Evaluation of risk factors and treatment options in patients with ureteral stricture disease at a single institution
Ureteral strictures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, resulting in potential kidney damage requiring several surgical procedures. Non-malignant causes include radiation, trauma from calculi impaction, pelvic surgery, or ureteroscopy (URS). We identified risk factors in our patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Urological Association journal 2015-11, Vol.9 (11-12), p.E921-E924 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E924 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11-12 |
container_start_page | E921 |
container_title | Canadian Urological Association journal |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Tran, Henry Arsovska, Olga Paterson, Ryan F Chew, Ben H |
description | Ureteral strictures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, resulting in potential kidney damage requiring several surgical procedures. Non-malignant causes include radiation, trauma from calculi impaction, pelvic surgery, or ureteroscopy (URS). We identified risk factors in our patients with ureteral strictures and the success of their treatment outcomes.
A retrospective chart review of 25 patients with 29 ureteral strictures was performed to determine the success of their treatment.
Twenty-five (25) patients with 29 benign ureteral strictures were identified. Most cases (60%) were caused by impacted stones where the median stone size was 1.15 cm (0.37-1.8 cm). Intervention for stones prior to stricture development included shockwave lithotripsy, URS, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Five patients with strictures from impacted stones had ureteric complications during stone treatment including perforation +/- urinoma (n=3), fractured guidewire left in situ (n=1), and ureteric orifice resection (n=1). Other stricture etiologies included radiation (28%) and endometriosis (4%). Treatment modalities used included ureteroureterostomy (n=2), ureteral re-implant (n=3), urinary diversion (n=3), autotrasplant (n=1), laser endoureterotomy +/- balloon dilation (n=8), nephrectomy (n=2), balloon dilation +/- stent (n=3), ureterovesical junction (UVJ) resection + stent (n=1), chronic stent changes (n=4), or surveillance (n=3).
Our evaluation highlights important principles. Patients with complicated ureteroscopies or severely impacted calculi warrant close followup with imaging after stone treatment due to possibility of rapid renal deterioration from stricture formation. Radiation-induced strictures are difficult to manage, possibly requiring subsequent urinary diversion. Finally, endoscopic management of benign ureteral strictures via balloon dilation and laser endoureterotomy is an excellent choice in properly selected patients, with opportunity for subsequent salvage treatments if needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5489/cuaj.3057 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4707921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A444046248</galeid><sourcerecordid>A444046248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-fa617ace97c0eabd7987079e012af44cb3d3591b98a0c2ff9068fe40452ed5ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw4A8gCyQEh13sxPnwpVJVFahUwQE4WxNnvOuSxKnHKfDvcWipdqWVD_aMn3k9Gr9Z9lLwdSkb9cHMcL0ueFk_yo6FyvlK5EI-Xs5CrCpZ86PsGdE151XK1E-zo7yqmyaX4jiLF7fQzxCdH5m3LDj6ySyY6AMxGDsWA0IccIzMTwtEzI1sSnxKEfvl4pbNASMG6BnF4ExMIescIRAyiAwYuXHTY6qj6OK8iDzPnljoCV_c7yfZj48X388_r66-fro8P7taGalUXFmoRA0GVW04QtvVqql5rZCLHKyUpi26olSiVQ1wk1ureNVYlFyWOXYltMVJdnqnO83tgJ1JPac-9RTcAOGP9uD0_s3otnrjb7Vc3slFEnh3LxD8zYwU9eDIYN_DiH4mLeqKK1EIoRL65g7dQI_ajdYnRbPg-kzK1FSVyyZRrw9QZnI3ehdaH4DS6nBwxo9oXcrvqb7fK0hMxN9xAzORvvz2ZZ99u8NuEfq4Jd__-xc6KGqCJwpoH-YmuF5spxfb6cV2iX21O-gH8r_Pir9iCdMt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760913119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of risk factors and treatment options in patients with ureteral stricture disease at a single institution</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek</source><creator>Tran, Henry ; Arsovska, Olga ; Paterson, Ryan F ; Chew, Ben H</creator><creatorcontrib>Tran, Henry ; Arsovska, Olga ; Paterson, Ryan F ; Chew, Ben H</creatorcontrib><description>Ureteral strictures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, resulting in potential kidney damage requiring several surgical procedures. Non-malignant causes include radiation, trauma from calculi impaction, pelvic surgery, or ureteroscopy (URS). We identified risk factors in our patients with ureteral strictures and the success of their treatment outcomes.
A retrospective chart review of 25 patients with 29 ureteral strictures was performed to determine the success of their treatment.
