Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: The PRIME consortium methodology
Few studies have evaluated the implementation and impact of real-world mental health programmes delivered at scale in low-resource settings. To describe the cross-country research methods used to evaluate district-level mental healthcare plans (MHCPs) in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa and Ugan...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of psychiatry 2016-01, Vol.208 (s56), p.s63-s70 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | s70 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | s56 |
| container_start_page | s63 |
| container_title | British journal of psychiatry |
| container_volume | 208 |
| creator | De Silva, Mary J. Rathod, Sujit D. Hanlon, Charlotte Breuer, Erica Chisholm, Dan Fekadu, Abebaw Jordans, Mark Kigozi, Fred Petersen, Inge Shidhaye, Rahul Medhin, Girmay Ssebunnya, Joshua Prince, Martin Thornicroft, Graham Tomlinson, Mark Lund, Crick Patel, Vikram |
| description | Few studies have evaluated the implementation and impact of real-world mental health programmes delivered at scale in low-resource settings.
To describe the cross-country research methods used to evaluate district-level mental healthcare plans (MHCPs) in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa and Uganda.
Multidisciplinary methods conducted at community, health facility and district levels, embedded within a theory of change.
The following designs are employed to evaluate the MHCPs: (a) repeat community-based cross-sectional surveys to measure change in population-level contact coverage; (b) repeat facility-based surveys to assess change in detection of disorders; (c) disorder-specific cohorts to assess the effect on patient outcomes; and (d) multilevel case studies to evaluate the process of implementation.
To evaluate whether and how a health-system-level intervention is effective, multidisciplinary research methods are required at different population levels. Although challenging, such methods may be replicated across diverse settings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.153858 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4698558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bjp_bp_114_153858</cupid><sourcerecordid>1768576905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-49646f0fac5fb20d7be54a54cb59964fbbf2672c1b05a07598135a3267647fe73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVpabZpfkAvxdBLL95KskayeyiEsE0DCQklOQtJltdabMuV5ED-fRV2k35AoSeNNM-8M6MXoXcErwlp6Ce9m9d6zjFbE6hqqF-gFWGCloRxeIlWGGNREgr4CL2JcZevFaPiNTqinDFBBKzQzeZeDYtKzk-F74rWxRScScVop6SGordqSL1RwRbzoKb4ubjtbXHz_eJqUxg_RR-SW8ZMp963fvDbh7foVaeGaE8O5zG6-7q5PftWXl6fX5ydXpYGMEslazjjHe6UgU5T3AptgSlgRkOTU53WHeWCGqIxKCygqUkFqspvnInOiuoYfdnrzosebWvyvEENcg5uVOFBeuXkn5nJ9XLr7yXjTQ1QZ4GPB4Hgfyw2Jjm6aOyQ17R-iZIIXoPgDYb_QIHhhmHBM_rhL3TnlzDln5C0IsAJiOqxN9lTJvgYg-2e5yZYPlors7VSzzlmcm9trnn_-8LPFU9eZqA6iKpRB9du7a_e_5b9CQDJsQ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315615738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: The PRIME consortium methodology</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>De Silva, Mary J. ; Rathod, Sujit D. ; Hanlon, Charlotte ; Breuer, Erica ; Chisholm, Dan ; Fekadu, Abebaw ; Jordans, Mark ; Kigozi, Fred ; Petersen, Inge ; Shidhaye, Rahul ; Medhin, Girmay ; Ssebunnya, Joshua ; Prince, Martin ; Thornicroft, Graham ; Tomlinson, Mark ; Lund, Crick ; Patel, Vikram</creator><creatorcontrib>De Silva, Mary J. ; Rathod, Sujit D. ; Hanlon, Charlotte ; Breuer, Erica ; Chisholm, Dan ; Fekadu, Abebaw ; Jordans, Mark ; Kigozi, Fred ; Petersen, Inge ; Shidhaye, Rahul ; Medhin, Girmay ; Ssebunnya, Joshua ; Prince, Martin ; Thornicroft, Graham ; Tomlinson, Mark ; Lund, Crick ; Patel, Vikram</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies have evaluated the implementation and impact of real-world mental health programmes delivered at scale in low-resource settings.
