Transient Poverty, Poverty Dynamics, and Vulnerability to Poverty: An Empirical Analysis Using a Balanced Panel from Rural China
•We study poverty dynamics and vulnerability in rural China from 1991 through 2006.•Over time, the structure of poverty has changed from being mostly chronic to mostly transitory.•Vulnerability to poverty has been declining over time, largely due to increasing real incomes.•As of 2006, high income v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World development 2016-02, Vol.78, p.541-553 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 553 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 541 |
container_title | World development |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Ward, Patrick S. |
description | •We study poverty dynamics and vulnerability in rural China from 1991 through 2006.•Over time, the structure of poverty has changed from being mostly chronic to mostly transitory.•Vulnerability to poverty has been declining over time, largely due to increasing real incomes.•As of 2006, high income variability is the source of most vulnerability to poverty.
China’s economic reforms starting in the late 1970s have resulted in rapid economic growth, with annual growth in gross domestic product averaging greater than 10% per year for more than 30years. Accompanying this rapid growth in national accounts have been rapid and widespread reductions in poverty. With these reductions in poverty, however, there has often been observed an increase in income inequality, both between as well as within rural and urban sectors. This rising income gap challenges the notion that economic reforms in China have been as successful as the poverty statistics would suggest.
In this paper, we suggest that an alternative view would be to consider the effects of these reforms on changing the chronic nature of poverty and reducing household vulnerability to poverty. Using a balanced panel from rural China from 1991 through 2006, we find that most poverty among our sample has shifted from being chronic in nature to being transient, with households either shifting into a state of being non-poor moving in and out of poverty. Among our sample, vulnerability to poverty has been declining over time, but the declines are not uniform over time or space. We decompose household vulnerability status into two proximate causes: low expected income and high income variability, finding vulnerability increasingly due to income variability. Additionally, we demonstrate that vulnerable households have very different characteristics than non-vulnerable households. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4740920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A640646760</galeid><els_id>S0305750X15002442</els_id><sourcerecordid>A640646760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-98227d2fba91147e33defdc49920f3aba1c0926ddfac1da1175b955ff9fa7f713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhL1SWkBCHbrC9azvLARFC-ZAqUaEWcbMm_kgd7drB3k2bGz8dr9JUwKUn2zPPzHhm3qI4IXhKMOFv1tObEFutzXZKMWHZOMWUPiomZCaqkjUNeVxMcIVZKRj-eVQ8S2mNMWZVI54WR5TPGKsFnhS_LyP45Izv0UXYmtjvTg8X9HHnoXMqnSLwGv0YWm8iLF3rsq8PB-wtmnt01m1cdAra_IB2l1xCV8n5FQL0AVrwymh0Ad60yMbQoe9DzOji2nl4Xjyx0Cbz4u48Lq4-nV0uvpTn3z5_XczPS8Wp6MtmRqnQ1C6hIaQWpqq0sVrVTUOxrWAJROGGcq0tKKKBEMGWDWPWNhaEFaQ6Lt7t826GZWe0yh3nP8hNdB3EnQzg5L8e767lKmxlLeqcGecEr-8SxPBrMKmXnUvKtLk7E4YkyYxyzsg4_wdRwRnHWIg6oy__Q9dhiHmGI8Xywup97Vd7agWtkc6r4Htz269gSEnKOa8xr7ngI8j3oIohpWjsfYMEy1E4ci0PwpGjcEZ7Fk4OPPl7PPdhB6Vk4P0eMHlJW2eiTCrLJi_WRaN6qYN7qMYfBQHZGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750054920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transient Poverty, Poverty Dynamics, and Vulnerability to Poverty: An Empirical Analysis Using a Balanced Panel from Rural China</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Ward, Patrick S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ward, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><description>•We study poverty dynamics and vulnerability in rural China from 1991 through 2006.•Over time, the structure of poverty has changed from being mostly chronic to mostly transitory.•Vulnerability to poverty has been declining over time, largely due to increasing real incomes.•As of 2006, high income variability is the source of most vulnerability to poverty.
