Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF) in revision and primary cases. In a retrospective study, we compared the clinical and radiological results of MI-PLIF for lytic spondylolisthesis (n = 28) and r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2016-01, Vol.11 (1), p.2-2, Article 2 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 2 |
| container_title | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Hentenaar, B Spoor, A B de Waal Malefijt, J Diekerhof, C H den Oudsten, B L |
| description | The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF) in revision and primary cases.
In a retrospective study, we compared the clinical and radiological results of MI-PLIF for lytic spondylolisthesis (n = 28) and recurrent radiculopathy after herniated disc surgery (n = 28). Clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Quality of life was assessed with the Euroqol-5d (EQ5D), the EQ5D VAS and the WHOQOL-BREF.
The follow-up was 5.1 (SD 2.3) years. The decrease in VAS scores was significant and comparable in both groups. We found significantly better ODI and quality of life scores for the patients with lytic spondylolisthesis. The radiological outcome showed only one non-union, and subsidence occurred in both groups at an equal amount.
The MI-PLIF technique is a safe procedure with only few complications and a high fusion rate. It was successful in both groups, but the quality of life and ODI are better in primary cases. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13018-015-0337-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4700646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A451358863</galeid><sourcerecordid>A451358863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-910f2f3020172b6be57afe44ec83450b6739a45aed7c93508e6a04f3347e444f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUs2L1DAUL6K46-of4EUCXrx0TZqkaS_CMvgFC14UvIU0fRmzpMmYTAsF_3jf7IzrrkgOSd7v4-WFX1W9ZPSSsa59WxinrKspkzXlXNXro-qcKdHXqu-_P753PquelXJDqaSyE0-rs6ZVTUcZP69-bYKP3ppATBxJNqNPIW1vC2ne2zQBSY5MyJlMCCvxcTHFL0B2qewh-5RJmKfBZETwPqRxJW4uPkUskF1GWV7JArnMhWRY_C1U5ryFvD6vnjgTCrw47RfVtw_vv24-1ddfPn7eXF3XVvRiX_eMusZx2lCmmqEdQCrjQAiwHReSDq3ivRHSwKhszyXtoDVUOM6FQhYeLqp3R9_dPEwwWoj7bII-vU4n4_VDJPofepsWLRSlrWjR4M3JIKefM5S9nnyxEIKJkOaimZKCdhIbIvX1P9SbNOeI4yFLCcoYk-wva2sCaB9dwr72YKqvBOKy61qOrMv_sHCNMHmbIjiP9QcCdhTYnErJ4O5mZFQfIqOPkdEYGX2IjF5R8-r-59wp_mSE_wZPR77o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774011151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Hentenaar, B ; Spoor, A B ; de Waal Malefijt, J ; Diekerhof, C H ; den Oudsten, B L</creator><creatorcontrib>Hentenaar, B ; Spoor, A B ; de Waal Malefijt, J ; Diekerhof, C H ; den Oudsten, B L</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF) in revision and primary cases.
In a retrospective study, we compared the clinical and radiological results of MI-PLIF for lytic spondylolisthesis (n = 28) and recurrent radiculopathy after herniated disc surgery (n = 28). Clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Quality of life was assessed with the Euroqol-5d (EQ5D), the EQ5D VAS and the WHOQOL-BREF.
The follow-up was 5.1 (SD 2.3) years. The decrease in VAS scores was significant and comparable in both groups. We found significantly better ODI and quality of life scores for the patients with lytic spondylolisthesis. The radiological outcome showed only one non-union, and subsidence occurred in both groups at an equal amount.
The MI-PLIF technique is a safe procedure with only few complications and a high fusion rate. It was successful in both groups, but the quality of life and ODI are better in primary cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-799X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-799X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0337-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26728013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fractures ; Gender ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Orthopedics ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Patients ; Quality of life ; Radiculopathy - etiology ; Radiculopathy - surgery ; Recurrence ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Spine ; Spondylolisthesis - surgery ; Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2016-01, Vol.11 (1), p.2-2, Article 2</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>Hentenaar et al. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-910f2f3020172b6be57afe44ec83450b6739a45aed7c93508e6a04f3347e444f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-910f2f3020172b6be57afe44ec83450b6739a45aed7c93508e6a04f3347e444f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700646/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700646/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26728013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hentenaar, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spoor, A B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Waal Malefijt, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekerhof, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Oudsten, B L</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research</title><addtitle>J Orthop Surg Res</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF) in revision and primary cases.
In a retrospective study, we compared the clinical and radiological results of MI-PLIF for lytic spondylolisthesis (n = 28) and recurrent radiculopathy after herniated disc surgery (n = 28). Clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Quality of life was assessed with the Euroqol-5d (EQ5D), the EQ5D VAS and the WHOQOL-BREF.