Twenty-five (25) patients with 29 benign ureteral strictures were identified. Most cases (60%) were caused by impacted stones where the median stone size was 1.15 cm (0.37-1.8 cm). Intervention for stones prior to stricture development included shockwave lithotripsy, URS, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Five patients with strictures from impacted stones had ureteric complications during stone treatment including perforation +/- urinoma (n=3), fractured guidewire left in situ (n=1), and ureteric orifice resection (n=1). Other stricture etiologies included radiation (28%) and endometriosis (4%). Treatment modalities used included ureteroureterostomy (n=2), ureteral re-implant (n=3), urinary diversion (n=3), autotrasplant (n=1), laser endoureterotomy +/- balloon dilation (n=8), nephrectomy (n=2), balloon dilation +/- stent (n=3), ureterovesical junction (UVJ) resection + stent (n=1), chronic stent changes (n=4), or surveillance (n=3).
Our evaluation highlights important principles. Patients with complicated ureteroscopies or severely impacted calculi warrant close followup with imaging after stone treatment due to possibility of rapid renal deterioration from stricture formation. Radiation-induced strictures are difficult to manage, possibly requiring subsequent urinary diversion. Finally, endoscopic management of benign ureteral strictures via balloon dilation and laser endoureterotomy is an excellent choice in properly selected patients, with opportunity for subsequent salvage treatments if needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-6470</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1920-1214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1920-1214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26788241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Canadian Urological Association</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Case Series ; Complications and side effects ; Ischemia ; Patient outcomes ; Ureterocele</subject><ispartof>Canadian Urological Association journal, 2015-11, Vol.9 (11-12), p.E921-E924</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Canadian Urological Association</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2015 Canadian Urological Association or its licensors 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-fa617ace97c0eabd7987079e012af44cb3d3591b98a0c2ff9068fe40452ed5ab3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707921/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707921/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tran, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arsovska, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Ryan F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Ben H</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of risk factors and treatment options in patients with ureteral stricture disease at a single institution</title><title>Canadian Urological Association journal</title><addtitle>Can Urol Assoc J</addtitle><description>Ureteral strictures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, resulting in potential kidney damage requiring several surgical procedures. Non-malignant causes include radiation, trauma from calculi impaction, pelvic surgery, or ureteroscopy (URS). We identified risk factors in our patients with ureteral strictures and the success of their treatment outcomes.
A retrospective chart review of 25 patients with 29 ureteral strictures was performed to determine the success of their treatment.
Twenty-five (25) patients with 29 benign ureteral strictures were identified. Most cases (60%) were caused by impacted stones where the median stone size was 1.15 cm (0.37-1.8 cm). Intervention for stones prior to stricture development included shockwave lithotripsy, URS, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Five patients with strictures from impacted stones had ureteric complications during stone treatment including perforation +/- urinoma (n=3), fractured guidewire left in situ (n=1), and ureteric orifice resection (n=1). Other stricture etiologies included radiation (28%) and endometriosis (4%). Treatment modalities used included ureteroureterostomy (n=2), ureteral re-implant (n=3), urinary diversion (n=3), autotrasplant (n=1), laser endoureterotomy +/- balloon dilation (n=8), nephrectomy (n=2), balloon dilation +/- stent (n=3), ureterovesical junction (UVJ) resection + stent (n=1), chronic stent changes (n=4), or surveillance (n=3).
