Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A netw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 2016-01, Vol.60 (1), p.376-386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 386 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 376 |
container_title | Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Zhao, Ying Jiao Khoo, Ai Leng Tan, Gloria Teng, Monica Tee, Caroline Tan, Ban Hock Ong, Benjamin Lim, Boon Peng Chai, Louis Yi Ann |
description | Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/AAC.01985-15 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4704197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1753011405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a517t-ed1d1fa3f30f4e76df137825b6133a65704c8b2029dc7c80467cf19b9f1827993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkFvEzEUhC0Eomnhxhn5CFK32N717vqCFEUNRCqQA3C1Xrx24-K1g70bSP8KfxanaUs5IHGyxm_0yfPGCL2g5IxS1r6ZTmdnhIqWF5Q_QhNKRFvUXNSP0YSQui6qllRH6DilK5I1F-QpOmI1Z7xp2QT9-qiHHyF-wx_0AAV4cLtkEwbf4eUaYg8qaBV86K3C51twIww2eBwMnrsxD-A6OH2KF0OEP2oZ0gO1Z30N0d7dYOvxwm8h2a3G89FfgsvaaHVDXsawWe8c_LTpGXpiwCX9_PY8QV_m559n74uLT-8Ws-lFAZw2Q6E72lEDpSmJqXRTd4aWORtf1bQsoeYNqVS7YoSJTjUqb6NulKFiJQxtWSNEeYLeHribcdXrTmmf0zi5ibaHuJMBrPx74u1aXoatrDKaiiYDXt0CYvg-6jTI3ialnQOvw5gkbXjLqpYx-j_WklBaEZ6tpweriiGlqM39iyiR--plrl7eVC_p3v76YIfUM3kVxpjLTP_yvnyY-B589y_K38czuYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1753011405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhao, Ying Jiao ; Khoo, Ai Leng ; Tan, Gloria ; Teng, Monica ; Tee, Caroline ; Tan, Ban Hock ; Ong, Benjamin ; Lim, Boon Peng ; Chai, Louis Yi Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ying Jiao ; Khoo, Ai Leng ; Tan, Gloria ; Teng, Monica ; Tee, Caroline ; Tan, Ban Hock ; Ong, Benjamin ; Lim, Boon Peng ; Chai, Louis Yi Ann</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-4804</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1098-6596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01985-15</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26525782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antifungal Agents ; Antifungal Agents - economics ; Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use ; Aspergillus - drug effects ; Aspergillus - growth & development ; Candida - drug effects ; Candida - growth & development ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Fluconazole - economics ; Fluconazole - therapeutic use ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - economics ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - mortality ; Humans ; Itraconazole - economics ; Itraconazole - therapeutic use ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - economics ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - microbiology ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Economic ; Mycoses ; Mycoses - drug therapy ; Mycoses - economics ; Mycoses - microbiology ; Mycoses - mortality ; Pharmacology ; Singapore ; Survival Analysis ; Triazoles - economics ; Triazoles - therapeutic use ; Voriconazole - economics ; Voriconazole - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016-01, Vol.60 (1), p.376-386</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. 2015 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a517t-ed1d1fa3f30f4e76df137825b6133a65704c8b2029dc7c80467cf19b9f1827993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a517t-ed1d1fa3f30f4e76df137825b6133a65704c8b2029dc7c80467cf19b9f1827993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4704197/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4704197/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26525782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ying Jiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Ai Leng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tee, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ban Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Boon Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, Louis Yi Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis</title><title>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</title><addtitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</addtitle><addtitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</addtitle><description>Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - economics</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Aspergillus - drug effects</subject><subject>Aspergillus - growth & development</subject><subject>Candida - drug effects</subject><subject>Candida - growth & development</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluconazole - economics</subject><subject>Fluconazole - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - economics</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Itraconazole - economics</subject><subject>Itraconazole - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - economics</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - microbiology</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - mortality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Mycoses</subject><subject>Mycoses - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mycoses - economics</subject><subject>Mycoses - microbiology</subject><subject>Mycoses - mortality</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Singapore</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Triazoles - economics</subject><subject>Triazoles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Voriconazole - economics</subject><subject>Voriconazole - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0066-4804</issn><issn>1098-6596</issn><issn>1098-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkFvEzEUhC0Eomnhxhn5CFK32N717vqCFEUNRCqQA3C1Xrx24-K1g70bSP8KfxanaUs5IHGyxm_0yfPGCL2g5IxS1r6ZTmdnhIqWF5Q_QhNKRFvUXNSP0YSQui6qllRH6DilK5I1F-QpOmI1Z7xp2QT9-qiHHyF-wx_0AAV4cLtkEwbf4eUaYg8qaBV86K3C51twIww2eBwMnrsxD-A6OH2KF0OEP2oZ0gO1Z30N0d7dYOvxwm8h2a3G89FfgsvaaHVDXsawWe8c_LTpGXpiwCX9_PY8QV_m559n74uLT-8Ws-lFAZw2Q6E72lEDpSmJqXRTd4aWORtf1bQsoeYNqVS7YoSJTjUqb6NulKFiJQxtWSNEeYLeHribcdXrTmmf0zi5ibaHuJMBrPx74u1aXoatrDKaiiYDXt0CYvg-6jTI3ialnQOvw5gkbXjLqpYx-j_WklBaEZ6tpweriiGlqM39iyiR--plrl7eVC_p3v76YIfUM3kVxpjLTP_yvnyY-B589y_K38czuYA</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Zhao, Ying Jiao</creator><creator>Khoo, Ai Leng</creator><creator>Tan, Gloria</creator><creator>Teng, Monica</creator><creator>Tee, Caroline</creator><creator>Tan, Ban Hock</creator><creator>Ong, Benjamin</creator><creator>Lim, Boon Peng</creator><creator>Chai, Louis Yi Ann</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis</title><author>Zhao, Ying Jiao ; Khoo, Ai Leng ; Tan, Gloria ; Teng, Monica ; Tee, Caroline ; Tan, Ban Hock ; Ong, Benjamin ; Lim, Boon Peng ; Chai, Louis Yi Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a517t-ed1d1fa3f30f4e76df137825b6133a65704c8b2029dc7c80467cf19b9f1827993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - economics</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Aspergillus - drug effects</topic><topic>Aspergillus - growth & development</topic><topic>Candida - drug effects</topic><topic>Candida - growth & development</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluconazole - economics</topic><topic>Fluconazole - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - economics</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Itraconazole - economics</topic><topic>Itraconazole - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - economics</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - microbiology</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - mortality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Mycoses</topic><topic>Mycoses - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mycoses - economics</topic><topic>Mycoses - microbiology</topic><topic>Mycoses - mortality</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Singapore</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Triazoles - economics</topic><topic>Triazoles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Voriconazole - economics</topic><topic>Voriconazole - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Ying Jiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Ai Leng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tee, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ban Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Boon Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, Louis Yi Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Ying Jiao</au><au>Khoo, Ai Leng</au><au>Tan, Gloria</au><au>Teng, Monica</au><au>Tee, Caroline</au><au>Tan, Ban Hock</au><au>Ong, Benjamin</au><au>Lim, Boon Peng</au><au>Chai, Louis Yi Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis</atitle><jtitle>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</jtitle><stitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</stitle><addtitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>376-386</pages><issn>0066-4804</issn><issn>1098-6596</issn><eissn>1098-6596</eissn><abstract>Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>26525782</pmid><doi>10.1128/AAC.01985-15</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0066-4804 |
ispartof | Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016-01, Vol.60 (1), p.376-386 |
issn | 0066-4804 1098-6596 1098-6596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4704197 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Antifungal Agents Antifungal Agents - economics Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use Aspergillus - drug effects Aspergillus - growth & development Candida - drug effects Candida - growth & development Cost-Benefit Analysis Female Fluconazole - economics Fluconazole - therapeutic use Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - economics Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - mortality Humans Itraconazole - economics Itraconazole - therapeutic use Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - economics Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - microbiology Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - mortality Male Middle Aged Models, Economic Mycoses Mycoses - drug therapy Mycoses - economics Mycoses - microbiology Mycoses - mortality Pharmacology Singapore Survival Analysis Triazoles - economics Triazoles - therapeutic use Voriconazole - economics Voriconazole - therapeutic use |
title | Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A38%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Network%20Meta-analysis%20and%20Pharmacoeconomic%20Evaluation%20of%20Fluconazole,%20Itraconazole,%20Posaconazole,%20and%20Voriconazole%20in%20Invasive%20Fungal%20Infection%20Prophylaxis&rft.jtitle=Antimicrobial%20agents%20and%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Zhao,%20Ying%20Jiao&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=376-386&rft.issn=0066-4804&rft.eissn=1098-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/AAC.01985-15&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1753011405%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1753011405&rft_id=info:pmid/26525782&rfr_iscdi=true |