Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy

Penile cancer, although rare, is one of the common genitourinary cancers in India affecting mostly aged uncircumcised males. For patients presenting with small superficial lesions < 3 cm restricted to glans, surgery, radical external radiation or brachytherapy may be offered, the latter being pre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of contemporary brachytherapy 2015, Vol.7 (6), p.503-507
Hauptverfasser: Bindal, Arpita, Mahantshetty, Umesh, Tambe, Chandrashekhar M, Ghadi, Yogesh, Murthy, Vedang, Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 507
container_issue 6
container_start_page 503
container_title Journal of contemporary brachytherapy
container_volume 7
creator Bindal, Arpita
Mahantshetty, Umesh
Tambe, Chandrashekhar M
Ghadi, Yogesh
Murthy, Vedang
Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
description Penile cancer, although rare, is one of the common genitourinary cancers in India affecting mostly aged uncircumcised males. For patients presenting with small superficial lesions < 3 cm restricted to glans, surgery, radical external radiation or brachytherapy may be offered, the latter being preferred as it allows organ and function preservation. In patients receiving brachytherapy, testicular morbidity is not commonly addressed. With an aim to minimize and document the doses to testis after adequate shielding during radical interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancers, we undertook this study in 2 patients undergoing brachytherapy and forms the basis of this report. Two patients with early stage penile cancer limited to the glans were treated with radical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using interstitial implant. A total of 7-8 tubes were implanted in two planes, parallel to the penile shaft. A total dose of 44-48 Gy (55-60 Gy EQD2 doses with α/β = 10) was delivered in 11-12 fractions of 4 Gy each delivered twice daily. Lead sheets adding to 11 mm (4-5 half value layer) were interposed between the penile shaft and scrotum. The testicular dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. For each patient, dosimetry was done for 3 fractions and mean calculated. The cumulative testicular dose to left and right testis was 31.68 cGy and 42.79 cGy for patient A, and 21.96 cGy and 23.28 cGy for patient B. For the same patients, the mean cumulative dose measured at the posterior aspect of penile shaft was 722.15 cGy and 807.72 cGy, amounting to 16.4% and 16.8% of the prescribed dose. Hence, the application of lead shield 11 mm thick reduced testicular dose from 722-808 cGy to 21.96-42.57 cGy, an "absolute reduction" of 95.99 ± 1.5%. With the use of a simple lead shield as described, we were able to effectively reduce testicular dose from "spermicidal" range to "oligospermic" range with possible reversibility.
doi_str_mv 10.5114/jcb.2015.56410
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4716126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3986102541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-6db1c475259d2660de6a785d710bc2f793b78c7da4c61c8f83d9585c0f5f32ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AQxRdRtFavHiXg1cSd3exHLoIUv6DgpYK3ZbO7abakSdwkQv97U1uLnuYwb96890PoCnDCANK7lckTgoEljKeAj9CEYAkxkSkcowlwmcWSko8zdN51K4x5RjA7RWeES-AMZxN0u3Bd781Q6RB1pXeV9fUy8nXUutpXLsqDNuWmL13Q7eYCnRS66tzlfk7R-9PjYvYSz9-eX2cP89jQFPcxtzmYVDDCMks4x9ZxLSSzAnBuSCEymgtphNWp4WBkIanNmGQGF6ygxBV0iu53vu2Qr501ru6DrlQb_FqHjWq0V_83tS_VsvlSqQAOhI8GN3uD0HwOY0O1aoZQj5kVCEEZzaRkoyrZqUxoui644vABsNrSVSNdtaWrfuiOB9d_cx3kvzjpN6zHdhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773539885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bindal, Arpita ; Mahantshetty, Umesh ; Tambe, Chandrashekhar M ; Ghadi, Yogesh ; Murthy, Vedang ; Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore</creator><creatorcontrib>Bindal, Arpita ; Mahantshetty, Umesh ; Tambe, Chandrashekhar M ; Ghadi, Yogesh ; Murthy, Vedang ; Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore</creatorcontrib><description>Penile cancer, although rare, is one of the common genitourinary cancers in India affecting mostly aged uncircumcised males. For patients presenting with small superficial lesions &lt; 3 cm restricted to glans, surgery, radical external radiation or brachytherapy may be offered, the latter being preferred as it allows organ and function preservation. In patients receiving brachytherapy, testicular morbidity is not commonly addressed. With an aim to minimize and document the doses to testis after adequate shielding during radical interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancers, we undertook this study in 2 patients undergoing brachytherapy and forms the basis of this report. Two patients with early stage penile cancer