals and owners wishing to continue treatment of terminally ill animals. The aim of the study was to gain insight into the attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia of small animals. This included assessing their agreement with euthanasia in exemplified case scenarios, potentially predicted by demographic variables (e.g. gender, age, working in small animal practice, employment, working in a team, numbers of performed euthanasia). Further describing the veterinarians' agreement with a number of different normative and descriptive statements, including coping strategies. A questionnaire with nine euthanasia scenarios, 26 normative and descriptive statements, and demographic data were sent to all members of the Austrian Chamber of Veterinary Surgeons (n = 2478).
In total, 486 veterinarians answered sufficiently completely to enable analyses. Responses were first explored descriptively before being formally analysed using linear regression and additive Bayesian networks - a multivariate regression methodology - in order to identify joint relationships between the demographic variables, the statements and each of the nine euthanasia scenarios. Mutual dependencies between the demographic variables were found, i.e. female compared to male veterinarians worked mostly in small animal practice, and working mostly in small animal practice was linked to performing more euthanasia per month.
Gender and age were found to be associated with views on euthanasia: female veterinarians and veterinarians having worked for less years were more likely to disagree with euthanasia in at least some of the convenience euthanasia scenarios. The number of veterinarians working together was found to be the variable with the highest number of links to other variables, demographic as well as ethical statements. This highlights the role of a team potentially providing support in stressful situations. The results are useful for a better understanding of coping strategies for veterinarians with moral stress due to euthanasia of small animals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12917-016-0649-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4743177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A444737131</galeid><sourcerecordid>A444737131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-a38cce557034cca1b2c959cea940c991b9b1f03fbd0b14f73d1801f61a05f7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstu3SAQhq2qVZOmfYBuKqRusnHC2BhMF5WOot6kSN1kjzAeTohsOAWcqMu-eXBPmksVsZgB_vmYQX9VvQd6AtDz0wSNBFFT4DXlTNb0RXUIgvGaA-tfPsoPqjcpXVHKmBT8dXXQ8J6JroPD6s8mZ5eXERMJlmyWlKPTnlxjxui8XjeJ5HCj45gILvlSe52cJs6TNOtpItq7EskuapOdwU_EzbuS_sXpLZb7kWzRjxhJKFyHN2lNHlBvq1dWTwnf3cWj6uLrl4uz7_X5z28_zjbntWGS5Vq3vTHYdYK2zBgNQ2NkJw1qyaiREgY5gKWtHUY6ALOiHaGnYDlo2lmB7VH1eY_dLcOMo0Gfo57ULpb2428VtFNPb7y7VNtwrZhgLQhRAMd3gBh-LZiyml0yOE3aY1iSAsGb0lHDuyL9-J_0KizRl-nUShJNT1v6oNrqCZXzNpR3zQpVG8ZY0UELRXXyjKqsEWdngkfryvmTAtgXmBhSimjvZwSqVtuovW1UsY1abaPWVj48_pz7in8-aW8BYnS_Mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773728030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia in small animal practice: impacts of age and gender on views on euthanasia</title><source>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerOpen</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hartnack, Sonja ; Springer, Svenja ; Pittavino, Marta ; Grimm, Herwig</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartnack, Sonja ; Springer, Svenja ; Pittavino, Marta ; Grimm, Herwig</creatorcontrib><description>Euthanasia of pets has been described by veterinarians as "the best and the worst" of the profession. The most commonly mentioned ethical dilemmas veterinarians face in small animal practice are: limited treatment options due to financial constraints, euthanizing of healthy animals and owners wishing to continue treatment of terminally ill animals. The aim of the study was to gain insight into the attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia of small animals. This included assessing their agreement with euthanasia in exemplified case scenarios, potentially predicted by demographic variables (e.g. gender, age, working in small animal practice, employment, working in a team, numbers of performed euthanasia). Further describing the veterinarians' agreement with a number of different normative and descriptive statements, including coping strategies. A questionnaire with nine euthanasia scenarios, 26 normative and descriptive statements, and demographic data were sent to all members of the Austrian Chamber of Veterinary Surgeons (n = 2478).
In total, 486 veterinarians answered sufficiently completely to enable analyses. Responses were first explored descriptively before being formally analysed using linear regression and additive Bayesian networks - a multivariate regression methodology - in order to identify joint relationships between the demographic variables, the statements and each of the nine euthanasia scenarios. Mutual dependencies between the demographic variables were found, i.e. female compared to male veterinarians worked mostly in small animal practice, and working mostly in small animal practice was linked to performing more euthanasia per month.
