Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve
Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in cognitive psychology 2015, Vol.11 (4), p.147-155 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 155 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Advances in cognitive psychology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Tindle, Richard Longstaff, Mitchell G |
description | Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists of words before recalling them, and hearing lists of words and writing them as they heard them, then recalling them. The experiment involved serial recall of lists of 6 words. The hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled overall when writing was supported. Post-hoc analysis revealed the same pattern of results at individual serial positions (1 to 3). However, there was no difference between the three conditions at serial position 4, or between listening and writing at positions 5 and 6 which were both greater than recall in the reading condition. This suggests writing overloads working memory more than reading and listening, particularly in the early serial positions. The results show that writing interferes with working memory processes and so is not recommended when the goal is to immediately recall information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5709/acp-0179-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4710969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A452290648</galeid><sourcerecordid>A452290648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7e52e011dbf07062e6633699b20772a618e8ddfff25cbb38f9f3b4b6a842ea513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptktuKFDEQhhtR3IPe-AASEETEXpN0dw43wjDrCUZ28cBehnR3ZSZrOhmT7oF5ezO76zojkosc6qu_qMpfFM8IPms4lm91ty4x4bJkD4pjImRTEsLJw73zUXGS0jXGNadYPi6OKOMcU8GPi3QV7Wj98g36Crq_OWjfo4VNI_h8RefWGIjgR6ud26KLDUQXdI-uQvy5i3-BIcQtuoRoQhy07wDNuhhSQuMK0DeIOQ9dhpSrBI_mU9zAk-KR0S7B07v9tPjx4f33-adycfHx83y2KLsG12PJoaGACelbgzlmFBirKiZlSzHnVDMiQPS9MYY2XdtWwkhTtXXLtKgp6IZUp8W7W9311A7Qd7mJqJ1aRzvouFVBW3UY8XallmGjak6wZDILvLoTiOHXBGlUg00dOKc9hCkpwhkWvBaSZ_TFP-h1mKLP7SlaCYGrSlL8l1pqB8p6E3LdbieqZnVDqcSsFpk6-w-VVw-D7YIHY_P7QcLLvYQVaDeuUnDTbuTpEHx9C978UARzPwyC1c5LKntJ7bykWIaf74_vHv1jnuo3b7rD-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388033920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tindle, Richard ; Longstaff, Mitchell G</creator><creatorcontrib>Tindle, Richard ; Longstaff, Mitchell G</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists of words before recalling them, and hearing lists of words and writing them as they heard them, then recalling them. The experiment involved serial recall of lists of 6 words. The hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled overall when writing was supported. Post-hoc analysis revealed the same pattern of results at individual serial positions (1 to 3). However, there was no difference between the three conditions at serial position 4, or between listening and writing at positions 5 and 6 which were both greater than recall in the reading condition. This suggests writing overloads working memory more than reading and listening, particularly in the early serial positions. The results show that writing interferes with working memory processes and so is not recommended when the goal is to immediately recall information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1895-1171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1895-1171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5709/acp-0179-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26770287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: University of Finance and Management in Warsaw</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cognitive load ; Listening ; Memory ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological research ; Reading ; Short-term memory ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Advances in cognitive psychology, 2015, Vol.11 (4), p.147-155</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 University of Finance and Management in Warsaw</rights><rights>2015. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2015 University of Finance and Management in Warsaw 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7e52e011dbf07062e6633699b20772a618e8ddfff25cbb38f9f3b4b6a842ea513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710969/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710969/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,4025,27925,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tindle, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longstaff, Mitchell G</creatorcontrib><title>Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve</title><title>Advances in cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Adv Cogn Psychol</addtitle><description>Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists of words before recalling them, and hearing lists of words and writing them as they heard them, then recalling them. The experiment involved serial recall of lists of 6 words. The hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled overall when writing was supported. Post-hoc analysis revealed the same pattern of results at individual serial positions (1 to 3). However, there was no difference between the three conditions at serial position 4, or between listening and writing at positions 5 and 6 which were both greater than recall in the reading condition. This suggests writing overloads working memory more than reading and listening, particularly in the early serial positions. The results show that writing interferes with working memory processes and so is not recommended when the goal is to immediately recall information.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cognitive load</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Short-term memory</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1895-1171</issn><issn>1895-1171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptktuKFDEQhhtR3IPe-AASEETEXpN0dw43wjDrCUZ28cBehnR3ZSZrOhmT7oF5ezO76zojkosc6qu_qMpfFM8IPms4lm91ty4x4bJkD4pjImRTEsLJw73zUXGS0jXGNadYPi6OKOMcU8GPi3QV7Wj98g36Crq_OWjfo4VNI_h8RefWGIjgR6ud26KLDUQXdI-uQvy5i3-BIcQtuoRoQhy07wDNuhhSQuMK0DeIOQ9dhpSrBI_mU9zAk-KR0S7B07v9tPjx4f33-adycfHx83y2KLsG12PJoaGACelbgzlmFBirKiZlSzHnVDMiQPS9MYY2XdtWwkhTtXXLtKgp6IZUp8W7W9311A7Qd7mJqJ1aRzvouFVBW3UY8XallmGjak6wZDILvLoTiOHXBGlUg00dOKc9hCkpwhkWvBaSZ_TFP-h1mKLP7SlaCYGrSlL8l1pqB8p6E3LdbieqZnVDqcSsFpk6-w-VVw-D7YIHY_P7QcLLvYQVaDeuUnDTbuTpEHx9C978UARzPwyC1c5LKntJ7bykWIaf74_vHv1jnuo3b7rD-A</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Tindle, Richard</creator><creator>Longstaff, Mitchell G</creator><general>University of Finance and Management in Warsaw</general><general>Vizja Press & IT</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve</title><author>Tindle, Richard ; Longstaff, Mitchell G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7e52e011dbf07062e6633699b20772a618e8ddfff25cbb38f9f3b4b6a842ea513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cognitive load</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Short-term memory</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tindle, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longstaff, Mitchell G</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tindle, Richard</au><au>Longstaff, Mitchell G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve</atitle><jtitle>Advances in cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Cogn Psychol</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>147-155</pages><issn>1895-1171</issn><eissn>1895-1171</eissn><abstract>Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists of words before recalling them, and hearing lists of words and writing them as they heard them, then recalling them. The experiment involved serial recall of lists of 6 words. The hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled overall when writing was supported. Post-hoc analysis revealed the same pattern of results at individual serial positions (1 to 3). However, there was no difference between the three conditions at serial position 4, or between listening and writing at positions 5 and 6 which were both greater than recall in the reading condition. This suggests writing overloads working memory more than reading and listening, particularly in the early serial positions. The results show that writing interferes with working memory processes and so is not recommended when the goal is to immediately recall information.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>University of Finance and Management in Warsaw</pub><pmid>26770287</pmid><doi>10.5709/acp-0179-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1895-1171 |
ispartof | Advances in cognitive psychology, 2015, Vol.11 (4), p.147-155 |
issn | 1895-1171 1895-1171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4710969 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Cognitive load Listening Memory Psychological aspects Psychological research Reading Short-term memory Writing |
title | Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T01%3A50%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Writing,%20Reading,%20and%20Listening%20Differentially%20Overload%20Working%20Memory%20Performance%20Across%20the%20Serial%20Position%20Curve&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Tindle,%20Richard&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=147-155&rft.issn=1895-1171&rft.eissn=1895-1171&rft_id=info:doi/10.5709/acp-0179-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA452290648%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388033920&rft_id=info:pmid/26770287&rft_galeid=A452290648&rfr_iscdi=true |