limited to the glans were treated with radical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using interstitial implant. A total of 7-8 tubes were implanted in two planes, parallel to the penile shaft. A total dose of 44-48 Gy (55-60 Gy EQD2 doses with α/β = 10) was delivered in 11-12 fractions of 4 Gy each delivered twice daily. Lead sheets adding to 11 mm (4-5 half value layer) were interposed between the penile shaft and scrotum. The testicular dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. For each patient, dosimetry was done for 3 fractions and mean calculated. The cumulative testicular dose to left and right testis was 31.68 cGy and 42.79 cGy for patient A, and 21.96 cGy and 23.28 cGy for patient B. For the same patients, the mean cumulative dose measured at the posterior aspect of penile shaft was 722.15 cGy and 807.72 cGy, amounting to 16.4% and 16.8% of the prescribed dose. Hence, the application of lead shield 11 mm thick reduced testicular dose from 722-808 cGy to 21.96-42.57 cGy, an "absolute reduction" of 95.99 ± 1.5%. With the use of a simple lead shield as described, we were able to effectively reduce testicular dose from "spermicidal" range to "oligospermic" range with possible reversibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1689-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2081-2841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2015.56410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26816509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Termedia Publishing House</publisher><subject>Case Report</subject><ispartof>Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2015, Vol.7 (6), p.503-507</ispartof><rights>Copyright Termedia Publishing House 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Termedia Sp. z o. o. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716126/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4716126/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816509$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bindal, Arpita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahantshetty, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambe, Chandrashekhar M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghadi, Yogesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Vedang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore</creatorcontrib><title>Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy</title><title>Journal of contemporary brachytherapy</title><addtitle>J Contemp Brachytherapy</addtitle><description>Penile cancer, although rare, is one of the common genitourinary cancers in India affecting mostly aged uncircumcised males. For patients presenting with small superficial lesions &lt; 3 cm restricted to glans, surgery, radical external radiation or brachytherapy may be offered, the latter being preferred as it allows organ and function preservation. In patients receiving brachytherapy, testicular morbidity is not commonly addressed. With an aim to minimize and document the doses to testis after adequate shielding during radical interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancers, we undertook this study in 2 patients undergoing brachytherapy and forms the basis of this report. Two patients with early stage penile cancer limited to the glans were treated with radical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using interstitial implant. A total of 7-8 tubes were implanted in two planes, parallel to the penile shaft. A total dose of 44-48 Gy (55-60 Gy EQD2 doses with α/β = 10) was delivered in 11-12 fractions of 4 Gy each delivered twice daily. Lead sheets adding to 11 mm (4-5 half value layer) were interposed between the penile shaft and scrotum. The testicular dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. For each patient, dosimetry was done for 3 fractions and mean calculated. The cumulative testicular dose to left and right testis was 31.68 cGy and 42.79 cGy for patient A, and 21.96 cGy and 23.28 cGy for patient B. For the same patients, the mean cumulative dose measured at the posterior aspect of penile shaft was 722.15 cGy and 807.72 cGy, amounting to 16.4% and 16.8% of the prescribed dose. Hence, the application of lead shield 11 mm thick reduced testicular dose from 722-808 cGy to 21.96-42.57 cGy, an "absolute reduction" of 95.99 ± 1.5%. With the use of a simple lead shield as described, we were able to effectively reduce testicular dose from "spermicidal" range to "oligospermic" range with possible reversibility.