Enhancing Quit & Win contests to improve cessation among college smokers: a randomized clinical trial
Background and Aims Quit & Win contests (in which smokers pledge to quit smoking for a defined period in exchange for the chance to win a prize) may be well‐suited for college smokers. We tested the effectiveness of multiple versus single Quit & Win contests and that of added counseling vers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2016-02, Vol.111 (2), p.331-339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 331 |
container_title | Addiction (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Thomas, Janet L. Luo, Xianghua Bengtson, Jill Wang, Qi Ghidei, Winta Nyman, John Lust, Katherine An, Lawrence Wetter, David W. Epstein, Leonard Ahluwalia, Jasjit S. |
description | Background and Aims
Quit & Win contests (in which smokers pledge to quit smoking for a defined period in exchange for the chance to win a prize) may be well‐suited for college smokers. We tested the effectiveness of multiple versus single Quit & Win contests and that of added counseling versus no counseling in smoking cessation.
Design
A two‐by‐two, randomized controlled trial with 6‐month follow‐up.
Setting
Nineteen institutions in Minnesota, Texas, Ohio and Wisconsin.
Participants
College student smokers (n = 1217) were randomized within site to four conditions: single (n = 306), multiple contests alone (n = 309), single contest plus counseling (n = 296) or multiple contests with counseling (n = 306).
Intervention
Participants in the standard contest condition (T1 and T2) were asked to abstain from all tobacco products for a 30‐day period; those with confirmed abstinence were eligible for a lottery‐based prize. Participants assigned to the multiple contest conditions (T3 and T4) participated in the 30‐day contest and were enrolled automatically into two additional contest periods with an escalating prize structure. Participants randomized into the counseling conditions (T2 and T4) received up to six telephone‐administered Motivation and Problem Solving (MAPS) counseling sessions over the 12‐week treatment period.
Measures
The primary outcome was biochemically verified 30‐day point prevalence (PP) abstinence rate at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the same abstinence at end of treatment (4 months) and a proxy measure of 6‐month verified continuous abstinence rate. Outcomes were based on all participants randomized.
Findings
We found no evidence of an interaction between number of contests and counseling. Abstinence rates for multiple (13.5%) and single (11.7%) contests were not significantly different at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84–1.66]. The addition of counseling did not improve 6‐month abstinence significantly (13.7 versus 11.6%, OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.86–1.70). Multiple contests increased abstinence at 4 months (19.3 versus 10.3%, OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.50–2.91) and continuous abstinence at 6 months (7.8 versus 3.8%, OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.28–3.56).
Conclusion
Multiple Quit & Win contests may increase smoking abstinence rates in college students more than single contests, but it is not clear whether adding counseling to these interventions produces any additional benefit. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/add.13144 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4721252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3921470171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5834-68a7609c49edc6cc775fc8ef3df3a010e077c5d41dc4bbf77ca22371796e39603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9PFDEUxRsjkRV88AuYJiaGl4H-79QHEwIIJkQ0ata3ptvpLIVOu7QzKH56K4sb9cm-tM39nZObew8AzzHax_UcmK7bxxQz9gjMMBWoQYzRx2CGlOANwQxtg6elXCGEZKvYE7BNhBSSMjQD7iRemmh9XMKPkx_hKzj3EdoUR1fGAscE_bDK6dZB60oxo08RmiFV3KYQ3NLBMqRrl8traGA2sUuD_-E6aIOP3poAx-xN2AVbvQnFPXu4d8CXtyefj86a84vTd0eH543lLWWNaI0USFmmXGeFtVLy3raup11PDcLIISkt7xjuLFss-voxhFCJpRKOKoHoDniz9l1Ni6F6uDhmE_Qq-8HkO52M139Xor_Uy3SrmSSYcFIN9h4McrqZ6gj04It1IZjo0lQ0llII0VIi_gMVnCvVIlrRl_-gV2nKsU6iUrxuQiksK_Xiz-Y3Xf9eVgUO1sA3H9zdpo6R_pUCXVOg71OgD4-P7x9V0awVvozu-0Zh8rWulpLr-ftTPVdfPxD0iWhJfwIPTbOB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1756739917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing Quit & Win contests to improve cessation among college smokers: a randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Thomas, Janet L. ; Luo, Xianghua ; Bengtson, Jill ; Wang, Qi ; Ghidei, Winta ; Nyman, John ; Lust, Katherine ; An, Lawrence ; Wetter, David W. ; Epstein, Leonard ; Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Janet L. ; Luo, Xianghua ; Bengtson, Jill ; Wang, Qi ; Ghidei, Winta ; Nyman, John ; Lust, Katherine ; An, Lawrence ; Wetter, David W. ; Epstein, Leonard ; Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims
Quit & Win contests (in which smokers pledge to quit smoking for a defined period in exchange for the chance to win a prize) may be well‐suited for college smokers. We tested the effectiveness of multiple versus single Quit & Win contests and that of added counseling versus no counseling in smoking cessation.
