Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve

Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in cognitive psychology 2015, Vol.11 (4), p.147-155
Hauptverfasser: Tindle, Richard, Longstaff, Mitchell G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 155
container_issue 4
container_start_page 147
container_title Advances in cognitive psychology
container_volume 11
creator Tindle, Richard
Longstaff, Mitchell G
description Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists of words before recalling them, and hearing lists of words and writing them as they heard them, then recalling them. The experiment involved serial recall of lists of 6 words. The hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled overall when writing was supported. Post-hoc analysis revealed the same pattern of results at individual serial positions (1 to 3). However, there was no difference between the three conditions at serial position 4, or between listening and writing at positions 5 and 6 which were both greater than recall in the reading condition. This suggests writing overloads working memory more than reading and listening, particularly in the early serial positions. The results show that writing interferes with working memory processes and so is not recommended when the goal is to immediately recall information.
doi_str_mv 10.5709/acp-0179-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4710969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A452290648</galeid><sourcerecordid>A452290648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7e52e011dbf07062e6633699b20772a618e8ddfff25cbb38f9f3b4b6a842ea513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptktuKFDEQhhtR3IPe-AASEETEXpN0dw43wjDrCUZ28cBehnR3ZSZrOhmT7oF5ezO76zojkosc6qu_qMpfFM8IPms4lm91ty4x4bJkD4pjImRTEsLJw73zUXGS0jXGNadYPi6OKOMcU8GPi3QV7Wj98g36Crq_OWjfo4VNI_h8RefWGIjgR6ud26KLDUQXdI-uQvy5i3-BIcQtuoRoQhy07wDNuhhSQuMK0DeIOQ9dhpSrBI_mU9zAk-KR0S7B07v9tPjx4f33-adycfHx83y2KLsG12PJoaGACelbgzlmFBirKiZlSzHnVDMiQPS9MYY2XdtWwkhTtXXLtKgp6IZUp8W7W9311A7Qd7mJqJ1aRzvouFVBW3UY8XallmGjak6wZDILvLoTiOHXBGlUg00dOKc9hCkpwhkWvBaSZ_TFP-h1mKLP7SlaCYGrSlL8l1pqB8p6E3LdbieqZnVDqcSsFpk6-w-VVw-D7YIHY_P7QcLLvYQVaDeuUnDTbuTpEHx9C978UARzPwyC1c5LKntJ7bykWIaf74_vHv1jnuo3b7rD-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388033920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tindle, Richard ; Longstaff, Mitchell G</creator><creatorcontrib>Tindle, Richard ; Longstaff, Mitchell G</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists of words before recalling them, and hearing lists of words and writing them as they heard them, then recalling them. The experiment involved serial recall of lists of 6 words. The hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled overall when writing was supported. Post-hoc analysis revealed the same pattern of results at individual serial positions (1 to 3). However, there was no difference between the three conditions at serial position 4, or between listening and writing at positions 5 and 6 which were both greater than recall in the reading condition. This suggests writing overloads working memory more than reading and listening, particularly in the early serial positions. The results show that writing interferes with working memory processes and so is not recommended when the goal is to immediately recall information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1895-1171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1895-1171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5709/acp-0179-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26770287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: University of Finance and Management in Warsaw</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cognitive load ; Listening ; Memory ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological research ; Reading ; Short-term memory ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Advances in cognitive psychology, 2015, Vol.11 (4), p.147-155</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 University of Finance and Management in Warsaw</rights><rights>2015. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2015 University of Finance and Management in Warsaw 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7e52e011dbf07062e6633699b20772a618e8ddfff25cbb38f9f3b4b6a842ea513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710969/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710969/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,4025,27925,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tindle, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longstaff, Mitchell G</creatorcontrib><title>Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve</title><title>Advances in cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Adv Cogn Psychol</addtitle><description>Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists of words before recalling them, and hearing lists of words and writing them as they heard them, then recalling them. The experiment involved serial recall of lists of 6 words. The hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled overall when writing was supported. Post-hoc analysis revealed the same pattern of results at individual serial positions (1 to 3). However, there was no difference between the three conditions at serial position 4, or between listening and writing at positions 5 and 6 which were both greater than recall in the reading condition. This suggests writing overloads working memory more than reading and listening, particularly in the early serial positions. The results show that writing interferes with working memory processes and so is not recommended when the goal is to immediately recall information.