To describe the cross-country research methods used to evaluate district-level mental healthcare plans (MHCPs) in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa and Uganda.
Multidisciplinary methods conducted at community, health facility and district levels, embedded within a theory of change.
The following designs are employed to evaluate the MHCPs: (a) repeat community-based cross-sectional surveys to measure change in population-level contact coverage; (b) repeat facility-based surveys to assess change in detection of disorders; (c) disorder-specific cohorts to assess the effect on patient outcomes; and (d) multilevel case studies to evaluate the process of implementation.
To evaluate whether and how a health-system-level intervention is effective, multidisciplinary research methods are required at different population levels. Although challenging, such methods may be replicated across diverse settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.153858</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26447175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Community Mental Health Services - standards ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Developing Countries ; Ethiopia ; Health care ; Humans ; India ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mental health ; Nepal ; Patient Care Planning - standards ; Polls & surveys ; Population levels ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Quality Improvement ; Research methodology ; South Africa ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Uganda</subject><ispartof>British journal of psychiatry, 2016-01, Vol.208 (s56), p.s63-s70</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2016</rights><rights>The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016.</rights><rights>2016 This article is published under (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-49646f0fac5fb20d7be54a54cb59964fbbf2672c1b05a07598135a3267647fe73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-49646f0fac5fb20d7be54a54cb59964fbbf2672c1b05a07598135a3267647fe73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712500024628X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,776,780,881,12825,27901,27902,30976,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447175$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Silva, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathod, Sujit D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanlon, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fekadu, Abebaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordans, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kigozi, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shidhaye, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medhin, Girmay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ssebunnya, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prince, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Crick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vikram</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: The PRIME consortium methodology</title><title>British journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Few studies have evaluated the implementation and impact of real-world mental health programmes delivered at scale in low-resource settings.
To describe the cross-country research methods used to evaluate district-level mental healthcare plans (MHCPs) in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa and Uganda.
Multidisciplinary methods conducted at community, health facility and district levels, embedded within a theory of change.
The following designs are employed to evaluate the MHCPs: (a) repeat community-based cross-sectional surveys to measure change in population-level contact coverage; (b) repeat facility-based surveys to assess change in detection of disorders; (c) disorder-specific cohorts to assess the effect on patient outcomes; and (d) multilevel case studies to evaluate the process of implementation.
To evaluate whether and how a health-system-level intervention is effective, multidisciplinary research methods are required at different population levels. Although challenging, such methods may be replicated across diverse settings.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Ethiopia</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Nepal</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning - standards</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population levels</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Uganda</subject><issn>0007-1250</issn><issn>1472-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVpabZpfkAvxdBLL95KskayeyiEsE0DCQklOQtJltdabMuV5ED-fRV2k35AoSeNNM-8M6MXoXcErwlp6Ce9m9d6zjFbE6hqqF-gFWGCloRxeIlWGGNREgr4CL2JcZevFaPiNTqinDFBBKzQzeZeDYtKzk-F74rWxRScScVop6SGordqSL1RwRbzoKb4ubjtbXHz_eJqUxg_RR-SW8ZMp963fvDbh7foVaeGaE8O5zG6-7q5PftWXl6fX5ydXpYGMEslazjjHe6UgU5T3AptgSlgRkOTU53WHeWCGqIxKCygqUkFqspvnInOiuoYfdnrzosebWvyvEENcg5uVOFBeuXkn5nJ9XLr7yXjTQ1QZ4GPB4Hgfyw2Jjm6aOyQ17R-iZIIXoPgDYb_QIHhhmHBM_rhL3TnlzDln5C0IsAJiOqxN9lTJvgYg-2e5yZYPlors7VSzzlmcm9trnn_-8LPFU9eZqA6iKpRB9du7a_e_5b9CQDJsQ8</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>De Silva, Mary J.</creator><creator>Rathod, Sujit D.