Our evaluation highlights important principles. Patients with complicated ureteroscopies or severely impacted calculi warrant close followup with imaging after stone treatment due to possibility of rapid renal deterioration from stricture formation. Radiation-induced strictures are difficult to manage, possibly requiring subsequent urinary diversion. Finally, endoscopic management of benign ureteral strictures via balloon dilation and laser endoureterotomy is an excellent choice in properly selected patients, with opportunity for subsequent salvage treatments if needed.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Case Series</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Ureterocele</subject><issn>1911-6470</issn><issn>1920-1214</issn><issn>1920-1214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw4A8gCyQEh13sxPnwpVJVFahUwQE4WxNnvOuSxKnHKfDvcWipdqWVD_aMn3k9Gr9Z9lLwdSkb9cHMcL0ueFk_yo6FyvlK5EI-Xs5CrCpZ86PsGdE151XK1E-zo7yqmyaX4jiLF7fQzxCdH5m3LDj6ySyY6AMxGDsWA0IccIzMTwtEzI1sSnxKEfvl4pbNASMG6BnF4ExMIescIRAyiAwYuXHTY6qj6OK8iDzPnljoCV_c7yfZj48X388_r66-fro8P7taGalUXFmoRA0GVW04QtvVqql5rZCLHKyUpi26olSiVQ1wk1ureNVYlFyWOXYltMVJdnqnO83tgJ1JPac-9RTcAOGP9uD0_s3otnrjb7Vc3slFEnh3LxD8zYwU9eDIYN_DiH4mLeqKK1EIoRL65g7dQI_ajdYnRbPg-kzK1FSVyyZRrw9QZnI3ehdaH4DS6nBwxo9oXcrvqb7fK0hMxN9xAzORvvz2ZZ99u8NuEfq4Jd__-xc6KGqCJwpoH-YmuF5spxfb6cV2iX21O-gH8r_Pir9iCdMt</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Tran, Henry</creator><creator>Arsovska, Olga</creator><creator>Paterson, Ryan F</creator><creator>Chew, Ben H</creator><general>Canadian Urological Association</general><general>Canadian Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of risk factors and treatment options in patients with ureteral stricture disease at a single institution</title><author>Tran, Henry ; Arsovska, Olga ; Paterson, Ryan F ; Chew, Ben H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-fa617ace97c0eabd7987079e012af44cb3d3591b98a0c2ff9068fe40452ed5ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Case Series</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Ureterocele</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tran, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arsovska, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Ryan F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Ben H</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Urological Association journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tran, Henry</au><au>Arsovska, Olga</au><au>Paterson, Ryan F</au><au>Chew, Ben H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of risk factors and treatment options in patients with ureteral stricture disease at a single institution</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Urological Association journal</jtitle><addtitle>Can Urol Assoc J</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11-12</issue><spage>E921</spage><epage>E924</epage><pages>E921-E924</pages><issn>1911-6470</issn><issn>1920-1214</issn><eissn>1920-1214</eissn><abstract>Ureteral strictures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, resulting in potential kidney damage requiring several surgical procedures. Non-malignant causes include radiation, trauma from calculi impaction, pelvic surgery, or ureteroscopy (URS). We identified risk factors in our patients with ureteral strictures and the success of their treatment outcomes.
A retrospective chart review of 25 patients with 29 ureteral strictures was performed to determine the success of their treatment.
Twenty-five (25) patients with 29 benign ureteral strictures were identified. Most cases (60%) were caused by impacted stones where the median stone size was 1.15 cm (0.37-1.8 cm). Intervention for stones prior to stricture development included shockwave lithotripsy, URS, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Five patients with strictures from impacted stones had ureteric complications during stone treatment including perforation +/- urinoma (n=3), fractured guidewire left in situ (n=1), and ureteric orifice resection (n=1). Other stricture etiologies included radiation (28%) and endometriosis (4%). Treatment modalities used included ureteroureterostomy (n=2), ureteral re-implant (n=3), urinary diversion (n=3), autotrasplant (n=1), laser endoureterotomy +/- balloon dilation (n=8), nephrectomy (n=2), balloon dilation +/- stent (n=3), ureterovesical junction (UVJ) resection + stent (n=1), chronic stent changes (n=4), or surveillance (n=3).
Our evaluation highlights important principles. Patients with complicated ureteroscopies or severely impacted calculi warrant close followup with imaging after stone treatment due to possibility of rapid renal deterioration from stricture formation. Radiation-induced strictures are difficult to manage, possibly requiring subsequent urinary diversion. Finally, endoscopic management of benign ureteral strictures via balloon dilation and laser endoureterotomy is an excellent choice in properly selected patients, with opportunity for subsequent salvage treatments if needed.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Canadian Urological Association</pub><pmid>26788241</pmid><doi>10.5489/cuaj.3057</doi><tpages>E921</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1911-6470 |
ispartof | Canadian Urological Association journal, 2015-11, Vol.9 (11-12), p.E921-E924 |
issn | 1911-6470 1920-1214 1920-1214 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4707921 |
source | NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek |
subjects | Care and treatment Case Series Complications and side effects Ischemia Patient outcomes Ureterocele |
title | Evaluation of risk factors and treatment options in patients with ureteral stricture disease at a single institution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A36%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20risk%20factors%20and%20treatment%20options%20in%20patients%20with%20ureteral%20stricture%20disease%20at%20a%20single%20institution&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Urological%20Association%20journal&rft.au=Tran,%20Henry&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=E921&rft.epage=E924&rft.pages=E921-E924&rft.issn=1911-6470&rft.eissn=1920-1214&rft_id=info:doi/10.5489/cuaj.3057&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA444046248%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760913119&rft_id=info:pmid/26788241&rft_galeid=A444046248&rfr_iscdi=true |