Design
A two‐by‐two, randomized controlled trial with 6‐month follow‐up.
Setting
Nineteen institutions in Minnesota, Texas, Ohio and Wisconsin.
Participants
College student smokers (n = 1217) were randomized within site to four conditions: single (n = 306), multiple contests alone (n = 309), single contest plus counseling (n = 296) or multiple contests with counseling (n = 306).
Intervention
Participants in the standard contest condition (T1 and T2) were asked to abstain from all tobacco products for a 30‐day period; those with confirmed abstinence were eligible for a lottery‐based prize. Participants assigned to the multiple contest conditions (T3 and T4) participated in the 30‐day contest and were enrolled automatically into two additional contest periods with an escalating prize structure. Participants randomized into the counseling conditions (T2 and T4) received up to six telephone‐administered Motivation and Problem Solving (MAPS) counseling sessions over the 12‐week treatment period.
Measures
The primary outcome was biochemically verified 30‐day point prevalence (PP) abstinence rate at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the same abstinence at end of treatment (4 months) and a proxy measure of 6‐month verified continuous abstinence rate. Outcomes were based on all participants randomized.
Findings
We found no evidence of an interaction between number of contests and counseling. Abstinence rates for multiple (13.5%) and single (11.7%) contests were not significantly different at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84–1.66]. The addition of counseling did not improve 6‐month abstinence significantly (13.7 versus 11.6%, OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.86–1.70). Multiple contests increased abstinence at 4 months (19.3 versus 10.3%, OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.50–2.91) and continuous abstinence at 6 months (7.8 versus 3.8%, OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.28–3.56).
Conclusion
Multiple Quit & Win contests may increase smoking abstinence rates in college students more than single contests, but it is not clear whether adding counseling to these interventions produces any additional benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/add.13144</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26767340</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Awards and Prizes ; College students ; Confidence intervals ; Counseling ; Counseling - methods ; Counselling ; Female ; financial incentives ; Health Promotion - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Minnesota - epidemiology ; Motivation ; Ohio - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Smoking - epidemiology ; Smoking - psychology ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Cessation - psychology ; Smoking Prevention ; Texas - epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome ; U.S.A ; Wisconsin - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2016-02, Vol.111 (2), p.331-339</ispartof><rights>2015 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><rights>2015 Society for the Study of Addiction.</rights><rights>2016 Society for the Study of Addiction</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5834-68a7609c49edc6cc775fc8ef3df3a010e077c5d41dc4bbf77ca22371796e39603</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fadd.13144$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fadd.13144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26767340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Xianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bengtson, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghidei, Winta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lust, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetter, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing Quit & Win contests to improve cessation among college smokers: a randomized clinical trial</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>Background and Aims
Quit & Win contests (in which smokers pledge to quit smoking for a defined period in exchange for the chance to win a prize) may be well‐suited for college smokers. We tested the effectiveness of multiple versus single Quit & Win contests and that of added counseling versus no counseling in smoking cessation.