Gender and age were found to be associated with views on euthanasia: female veterinarians and veterinarians having worked for less years were more likely to disagree with euthanasia in at least some of the convenience euthanasia scenarios. The number of veterinarians working together was found to be the variable with the highest number of links to other variables, demographic as well as ethical statements. This highlights the role of a team potentially providing support in stressful situations. The results are useful for a better understanding of coping strategies for veterinarians with moral stress due to euthanasia of small animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-6148</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-6148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0649-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26847551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Animals ; Attitude to Death ; Austria ; Euthanasia ; Euthanasia, Animal ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pets ; Sex Factors ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Veterinarians ; Veterinarians - psychology</subject><ispartof>BMC veterinary research, 2016-02, Vol.12 (27), p.26-26, Article 26</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>Hartnack et al. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-a38cce557034cca1b2c959cea940c991b9b1f03fbd0b14f73d1801f61a05f7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-a38cce557034cca1b2c959cea940c991b9b1f03fbd0b14f73d1801f61a05f7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4743177/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4743177/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847551$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartnack, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Springer, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittavino, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Herwig</creatorcontrib><title>Attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia in small animal practice: impacts of age and gender on views on euthanasia</title><title>BMC veterinary research</title><addtitle>BMC Vet Res</addtitle><description>Euthanasia of pets has been described by veterinarians as "the best and the worst" of the profession. The most commonly mentioned ethical dilemmas veterinarians face in small animal practice are: limited treatment options due to financial constraints, euthanizing of healthy animals and owners wishing to continue treatment of terminally ill animals. The aim of the study was to gain insight into the attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia of small animals. This included assessing their agreement with euthanasia in exemplified case scenarios, potentially predicted by demographic variables (e.g. gender, age, working in small animal practice, employment, working in a team, numbers of performed euthanasia). Further describing the veterinarians' agreement with a number of different normative and descriptive statements, including coping strategies. A questionnaire with nine euthanasia scenarios, 26 normative and descriptive statements, and demographic data were sent to all members of the Austrian Chamber of Veterinary Surgeons (n = 2478).
In total, 486 veterinarians answered sufficiently completely to enable analyses. Responses were first explored descriptively before being formally analysed using linear regression and additive Bayesian networks - a multivariate regression methodology - in order to identify joint relationships between the demographic variables, the statements and each of the nine euthanasia scenarios. Mutual dependencies between the demographic variables were found, i.e. female compared to male veterinarians worked mostly in small animal practice, and working mostly in small animal practice was linked to performing more euthanasia per month.
Gender and age were found to be associated with views on euthanasia: female veterinarians and veterinarians having worked for less years were more likely to disagree with euthanasia in at least some of the convenience euthanasia scenarios. The number of veterinarians working together was found to be the variable with the highest number of links to other variables, demographic as well as ethical statements. This highlights the role of a team potentially providing support in stressful situations. The results are useful for a better understanding of coping strategies for veterinarians with moral stress due to euthanasia of small animals.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Attitude to Death</subject><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Euthanasia</subject><subject>Euthanasia, Animal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pets</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Veterinarians</subject><subject>Veterinarians - psychology</subject><issn>1746-6148</issn><issn>1746-6148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstu3SAQhq2qVZOmfYBuKqRusnHC2BhMF5WOot6kSN1kjzAeTohsOAWcqMu-eXBPmksVsZgB_vmYQX9VvQd6AtDz0wSNBFFT4DXlTNb0RXUIgvGaA-tfPsoPqjcpXVHKmBT8dXXQ8J6JroPD6s8mZ5eXERMJlmyWlKPTnlxjxui8XjeJ5HCj45gILvlSe52cJs6TNOtpItq7EskuapOdwU_EzbuS_sXpLZb7kWzRjxhJKFyHN2lNHlBvq1dWTwnf3cWj6uLrl4uz7_X5z28_zjbntWGS5Vq3vTHYdYK2zBgNQ2NkJw1qyaiREgY5gKWtHUY6ALOiHaGnYDlo2lmB7VH1eY_dLcOMo0Gfo57ULpb2428VtFNPb7y7VNtwrZhgLQhRAMd3gBh-LZiyml0yOE3aY1iSAsGb0lHDuyL9-J_0KizRl-nUShJNT1v6oNrqCZXzNpR3zQpVG8ZY0UELRXXyjKqsEWdngkfryvmTAtgXmBhSimjvZwSqVtuovW1UsY1abaPWVj48_pz7in8-aW8BYnS_Mw</recordid><startdate>20160204</startdate><enddate>20160204</enddate><creator>Hartnack, Sonja</creator><creator>Springer, Svenja</creator><creator>Pittavino, Marta</creator><creator>Grimm, Herwig</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160204</creationdate><title>Attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia in small animal practice: impacts of age and gender on views on euthanasia</title><author>Hartnack, Sonja ; Springer, Svenja ; Pittavino, Marta ; Grimm, Herwig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-a38cce557034cca1b2c959cea940c991b9b1f03fbd0b14f73d1801f61a05f7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Attitude to Death</topic><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Euthanasia</topic><topic>Euthanasia, Animal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pets</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Veterinarians</topic><topic>Veterinarians - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartnack, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Springer, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittavino, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Herwig</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC veterinary research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartnack, Sonja</au><au>Springer, Svenja</au><au>Pittavino, Marta</au><au>Grimm, Herwig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia in small animal practice: impacts of age and gender on views on euthanasia</atitle><jtitle>BMC veterinary research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Vet Res</addtitle><date>2016-02-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>27</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>26-26</pages><artnum>26</artnum><issn>1746-6148</issn><eissn>1746-6148</eissn><abstract>Euthanasia of pets has been described by veterinarians as "the best and the worst" of the profession. The most commonly mentioned ethical dilemmas veterinarians face in small animal practice are: limited treatment options due to financial constraints, euthanizing of healthy animals and owners wishing to continue treatment of terminally ill animals. The aim of the study was to gain insight into the attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia of small animals. This included assessing their agreement with euthanasia in exemplified case scenarios, potentially predicted by demographic variables (e.g. gender, age, working in small animal practice, employment, working in a team, numbers of performed euthanasia). Further describing the veterinarians' agreement with a number of different normative and descriptive statements, including coping strategies. A questionnaire with nine euthanasia scenarios, 26 normative and descriptive statements, and demographic data were sent to all members of the Austrian Chamber of Veterinary Surgeons (n = 2478).
In total, 486 veterinarians answered sufficiently completely to enable analyses. Responses were first explored descriptively before being formally analysed using linear regression and additive Bayesian networks - a multivariate regression methodology - in order to identify joint relationships between the demographic variables, the statements and each of the nine euthanasia scenarios. Mutual dependencies between the demographic variables were found, i.e. female compared to male veterinarians worked mostly in small animal practice, and working mostly in small animal practice was linked to performing more euthanasia per month.
Gender and age were found to be associated with views on euthanasia: female veterinarians and veterinarians having worked for less years were more likely to disagree with euthanasia in at least some of the convenience euthanasia scenarios. The number of veterinarians working together was found to be the variable with the highest number of links to other variables, demographic as well as ethical statements. This highlights the role of a team potentially providing support in stressful situations. The results are useful for a better understanding of coping strategies for veterinarians with moral stress due to euthanasia of small animals.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26847551</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12917-016-0649-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1746-6148 |
ispartof | BMC veterinary research, 2016-02, Vol.12 (27), p.26-26, Article 26 |
issn | 1746-6148 1746-6148 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4743177 |
source | Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals; Open Access: PubMed Central; SpringerOpen; MEDLINE; SpringerLink; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Animals Attitude to Death Austria Euthanasia Euthanasia, Animal Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pets Sex Factors Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Veterinarians Veterinarians - psychology |
title | Attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia in small animal practice: impacts of age and gender on views on euthanasia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T21%3A58%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitudes%20of%20Austrian%20veterinarians%20towards%20euthanasia%20in%20small%20animal%20practice:%20impacts%20of%20age%20and%20gender%20on%20views%20on%20euthanasia&rft.jtitle=BMC%20veterinary%20research&rft.au=Hartnack,%20Sonja&rft.date=2016-02-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=27&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=26-26&rft.artnum=26&rft.issn=1746-6148&rft.eissn=1746-6148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12917-016-0649-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA444737131%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773728030&rft_id=info:pmid/26847551&rft_galeid=A444737131&rfr_iscdi=true |