</description><subject>Case Report</subject><issn>1689-832X</issn><issn>2081-2841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AQxRdRtFavHiXg1cSd3exHLoIUv6DgpYK3ZbO7abakSdwkQv97U1uLnuYwb96890PoCnDCANK7lckTgoEljKeAj9CEYAkxkSkcowlwmcWSko8zdN51K4x5RjA7RWeES-AMZxN0u3Bd781Q6RB1pXeV9fUy8nXUutpXLsqDNuWmL13Q7eYCnRS66tzlfk7R-9PjYvYSz9-eX2cP89jQFPcxtzmYVDDCMks4x9ZxLSSzAnBuSCEymgtphNWp4WBkIanNmGQGF6ygxBV0iu53vu2Qr501ru6DrlQb_FqHjWq0V_83tS_VsvlSqQAOhI8GN3uD0HwOY0O1aoZQj5kVCEEZzaRkoyrZqUxoui644vABsNrSVSNdtaWrfuiOB9d_cx3kvzjpN6zHdhA</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Bindal, Arpita</creator><creator>Mahantshetty, Umesh</creator><creator>Tambe, Chandrashekhar M</creator><creator>Ghadi, Yogesh</creator><creator>Murthy, Vedang</creator><creator>Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore</creator><general>Termedia Publishing House</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy</title><author>Bindal, Arpita ; Mahantshetty, Umesh ; Tambe, Chandrashekhar M ; Ghadi, Yogesh ; Murthy, Vedang ; Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-6db1c475259d2660de6a785d710bc2f793b78c7da4c61c8f83d9585c0f5f32ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Case Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bindal, Arpita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahantshetty, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambe, Chandrashekhar M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghadi, Yogesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Vedang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of contemporary brachytherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bindal, Arpita</au><au>Mahantshetty, Umesh</au><au>Tambe, Chandrashekhar M</au><au>Ghadi, Yogesh</au><au>Murthy, Vedang</au><au>Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of contemporary brachytherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Contemp Brachytherapy</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>507</epage><pages>503-507</pages><issn>1689-832X</issn><eissn>2081-2841</eissn><abstract>Penile cancer, although rare, is one of the common genitourinary cancers in India affecting mostly aged uncircumcised males. For patients presenting with small superficial lesions &lt; 3 cm restricted to glans, surgery, radical external radiation or brachytherapy may be offered, the latter being preferred as it allows organ and function preservation. In patients receiving brachytherapy, testicular morbidity is not commonly addressed. With an aim to minimize and document the doses to testis after adequate shielding during radical interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancers, we undertook this study in 2 patients undergoing brachytherapy and forms the basis of this report. Two patients with early stage penile cancer limited to the glans were treated with radical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using interstitial implant. A total of 7-8 tubes were implanted in two planes, parallel to the penile shaft. A total dose of 44-48 Gy (55-60 Gy EQD2 doses with α/β = 10) was delivered in 11-12 fractions of 4 Gy each delivered twice daily. Lead sheets adding to 11 mm (4-5 half value layer) were interposed between the penile shaft and scrotum. The testicular dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. For each patient, dosimetry was done for 3 fractions and mean calculated. The cumulative testicular dose to left and right testis was 31.68 cGy and 42.79 cGy for patient A, and 21.96 cGy and 23.28 cGy for patient B. For the same patients, the mean cumulative dose measured at the posterior aspect of penile shaft was 722.15 cGy and 807.72 cGy, amounting to 16.4% and 16.8% of the prescribed dose. Hence, the application of lead shield 11 mm thick reduced testicular dose from 722-808 cGy to 21.96-42.57 cGy, an "absolute reduction" of 95.99 ± 1.5%. With the use of a simple lead shield as described, we were able to effectively reduce testicular dose from "spermicidal" range to "oligospermic" range with possible reversibility.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Termedia Publishing House</pub><pmid>26816509</pmid><doi>10.5114/jcb.2015.56410</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1689-832X
ispartof Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2015, Vol.7 (6), p.503-507
issn 1689-832X
2081-2841
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4716126
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Case Report
title Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A13%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testicular%20shielding%20in%20penile%20brachytherapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20contemporary%20brachytherapy&rft.au=Bindal,%20Arpita&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=507&rft.pages=503-507&rft.issn=1689-832X&rft.eissn=2081-2841&rft_id=info:doi/10.5114/jcb.2015.56410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3986102541%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773539885&rft_id=info:pmid/26816509&rfr_iscdi=true