Design
A two‐by‐two, randomized controlled trial with 6‐month follow‐up.
Setting
Nineteen institutions in Minnesota, Texas, Ohio and Wisconsin.
Participants
College student smokers (n = 1217) were randomized within site to four conditions: single (n = 306), multiple contests alone (n = 309), single contest plus counseling (n = 296) or multiple contests with counseling (n = 306).
Intervention
Participants in the standard contest condition (T1 and T2) were asked to abstain from all tobacco products for a 30‐day period; those with confirmed abstinence were eligible for a lottery‐based prize. Participants assigned to the multiple contest conditions (T3 and T4) participated in the 30‐day contest and were enrolled automatically into two additional contest periods with an escalating prize structure. Participants randomized into the counseling conditions (T2 and T4) received up to six telephone‐administered Motivation and Problem Solving (MAPS) counseling sessions over the 12‐week treatment period.
Measures
The primary outcome was biochemically verified 30‐day point prevalence (PP) abstinence rate at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the same abstinence at end of treatment (4 months) and a proxy measure of 6‐month verified continuous abstinence rate. Outcomes were based on all participants randomized.
Findings
We found no evidence of an interaction between number of contests and counseling. Abstinence rates for multiple (13.5%) and single (11.7%) contests were not significantly different at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84–1.66]. The addition of counseling did not improve 6‐month abstinence significantly (13.7 versus 11.6%, OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.86–1.70). Multiple contests increased abstinence at 4 months (19.3 versus 10.3%, OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.50–2.91) and continuous abstinence at 6 months (7.8 versus 3.8%, OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.28–3.56).
Conclusion
Multiple Quit & Win contests may increase smoking abstinence rates in college students more than single contests, but it is not clear whether adding counseling to these interventions produces any additional benefit.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Awards and Prizes</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Counseling - methods</subject><subject>Counselling</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>financial incentives</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Minnesota - epidemiology</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Ohio - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>Smoking - psychology</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - psychology</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Texas - epidemiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Wisconsin - epidemiology</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9PFDEUxRsjkRV88AuYJiaGl4H-79QHEwIIJkQ0ata3ptvpLIVOu7QzKH56K4sb9cm-tM39nZObew8AzzHax_UcmK7bxxQz9gjMMBWoQYzRx2CGlOANwQxtg6elXCGEZKvYE7BNhBSSMjQD7iRemmh9XMKPkx_hKzj3EdoUR1fGAscE_bDK6dZB60oxo08RmiFV3KYQ3NLBMqRrl8traGA2sUuD_-E6aIOP3poAx-xN2AVbvQnFPXu4d8CXtyefj86a84vTd0eH543lLWWNaI0USFmmXGeFtVLy3raup11PDcLIISkt7xjuLFss-voxhFCJpRKOKoHoDniz9l1Ni6F6uDhmE_Qq-8HkO52M139Xor_Uy3SrmSSYcFIN9h4McrqZ6gj04It1IZjo0lQ0llII0VIi_gMVnCvVIlrRl_-gV2nKsU6iUrxuQiksK_Xiz-Y3Xf9eVgUO1sA3H9zdpo6R_pUCXVOg71OgD4-P7x9V0awVvozu-0Zh8rWulpLr-ftTPVdfPxD0iWhJfwIPTbOB</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Thomas, Janet L.</creator><creator>Luo, Xianghua</creator><creator>Bengtson, Jill</creator><creator>Wang, Qi</creator><creator>Ghidei, Winta</creator><creator>Nyman, John</creator><creator>Lust, Katherine</creator><creator>An, Lawrence</creator><creator>Wetter, David W.</creator><creator>Epstein, Leonard</creator><creator>Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Enhancing Quit & Win contests to improve cessation among college smokers: a randomized clinical trial</title><author>Thomas, Janet L. ; Luo, Xianghua ; Bengtson, Jill ; Wang, Qi ; Ghidei, Winta ; Nyman, John ; Lust, Katherine ; An, Lawrence ; Wetter, David W. ; Epstein, Leonard ; Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5834-68a7609c49edc6cc775fc8ef3df3a010e077c5d41dc4bbf77ca22371796e39603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Awards and Prizes</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Counseling - methods</topic><topic>Counselling</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>financial incentives</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Minnesota - epidemiology</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Ohio - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>Smoking - psychology</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - psychology</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Texas - epidemiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Wisconsin - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Xianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bengtson, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghidei, Winta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lust, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetter, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Janet L.