China’s economic reforms starting in the late 1970s have resulted in rapid economic growth, with annual growth in gross domestic product averaging greater than 10% per year for more than 30years. Accompanying this rapid growth in national accounts have been rapid and widespread reductions in poverty. With these reductions in poverty, however, there has often been observed an increase in income inequality, both between as well as within rural and urban sectors. This rising income gap challenges the notion that economic reforms in China have been as successful as the poverty statistics would suggest.
In this paper, we suggest that an alternative view would be to consider the effects of these reforms on changing the chronic nature of poverty and reducing household vulnerability to poverty. Using a balanced panel from rural China from 1991 through 2006, we find that most poverty among our sample has shifted from being chronic in nature to being transient, with households either shifting into a state of being non-poor moving in and out of poverty. Among our sample, vulnerability to poverty has been declining over time, but the declines are not uniform over time or space. We decompose household vulnerability status into two proximate causes: low expected income and high income variability, finding vulnerability increasingly due to income variability. Additionally, we demonstrate that vulnerable households have very different characteristics than non-vulnerable households.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26855470</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WODEDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Antipoverty programs ; China ; Economic analysis ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economic policy ; Economic reform ; Empirical analysis ; Food ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Households ; Income ; Income distribution ; Income inequality ; National accounts ; panel data ; Poverty ; Proximate causes ; Rural areas ; Socioeconomics ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics ; Studies ; Variability ; vulnerability</subject><ispartof>World development, 2016-02, Vol.78, p.541-553</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Elsevier Science Publishers</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-98227d2fba91147e33defdc49920f3aba1c0926ddfac1da1175b955ff9fa7f713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-98227d2fba91147e33defdc49920f3aba1c0926ddfac1da1175b955ff9fa7f713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ward, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><title>Transient Poverty, Poverty Dynamics, and Vulnerability to Poverty: An Empirical Analysis Using a Balanced Panel from Rural China</title><title>World development</title><addtitle>World Dev</addtitle><description>•We study poverty dynamics and vulnerability in rural China from 1991 through 2006.•Over time, the structure of poverty has changed from being mostly chronic to mostly transitory.•Vulnerability to poverty has been declining over time, largely due to increasing real incomes.•As of 2006, high income variability is the source of most vulnerability to poverty.
China’s economic reforms starting in the late 1970s have resulted in rapid economic growth, with annual growth in gross domestic product averaging greater than 10% per year for more than 30years. Accompanying this rapid growth in national accounts have been rapid and widespread reductions in poverty. With these reductions in poverty, however, there has often been observed an increase in income inequality, both between as well as within rural and urban sectors. This rising income gap challenges the notion that economic reforms in China have been as successful as the poverty statistics would suggest.
In this paper, we suggest that an alternative view would be to consider the effects of these reforms on changing the chronic nature of poverty and reducing household vulnerability to poverty. Using a balanced panel from rural China from 1991 through 2006, we find that most poverty among our sample has shifted from being chronic in nature to being transient, with households either shifting into a state of being non-poor moving in and out of poverty. Among our sample, vulnerability to poverty has been declining over time, but the declines are not uniform over time or space. We decompose household vulnerability status into two proximate causes: low expected income and high income variability, finding vulnerability increasingly due to income variability. Additionally, we demonstrate that vulnerable households have very different characteristics than non-vulnerable households.