</creator><creator>Hanlon, Charlotte</creator><creator>Breuer, Erica</creator><creator>Chisholm, Dan</creator><creator>Fekadu, Abebaw</creator><creator>Jordans, Mark</creator><creator>Kigozi, Fred</creator><creator>Petersen, Inge</creator><creator>Shidhaye, Rahul</creator><creator>Medhin, Girmay</creator><creator>Ssebunnya, Joshua</creator><creator>Prince, Martin</creator><creator>Thornicroft, Graham</creator><creator>Tomlinson, Mark</creator><creator>Lund, Crick</creator><creator>Patel, Vikram</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Royal College of Psychiatrists</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: The PRIME consortium methodology</title><author>De Silva, Mary J. ; Rathod, Sujit D. ; Hanlon, Charlotte ; Breuer, Erica ; Chisholm, Dan ; Fekadu, Abebaw ; Jordans, Mark ; Kigozi, Fred ; Petersen, Inge ; Shidhaye, Rahul ; Medhin, Girmay ; Ssebunnya, Joshua ; Prince, Martin ; Thornicroft, Graham ; Tomlinson, Mark ; Lund, Crick ; Patel, Vikram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-49646f0fac5fb20d7be54a54cb59964fbbf2672c1b05a07598135a3267647fe73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Ethiopia</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Nepal</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning - standards</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population levels</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Uganda</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Silva, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathod, Sujit D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanlon, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisholm, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fekadu, Abebaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordans, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kigozi, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shidhaye, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medhin, Girmay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ssebunnya, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prince, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Crick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vikram</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Silva, Mary J.</au><au>Rathod, Sujit D.</au><au>Hanlon, Charlotte</au><au>Breuer, Erica</au><au>Chisholm, Dan</au><au>Fekadu, Abebaw</au><au>Jordans, Mark</au><au>Kigozi, Fred</au><au>Petersen, Inge</au><au>Shidhaye, Rahul</au><au>Medhin, Girmay</au><au>Ssebunnya, Joshua</au><au>Prince, Martin</au><au>Thornicroft, Graham</au><au>Tomlinson, Mark</au><au>Lund, Crick</au><au>Patel, Vikram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: The PRIME consortium methodology</atitle><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>208</volume><issue>s56</issue><spage>s63</spage><epage>s70</epage><pages>s63-s70</pages><issn>0007-1250</issn><eissn>1472-1465</eissn><abstract>Few studies have evaluated the implementation and impact of real-world mental health programmes delivered at scale in low-resource settings.
To describe the cross-country research methods used to evaluate district-level mental healthcare plans (MHCPs) in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa and Uganda.
Multidisciplinary methods conducted at community, health facility and district levels, embedded within a theory of change.
The following designs are employed to evaluate the MHCPs: (a) repeat community-based cross-sectional surveys to measure change in population-level contact coverage; (b) repeat facility-based surveys to assess change in detection of disorders; (c) disorder-specific cohorts to assess the effect on patient outcomes; and (d) multilevel case studies to evaluate the process of implementation.
To evaluate whether and how a health-system-level intervention is effective, multidisciplinary research methods are required at different population levels. Although challenging, such methods may be replicated across diverse settings.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>26447175</pmid><doi>10.1192/bjp.bp.114.153858</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-1250 |
| ispartof | British journal of psychiatry, 2016-01, Vol.208 (s56), p.s63-s70 |
| issn | 0007-1250 1472-1465 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4698558 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Clinical outcomes Community Mental Health Services - standards Cross-Sectional Studies Developing Countries Ethiopia Health care Humans India Interdisciplinary aspects Mental disorders Mental Disorders - therapy Mental health Nepal Patient Care Planning - standards Polls & surveys Population levels Program Evaluation - methods Quality Improvement Research methodology South Africa Surveys and Questionnaires Uganda |
| title | Evaluation of district mental healthcare plans: The PRIME consortium methodology |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A05%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20district%20mental%20healthcare%20plans:%20The%20PRIME%20consortium%20methodology&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=De%20Silva,%20Mary%20J.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=208&rft.issue=s56&rft.spage=s63&rft.epage=s70&rft.pages=s63-s70&rft.issn=0007-1250&rft.eissn=1472-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.153858&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1768576905%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315615738&rft_id=info:pmid/26447175&rft_cupid=10_1192_bjp_bp_114_153858&rfr_iscdi=true |