The follow-up was 5.1 (SD 2.3) years. The decrease in VAS scores was significant and comparable in both groups. We found significantly better ODI and quality of life scores for the patients with lytic spondylolisthesis. The radiological outcome showed only one non-union, and subsidence occurred in both groups at an equal amount.
The MI-PLIF technique is a safe procedure with only few complications and a high fusion rate. It was successful in both groups, but the quality of life and ODI are better in primary cases.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Radiculopathy - etiology</subject><subject>Radiculopathy - surgery</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spondylolisthesis - surgery</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1749-799X</issn><issn>1749-799X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptUs2L1DAUL6K46-of4EUCXrx0TZqkaS_CMvgFC14UvIU0fRmzpMmYTAsF_3jf7IzrrkgOSd7v4-WFX1W9ZPSSsa59WxinrKspkzXlXNXro-qcKdHXqu-_P753PquelXJDqaSyE0-rs6ZVTUcZP69-bYKP3ppATBxJNqNPIW1vC2ne2zQBSY5MyJlMCCvxcTHFL0B2qewh-5RJmKfBZETwPqRxJW4uPkUskF1GWV7JArnMhWRY_C1U5ryFvD6vnjgTCrw47RfVtw_vv24-1ddfPn7eXF3XVvRiX_eMusZx2lCmmqEdQCrjQAiwHReSDq3ivRHSwKhszyXtoDVUOM6FQhYeLqp3R9_dPEwwWoj7bII-vU4n4_VDJPofepsWLRSlrWjR4M3JIKefM5S9nnyxEIKJkOaimZKCdhIbIvX1P9SbNOeI4yFLCcoYk-wva2sCaB9dwr72YKqvBOKy61qOrMv_sHCNMHmbIjiP9QcCdhTYnErJ4O5mZFQfIqOPkdEYGX2IjF5R8-r-59wp_mSE_wZPR77o</recordid><startdate>20160104</startdate><enddate>20160104</enddate><creator>Hentenaar, B</creator><creator>Spoor, A B</creator><creator>de Waal Malefijt, J</creator><creator>Diekerhof, C H</creator><creator>den Oudsten, B L</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160104</creationdate><title>Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery</title><author>Hentenaar, B ; Spoor, A B ; de Waal Malefijt, J ; Diekerhof, C H ; den Oudsten, B L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-910f2f3020172b6be57afe44ec83450b6739a45aed7c93508e6a04f3347e444f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Radiculopathy - etiology</topic><topic>Radiculopathy - surgery</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spondylolisthesis - surgery</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hentenaar, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spoor, A B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Waal Malefijt, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekerhof, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Oudsten, B L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hentenaar, B</au><au>Spoor, A B</au><au>de Waal Malefijt, J</au><au>Diekerhof, C H</au><au>den Oudsten, B L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Surg Res</addtitle><date>2016-01-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>2</epage><pages>2-2</pages><artnum>2</artnum><issn>1749-799X</issn><eissn>1749-799X</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF) in revision and primary cases.
In a retrospective study, we compared the clinical and radiological results of MI-PLIF for lytic spondylolisthesis (n = 28) and recurrent radiculopathy after herniated disc surgery (n = 28). Clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Quality of life was assessed with the Euroqol-5d (EQ5D), the EQ5D VAS and the WHOQOL-BREF.
The follow-up was 5.1 (SD 2.3) years. The decrease in VAS scores was significant and comparable in both groups. We found significantly better ODI and quality of life scores for the patients with lytic spondylolisthesis. The radiological outcome showed only one non-union, and subsidence occurred in both groups at an equal amount.
The MI-PLIF technique is a safe procedure with only few complications and a high fusion rate. It was successful in both groups, but the quality of life and ODI are better in primary cases.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>26728013</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13018-015-0337-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1749-799X |
| ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2016-01, Vol.11 (1), p.2-2, Article 2 |
| issn | 1749-799X 1749-799X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4700646 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
| subjects | Adult Age Aged Disability Evaluation Female Follow-Up Studies Fractures Gender Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Male Middle Aged Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods Orthopedics Pain Measurement - methods Patients Quality of life Radiculopathy - etiology Radiculopathy - surgery Recurrence Reoperation - methods Retrospective Studies Spinal Fusion - adverse effects Spinal Fusion - methods Spine Spondylolisthesis - surgery Studies Surgery Surgical outcomes Treatment Outcome |
| title | Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20and%20radiological%20outcome%20of%20minimally%20invasive%20posterior%20lumbar%20interbody%20fusion%20in%20primary%20versus%20revision%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20and%20research&rft.au=Hentenaar,%20B&rft.date=2016-01-04&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=2&rft.pages=2-2&rft.artnum=2&rft.issn=1749-799X&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13018-015-0337-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA451358863%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774011151&rft_id=info:pmid/26728013&rft_galeid=A451358863&rfr_iscdi=true |