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cognitive load</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Short-term memory</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1895-1171</issn><issn>1895-1171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptktuKFDEQhhtR3IPe-AASEETEXpN0dw43wjDrCUZ28cBehnR3ZSZrOhmT7oF5ezO76zojkosc6qu_qMpfFM8IPms4lm91ty4x4bJkD4pjImRTEsLJw73zUXGS0jXGNadYPi6OKOMcU8GPi3QV7Wj98g36Crq_OWjfo4VNI_h8RefWGIjgR6ud26KLDUQXdI-uQvy5i3-BIcQtuoRoQhy07wDNuhhSQuMK0DeIOQ9dhpSrBI_mU9zAk-KR0S7B07v9tPjx4f33-adycfHx83y2KLsG12PJoaGACelbgzlmFBirKiZlSzHnVDMiQPS9MYY2XdtWwkhTtXXLtKgp6IZUp8W7W9311A7Qd7mJqJ1aRzvouFVBW3UY8XallmGjak6wZDILvLoTiOHXBGlUg00dOKc9hCkpwhkWvBaSZ_TFP-h1mKLP7SlaCYGrSlL8l1pqB8p6E3LdbieqZnVDqcSsFpk6-w-VVw-D7YIHY_P7QcLLvYQVaDeuUnDTbuTpEHx9C978UARzPwyC1c5LKntJ7bykWIaf74_vHv1jnuo3b7rD-A</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Tindle, Richard</creator><creator>Longstaff, Mitchell G</creator><general>University of Finance and Management in Warsaw</general><general>Vizja Press &amp; IT</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve</title><author>Tindle, Richard ; Longstaff, Mitchell G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7e52e011dbf07062e6633699b20772a618e8ddfff25cbb38f9f3b4b6a842ea513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cognitive load</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Short-term memory</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tindle, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longstaff, Mitchell G</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tindle, Richard</au><au>Longstaff, Mitchell G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve</atitle><jtitle>Advances in cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Cogn Psychol</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>147-155</pages><issn>1895-1171</issn><eissn>1895-1171</eissn><abstract>Previous research has assumed that writing is a cognitively complex task, but has not determined if writing overloads Working Memory more than reading and listening. To investigate this, participants completed three recall tasks. These were reading lists of words before recalling them, hearing lists of words before recalling them, and hearing lists of words and writing them as they heard them, then recalling them. The experiment involved serial recall of lists of 6 words. The hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled overall when writing was supported. Post-hoc analysis revealed the same pattern of results at individual serial positions (1 to 3). However, there was no difference between the three conditions at serial position 4, or between listening and writing at positions 5 and 6 which were both greater than recall in the reading condition. This suggests writing overloads working memory more than reading and listening, particularly in the early serial positions. The results show that writing interferes with working memory processes and so is not recommended when the goal is to immediately recall information.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>University of Finance and Management in Warsaw</pub><pmid>26770287</pmid><doi>10.5709/acp-0179-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1895-1171
ispartof Advances in cognitive psychology, 2015, Vol.11 (4), p.147-155
issn 1895-1171
1895-1171
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4710969
source PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Cognitive load
Listening
Memory
Psychological aspects
Psychological research
Reading
Short-term memory
Writing
title Writing, Reading, and Listening Differentially Overload Working Memory Performance Across the Serial Position Curve
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T01%3A50%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Writing,%20Reading,%20and%20Listening%20Differentially%20Overload%20Working%20Memory%20Performance%20Across%20the%20Serial%20Position%20Curve&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Tindle,%20Richard&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=147-155&rft.issn=1895-1171&rft.eissn=1895-1171&rft_id=info:doi/10.5709/acp-0179-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA452290648%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388033920&rft_id=info:pmid/26770287&rft_galeid=A452290648&rfr_iscdi=true