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antipoverty programs</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>National accounts</subject><subject>panel data</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Proximate causes</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>vulnerability</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhL1SWkBCHbrC9azvLARFC-ZAqUaEWcbMm_kgd7drB3k2bGz8dr9JUwKUn2zPPzHhm3qI4IXhKMOFv1tObEFutzXZKMWHZOMWUPiomZCaqkjUNeVxMcIVZKRj-eVQ8S2mNMWZVI54WR5TPGKsFnhS_LyP45Izv0UXYmtjvTg8X9HHnoXMqnSLwGv0YWm8iLF3rsq8PB-wtmnt01m1cdAra_IB2l1xCV8n5FQL0AVrwymh0Ad60yMbQoe9DzOji2nl4Xjyx0Cbz4u48Lq4-nV0uvpTn3z5_XczPS8Wp6MtmRqnQ1C6hIaQWpqq0sVrVTUOxrWAJROGGcq0tKKKBEMGWDWPWNhaEFaQ6Lt7t826GZWe0yh3nP8hNdB3EnQzg5L8e767lKmxlLeqcGecEr-8SxPBrMKmXnUvKtLk7E4YkyYxyzsg4_wdRwRnHWIg6oy__Q9dhiHmGI8Xywup97Vd7agWtkc6r4Htz269gSEnKOa8xr7ngI8j3oIohpWjsfYMEy1E4ci0PwpGjcEZ7Fk4OPPl7PPdhB6Vk4P0eMHlJW2eiTCrLJi_WRaN6qYN7qMYfBQHZGw</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Ward, Patrick S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishers</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Transient Poverty, Poverty Dynamics, and Vulnerability to Poverty: An Empirical Analysis Using a Balanced Panel from Rural China</title><author>Ward, Patrick S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c627t-98227d2fba91147e33defdc49920f3aba1c0926ddfac1da1175b955ff9fa7f713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antipoverty programs</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>National accounts</topic><topic>panel data</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Proximate causes</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ward, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ward, Patrick S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transient Poverty, Poverty Dynamics, and Vulnerability to Poverty: An Empirical Analysis Using a Balanced Panel from Rural China</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><addtitle>World Dev</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>78</volume><spage>541</spage><epage>553</epage><pages>541-553</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><coden>WODEDW</coden><abstract>•We study poverty dynamics and vulnerability in rural China from 1991 through 2006.•Over time, the structure of poverty has changed from being mostly chronic to mostly transitory.•Vulnerability to poverty has been declining over time, largely due to increasing real incomes.•As of 2006, high income variability is the source of most vulnerability to poverty.
China’s economic reforms starting in the late 1970s have resulted in rapid economic growth, with annual growth in gross domestic product averaging greater than 10% per year for more than 30years. Accompanying this rapid growth in national accounts have been rapid and widespread reductions in poverty. With these reductions in poverty, however, there has often been observed an increase in income inequality, both between as well as within rural and urban sectors. This rising income gap challenges the notion that economic reforms in China have been as successful as the poverty statistics would suggest.
In this paper, we suggest that an alternative view would be to consider the effects of these reforms on changing the chronic nature of poverty and reducing household vulnerability to poverty. Using a balanced panel from rural China from 1991 through 2006, we find that most poverty among our sample has shifted from being chronic in nature to being transient, with households either shifting into a state of being non-poor moving in and out of poverty. Among our sample, vulnerability to poverty has been declining over time, but the declines are not uniform over time or space. We decompose household vulnerability status into two proximate causes: low expected income and high income variability, finding vulnerability increasingly due to income variability. Additionally, we demonstrate that vulnerable households have very different characteristics than non-vulnerable households.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26855470</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.022</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-750X |
ispartof | World development, 2016-02, Vol.78, p.541-553 |
issn | 0305-750X 1873-5991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4740920 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Analysis Antipoverty programs China Economic analysis Economic development Economic growth Economic policy Economic reform Empirical analysis Food GDP Gross Domestic Product Households Income Income distribution Income inequality National accounts panel data Poverty Proximate causes Rural areas Socioeconomics Statistical analysis Statistics Studies Variability vulnerability |
title | Transient Poverty, Poverty Dynamics, and Vulnerability to Poverty: An Empirical Analysis Using a Balanced Panel from Rural China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A37%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transient%20Poverty,%20Poverty%20Dynamics,%20and%20Vulnerability%20to%20Poverty:%20An%20Empirical%20Analysis%20Using%20a%20Balanced%20Panel%20from%20Rural%20China&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Ward,%20Patrick%20S.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=78&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=553&rft.pages=541-553&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft.coden=WODEDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.022&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA640646760%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750054920&rft_id=info:pmid/26855470&rft_galeid=A640646760&rft_els_id=S0305750X15002442&rfr_iscdi=true |