</au><au>Luo, Xianghua</au><au>Bengtson, Jill</au><au>Wang, Qi</au><au>Ghidei, Winta</au><au>Nyman, John</au><au>Lust, Katherine</au><au>An, Lawrence</au><au>Wetter, David W.</au><au>Epstein, Leonard</au><au>Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing Quit & Win contests to improve cessation among college smokers: a randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>331-339</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>Background and Aims
Quit & Win contests (in which smokers pledge to quit smoking for a defined period in exchange for the chance to win a prize) may be well‐suited for college smokers. We tested the effectiveness of multiple versus single Quit & Win contests and that of added counseling versus no counseling in smoking cessation.
Design
A two‐by‐two, randomized controlled trial with 6‐month follow‐up.
Setting
Nineteen institutions in Minnesota, Texas, Ohio and Wisconsin.
Participants
College student smokers (n = 1217) were randomized within site to four conditions: single (n = 306), multiple contests alone (n = 309), single contest plus counseling (n = 296) or multiple contests with counseling (n = 306).
Intervention
Participants in the standard contest condition (T1 and T2) were asked to abstain from all tobacco products for a 30‐day period; those with confirmed abstinence were eligible for a lottery‐based prize. Participants assigned to the multiple contest conditions (T3 and T4) participated in the 30‐day contest and were enrolled automatically into two additional contest periods with an escalating prize structure. Participants randomized into the counseling conditions (T2 and T4) received up to six telephone‐administered Motivation and Problem Solving (MAPS) counseling sessions over the 12‐week treatment period.
Measures
The primary outcome was biochemically verified 30‐day point prevalence (PP) abstinence rate at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the same abstinence at end of treatment (4 months) and a proxy measure of 6‐month verified continuous abstinence rate. Outcomes were based on all participants randomized.
Findings
We found no evidence of an interaction between number of contests and counseling. Abstinence rates for multiple (13.5%) and single (11.7%) contests were not significantly different at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84–1.66]. The addition of counseling did not improve 6‐month abstinence significantly (13.7 versus 11.6%, OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.86–1.70). Multiple contests increased abstinence at 4 months (19.3 versus 10.3%, OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.50–2.91) and continuous abstinence at 6 months (7.8 versus 3.8%, OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.28–3.56).
Conclusion
Multiple Quit & Win contests may increase smoking abstinence rates in college students more than single contests, but it is not clear whether adding counseling to these interventions produces any additional benefit.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26767340</pmid><doi>10.1111/add.13144</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-2140 |
ispartof | Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2016-02, Vol.111 (2), p.331-339 |
issn | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4721252 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Adult Awards and Prizes College students Confidence intervals Counseling Counseling - methods Counselling Female financial incentives Health Promotion - methods Humans Male Minnesota - epidemiology Motivation Ohio - epidemiology Prevalence Smoking - epidemiology Smoking - psychology Smoking cessation Smoking Cessation - methods Smoking Cessation - psychology Smoking Prevention Texas - epidemiology Treatment Outcome U.S.A Wisconsin - epidemiology |
title | Enhancing Quit & Win contests to improve cessation among college smokers: a randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A45%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20Quit%20&%20Win%20contests%20to%20improve%20cessation%20among%20college%20smokers:%20a%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Thomas,%20Janet%20L.&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=331-339&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/add.13144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3921470171%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1756739917&rft_id=info:pmid/26767340&rfr_iscdi=true |